Cover not available

Article published In: Language, Interaction and Acquisition
Vol. 9:2 (2018) ► pp.137–182

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload PDF
authorization required

Types syntaxiques des énoncés de jeunes enfants en dialogue avec le père ou la mère

Influence de l’interlocuteur et du type d’activité

 | Institut de linguistique et phonétique générales et appliquées – ILPGA | Université Sorbonne Nouvelle – Paris 3

Article language: French

Published online: 21 January 2019
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/lia.17003.heu
Résumé
Peu d’études ont examiné les effets du statut de l’interlocuteur de l’enfant et des activités dans lesquelles les dyades parent-enfant interagissent sur les productions syntaxiques de l’enfant, et en particulier sur les types syntaxiques des énoncés qu’il produit (énoncés avec ou sans verbe, énoncés à présentatif). Cet article a pour objectif d’analyser l’effet de l’activité en cours et du statut de l’interlocuteur de l’enfant sur la production et les usages syntaxiques de dyades mère-enfant et père-enfant. De jeunes enfants francophones (dont l’âge est compris entre 3 et 4 ans) et leurs parents ont été observés dans deux activités : un jeu symbolique (sept enfants) et un jeu de cartes illustrées (cinq de ces sept enfants). Les différents types syntaxiques de leurs énoncés ont été analysés en considérant deux variables extralinguistiques reliées à l’usage de ces productions : le type d’activité et le statut de l’interlocuteur de l’enfant (mère ou père). Nos résultats suggèrent que le type d’activité et le statut de l’interlocuteur constituent deux variables – parmi d’autres – qui devraient être prises en compte afin de mieux décrire les usages syntaxiques des enfants et leurs variabilités.
Abstract
Few studies have examined the effects of the child’s interlocutor (father or mother) and activity on the child’s syntactic development. This paper aims to analyze the role of activity and interlocutor on language production and use in mother-child and father-child dyads. Young French-speaking children (aged 3 to 4) and their parents were observed during two activities: a symbolic play situation (seven children) and narration based on a picture card game (five of the seven children). Syntactic types of utterances were analyzed while considering the impact of extralinguistic properties, i.e. parent and activity. Our results suggest that the type of activity and the status of child’s interlocutor (father or mother) form a body of variables – among other variables – that should be taken into account in order to better describe and understand children’s syntactic use and variability.
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Cadre et précisions théoriques
    • 2.1LAE et styles interactionnels des pères et des mères
    • 2.2Influence de l’activité dans les interactions parent-enfant
  • 3.Questions et hypothèses de recherche
  • 4.Méthodologie
    • 4.1Sujets et protocole
    • 4.2Codage : catégories retenues
      • 4.2.1Activités
      • 4.2.2Enoncé et types syntaxiques
        • 4.2.2.1Prophrases et phatèmes
        • 4.2.2.2Enoncés à noyau non verbal
        • 4.2.2.3Enoncés à présentatif
        • 4.2.2.4Enoncés à prédicat verbal
    • 4.3Statistiques
  • 5.Résultats
    • 5.1Distribution des types syntaxiques des énoncés : influence de l’interlocuteur, toutes activités confondues
    • 5.2Distribution des types syntaxiques des énoncés : influence de l’activité
  • 6.Discussion
  • Remerciements
  • Remarques
  • Références
References (143)
Références
Altınkamış, N. F., Kern, S., & Sofu, H. (2014). When context matters more than language: Verb or noun in French and Turkish caregiver speech. First Language, 34(6), 537–550. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Aronoff, M. & Rees-Miller, J. (2001). The handbook of linguistics. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Baker, C. E., Vernon-Feagans, L., & The Family Life Project Key Investigators. (2015). Fathers’ language input during shared book activities: Links to children’s kindergarten achievement. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 361, 53–59. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bakhtine, M. (1984/1979). Esthétique de la création verbale. Paris: Gallimard.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bailly, S. (2007). Sexotypes langagiers et communication. In H. Boyer (Ed.), Stéréotypages, stéréotypes : fonctionnements ordinaires et mises en scènes tome 12 « Identités », (15–27). Paris: L’Harmattan.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Balleyguier, G. (1998). Attachement et tempérament chez le jeune enfant. Enfance, 31, 69–81. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Barton, M. & Tomasello, M. (1994). The rest of the family: The role of fathers and siblings in early language development. In C. Gallaway & B. J. Richards (Eds.), Input and Interaction in Language Acquisition (109–134). