Article published In: Verbal and gestural expression of motion and spatial events / L’expression verbale et gestuelle du mouvement et de l’espace: New evidence from different age groups and linguistic environments / nouveaux arguments en provenance de différents groupes d’âge et de différents environnements linguistiques
Edited by Kateřina Fibigerová, Jean-Marc Colletta and Michèle Guidetti
[Language, Interaction and Acquisition 9:1] 2018
► pp. 22–39
Children’s use of gesture and action with static and dynamic verbs
Published online: 9 May 2018
https://doi.org/10.1075/lia.15015.and
https://doi.org/10.1075/lia.15015.and
Abstract
The present study investigates the use of gestures by 18-, 24- and 30-month-old Swedish children, as well as their practical actions in coordination with verbs. Previous research on connections between children’s verbs and gestures has mainly focused only on iconic gestures and action verbs. We expand the research foci in two ways: we look both at gestures and at practical actions, examining how the two are coordinated with static verbs (e.g. sleep) and dynamic verbs (e.g. fall). Thanks to these additional distinctions, we have found that iconic gestures and iconic actions (the latter in particular) most commonly occurred with dynamic verbs. Static verbs were most commonly accompanied by deictic actions and deictic gestures (the latter in particular). At 30 months, deictic bodily expressions, including both gestures and actions, increased, whereas iconic expressions decreased. We suggest that this may reflect a transition to less redundant ways of using bodily expressions at 30 months, where bodily movement increasingly takes on the role of specifying verb arguments rather than expressing the semantics of the verb itself.
Keywords: gesture, action, verbs, development, language
Résumé
Cette étude porte sur l’utilisation des gestes par des enfants suédois âgés de 18, 24 et 30 mois
ainsi que sur des actions coordonnées avec les verbes. La plupart des recherches antérieures
sur les connexions entre les verbes et les gestes des enfants ont porté uniquement sur les
gestes iconiques et sur les verbes d’action. Nous élargissons ces domaines de recherche de deux
façons : nous examinons à la fois les gestes et les actions, et nous étudions comment ceuxci
sont coordonnés avec les verbes statiques (par exemple, dormir) et les verbes dynamiques
(par exemple, tomber). En faisant ces distinctions supplémentaires, nous avons constaté que les
gestes iconiques et les actions iconiques (en particulier) se produisaient le plus souvent avec les
verbes dynamiques. Pour les verbes statiques, les gestes déictiques (en particulier) et les actions
déictiques sont les plus communs. À 30 mois, les expressions corporelles déictiques – comprenant
les gestes et les actions – ont augmenté, tandis que les expressions iconiques ont diminué.
Nous proposons que cela reflète une transition vers des façons moins redondantes d’utiliser
l’expression corporelle à 30 mois, où le mouvement corporel sert de plus en plus à spécifier des
arguments verbaux plutôt qu’à exprimer la sémantique du verbe lui-même.
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.Method
- 2.1Data
- 2.2Coding
- 2.3Expected findings
- 3.Results
- 4.Discussion
- 4.1Do verbs come before the first iconic gestures?
- 4.2Gestures, verbs, and predication
- Notes
References
References (46)
Adamson, L. B. & Bakeman, R. (2006). Development of displaced speech in early mother-child conversations. Child Development, 77(1), 186–200.
Andrén, M. (2010). Children’s gestures from 18 to 30 months. Lund University: Centre for Languages and Literature.
(2014a). On the lower limit of gesture. In M. Seyfeddinipur & M. Gullberg (Eds.), From gesture in conversation to visible action as utterance: Essays in honor of Adam Kendon (pp. 153–174). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
(2014b). Multimodal constructions in children: Is the headshake part of language? Gesture,
14
(2), 141–170.
Armstrong, D. E., Stokoe, W. C., & Wilcox, S. E. (1995). Gesture and the nature of language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Bååth, R. (2010). ChildFreq: An online tool to explore word frequencies in child language. LUCS Minor 161.
Blake, J. (2000). Routes to child language: Evolutionary and developmental precursors. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Capirci, O., Iverson, J. M., Pizzuto, E. & Volterra, V. (1996). Gesture and words during the transition to two-word speech. Journal of Child Language, 231, 645–673.
Eckerman, C. O. (1993). Imitation and toddlers' achievement of coordinated action with others. In J. Nadel & L. Camaioni (Eds.), New perspectives in early communicative development (116–138). London: Routledge.
Garton, A. F. (1986). The production of ‘this’ and ‘that’ by young children. First Language,
6
(16), 29–39.
Gerson, S. A., & Woodward, A. L. (2014). Learning from their own actions: The unique effect of producing actions on infants’ action understanding. Child Development,
85
(1), 264–277.
Gogate, L., Maganti, M. & Bahrick, L. E. (2015). Cross-cultural evidence for multimodal motherese: Asian-Indian mothers’ adaptive use of synchronous words and gestures. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 1291, 110–126.
Gogate, L., & Maganti, M. (2017). The origins of verb learning: Preverbal and postverbal infants' learning of word – action relations. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 151, 1–13.
Goldin-Meadow, S., & Butcher, C. (2003). Pointing toward two-word speech in young children. In S. Kita (Ed.), Pointing: Where language, culture, and cognition meet (pp. 85–107). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Goodrich, W., & Hudson Kam, C. L. (2009). Co-speech gesture as input in verb learning. Developmental Science,
12
(1), 81–87.
Gullberg, M., Hendriks, H., & Hickmann, M. (2008). Learning to talk and gesture about motion in French. First Language,
28
(2), 200–236.
Gullberg, M., & Narasimhan, B. (2010). What gestures reveal about how semantic distinctions develop in Dutch children’s placement verbs. Cognitive Linguistics,
21
(2), 239–262.
Huttenlocher, J., Smiley, P., & Charney, R. (1983). Emergence of action categories in the child: Evidence from verb meanings. Psychological Review,
90
(1), 72–93.
Imai, M., Haryu, E., & Okada, H. (2005). Mapping novel nouns and verbs onto dynamic action events: Are verb meanings easier to learn than noun meanings for Japanese children? Child Development, 7(2), 340–355.
Iverson, J. M., Capirci, O., & Caselli, M. C. (1994). From communication to language in two modalities. Cognitive Development, 91, 23–43.
Iverson, J. M., Capirci, O., Volterra, V., & Goldin-Meadow, S. (2008). Learning to talk in a gesture-rich world: Early communication of Italian vs. American children. First Language, 281, 164–181.
Iverson, J. M., & Goldin-Meadow, S. (2005). Gesture paves the way for language development. Psychological Science,
16
(5), 368–371.
Iverson, J. M., & Thelen, E. (1999). Hand, mouth, and brain: The dynamic emergence of speech and gesture. Journal of Consciousness Studies, 61, 19–40.
Kendon, A. (2002). Historical observations on the relationship between research on sign languages and language origins theory. In D. Armstrong, M. A. Karchmar & J. Vickrey Van Cleve (Eds.), The Study of signed languages: Essays in honor of William C. Stokoe (pp. 32–52). Washington, DC: Gallaudet University Press.
Lock, A., & Zukow-Goldring, P. (2011). Prelinguistic communication. In G. J. Bremner & T. D. Wachs (Eds.), Blackwell Handbook of infant development (2nd ed.) (pp. 394–425). Oxford: Blackwell.
MacWhinney, B. (2000). The CHILDES Project: Tools for analyzing talk. Third Edition. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
McNeill, D. (1992). Hand and mind: What gestures reveal about thought. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Mumford, K. H., & Kita, S. (2014). Children use gesture to interpret novel verb meanings. Child Development,
85
(3), 1181–1189.
Namy, L. L. (2008). Recognition of iconicity doesn’t come for free. Developmental Science,
11
(6), 841–846.
Namy, L. L., Campbell, A. L., & Tomasello, M. (2004). The changing role of iconicity in non-verbal symbol learning: A U-shaped trajectory in the acquisition of arbitrary gestures. Journal of Cognition and Development,
5
(1), 37–57.
Nicoladis, E. (2002). Some gestures develop in conjunction with spoken language development and others don’t: Evidence from bilingual preschoolers. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior,
26
(4), 241–266.
Nicoladis, E., Mayberry, R. I., & Genesee, F. (1999). Gesture and early bilingual development. Developmental Psychology,
35
(2), 514–526.
Özçalışkan, Ş., Gentner, D., & Goldin-Meadow, S. (2014). Do iconic gestures pave the way for children’s early verbs? Applied Psycholinguistics,
35
1, 1143–1162.
Özçalışkan, S. & Goldin-Meadow, S. (2005). Gesture is at the cutting edge of early language development. Cognition,
96
(3), 101–113.
Özçalışkan, Ş., & Goldin-Meadow, S. (2009). When gesture-speech combinations do and do not index linguistic change. Language and Cognitive Processes,
24
(2), 190–217.
(2011). Is there an iconic gesture spurt at 26 months? In G. Stam & M. Ishino (Eds.), Integrating gestures: the interdisciplinary nature of gesture (pp. 163–174). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Piaget, J. (1962 [1946]). Play, dreams and imitation in childhood. [Translated by C. Cattegno & F. M. Hodgson]. New York: Norton.
Richthoff, U. (2000). En svensk barnspråkskorpus: Uppbyggnad och analyser. Ph.D. thesis. Department of Linguistics: University of Gothenburg.
Sonesson, G. (2008). Prolegomena to a general theory of iconicity: Considerations of language, gesture, and pictures. In K. Willems & I. de Cuypere (Eds.), Naturalness and iconicity in language (pp. 47–72). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
(2009). New considerations on the proper study of man – and, marginally, some other animals. Cognitive Semiotics,
4
1, 133–168.
Cited by (1)
Cited by one other publication
Nicoladis, Elena, Paula Marentette & Candace Lam
2022. Co-speech gestures can interfere with learning foreign language words*. Gesture 21:2-3 ► pp. 239 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 25 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
