Article published In: Transitivity and Valency: From theory to acquisition
Edited by Georgia Fotiadou and Hélène Vassiliadou
[Lingvisticæ Investigationes 40:1] 2017
► pp. 117–133
Clitics as input to the acquisition of verbal transitivity in French
Published online: 8 December 2017
https://doi.org/10.1075/li.40.1.06per
https://doi.org/10.1075/li.40.1.06per
Abstract
We investigate the effect of French clitic construction on verb learning. In French, object pronouns precede the verb, and the canonical direct object position remains empty. We test whether children treat such contexts as input for transitivity (since a direct object is morphologically identified) or optional transitivity (due to the empty direct object position). Forty-eight monolingual French preschoolers heard verb input with clitics and noun phrases as direct objects, in two input conditions: obligatory transitivity, and mixed optional transitivity. Results show that children are sensitive to the input, but produce more sentences with null implicit objects in the clitic conditions. This provides evidence that specific properties of a language (e.g. clitic constructions), affect the acquisition of verbal classes.
Article outline
- Introduction
- 1.Verb input and learning
- 1.1Input to transitivity across languages
- 1.2Clitics in French
- 2.Methods
- 2.1Participants
- 2.2Materials, procedures and design
- 2.3Coding
- 3.Results
- 4.Discussion
- Acknowledgements
References
References (43)
Abbot-Smith, K., Lieven, E., & Tomasello, M. (2004). Training 2;6-year-olds to produce the transitive construction: The role of frequency, semantic similarity and shared syntactic distribution. Developmental Science, 7(1), 48–55.
Bencini, G. M. L., & Valian, V. V. (2008). Abstract sentence representations in 3-year-olds: Evidence from language production and comprehension. Journal of Memory and Language, 59(1), 97–113.
Bock, J. K., & Griffin, Z. M. (2000). The persistence of structural priming: Transient activation or implicit learning? Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 129(2), 177–192.
Bourmayan, A. (2013). Les objets implicites en français : une approche pragmatique. Doctoral dissertation. École des hautes études en sciences sociales.
Cardinaletti, A., & Starke, M. (1999). The typology of structural deficiency: A case study of the three classes of pronouns. In H. Van Riemsdijk (Ed.), Clitics in the languages of Europe (pp. 145–233). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Childers, J., & Tomasello, M. (2001). The role of pronouns in young children’s acquisition of the English transitive construction. Developmental Psychology, 371, 739–748.
Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences (second ed.). Hillsdale, N.J.: L. Erlbaum Associates.
Göksun, T., Küntay, A. & Naigles, L. (2008). Turkish children use morphosyntax in extending verb meaning. Journal of Child Language, 351, 291–323.
Hamann, C., Rizzi, L. & Frauenfelder, U. (1996). The acquisition of subject and object clitics in French. In H. Clahsen (Ed.), Generative perspectives on language acquisition (pp. 309–334). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Ingham, R. (1993/1994). Input and learnability: direct object omissibility in English. Language Acquisition, 31, 95–120.
Jakubowicz, C., Müller, N., Kang, O. -K., Riemer, B. & Rigaut, C. (1996). On the acquisition of the pronominal system in French and German. In A. Springfellow, D. Cahana-Amitay, E. Hughes & A. Zukowski (Eds.), Proceedings of the 20th Boston University Conference in Language Development (pp. 374–385). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.
Kline, M. & Demuth, K. (2014). Syntactic generalizations with novel intransitive verbs. Journal of Child Language, 41(3), 543–74.
Lambrecht, K. & Lemoine, K. (1996). Vers une grammaire des compléments zéro en français parlé, in J. Chuquet & M. Frid (Eds.), Absence de marques et représentation de l’absence (pp. 279–309). Rennes: Presses universitaires de Rennes.
(2005). Definite null objects in (spoken) French. A construction-grammar account, in M. Fried & H. Boas (Eds.), Proceedings of the First International Construction-Grammar Conference (pp. 13–55). Amsterdam, Philadelphia: Benjamins.
Larjavaara, M., (2000). Présence ou absence de l’objet. Limites du possible en français contemporain. Helsinki: Academia Scientiarum Fennica.
Lee, J. & Naigles, L. R. (2005). Input to verb learning in Mandarin Chinese: A role for syntactic bootstrapping. Developmental Psychology, 411, 529–540.
Matsuo, A., Kita, S., Shinya, Y., Wood, G. C. & Naigles, L. (2012). Japanese two-year-olds use morphosyntax to learn novel verb meanings. Journal of Child Language, 39(3), 637–663.
Merlo, P. & Stevenson, S. (2001). Automatic verb classification based on statistical distributions of argument structure. Computational Linguistics, 271, 373–408.
Naigles, L., Gleitman, H., & Gleitman, L. (1993). Children acquire word meaning components from syntactic evidence. In E. Dromi (Ed.), Language and development (pp. 104–140). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
Naigles, L., & Hoff-Ginsberg, E. (1995). Input to verb learning: Evidence for the plausibility of syntactic bootstrapping. Developmental Psychology, 311, 827–837.
Naigles, L., & Lehrer, A. (2002). Language-general and language-specific influences on children’s acquisition of argument structure: A comparison of French and English. Journal of Child Language, 291, 545–566.
O’Grady, W., Yamashita, Y., & Cho, S. (2008). Object drop in Japanese and Korean. Language Acquisition, 151, 58–68.
Olguin, R., & Tomasello, M. (1993). Twenty-five-month-old children do not have a grammatical category of verb. Cognitive Development, 81, 245–272.
Oshima-Takane, Y., Ariyama, J., Kobayashi, T., Katerelos, M., & Poulin-Dubois, D. (2011). Early verb learning in 20-month-old Japanese-speaking children. Journal of Child Language, 381, 455–484.
Pérez-Leroux, A., Pirvulescu, M., & Roberge, Y. (2008). Null objects in child language: Syntax and the lexicon. Lingua, 1181, 370–398.
Pérez-Leroux, A. T., Pirvulescu, M., Roberge, Y., Tieu, L., & Thomas, D. (2006). Variable input and object drop in child language. In C. Gurski & M. Radisic. Proceedings of the 2006 Canadian Linguistics Association Annual Conference. Retrieved from [URL]
Pirvulescu, M. (2006). Theoretical implications of clitic omission in early French: Spontaneous vs. clicited production. Catalan Journal of Linguistics, 51, 221–236.
Prévost, P. (2009). The acquisition of French: The development of inflectional morphology and syntax in L1 acquisition, bilingualism, and L2 acquisition. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Pye, C. (1994). A cross-linguistic approach to the causative alternation. In Y. Levy (Ed.), Other children, other languages (pp. 243–264). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Rissman, L., Legendre, G. & Landau, B. (2013). Abstract morphosyntax in two- and three-year-old children: Evidence from priming. Language Learning and Development, 91, 278–292.
Roberge, Y. (1990). The syntactic recoverability of null arguments. Montreal: McGill-Queen’s University Press.
Rowland, C., Chang, F., Ambridge, B., Pine, J., & Lieven, E. V. M. (2012). The development of abstract syntax: Evidence from structural priming and the lexical boost. Cognition, 1251, 49–63.
Smith, J. (2011). Everyday talk informs toddlers’ novel verb generalizations. First Language, 31(4), 404–424.
Sportiche, D. (1995). Clitic constructions. In J. Rooryck & L. Zaring (Eds.), Phrase structure and the lexicon (pp. 213–276). Dordrecht: Kluwer.