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Behr, I. (2004). Prédications averbales dans un débat télévisé, formes et fonctions. Syntaxe et Sémantique, 61, 163–180. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Benveniste, E. (1966). Problèmes de linguistique générale. Tome 1. Paris: Gallimard.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(1974). Problèmes de linguistique générale. Tome 2. Paris: Gallimard.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bernicot, J. & Clark, E. V. (2010). La fonction des répétitions dans les interactions entre parent et jeune enfant : Une étude sur un grand corpus. Psychologie de l’interaction, 25/26, 221–251.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Berrendonner, A. (2002). Les deux syntaxes. Verbum, 24(1–2), 23–35.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Biber, D. (1988). Variations across speech and writing. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Black, B. & Logan, A. (1995). Links between communication patterns in mother-child, father-child, and child-peer interactions and children’s social status. Child Development, 66(1), 255–271. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Blanche-Benveniste, C. (2000/1997). Approche de la langue parlée en français. Paris: Ophrys.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Brachfeld-Child, S., Simpson, T., & Izenson, N. (1988). Mothers’ and fathers’ speech to infants in a teaching situation. Infant Mental Health Journal, 9(2), 173–180. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Brazelton, T. B. (1992). Touchpoints: Emotional and behavioral development. Reading: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bredart-Compernol, C., Rondal, J.-A., & Peree, F. (1981). More about maternal and paternal speech to language-learning children in various dyadic and triadic situational contexts. International Journal of Psycholinguistics, 81, 149–168.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bronckart, J.-P. (2011). Activité langagière, genres de texte et types de discours. Paper presented at Linguistique de l’acquisition du langage oral et écrit : retour sur des questions théoriques . Paris: AsFoReL/Université Sorbonne Nouvelle.
Brown, R. & Bellugi, U. (1964). Three processes in the child’s acquisition of syntax. Harvard Educational Review, 341, 133–151. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Brown, R., Cazden, C., & Bellugi, U. (1969). The child’s grammar from I to III. In J. P. Hill (Ed.), Minnesota Symposium on Child Psychology, vol. 21. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bruner, J. (1983). Child’s talk, learning to use language. New York: W.W. Norton & Company Inc.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bus, A. G., Belsky, J., van IJzendoorn, M. H., & Crnic, K. (1997). Attachment and bookreading patterns: A study of mothers, fathers, and their toddlers. Early Childhood Research Quaterly, 121, 81–98. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cherry, L. (1975). The preschool teacher-child dyad: Sex differences in verbal interaction. Child Development, 461, 532–535. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Choi, S. (2000). Caregiver input in English and Korean: Use of nouns and verbs in book-reading and toy-play contexts. Journal of Child Language, 27(1), 69–96. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Chomsky, N. (1965). Aspects of the Theory of Syntax. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Clark, E. V. & Chouinard, M. M. (2000). Enoncés enfantins et reformulations adultes dans l’acquisition du langage. Langages, 1401, 9–23. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
De Houwer, A. (2000). Children’s linguistic environments: A first impression. In M. Beers, B. van den Bogaerde, G. Bol, J. de Jong, & C. Rooijmans (Eds.), From sound to sentence: Studies on first language acquisition (57–68). Groningen: Centre for Language and Cognition.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Delamotte-Legrand, R. (2008). Interactions entre pairs dans des échanges ordinaires : pratiques conversationnelles de jeunes enfants entre eux. Travaux neuchâtelois de linguistique, 491, 29–44.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Demuth, K., Culbertson, J., & Alter, J. (2006). Word-minimality, epenthesis, and coda licensing in the acquisition of English. Language & Speech, 491, 137–174. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Deulofeu, H.-J. & Debaisieux, J.-M. (2012). Une tâche à accomplir pour la linguistique française du XXIe siècle : élaborer une grammaire des usages du français. Langue Française, 176(4), 27–46. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
De Weck, G. & Rodi, M. (2005). Evaluation des capacités pragmatiques et discursives. In B. Piérart (Ed.), Le langage de l’enfant : comment l’évaluer ? (195–212). Bruxelles: De Boeck.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dore, J. (1974). A pragmatic description of early language development. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 3(4), 118–123. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ducrot, O. (1979). Les lois du discours. Langue Française, 421, 21–33. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ervin-Tripp, S. M. (1976). Speech acts and social learning. In K. H. Basso & H. Selby (Eds.), Meaning in Anthropology (123–153). University of New Mexico Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Estienne, F. & Piérart, B. (2006). Les bilans de langage et de voix : Fondements théoriques et pratiques. Paris: Masson.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fagot, B. (1997). Attachment, parenting, and peer interactions with toddler children. Developmental Psychology, 331, 489–499. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fagot, B. & Hagan, R. (1991). Observations of parent reactions to sex-stereotyped behaviours: Age and sex differences. Child Development, 621, 617–628. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fash, D. & Madison, C. (1981). Parent’s language interaction with young children: A comparative study of mothers and fathers. Child Study Journal, 111, 137–153.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fenson, L., Dale, P., Reznick, S., Thal, D., Bates, E., Hartung, J., Tethick, S., & Reilly, J. (1993). MacArthur Communicative Development Inventories: User’s guide and technical manual. San Diego: Singular Publishing Group.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
François, D. (1975). Les auxiliaires de prédication. La linguistique, 11(1), 31–40.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
François, F. (1989). Cohésion et déplacements dans des dialogues enfants-adultes ou de quelques façons dont se dessinent les figures des sujets dans les dialogues. DRLAV – Revue de linguistique, 401, 115–140.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(1993). Pratiques de l’oral. Paris: Nathan.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2005). Interprétation et dialogue chez des enfants et quelques autres. Lyon: ENS éditions.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
François, F., François, D., Sabeau-Jouannet, E., & Sourdot, M. (1977). La syntaxe de l’enfant avant 5 ans. Paris: Larousse.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
François, F., Hudelot, C., & Sabeau-Jouannet, E. (1984). Conduites linguistiques chez le jeune enfant. Paris: PUF.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gadet, F. (1997). Le français ordinaire. Paris: Armand Colin.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gallaway, C. & Richards, B. J. (Eds.) (1994). Input and Interaction in Language Acquisition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Garitte, C. (1998). Le développement de la conversation chez l’enfant. Paris/Bruxelles: De Boeck Université.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gee, J. & Savasir, I. (1985). On the use of will and gonna: Toward a description of activity-types for child language. Discourse Processes, 81, 143–175. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(1986). The use of the simple present in the speech of two three-year-olds: Normativity not subjectivity. Language in Society, 151, 501–536. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gleason, J. Berko. (1975). Fathers and others strangers: Men’s speech to young children. In D. P. Dato (Ed.), Developmental Psycholinguistics: Theory and Applications (289–297). Washington: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Golinkoff, R. M. & Ames, G. J. (1979). A comparison of fathers’ and mothers’ speech with their young children. Child Development, 501, 28–32. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Grevisse, M. (1994). Le Bon Usage – Grammaire française avec des remarques sur la langue française d’aujourd’hui. Gembloux: Duculot.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gries, S. Th. (2013/2009). Statistics for linguistics with R: A practical introduction. Mouton De Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Grossmann, K., Grossmann, K. E., Fremmer-Bombik, E., Kindler, H., Scheuerer-Englisch, H., & Zimmermann, P. (2002). The uniqueness of the child-father attachment relationship: Fathers’ sensitive and challenging play as a pivotal variable in a 16-year longitudinal study. Social Development, 11(3), 301–337. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Heurdier, J., da Silva, C., Le Mené, M., & Salazar Orvig, A. (2012). Premiers usages de « c’est » : formes et valeurs sémantico-discursives. Paper presented at the Annual Conference of the Association of French Language Studies, « Le français à travers le temps : acquisition, changement, variation ». Newcastle University.
Hladik, E. G. & Edwards, H. T. (1984). A comparative analysis of mother-father speech in the naturalistic home environment. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 13(5), 321–332. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hoff-Ginsberg, E. (1986). Function and structure in maternal speech: Their relation to the child’s development of syntax. Developmental Psychology, 22(2), 155–163. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(1991). Mother-child conversation in different social classes and communicative settings. Child Development, 62(4), 782–796. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Holmes, J. (1999). Language in Society, 28(2), special issue on Communities of practice in language and gender research.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hudelot, C. (1980). Qu’est-ce que la complexité syntaxique ? L’exemple de la relative. La linguistique, 16(2), 5–41.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(1988). Gestion de la différence dans le dialogue adulte-enfant et entre enfants. Cahiers d’acquisition et de pathologie du langage, 31, 1–31.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hummel, D. D. (1982). Syntactic and conversational characteristics of fathers’ speech. Journal of Psycholinguistics Research, 11(5), 465–483. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
INSEE. (2012). France, portrait social. Institut national de la statistique et des études économiques Références. [en ligne] [URL]
Kern, S. & Chenu, F. (2010). Contextes de production et LAE en français : caractéristiques pragmatiques et syntaxiques. In F. Neveu, V. Muni Toke, T. Klingler, J. Durand, L. Mondada, & S. Prévost (Eds.), Actes du Congrès Mondial de Linguistique Française – CMLF, 2010 (1527–1537). Paris: ILF.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kern, S., Chenu, F., & Turkay, F. (2012). Poids du contexte sur la répartition noms/verbes dans le langage adressé à l’enfant en français et en turc. Actes du Congrès Mondial de Linguistique Française – CMLF, 2012 (1607–1622). Lyon: EDP Sciences.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kern, S., Gayraud, F., & Chenu, F. (Eds.) (2014). The role of input on early first language morphosyntactic development. Language, Interaction and Acquisition, 5(1), 1–18. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kromelow, S., Harding, C., & Touris, M. (1990). The role of the father in the development of stranger sociability during the second year. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 61, 521–530. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Labrell, F. (1997). Le rôle du père dans le développement cognitif du jeune enfant. In J. Le Camus, F. Labrell, & C. Zaouche-Gaudron (Eds.), Le rôle du père dans le développement du jeune enfant (9–68). Paris: Nathan.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2005). Que nous apprennent les recherches sur l’étayage parental des connaissances des jeunes enfants pour la mise en place des apprentissages langagiers à l’école maternelle ? Revue française de pédagogie, 1511, 17–28. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lacheret-Dujour, A., Kahane, S., Pietrandrea, P., Avanzi, M., & Victorri, B. (2011). Oui mais elle est où la coupure, là ? Quand syntaxe et prosodie s’entraident ou se complètent. Langue Française, 1701, 61–80. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lallemand, S. (1997). Enfances d’ailleurs, approche anthropologique. In M. Guidetti, S. Lallemand, & M. F. Morel (Eds.), Enfance d’ailleurs, d’hier et d’aujourd’hui (7–57). Paris: Armand Colin.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lamb, M. (1975). Fathers: Forgotten contributors to child development. Human Development, 181, 245–246. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(1982). Mother- and father-infant interaction involving play and holding in traditional and nontraditional Swedish families. Developmental Psychology, 181, 215–221. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Le Camus, J. (2000). Le vrai rôle du père. Paris: Odile Jacob.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2001). La fonction du père dans les premières années de la vie de l’enfant. Perspectives ouvertes par la psychologie du développement. In C. Zaouche-Gaudron, (Ed.), La problématique paternelle (75–93). Paris: ERES.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2005). Comment être père aujourd’hui ? Paris: Odile Jacob.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Le Camus, J. & Zaouche-Gaudron, C. (1998). La présence du père auprès du jeune enfant : de l’implication accrue à l’implication congrue. Psychiatrie de l’enfant, 41(1), 297–319.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lefeuvre, F. (1999). La phrase averbale en français. Paris: L’Harmattan.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lefeuvre, F. & Behr, I. (2011). Enoncés averbaux autonomes entre grammaire et discours. Paris: Ophrys.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Le Mené, M., da Silva, C., Heurdier, J., & Salazar Orvig, A. (2013). Usage des précurseurs de « c’est » dans des dialogues adulte-enfant. Paper presented at the International Conference L’acquisition des expressions référentielles : perspectives croisées – AERef , 2013. Paris: Bibliothèque Universitaire des Langues et Civilisations.
Le Normand, M.-T. (1986). A developmental exploration of language used to accompany symbolic play in young, normal children (2–4 years-old). Child: Care, Health and Development, 121, 121–134. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Levinson, S. C. (1979). Activity types and language. Linguistics, 171, 365–399. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(1983). Pragmatics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lieven, E. & Tomasello, M. (2008). Children’s first language acquisition from a usage-based perspective. In P. Robinson & N. Ellis (Eds.), Handbook of cognitive linguistics and second language acquisition (168–196). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
MacDonald, K. & Parke, R. D. (1984). Bridging the gap: Parent-child play interaction and peer interactive competence. Child Development, 551, 1265–1277. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
MacWhinney, B. (2000). The CHILDES project: Tools for analyzing talk. Mahwah, N.J: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Majorano, M., Rainieri, C., & Corsano, P.: (2013). Parents’ child-directed communication and child language development: a longitudinal study with Italian toddlers. Journal of Child Language, 40(4), 1–24. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Malone, M. J. & Guy, R. F. (1982). A comparison of mothers’ and fathers’ speech to their 3-year-old sons. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 11(6), 599–608. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mannle, S. & Tomasello, T. (1987). Fathers, siblings and the Bridge Hypothesis. In K. Nelson & A. van Kleeck (Eds.), Children’s Language (23–41), vol. 61. Hillsdale, N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Marcos, H. (1998). De la communication prélinguistique au langage : formes et fonctions. Paris: L’Harmattan.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Marcos, H. & Le Chanu, M. (1994). Father-child and mother-child speech: A perspective on parental roles. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 9(1), 3–13. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Masur, E. F. & Gleason, J. Berko. (1980). Parent-child interaction and the acquisition of lexical information during play. Developmental Psychology, 16(5), 404–409. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Morel, M.-A. (2003). Phrase ? Énoncé ? Paragraphe ? Hyperparagraphe ? Quelles unités intonatives et discursives pour le dialogue oral en français ? L’information grammaticale, 981, 39–47. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Morel, M.-A., & Danon-Boileau, L. (1998). Grammaire de l’intonation. L’exemple du français oral. Paris: Ophrys.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Morgenstern, A., & Préneron, C. (2010). Père ou pair ? Décalages et ajustements co-énonciatifs. Alfa: Revista de Linguistica, 54(2), 431–457.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mounin, G. et al. (2004/1974). Dictionnaire de la linguistique. Paris: Quadrige/PUF.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mouret, F. (2007). Grammaire des constructions coordonnées. Coordinations simples et coordinations à redoublement en français contemporain. Thèse de doctorat. Université Paris Diderot.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Nelson, K. (2007). Young minds in the social world: Experience, meaning and memory. Harvard: Harvard University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Newport, E., Gleitman, L., & Gleitman, H. (1977). Mother, I’d rather do it myself. In C. E. Snow & C. A. Ferguson (Eds.), Talking to children: Language input and acquisition (109–149). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ninio, A. & Snow, C. E. (1996). Pragmatic development. Boulder: Westview Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ochs, E. & Taylor, C. (1996). The “father knows best” dynamic in dinnertime narratives. In K. Hall (Ed.), Gender articulated: Language and the socially constructed self (97–121). London: Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ogura, T., Dale, P. S., Yamashita, Y., Murase, T., & Mahieu, A. (2006). The use of nouns and verbs by Japanese children and their caregiver in book-reading and toy-playing contexts. Journal of Child Language, 33(1), 1–29. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pancsofar, N. & Vernon-Feagans, L. (2006). Mother and father language input to young children: Contributions to later language development. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 271, 571–587. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Parke, R. D. (2004). Fathers, families, and the future: A plethora of plausible predictions. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly of Behavior and Development, 50(4), 456–470. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Parke, R. D. & Buriel, R. (1998). Socialization in the family: Ethnic and ecological perspectives. In W. Damon (series ed.) & N. Eisenberg (vol. ed.), Handbook of child psychology. vol. 3, social, emotional, and personality development (463–552). New York: Wiley.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Parisse, C. & Le Normand, M.-T. (2000). How children build their morphosyntax: The case of French. Journal of Child Language, 27(2), 267–292. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2006). Une méthode pour évaluer la production du langage spontané chez l’enfant entre 2 et 4 ans. Glossa, 971, 20–41.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pécheux, M. G. & Labrell, F. (1994). Parent-infant interactions and early cognitive development. In A. Vyt, H. Bloch & M. Bornstein (Eds.), Early child development in the French tradition (255–267). Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Plantin, C. (1982). Oui et non sont-ils des « prophrases » ? Remarques sur leur fonctionnement dans les dialogues. Le Français Moderne, 50(3), 252–265.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pleck, E. H. & Pleck, J. H. (1997). Fatherhood ideals in the United States: Historical dimensions. In M. Lamb (Ed.), The Role of the Father in Child Development (33–48). New York: Wiley.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Power, T. (1985). Mother- and father-infant play: A developmental analysis. Child Development, 561, 1514–1524. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ratner, N. B. (1988). Patterns of parental vocabulary selection in speech to very young children. Journal of Child Language, 151, 481–492. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rezzonico, S., de Weck, G., Salazar Orvig, A., da Silva-Genest, C., & Rahmati, S. (2014). Maternal recasts and activity variations: A comparison of mother-child dyads involving children with and without SLI. Clinical Phonetics and Linguistics, 28(4), 223–240. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Riegel, M., Pellat, J.-C., & Rioul, R. (1994). Grammaire méthodique du français. Paris: PUF.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rondal, J.-A. (1980). Fathers’ and mothers’ speech in early language development. Journal of Child Language, 71, 353–369. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rossi, C., Caët, S., & Morgenstern, A. (2013). Le futur en construction. Premiers usages de will et be going to chez l’enfant anglophone. Cercles, 291, 265–285.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Roth, F. P., & Clark, M. (1987). Symbolic play and social participation abilities of language-impaired and normally developing children. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders, 521, 17–29. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ryckebusch, C. & Marcos, H. (2000). La communication du jeune enfant avec le père ou la mère : influence de l’interlocuteur et du type d’activité. Enfance, 53(2), 127–147. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Salazar Orvig, A. (2002). Remarques sur la continuité et l’engagement dialogique chez le jeune enfant. In L. Danon-Boileau, C. Hudelot, & A. Salazar Orvig (Eds.), Usages du langage chez l’enfant (61–81). Paris: Ophrys.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Salazar Orvig, A. & de Weck, G. (2013). Profils de mères et implication des enfants dans la co-construction d’un récit. A.N.A.E, 25(124), 269–278.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Shatz, M. & Gelman, R. (1973). The development of communication skills: Modification in the speech of young children as a function of listener. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 38(5), 1–38. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Siegel, S. & Castellan, N. J. (1998). Nonparametric Statistics for the Behavioral Sciences. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Slobin, D. I. (1985). Crosslinguistic evidence for the Language-Making Capacity. In D. I. Slobin (Ed.), The crosslinguistic study of language acquisition. Vol. 21: Theoretical issues (1157–1256). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Snow, C. E. (1995). Issues in the study of input: Finetuning, universality, individual and developmental differences, and necessary causes. In P. Fletcher & B. MacWhinney (Eds.), The handbook of child language (180–193). Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tannen, D. (1990). “You just don’t understand”: Women and men in conversation. New York: William Morrow.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(1994). Gender and discourse. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tardif, T., Gelman, S. A., & Xu, F. (1999). Putting the noun bias in context: A comparison of English and Mandarin. Child Development, 701, 620–635. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tesnière, L. (1965). Eléments de syntaxe structurale. Paris: Klincksiek.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tomasello, M. (2003). Constructing a language: A usage-based theory of language acquisition. Harvard: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tomasello, M., Conti-Ramsden, G., & Ewert, B. (1990). Young children’s conversations with their mothers and fathers: Differences of breakdown and repair. Journal of Child Language, 171, 115–130. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Valian, V. (1986). Syntactic categories in the speech of young children. Developmental Psychology, 22(4), 562–579. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Vandermass-Peeler, M., Sassine, B., Price, C., & Brilhart, C. (2012). Mothers’ and fathers’ guidance behaviours during storybook reading. Journal of Early Childhood Literacy, 12(4), 415–442. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Vasseur, M.-T. & Hudelot, C. (1998). Imaginaire et pratiques didactiques dans les dialogues experts-novices. In C. Springer (Ed.), Les linguistiques appliquées et les sciences du langage (100–112). Strasbourg: Université de Strasbourg.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Veneziano, E. (2010). Jeu et langage en développement : entre fonction sémiotique et théorie de l’esprit. Rééducation orthophonique, 2441, 35–51.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Voloshinov, N. V. (1977). Le marxisme et la philosophie du langage. Paris: Editions de Minuit.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Vygotski, L. S. (1986/1934). Pensée et langage. Paris: La Dispute.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Walker, K. & Armstrong, L. (1995). Do mothers and fathers interact differently with their child or is it the situation which matters? Child: Care, Health, and Development, 211, 161–181. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wasserman, L. (2004). All of statistics: A concise course in statistical inference. Springer. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Welkowitz, J., Bond, R., Feldman, L., & Tota, M. (1990). Conversational time patterns and mutual influence in parent-child interactions: A time series approach. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 191, 221–243. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wilmet, M. (1997). Grammaire critique du français. Paris/Louvain: Hachette/Duculot.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (3)

Cited by three other publications

Le Mené, Marine, Anne Salazar Orvig, Christine Da Silva-Genest & Haydée Marcos
2023. The choice of referring expressions in adult-child dialogues. In Reference [Studies in Language Companion Series, 228], ► pp. 323 ff. DOI logo
de Weck, Geneviève, Rouba Hassan, Julien Heurdier, Janina Klein & Nathalie Salagnac
2021. Activities and social settings: Their roles in the use of referring expressions. In The Acquisition of Referring Expressions [Trends in Language Acquisition Research, 28], ► pp. 261 ff. DOI logo
Vinel, Elise, Anne Salazar Orvig, Geneviève de Weck, Salma Nashawati & Somayeh Rahmati
2021. The impact of speech genres on the use of referring expressions. In The Acquisition of Referring Expressions [Trends in Language Acquisition Research, 28], ► pp. 287 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 25 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue