Article published In: Language, Interaction and Acquisition
Vol. 8:2 (2017) ► pp.273–287
Military L2 immersion
Language learning motivations among Finnish-speaking conscripts in a Swedish language garrison
Published online: 2 March 2018
https://doi.org/10.1075/lia.16002.vin
https://doi.org/10.1075/lia.16002.vin
Abstract
The purpose of the present study was to examine some of the motivations and longitudinal consequences of military service in L2
Swedish for L1 Finnish conscripts in Finland’s only Swedish language garrison. Cross-sectional data (N = 42),
analyzed with Bayesian path analysis, indicates that promotional instrumentality enhanced participants’ L2 ideal selves, but
integrative orientation did not. The L2 ideal self predicts L2 learning intentions in the army, but only among learners with low
L2 proficiency at the beginning of military service. Longitudinal data (N = 17), analyzed with a Bayesian model
selection procedure, shows that after six months in the army, participants reported higher levels of L2 proficiency, lower levels
of L2 use anxiety and more positive attitudes towards L2 speakers than at the beginning of military service.
Résumé
L’objet de cet article est d’analyser certaines des motivations qui conduisent à effectuer son service militaire en suédois L2 dans
l’unique garnison de langue suédoise en Finlande parmi des conscrits locuteurs du Finnois L1, et les conséquences de ce choix sur
le plan longitudinal. Les données transversales (N = 42), analysées suivant une démarche bayésienne, montrent que
l’instrumentalité promotionnelle renforce le moi idéal en L2 des participants alors que la motivation intégrative ne produit pas
un tel effet. Le moi idéal en L2 permet de prévoir des efforts d’apprentissage de la L2 à l’armée, mais cela exclusivement pour
ceux dont les compétences étaient faibles en L2 au début de leur service militaire. Les données longitudinales
(N = 17), analysées à l’aide d’une procédure de sélection bayésienne, montrent qu’après six mois à l’armée, les
participants ont déclaré des niveaux supérieurs de compétence en L2, des niveaux plus faibles d’anxiété dans l’emploi des L2, et
des attitudes plus positives à l’égard des locuteurs de L2, par rapport au début de leur service militaire.
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.Study 1: The cross-sectional study
- 2.1Theoretical background
- 2.2Method
- 2.2.1Participants
- 2.2.2Measures
- 2.2.3Analysis
- 2.4Results
- 2.5Discussion
- 3.Study 2: The longitudinal study
- 3.1Theoretical background
- 3.2Method
- 3.2.1Participants
- 3.2.2Measures
- 3.2.3Analysis
- 3.3Results
- 3.4Discussion
- 4.General discussion
- Acknowledgements
References
References (32)
Busse, V. (2013). How
do students of German perceive feedback practices at university? A motivational
exploration. Journal of Second Language
Writing, 22(4), 406–424.
Clément, R., & S. C. Baker. (2001). Measuring
social aspects of L2 acquisition and use: Scale characteristics and
administration. Ottawa: University of Ottawa, School of Psychology.
Clément, R., Baker, S. C., & MacIntyre, P. D. (2003). Willingness
to communicate in a second language: The effects of context norms, and vitality. Journal of
Language And Social
Psychology, 22(2), 190–209.
Depaoli, S., & van de Schoot, R. (2017). Improving
transparency and replication in Bayesian statistics: The WAMBS-Checklist. Psychological
methods, 22(2), 240–261.
Dörnyei, Z. (2009). The
L2 motivational self system. In Dörnyei, Z. & Ushioda, E. (Eds.), Motivation,
language identity and the L2
self (pp. 9–42). Bristol: Multilingual Matters.
Dörnyei, Z., & Chan, L. (2013). Motivation
and vision: An analysis of future L2 self images, sensory styles, and imagery capacity across two target
languages. Language
Learning, 63(3), 437–462.
Gardner, R. C. (2010). Motivation
and second language acquisition: The socio-educational
model. Berne: Peter Lang.
Gelman, A., Carlin, J. B., Stern, H. S., & Rubin, D. B. (2004). Bayesian
data analysis (2nd
ed.). London: Chapman & Hall.
Gelman, A., & Rubin, D. B. (1992). Inference
from iterative simulation using multiple sequences. Statistical
Science, 71, 457–511.
Giles, H., Bourhis, R. Y., & Taylor, D. M. (1977). Towards
a theory of language in ethnic group relations. In H. Giles (Ed.), Language,
ethnicity and intergroup
relations (pp. 307-348). New York, NY: Academic Press.
Hoijtink, H. (2011). Informative
hypotheses: Theory and practice for behavioral and social
scientists. London: CRC Press.
Holm, G., Londen, M., & Mansikka, J. E. (2015). Interpreting
visual (and verbal) data: Teenagers’ views on belonging to a language minority group in
Finland. In P. Smeyers, D. Bridges, N. C. Burbules, & M. Griffiths (Eds.). International
handbook of interpretation in educational research: Part
one (pp. 753–782). Dordrecht: Springer.
Kass, R. E., & Raftery, A. E. (1995). Bayes
factors. Journal of the American Statistical
Association, 901, 773–795.
Kephart, W. M. (1957). Racial
factors and urban law enforcement. Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press.
Lamb, M. (2012). A
self system perspective on young adolescents’ motivation to learn English in urban and rural
settings. Language
Learning, 62(4), 997–1023.
Lasagabaster, D. (2016). The
relationship between motivation, gender, L1 and possible selves in English-medium
instruction. International Journal of
Multilingualism, 13(3), 315–332.
Lee, S. -Y., & Song, X. -Y. (2004). Evaluation
of the Bayesian and maximum likelihood approaches in analyzing structural equation models with small sample
sizes. Multivariate Behavioral
Research, 391, 653–686.
Muthén, L., & Muthén, B. (1998–2015). Mplus
user’s guide (Seventh ed.). Los Angeles, CA: Muthén & Muthén.
Papi, M., & Teimouri, Y. (2012). Dynamics
of selves and motivation: A cross‐sectional study in the EFL context of Iran. International
Journal of Applied
Linguistics, 22(3), 287–309.
Pettigrew, T. F., & Tropp, L. R. (2006). A
meta-analytical test of the intergroup contact theory. Journal of Personality and Social
Psychology, 901, 751–783.
Puolustusvoimat (2013, November 9) Nylands brigad utbildar för kusten och skärgården. [Nylands
Brigad trains for the coast and the archipelago] Retrieved from <[URL]>
Pöyhönen, S., & Saarinen, T. (2014). Constructions
of bilingualism in Finnish Government programs and a newspaper discussion site debate. Current
Issues in Language
Planning, (ahead-of-print), 1–17.
Rakić, T., Steffens, M. C., & Mummendey, A. (2011). Blinded
by the accent! The minor role of looks in ethnic categorization. Journal of Personality and
Social
Psychology, 100(1), 16–29.
Ryan, S. (2009). Self
and identity in L2 motivation in Japan: The ideal L2 self and Japanese learners of
English. In Z. Dörnyei & E. Ushioda (Eds.), Motivation,
language identity and the L2
self (pp. 120–143). Bristol: Multilingual Matters.
Saari, Mirja. (2012). The
development of Finnish into a national language. In M. Hüning, U. Vogl, & O. Moliner (Eds.), Standard
languages and multilingualism in European
history (pp. 179–204). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Sampasivam, S., & Clément, R. (2014). The
dynamics of second language confidence: Perspective and
interaction. In S. Mercer, & M. Williams (Eds.), Multiple
perspectives on the self in
SLA (pp. 23–40). Bristol: Multilingual Matters.
Stephan, C. W., & Stephan, W. G. (1992). Reducing
intercultural anxiety through intercultural contact. International Journal of Intercultural
Relations 161, 89–106.
Utbildningsstyrelsen (2014). Elevernas språkbakgrund i årskurs 1–6 i de svenskspråkiga skolorna år 2013 [The
linguistic background of pupils in grades 1–6 of the Swedish-speaking schools in
2013]. Helsingfors: Utbildningsstyrelsen.
van de Schoot, R., Kaplan, D., Denissen, J., Asendorpf, J. B., Neyer, F. J., & Aken, M. A. (2014). A
gentle introduction to Bayesian analysis: Applications to developmental research. Child
development, 85(3), 842–860.
Yle (2013, February 22). Finska studerande en tillgång för Åbo Akademi [Finnish-speaking students as an asset for Åbo Academy University]. Retrieved
from <[URL]>
