Cover not available

Article published In: Language, Interaction and Acquisition
Vol. 9:2 (2018) ► pp.226–255

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload PDF
authorization required

Les structures verbales chez deux jeunes enfants francophones sourds profonds avec implant cochléaire

Emergence et développement à 36 mois post-implant

 | Université Grenoble Alpes
 | Université Paris Lumière
 | Guiheneuf Formation
 | Centre d’implantation cochléaire de Montpellier

Article language: French

Published online: 21 January 2019
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/lia.17007.vin
Résumé
Avec en arrière-plan des travaux soulignant le déficit linguistique des jeunes sourds en morphosyntaxe, cet article porte sur les structures verbales en contexte de surdité profonde et d’implantation précoce. Deux jeunes enfants sourds profonds francophones implantés précocement ont été filmés en situation d’interaction ludique avec un adulte, 36 mois après implantation. Lors de ce recueil, les deux enfants sont âgés de 54 mois et de 49 mois, respectivement. Notre étude se focalise sur les types de verbes employés par les enfants et montre la capacité de ces derniers, 36 mois post-implant, à se conformer aux structures cibles par l’emploi d’un sujet syntaxique, mais pas nécessairement par celle d’un complément. Les structures se diversifient, gagnent en conformité syntaxique et les verbes-support apparaissent. Le recours aux pronoms co-référentiels se développe, avec une conformité limitée aux emplois pronominaux ponctuels.
Abstract
Two early-implanted profoundly deaf French children (aged 54 months and 49 months respectively) were filmed while playing with an adult, 36 months after implantation. This paper investigates the verb structures in the data. While other studies show that deaf children have a global deficit in morphosyntax, our results evidence the types of verbs they use, and the children’s ability to use structures with a subject, but not necessarily with an object, 36 months after implantation. As the verb structures become more numerous, the syntax improves. Light verbs are used, as well as coreferential pronouns, with difficulties when coreference expands over the sentence.
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction et problématique
  • 2.Le recueil de données
    • 2.1Les sujets
    • 2.2Le corpus
  • 3.Analyse des verbes, des structures et des configurations verbales
    • 3.1Catégorisation des verbes employés par les enfants
    • 3.2Structures verbales et relations prédicatives
      • 3.2.1Les verbes intransitifs
      • 3.2.2Les verbes transitifs
    • 3.3Diversité des verbes et diversification des structures
      • 3.3.1Verbes concernés par la diversification
      • 3.3.2Formes et effets de la diversification : Syntaxe et sémantique
  • 4.L’apparition des formes pronominales
    • 4.1La co-référence ponctuelle
    • 4.2La co-référence suivie
  • 5.Interprétation des résultats et discussion
    • 5.1Les structures linéaires
    • 5.2Implicite et explicite
  • 6.Conclusion
  • Remerciements
  • Remarques
  • References
References (47)
References
Allen, C., Nikolopoulos, T. P. & O’Donoghue, G. M. (1998). Speech intelligibility in children after cochlear implantation. The American Journal of Otology, 191, 742–746.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Archbold, S. M., Nikolopoulos, T. P. & Tait, M. (2000). Approach to communication, speech perception and intelligibility after paediatric cochlear implantation. British Journal of Audiology, 341, 257–264. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Arfé, B., Rossi, C., & Sicoli, S. (2015). The contribution of verbal working memory to deaf children’s oral and written production. Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education, 20(3), 203–214. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Baddeley, A. D. (2000). The episodic buffer: A new component of working memory? Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 41, 417–423. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Benveniste, E. (1966). Problèmes de linguistique générale (Tome 1). Paris: Gallimard.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bishop, D. V. M., Bright, P., James, C., Bishop, S. J., & van der Lely, H. (2000). Grammatical SLI: A distinct subtype of developmental language impairment? Applied Psycholinguistics, 211, 159–181. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bourdin, B. (2015). Un modèle capacitaire du traitement langagier chez l’enfant sourd : le cas de la morphosyntaxe. ANAE 138, Approche neuropsychologique des apprentissages chez l’enfant, Surdité : évolutions technologiques, de la prise en charge et des apprentissages, 469–476.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bourdin, B., Ibernon, L., Le Driant, B., Levrez, C. & Vandromme, L. (2016). Troubles morphosyntaxiques chez l’enfant sourd et chez l’enfant dysphasique : similarités et spécificités. Revue de Neuropsychologie, Neurosciences cognitives et cliniques, 8(3), 161–172. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Brown, R. (1973). A first language: The early stages. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Chastain, C. (1975). Reference and context. In K. Gunderson (ed.), Language, mind, and knowledge (194–269). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Clark, E. (2001). Emergent categories. In M. Bowerman & S. C. Levinson (eds.), Language acquisition and conceptual development (379–405). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Connor, C. M., Craig, H. K., Raudenbush, S. W., Heavner, K. & Zwolan, T. A. (2006). The age at which young deaf children receive cochlear implants and their vocabulary and speech-production growth: Is there an added value for early implantation? Ear and Hearing, 271, 628–644. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Creissels, D. (1993). Les notions primitives de la syntaxe. Réflexions sur l’articulation logique entre les notions sur lesquelles se fondent les descriptions grammaticales. In M. Maillard (ed.), Vers une rénovation de la grammaire et de sa terminologie (51–83). Lidil 81. Grenoble: Presses Universitaires de Grenoble.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2006). Syntaxe générale, une introduction typologique (21 volumes). Paris-Cachan: Hermès Lavoisier.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Croft, W. (1991). Syntactic categories and grammatical relations. The cognitive organization of information. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Culioli, A. (1999). Pour une linguistique de l’énonciation. Formalisation et opérations de repérage (Tome 2). Paris et Gap: Ophrys.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Daza, M.-T., Phillips-Silver, J., Del Mar Ruiz-Cadra, M. & Lopez-Lopez, F. (2014). Language skills and nonverbal cognitive processes associated with reading comprehension in deaf children. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 351, 3526–3533. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Duchesne, L., Sutton, A. & Bergeron, F. (2009). Language achievement in children who received cochlear implants between 1 and 2 years of age: Group trends and individual patterns. Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education, 14(4), 465–485. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Durand, J. & Tarrier, J.-M. (2008). Deux thèses sur la transcription et le codage d’un grand corpus oral : le cas de PFC. In M. Bilger (ed.), Données orales. Les enjeux de la transcription (48–77). Cahiers de l’Université de Perpignan, 371. Perpignan: Presses Universitaires de Perpignan.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Edwards, J., Munson, B. & Beckman, M. E. (2011). Lexicon-phonology relationships and dynamics of early language development. Journal of Child Language, 381, 35–40. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hallé, F. & Duchesne, L. (2015). Habiletés morpho-syntaxiques des enfants sourds porteurs d’implants cochléaires : une revue systématique. Revue Canadienne d’Orthophonie et d’Audiologie, 39(3), 260–297.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Inscoe, J. R., Odell, A., Archbold, S. & Nikolopoulos, T. (2009). Expressive spoken language development in deaf children with cochlear implants who are beginning formal education. Deafness and Education International, 111, 39–55. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jakubowicz, C. & Rigaut, C. (2000). L’acquisition des clitiques nominatifs et des clitiques objets en français. Revue Canadienne de Linguistique, 45(1–2), 119–157. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Josse, D. (1997). Brunet-Lézine révisé. Echelle de développement psychomoteur de la première enfance. Paris: Editions et Applications Psychologiques (EAP).Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jung, J. & Ertmer, D. (2011). Early vocabulary size and grammatical abilities in young CI recipients and TD toddlers. Purdue University. Poster at the American Speech-Language-Hearing Association, San Diego, CA. Consulté le 10 mars 2017: [URL] .Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Khomsi, A. (2001). Evaluation du langage oral. Paris: les Editions du Centre de Psychologie Appliquée (ECPA).Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Koo, D., Crain, K., Lasasoo, C. & Eden, G. F. (2008). Phonological awareness and short-term memory in hearing and deaf individuals of different communication backgrounds. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 11451, 83–99. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Le Normand, M.-T. & Moreno-Torres, I. (2014). The role of linguistic and environmental factors on grammatical development in French children with cochlear implants. Lingua, 1391, 26–38. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lecanuet, J. P. (1995). L’expérience auditive prénatale. In I. Deliège & J. A. Sloboda (eds.), Naissance et développement du sens musical (7–38). Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Martinot, C. (2005). Comment parlent les enfants de 6 ans ? Pour une linguistique de l’acquisition. Besançon: Presses Universitaires de Franche-Comté.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2015). La reformulation : de la construction du sens à la construction des apprentissages en langue et sur la langue. In S. Volteau & J. Rançon (eds.), La reformulation : usages et contextes. Cognition, représentation, langage (Corela), hors-série n° 18.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mehler, J., Lambertz, G., Jusczyk, P. & Amiel-Tison, C. (1986). Discrimination of the mother tongue by newborn infants. Comptes Rendus de l’Academie des Sciences, 303(15), 637–640.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Morgenstern, A. (2006). Un JE en construction. Ontogenèse de l’autodésignation chez l’enfant. Paris et Gap: Ophrys.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2009). L’enfant dans la langue. Paris: Presses Sorbonne Nouvelle.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Morgenstern, A. & Parisse, C. (2012). Constructing “basic” verbal constructions: a longitudinal study of the blossoming of constructions with six frequent verbs. In M. Bouveret & D. Le Gallois (eds.). Constructions in French (127–153). Constructional Approaches to Language Series, 131, Amsterdam / Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Norbury, C. F., Bishop, D. V. M. & Briscoe, J. (2001). Production of English finite verb morphology: A comparison of SLI and mild-moderate hearing impairment. Journal of Speech, Language and Hearing Research, 44(1), 165–178. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Nott, P., Cowan, R., Brown, P. M. & Wigglesworth, G. (2009a). Early language development in children with profound hearing loss fitted with a device at a young age: Part I-the time period taken to acquire first words and first word combinations. Ear and Hearing, 30(5), 526–540. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2009b). Early language development in children with profound hearing loss fitted with a device at a young age: Part II – content of the first lexicon. Ear and Hearing, 30(5), 541–551. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Parisse, C. & Le Normand, M.-T. (2006). Une méthode pour évaluer la production du langage spontané chez l’enfant de 2 à 4 ans. Glossa, 971, 20–41.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pisoni, D. B. & Geers, A. (2000). Working memory in deaf children with cochlear implants: Correlations between digit span and measures of spoken language processing. Annals of Otology, Rhinology and Laryngology, 1091, 92–93. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rescorla, L., Alley, A. & Book, J. C. (2001). Word frequencies in toddlers’ lexicons. Journal of Speech, Language and Hearing Research, 441, 598–609. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Schnedecker, C. & Landragin, F. (2014). Les chaînes de référence : présentation. Langages, 1951, 3–22. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Szagun, G. (2000). The acquisition of grammatical and lexical structures in children with cochlear implants: a developmental psycholinguistic approach. Audiology and Neurotology, 5(1), 39–47. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Teberosky, A. & Vilaginès, E. (2008). Le corpus d’enfants : quels outils ? In M. Bilger (ed.), Données orales. Les enjeux de la transcription (110–127). Cahiers de l’Université de Perpignan, 371. Perpignan: Presses Universitaires de Perpignan.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tesnière, L. (1959). Eléments de syntaxe structurale. Paris: Klincksieck.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tuller, L. & Jakubowicz, C. (2004). Développement de la morphosyntaxe du français chez des enfants sourds moyens. Le Langage et l’Homme : Logopédie, Psychologie, Audiologie, 141, 101–207.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Vincent-Durroux, L. (2014). La langue orale des jeunes sourds profonds. Paris: De Boeck-Solal, collection Voix Parole Langage.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue