Cover not available

Article published In: Language, Interaction and Acquisition
Vol. 10:2 (2019) ► pp.229–254

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload PDF
authorization required

Le développement de l’expression du genre grammatical en français L2

Les cas de chose, famille, maison, nourriture et vie

 | Université Paul-Valéry Montpellier 3

Article language: French

Published online: 4 November 2019
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/lia.18010.edm
Résumé
Les recherches portant sur l’acquisition de l’expression du genre grammatical en français langue seconde (L2) nous montrent, entre autres, que les apprenants réussissent plus souvent à marquer le genre avec un nom masculin (vs. un nom féminin) et sur les déterminants plutôt que sur les adjectifs. En revanche, il n’est pas clair si ces tendances générales s’appliquent de la même manière à l’ensemble des noms, adjectifs et déterminants concernés. En d’autres termes, nous pouvons nous demander à quel point l’expression du genre grammatical est déterminée par des spécificités lexicales. Est analysée, dans cette étude, l’évolution du marquage en genre produit par un groupe de 20 apprenants britanniques du français L2 sur une période de 21 mois. Des productions orales et écrites recueillies à trois périodes différentes ont été analysées, et le marquage en genre avec cinq noms féminins fréquents – chose, famille, maison, nourriture, vie – a fait l’objet d’une étude approfondie. Les résultats montrent que l’expression du genre grammatical se développe différemment avec ces cinq noms, résultat qui est interprété à l’aide des approches basées sur l’usage.
Abstract
Research on the acquisition of gender marking in second language French has shown, among other things, that learners succeed more often in marking gender in a target-like manner on masculine (vs. feminine) nouns and on determiners as opposed to on adjectives. However, it remains unclear as to whether these general tendencies apply in similar fashion to all nouns, adjectives, and determiners. In other words, it is fair to question to what extent gender marking may be determined by lexical specificities. In the current study, the evolution of gender marking as produced by a group of 20 British learners of French is analyzed, using data collected over 21 months. Oral and written productions collected at three points in time were analyzed, and gender marking with five frequent feminine nouns (chose, famille, maison, nourriture, vie) was examined. Results show that the expression of gender marking develops differently with these five nouns, and these findings are interpreted with the help of insights from usage-based approaches to language learning.
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Le cadre théorique et les recherches précédentes
    • 2.1Les approches basées sur l’usage
    • 2.2Le genre grammatical en français
    • 2.3L’expression du genre grammatical en français L2
  • 3.La présente étude
    • 3.1Le corpus LANGSNAP
    • 3.2Les participants
    • 3.3L’analyse des données
    • 3.4L’analyse : résultats et discussion
      • 3.4.1L’expression du genre : Taux de réussite
      • 3.4.2Une caractérisation des cinq noms dans un corpus de référence
      • 3.4.3 Une caractérisation des usage events
      • 3.4.4Bilan
  • 4.Conclusion
  • Remarques
  • Références
References (42)
Références
Ågren, M. (2016). Apprendre l’orthographe profonde du français comme langue seconde/étrangère. Revue Française de Linguistique Appliquée, 21 (2). 95–108. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ayoun, D. (2007). The second language acquisition of grammatical gender and agreement. In D. Ayoun (Ed.), French applied linguistics (pp. 130–170). Amsterdam: Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2018). Grammatical gender assignment in French: Dispelling the native speaker myth. Journal of French Language Studies, 28 (1), 113–148. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bartning, I. (2000). Gender agreement in L2 French: Pre-advanced vs. advanced learners. Studia Linguistica, 54 1, 225–237. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Carroll, S. (1989). Second-language acquisition and the computational paradigm. Language Learning, 39 (4), 535–594. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dewaele, J.-M., & Véronique, D. (2001). Gender assignment and gender agreement in advanced French interlanguage: A cross-sectional study. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 4 1, 275–297. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Diessel, H. (2016). Frequency and lexical specificity in grammar: A critical review. In H. Behrens & S. Pfänder (Eds.), Experience counts: Frequency effects in language (pp. 209–238). Berlin: De Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Edmonds, A., & Gudmestad, A. (2018). Gender marking in written L2 French: Before, during, and after residence abroad. Study Abroad Research in Second Language Acquisition and International Education, 3 (1), 59–82. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ellis, N. C. (2002). Frequency effects in language processing: A review with implications for theories of implicit and explicit language acquisition. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 24 1, 143–188. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2015). Cognitive and social aspects of learning from usage. In T. Cadierno & S. W. Eskildsen (Eds.), Usage-based perspectives on second language learning (pp. 49–73). Berlin: de Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ellis, N. C., Römer, U., & O’Donnell, M. B. (2016). Usage-based approaches to language acquisition and processing: Cognitive and corpus investigations of construction grammar. Malden, MA: Wiley.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ellis, N. C., & Wulff, S. (2015). Usage-based approaches to SLA. In T. Cadierno & S. W. Eskildsen (Eds.), Usage-based perspectives on second language learning (pp. 75–93). Berlin: de Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Eskildsen, S. W., & Cadierno, T. (2007). Are recurring multi-word expressions really syntactic freezes? Second language acquisition from the perspective of usage-based linguistics. In M. Nenonen & S. Niemi (Eds.), Collocations and idioms 1: Papers from the first Nordic conference on syntactic freezes, 2006 (pp. 86–99). Joensuu, Finland: Joensuu University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Eskildsen, S., & Cadierno, T. (2015). Advancing usage-based approaches to L2 studies. In T. Cadierno & S. W. Eskildsen (Eds.), Usage-based perspectives on second language learning (pp. 1–16). Berlin: de Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Finnemann, M. D. (1992). Learning agreement in the noun phrase: The strategies of three first-year Spanish students. International review of Applied Linguistics in Teaching, 30 (2), 121–136.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Foucart, A., & Frenck-Mestre, C. (2012). Can late L2 learners acquire new grammatical features? Evidence from ERPs and eye-tracking. Journal of Memory and Language, 66 1, 226–248. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gaucher, D. (2015). Sémantique temporelle et accord du participe passé en français parlé : une analyse variationniste. Journal of French Language Studies, 25 1, 65–83. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Granfeldt, J. (2005). The development of gender attribution and gender concord in French: A comparison of bilingual first and second language learners. In J.-M. Dewaele (Ed.), Focus on French as a foreign language: Multidisciplinary approaches (pp. 164–190). Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hardison, D. M. (1992). Acquisition of grammatical gender in French: L2 learner accuracy and strategies. The Canadian Modern Language Review, 48 1, 292–306. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Harley, B. (1979). French gender ‘rules’ in the speech of English-dominant, French-dominant, and monolingual French speaking children. Working Papers in Bilingualism, 19 1, 129–156.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hawkins, R. (2001). Second language syntax: A generative introduction. New York: Wiley/Blackwell.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Holmes, V. M., & Dejean de la Bâtie, B. (1999). Assignment of grammatical gender by native speakers and foreign learners of French. Applied Psycholinguistics, 20 1, 479–506. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hopp, H. (2016). Learning (not) to predict: Grammatical gender processing in second language acquisition. Second Language Research, 32 (2), 277–307. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jach, D. (2018). A usage-based approach to preposition placement in English as a second language. Language Learning, 68 (1), 271–304. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kupisch, T., Akpinar, D., & Stöhr, A. (2013). Gender assignment and gender agreement in adult bilinguals and second language learners of French. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism, 3 1, 150–179. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Linford, B., Long, A., Solon, M., & Geeslin, K. L. (2016). Measuring lexical frequency: Comparison groups and subject expression in L2 Spanish. In L. Ortega, A. E. Tyler, H. I. Park, & M. Uno (Eds.), The usage-based study of language learning and multilingualism (pp. 137–154). Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lyster, R. (2006). Predictability in French gender attribution: A corpus analysis. Journal of French Language Studies, 16 1, 69–92. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mitchell, R., Myles, F., & Marsden, E. (2013). Second language learning theories. London: Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mitchell, R., Tracy-Ventura, N., & McManus, K. (2017). Anglophone students abroad: Identity, social relationships, and language learning. London: Routledge. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Montrul, S., Foote, R., & Perpiñán, S. (2008). Gender agreement in adult second language learners and Spanish heritage speakers: The effects of age and context of acquisition. Language Learning, 58 (3), 503–553. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Nelson, D. (2005). French gender assignment revisited. Word, 56 1, 19–38. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
New, B., Brysbaert, M., Veronis, J., & Pallier, C. (2007). The use of film subtitles to estimate word frequencies. Applied Psycholinguistics, 28 1, 661–677. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Prodeau, M., & Carlo, C. (2002). Le genre et le nombre dans des tâches verbales complexes en français L2 : grammaire et discours. Marges linguistiques, 4 1, 165–174.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sinclair, J. (1991). Corpus, concordance, collocation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Surridge, M. E., & Lessard, G. (1984). Pour une prise de conscience du genre grammatical. La Revue canadienne des langues vivantes, 41 1, 44–52.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tracy-Ventura, N., McManus, K., Norris, J. M., & Ortega, L. (2014). ‘Repeat as much as you can’: Elicited imitation as a measure of oral proficiency in L2 French. In P. Leclercq, A. Edmonds, & H. Hilton (Eds.), Measuring L2 proficiency: Perspectives from SLA (pp. 143–166). Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tucker, R., Lambert, W. E., & Rigault, A. (1977). The French speaker’s skill with grammatical gender: an example of rule-governed behavior. Paris: Mouton. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tummers, J., Heylen, K., & Geeraerts, D. (2005). Usage-based approaches in cognitive linguistics: A technical state of the art. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory, 1–2 1, 225–261.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tyler, A. E., & Ortega, L. (2018). Usage-inspired L2 instruction: An emergent, researched pedagogy. In A. E. Tyler, L. Ortega, M. Uno, & H. I. Park (Eds.), Usage-inspired L2 instruction: Researched pedagogy (pp. 3–26). Amsterdam: Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Vatz, K. L. (2009). Grammatical gender representation and processing in advanced second language learners of French. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Maryland.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wulff, S., Ellis, N. C., Römer, U., Bardovi-Harlig, K., & Leblanc, C. J. (2009). The acquisition of tense-aspect: Converging evidence from corpora and telicity ratings. The Modern Language Journal, 93 (3), 354–369. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (3)

Cited by three other publications

Cohen, Cathy & Erin Quirk
2025. The Role of Environmental Factors on Grammatical Development in French–English Bilinguals Attending a Dual Language Programme in France. Languages 10:1 ► pp. 6 ff. DOI logo
Thomas, Anita
2025. Researching L2 French input and instructed learning. In Approaches and Methods in French Second Language Acquisition Research [Research Methods in Applied Linguistics, 9], ► pp. 261 ff. DOI logo
Gudmestad, Aarnes & Amanda Edmonds
2024. Consistency as a baseline measure for tracking change in grammatical gender marking. Journal of the European Second Language Association 8:1 ► pp. 161 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 25 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue