Cover not available

Article published In: Conceptual transfer, (re)conceptualisation and other cognitive aspects of crosslinguistic influence in L2 acquisition
Edited by Cecilia Gunnarsson-Largy
[Language, Interaction and Acquisition 14:1] 2023
► pp. 14–40

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload PDF
EPUB logo with download linkDownload EPUB
authorization required

Conceptual transfer

Roots, assumptions, and current scope

ORCiD logo with link | Northern Arizona University
Published online: 27 October 2023
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/lia.22011.jar
Abstract
This article provides updated perspectives on research related to conceptual transfer, which is defined as crosslinguistic influence arising from language-specific concepts and patterns of conceptualization. I discuss the historical roots of conceptual transfer, its relationship to linguistic relativity and thinking for speaking, its core assumptions, and its current scope of inquiry. While discussing its scope of inquiry, I review some of the key findings in this area of research as well as some of the recent studies that have expanded its scope. I conclude with a summary of five important points that can be drawn from the existing research on conceptual transfer, and I offer suggestions for future directions.
Résumé
Cet article donne des perspectives mises à jour sur la recherche associée au ‘Transfert conceptuel’, défini comme l’influence translinguistique émanant des concepts et schémas de conceptualisation spécifiques d’une langue. J’aborde les racines historiques du ‘Transfert conceptuel’, sa relation à la relativité linguistique et au ‘Penser pour Parler’, ses hypothèses principales et son champ d’investigation actuel. Concernant ce dernier, je reviens sur les résultats clés dans le domaine, ainsi que sur quelques études récentes qui ont élargi son champ de recherche. Je conclus par un résumé de cinq points importants qui peuvent être tirés de la recherche existante sur le ‘Transfert conceptuel’ et je fais des propositions pour de futures directions de recherche.
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Historical roots and overlapping frameworks
  • 3.Conceptual transfer and its core assumptions
    • 3.1Assumption 1: Individuals and groups of individuals often conceptualize the same experiences differently
    • 3.2Assumption 2: Differing verbal expressions of experience can be used as evidence of differences in conceptualization
    • 3.3Assumption 3: The ways other people describe experiences affect how we conceptualize those experiences
    • 3.4Assumption 4: The more we hear/read experiences being described in a certain way, the stronger the schemas we develop
    • 3.5Assumption 5: Those schemas then affect how we conceptualize similar future experiences
    • 3.6Assumption 6: Each discourse community has conventional/habitual ways of referring to common experiences
    • 3.7Assumption 7: Each person belongs to one or more discourse communities
    • 3.8Assumption 8: The discourse practices we adopt from our communities affect how we conceptualize common experiences
  • 4.The conceptual transfer continuum
  • 5.The current scope of conceptual transfer
  • 6.Summary and future directions
  • Notes
  • References
References (78)
References
Alessandroni, N., & Rodríguez, C. (2020). The development of categorisation and conceptual thinking in early childhood: Methods and limitations. Psicologia: Reflexão e Crítica, 331, 17. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Athanasopoulos, P. (2009). Cognitive representation of colour in bilinguals: The case of Greek blues. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 121, 83–95. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Athanasopoulos, P., & Bylund, E. (2013). Does grammatical aspect affect motion event cognition? A cross-linguistic comparison of English and Swedish speakers. Cognitive Science, 371, 286–309. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2020). Whorf in the wild: Naturalistic evidence from human interaction. Applied Linguistics, 41(6), 947–970. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Berlin, B., & Kay, P. (1969). Basic color terms: Their universality and evolution. University of California Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Boas, F. (1911). Introduction to the handbook of North American Indians. Smithsonian Institution Bulletin 40, Part I.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Borg, E. (2003). Discourse community. ELT Journal, 57(4), 398–400. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Brewer, W. F., & Treyens, J. C. (1981). Role of schemata in memory for places. Cognitive Psychology, 131, 207–230. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bylund, E. (2009). The effects of age of L2 acquisition on L1 event conceptualization principles. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 121, 305–322. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bylund, E., & Athanasopoulos, P. (2014). Linguistic relativity in SLA: Toward a new research program. Language Learning, 64(4), 952–985. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bylund, E., & Jarvis, S. (2011). L2 effects on L1 event conceptualization. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 14(1), 47–59. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cal, N. A. (2016). Individual differences in eyewitness testimony. Honors Undergraduate Theses. 152. [URL]
Chang, M. X.-L., Jetten, J., Cruwys, T., Haslam, C., & Praharso, N. (2016). The more (social group memberships), the merrier: Is this the case for Asians? Frontiers in Psychology, 71. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Choi, S. (2009). Typological differences in syntactic expressions of path and causation. In V. Gathercole (Ed.), Routes to language: Studies in honor of Melissa Bowerman (pp. 169–194). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Chomsky, N. (1986). Knowledge of language. Praeger.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Davies, I. R. L., Sowden, P. T., Jerrett, D. T., Jerrett, T., & Corbett, G. G. (1998). A cross-cultural study of English and Setswana speakers on a colour triads task: A test of the Sapir–Whorf hypothesis. British Journal of Psychology, 89(1), 1–15. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Engemann, H., Hendriks, H., Hickmann, M., Soroli, E., & Vincent, C. (2015). How language impacts memory of motion events in English and French. Cognitive Processing, 16 (S1), 209–213. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Filipovic, L. (2008). Language as a witness: Insights from cognitive linguistics. International Journal of Speech, Language and the Law, 14(2), 245–267. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Flecken, M., Athanasopoulos, P., Kuipers, J. R., & Thierry, G. (2015). On the road to somewhere: Brain potentials reflect language effects on motion event perception. Cognition, 141(4), 41–51. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Forsyth, D. R. (2018). Group dynamics (seventh edition). Cengage.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Green, D. W., & Abutalebi, J. (2013). Language control in bilinguals: The adaptive control hypothesis. Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 25(5), 515–530. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gumperz, J. J., & Levinson, S. C. (1991). Rethinking linguistic relativity. Current Anthropology, 32(5), 613–623. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hampton, J. A., & Passanisi, A. (2016). When intensions do not map onto extensions: Individual differences in conceptualization. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 42(4), 505–523. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hartsuiker, R. J., & Pickering, M. J. (2008). Language integration in bilingual sentence production. Acta Psychologica, 128(3), 479–489. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Heider, E. R. (1972). Universals in color naming and memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 931, 10–20. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hendriks, H., Hickmann, M., & Demagny, A.-C. (2008). How English native speakers learn to express caused motion in English and French. Acquisition et Interaction en Langue Étrangère, 271, 15–41. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hudson, W. (1960). Pictorial depth perception in sub-cultural groups in Africa. Journal of Social Psychology, 521, 183–208. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(1967). The study of the problem of pictorial perception among unacculturated groups. International Journal of Psychology, 2(2), 89–10. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Humboldt, W. V. (1841–1852). Gesammelte Werke [Collected works]. Georg Reimer.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jarvis, S. (1997). The role of L1-based concepts in L2 lexical reference. PhD thesis, Indiana University.
(2011). Conceptual transfer: Crosslinguistic effects in categorization and construal. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 141, 1–8. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2016). Clarifying the scope of conceptual transfer. Language Learning, 66(3), 608–635. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jarvis, S., & Odlin, T. (2000). Morphological type, spatial reference, and language transfer. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 221, 535–556. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jarvis, S., & Pavlenko, A. (2008). Crosslinguistic influence in language and cognition. Routledge. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Klemfuss, N., Prinzmetal, W., & Ivry, R. B. (2012). How does language change perception: A cautionary note. Frontiers in Psychology, 31. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lakoff, G. (1987). Women, fire, and dangerous things: What categories reveal about the mind. University of Chicago Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lambert, M., Stutterheim, C. v., Gerwien, J., & Carroll, M. (2022). Under the surface: A survey on principles of language use in advanced L2 speakers. Language, Interaction and Acquisition, 13(1), 1–28. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Langacker, R. W. (2008). Cognitive grammar: A basic introduction. Oxford University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lenneberg, E. H. (1953). Cognition in ethnolinguistics. Language, 29(4), 463–471. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Levinson, S. C. (1992). Primer for the field investigation of spatial description and conception. Pragmatics, 2(1), 5–47.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Loftus, E., & Palmer, J. (1974). Reconstruction of automobile: An example of the interaction between language and memory. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 131, 585–589. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lucy, J. (1992). Grammatical categories and cognition. A case study of the linguistic relativity hypothesis. Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(1996). The scope of linguistic relativity: An analysis and review of empirical research. In J. J. Gumperz & S. C. Levinson (Eds.), Rethinking linguistic relativity (pp. 37–69). Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(1997). Linguistic relativity. Annual Review of Anthropology, 261, 291–312. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lupyan, G., & Bergen, B. (2016). How language programs the mind. Topics in Cognitive Science, 81, 408–424. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Malotki, E. (1983). Hopi time: A linguistic analysis of the temporal concepts in the Hopi language. Berlin: Mouton. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Meyer, P. G. (2005). Synchronic English linguistics (third edition). Gunter Narr.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Odlin, T. (2005). Crosslinguistic influence and conceptual transfer: What are the concepts? Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 251, 3–25. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Park, H. I. (2019). How do Korean-English bilinguals speak and think about motion events? Evidence from verbal and non-verbal tasks. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 23(3), 483–499. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2022). The role of language in expressing agentivity in caused motion events: A cross-linguistic investigation. Frontiers in Psychology, 161. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Park, H. I., Jarvis, S., & Kim, J. E. (2022). Exploring motion event construal: How much attention do speakers of different languages and cultures pay to context? Lingua, 2651, 103164. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Partos, T. R., Cropper, S. J., & Rawlings, D. (2016). You don’t see what I see: Individual differences in the perception of meaning from visual stimuli. PloS ONE, 11(3), e0150615. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pavlenko, A. (1997). Bilingualism and cognition. PhD thesis, Cornell University.
(1998, March). SLA and acculturation: Conceptual transfer in L2 learners’ narratives. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Association for Applied Linguistics, Seattle, WA.
(2003). Eyewitness memory in late bilinguals: Evidence for discursive relativity. International Journal of Bilingualism, 7(3), 257–281. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2014). The bilingual mind and what it tells us about language and thought. Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2016). Whorf’s lost argument: Multilingual awareness. Language Learning, 66(3), 581–607. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pinker, S. (1994). The language instinct: How the mind creates language. William Morrow. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pullum, G. K. (1991). The great Eskimo vocabulary hoax and other irreverent essays on the study of language. University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sapir, E. (1929). The status of linguistics as a science. Language, 5(4): 207–214. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(1931). Conceptual categories in primitive languages. Science, 741, 578.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Seel, N. M. (2012). Schema development. In N. M. Seel (Ed.), Encyclopedia of the sciences of learning. Springer. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Shepard, R. N. (1994). Perceptual-cognitive universals as reflections of the world. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 11, 2–28. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Slobin, D. I. (1993). Adult language acquisition: A view from child language study. In C. Perdue (Ed.), Adult language acquisition: Cross-linguistic perspectives (pp. 239–252). Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2003). Language and thought online: Cognitive consequences of linguistic relativity. In D. Gentner & S. Goldin-Meadow (Eds.), Language in mind: Advances in the investigation of language and thought (pp. 157–191). MIT Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Starren, M. (in preparation). A view on a crime: A language and genre-specific viewpoint on the same event.
Stutterheim, C. v., Andermann, M., Carroll, M., Flecken, M., & Schmiedtová, B. (2012). How grammaticized concepts shape event conceptualization in language production: Insights from linguistic analysis, eye tracking data, and memory performance. Linguistics, 50(4), 833–867. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Stutterheim, C. v., Gerwien, J., Bouhaous, A., Carroll, M., & Lambert, M. (2020). What makes up a reportable event in a language? Motion events as an important test domain in linguistic typology. Linguistics, 58(6), 1659–1700. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Stutterheim, C. v., & Klein, W. (1987). A concept-oriented approach to second language studies. In C. W. Pfaff (Ed.), First and second language acquisition processes (pp. 191–205). Newbury House.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Stutterheim, C. v., Lambert, M., & Gerwien, J. (2021). Limitations on the role of frequency in L2 acquisition. Language and Cognition, 131, 291–321. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Stutterheim, C. v., & Nüse, R. (2003). Processes of conceptualization in language production: Language-specific perspectives and event construal. Linguistics, 41(5), 831–881. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sunderman, G., & Kroll, J. F. (2006). First language activation during second language lexical processing: An investigation of lexical form, meaning, and grammatical class. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 281, 387–422. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Swales, J. M. (1990). Genre analysis: English in academic and research settings. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Trajchevska, D., & Jarvis, S. (2020, October). Crosslinguistic influence and evidentiality. Poster presented at the Second Language Research Forum (SLRF 2020), Virtual conference hosted by Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee, October 23–25, 2020.
Whorf, B. L. (1944). The relation of habitual thought and behavior to language. ETC: A Review of General Semantics, 1(4), 197–215.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(1956). Carroll, J. B. (ed.), Language, thought, and reality. MIT Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Zaal, F. F. J. M., Bingham, G. P., & Schmidt, R. C. (2000). Visual perception of mean relative phase and phase variability. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 26(3), 1209–1220.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue