Article published In: Language, Interaction and Acquisition
Vol. 15:2 (2024) ► pp.215–242
The development of CAF in the oral production of French L1 young learners of EFL
A longitudinal study
Published online: 20 March 2025
https://doi.org/10.1075/lia.22027.vra
https://doi.org/10.1075/lia.22027.vra
Abstract
Complexity, accuracy and fluency (CAF) have become established measures of L2 production, being used extensively
to gauge learning outcomes in teen and adult learners. Nonetheless, very few studies have looked into longitudinal
development and even less so with young learners. The present study seeks to explore the development of CAF in the oral production
of eight L1 French young learners of EFL enrolled in a secondary school in a suburb of Paris, France, over a two-year span. Oral
production was elicited by means of a picture narrative at regular intervals every 3-4 months. The findings indicate that CAF dimensions build on each other in the early stages of EFL and that children are capable of parallel processing in L2 production, attending to all
three dimensions simultaneously. Task repetition and characteristics seem to mitigate trade-offs among CAF.
Keywords: young learners, CAF, EFL, oral production
Résumé
La complexité, l’exactitude et la fluidité (en anglais CAF) sont devenues des mesures établies de la production
en L2, largement utilisées pour évaluer les résultats d’apprentissage chez les adolescents et les adultes. Néanmoins, très
peu d’études ont examiné leur développement longitudinal, et encore moins chez les jeunes apprenants. Cette étude
vise à explorer le développement de la CAF dans la production orale de huit jeunes apprenants de l’anglais langue
étrangère (en anglais EFL) dont la langue maternelle est le français, inscrits dans un collège de la banlieue parisienne (France), sur une
période de deux ans. La production orale a été recueillie à intervalles réguliers de 3 à 4 mois au moyen d’une narration
de séquences d’images. Les résultats indiquent que la complexité, l’exactitude et la fluidité se renforcent mutuellement dans
les premières étapes de l’apprentissage de l’EFL, et que les enfants sont capables de traiter parallèlement ces
trois dimensions de la production en L2, en y prêtant attention simultanément. La répétition des tâches et leurs caractéristiques
semblent atténuer le phénomène de compensation entre les trois mesures.
Mots-clés : jeunes apprenants, complexité, exactitude, fluidité, CAF, anglais langue étrangère, production orale
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.Literature review
- 2.1Development of YLs’ speaking skills in EFL: Evidence from European instructed settings
- 2.2Development of CAF in L2 English: Longitudinal trajectories and trade-offs
- 3.Method
- 3.1Participants
- 3.2The Task
- 3.3Data Collection
- 3.4CAF measures
- 3.4.1Complexity
- 3.4.2Accuracy
- 3.4.3Fluency
- 4.Results
- 5.Discussion
- 6.Conclusion
- Acknowledgements
- Note
References
References (40)
Boersma, P., & Weenink, D. (2023). Praat:
Doing phonetics by computer (Version 6.3.04) [Computer
software]. [URL]
Bourdin, B., & Fayol, M. (1994). Is
written language production more difficult than oral language production? A working memory
approach. International Journal of
Psychology, 29(5), 591–620.
Bret Blasco, A. (2014). L2
English young learners’ oral production skills in CLIL and EFL settings: A longitudinal
study (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona.
(2017). A
two-year longitudinal study of three EFL young learners’ oral output: The development of syntactic complexity and
accuracy. In M. P. García Mayo (Ed.), Learning
foreign languages in primary
school (pp. 176–192). Multilingual Matters.
Collins, L., & Muñoz, C. (2016). The
foreign language classroom: Current perspectives and future considerations. The Modern Language
Journal, 100(S1), 133–147.
European
Commission/EACEA/Eurydice (2017). Key Data on Teaching Languages at School in
Europe — 2017 Edition. Eurydice Report. Publications Office of the European Union.
Ferrari, S. (2012). A
longitudinal study of complexity, accuracy and fluency variation in second language
development. In A. Housen, F. Kuiken & I. Vedder (Eds.), Dimensions
of L2 performance and proficiency: Complexity, accuracy and fluency in SLA
(Vol.32) (pp. 277–297). John Benjamins.
Fleta, T. (2019). From
research on child L2 acquisition of English to classroom
practice. In J. Enever & E. Lindgren (Eds.), Early
Instructed Second Language
Acquisition (pp. 57–79). Multilingual Matters.
García Mayo, M. P., Lázaro Ibarrola, A., & Liceras, J. (2005). Placeholders
in the English interlanguage of bilingual (Basque/Spanish) children. Language
Learning, 55(3), 445–489.
Hopp, H., Vogelbacher, M., Kieseier, T., & Thoma, D. (2019). Bilingual
advantages in early foreign language learning: Effects of the minority and the majority
language. Learning and
Instruction 61(1), 99–110.
Housen, A., Kuiken, F., & Vedder, I. (Eds.) (2012). Dimensions
of L2 performance and proficiency: Complexity, accuracy and fluency in
SLA (Vol. 321). John Benjamins.
Larsen-Freeman, D. (2009). Adjusting
expectations: The study of complexity, accuracy, and fluency in second language
acquisition. Applied
Linguistics, 30(4), 579–589.
Lázaro-Ibarrola, A., & Hidalgo, M. Á. (2017). Procedural
repetition in task-based interaction among young EFL learners: Does it make a
difference? ITL-International Journal of Applied
Linguistics, 168(2), 183–202.
Maluch, T.-J., & Kempert, S. (2017). Bilingual
profiles and third language learning: The effects of the manner of learning, sequence of bilingual acquisition, and language
use practices. International Journal of Bilingual Education and
Bilingualism, 22 (7), 870–882.
Marusich, L. R., & Bakdash, J. Z. (2021). rmcorrShiny:
A web and standalone application for repeated measures
correlation. F1000Research, 101.
Michel, M. (2017). Complexity,
accuracy, and fluency in L2 production. In S. Loewen & M. Sato (Eds.), The
Routledge handbook of instructed second language
acquisition (pp. 66–84). Taylor & Francis.
Mihaljević Dijunović, J. (2017). Developmental
aspects of early EFL learning. In J. Enever & E. Lindgren (Eds.), Early
language
learning (pp. 222–246). Multilingual Matters.
Muñoz, C. (2006). The
effects of age on foreign language learning: The BAF
project. In C. Muñoz (Ed.), Age
and the rate of foreign language
learning (pp. 1–40). Multilingual Matters.
(2007). Age-related
differences and second language learning practice. In R. M. DeKeyser (Ed.), Practice in a second language: Perspectives
from applied linguistics and cognitive
psychology (pp. 229–255). Cambridge University Press.
Muñoz, C., Tragant, E., & Torras, M. R. (2010). Los
inicios de la producción oral en lengua extranjera de alumnos de primaria en
Europa. ELIA, 101, 11–39.
Myles, F. (2012). Complexity,
accuracy and fluency: The role played by formulaic sequences in early interlanguage
development. In A. Housen, F. Kuiken & I. Vedder (Eds.), Dimensions
of L2 performance and proficiency: Complexity, accuracy and fluency in SLA
(Vol.32) (pp. 71–93). John Benjamins.
Nikolov, M. & Mihaljevic-Djigunovic, J. (2006). Recent
research on age, second language acquisition, and early foreign language learning. Annual
Review of Applied
Linguistics, 261, 234–260.
Noyau, C., de Lorenzo, C., Kihlstedt, M., Paprocka, U., Sanz Espinar, G., & Schneider, R. (2005). Two
dimensions of the representation of complex event structures: granularity and condensation. Towards a typology of textual
production in L1 and L2. In H. Hendriks (Ed.), The
structure of learner
varieties (pp. 157–201). Mouton de Gruyter.
Pekarek Doehler, S. (2013). Socio-interactional
approaches to SLA. A state of the art and some future perspectives. Language, Interaction and
Acquisition, 4(2), 134–169.
Pinter, A. (2006). Verbal
evidence of task related strategies: Child versus adult
interactions. System, 34(4), 615–630.
Pladevall-Ballester, E., & Vraciu, A. (2017). Exploring
early EFL: L1 use in oral narratives by CLIL and non-CLIL primary school learners. In M. P. García Mayo (Ed.), Learning
foreign languages in primary school: Research
insights (pp. 124–148). Multilingual Matters.
Ranta, L. (2005). Language
analytic ability and oral production in a second language: Is there a
connection? In A. Housen & M. Pierrard (Eds.), Investigations
in instructed second language
acquisition (pp. 99–130). Mouton de Gruyter.
Robinson, P. (2001). Task
complexity, task difficulty, and task production: Exploring interactions in a componential
framework. Applied
Linguistics, 221, 27–57.
Sample, E., & Michel, M. (2014). An
exploratory study into trade-off effects of complexity, accuracy, and fluency on young learners’ oral task
repetition. TESL Canada
Journal, 311, 23–23.
Sanz, C. (2000). Bilingual
education enhances third language acquisition: Evidence from Catalonia. Applied
Psycholinguistics, 21(1), 23–44.
(2009). Modelling
second language performance: Integrating complexity, accuracy, fluency, and lexis. Applied
linguistics, 30(4), 510–532.
Skehan, P., & Foster, P. (2012). Complexity,
accuracy, fluency and lexis in task-based performance. In A. Housen, F. Kuiken & I. Vedder (Eds.), Dimensions
of L2 performance and proficiency: Complexity, accuracy and fluency in SLA
(Vol.32) (pp. 199–220). John Benjamins.
