Cover not available

Article published In: Lexical plurals and beyond
Edited by Peter Lauwers and Marie Lammert
[Lingvisticæ Investigationes 39:2] 2016
► pp. 309–334

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload PDF
authorization required

The capricious evolution of the indefinite plural article uns and its relationship with lexical plurality in medieval French

 | University of Lille | CNRS UMR STL |
Published online: 30 March 2017
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/li.39.2.06car
The indefinite plural article uns in medieval French conjoins the features of unity and plurality. Because of its grammatical nature, uns is not restricted to lexical plurals, but combines in a productive way to nouns having a regular singular-plural alternation in order to create a complex referent not reducible to the sum of its components. Moreover, uns expresses not only quantitative unity ‘one single N’, but also qualitative unity ‘one same N’ and is not linked to lexical plurality in the latter case. Since its features of unity and plurality are considered as incompatible, plural indefinite articles have been assumed to emerge in an advanced stage of grammaticalization, when the numeral source meaning is bleached out, and to be not viable over time. Both hypotheses were invalidated in the present study.
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
    • 1.1In search of grammatical markers of lexical plurality
    • 1.2Outline
    • 1.3Empirical data
  • 2.The different stages of grammaticalization of the indefinite article and the emergence of the plural form
    • 2.1The grammaticalization process of un and its stage of development in Old French: a new model
    • 2.2The plural indefinite article in the double-path model of the grammaticalization process
  • 3.The conditions of use of the plural indefinite article
    • 3.1Unity versus plurality
    • 3.2A typology of the uses of the plural indefinite article in medieval French
      • 3.2.1Qualitative uses of the indefinite plural article
      • 3.2.2Quantitative uses of the indefinite plural article
      • 3.2.3Statistical data concerning the conditions of use of the indefinite plural article in the 12th and 13th C
        • 3.2.3.1Qualitative versus quantitative use
        • 3.2.3.2The relative weight of the different features conditioning the quantitative use
    • 3.3The plural form of the indefinite article: a grammatical marker of lexical plural?
    • 3.4Fossilization and death of the indefinite article in the 15th C
    • 3.5The capricious evolution of the indefinite plural article
  • 4.Why does the plural form of the indefinite article disappear?
  • 5.Conclusions
  • Acknowledgements
  • Author queries
  • References
References (33)
References
Acquaviva, P. (2008). Lexical plurals. A morphosemantic approach. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Buridant, C. (2000). Grammaire nouvelle de l’ancien français. Paris: SEDES.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. (2015). Unes manieres de … L’indéfini pluriel uns/unes en français médiéval : nouvel aperçu en perspective romane », In R. Bellon (Ed.), Études de linguistique médiévale. Hommage à Ambroise Jean-Marc Queffélec (pp. 61–76). Bern: Lang.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Booij, G. (1994). Against split morphology. Yearbook of Morphology 1993, 27–50.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Carlier, A. (2001). La genèse de l’article un . Langue française, 1301, 65–88. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. (2013). Grammaticalization in progress in old French: Indefinite articles. In D. Arteaga (Ed.), Research on old French: The state of the art (pp. 45–60). Dordrecht: Springer. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Carlier, A., & Combettes B. (2015). Typologie et catégorisation morphosyntaxique: du latin au français moderne. Langue française, 1871,15–58. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Collin, M. (1982). L’article indéfini dans la traduction par Jean d’Antioche du ‘De Inventione’ de Cicéron. Master Thesis., Univ. of Leuven.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Corbett, G. (2000). Number. Cambridge: CUP. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fischer, O. (2000). Grammaticalization: Uni-directional, non-reversable. In O. Fischer, A. Rosenbach, & D. Stein (Eds.), Pathways of change (pp. 149–169). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Foulet, L. (1998). Petite Syntaxe de l'ancien Français (3e éd.). Paris: Champion.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Geisler, H. (1982). Studien zur typologischen Entwicklung: Lateinisch, Altfranzösisch, Neufranzösisch. München: Fink.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Givón, T. (1981). On the development of the numeral ‘one’ as an indefinite marker. Folia Linguistica Historica, 2(1), 35–53. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gréa, Ph. (2013). Deux-trois mots sur les déterminants de petite quantité: pluriel continu et perception sémantique. Journal of French Language Studies, 231, 193–219. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Guillaume, G. (1969). Langage et science du langage. Paris: Nizet.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Haspelmath, M. (1999). Why is grammaticalization irreversible? Linguistics, 371, 1043–1068. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Heine, B. (1997). Indefinite articles. In B. Heine (Ed.), Cognitive foundations of grammar (pp. 66–82). Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Herslund, M. (2003). Le pluriel de l’article indéfini en ancien français. In P. Blumenthal, & J-E. Tyvaert (Eds.), La Cognition dans le temps (pp. 75–84). Tübingen: Niemeyer. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hopper, P. J., & Traugott, E. C. (1993). Grammaticalization. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Laca, B., & Tasmowski, L. (1994). Référentialité du pluriel indéfini dans les langues romanes. Faits de langues, 41, 97–104. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lambrecht, K. (1986). Topic, focus, and the grammar of spoken French. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lauwers, P. (2014). Les pluriels ‘lexicaux’. Typologie quantifiée des déficits de dénombrabilité. Langue française, 1831, 117–132. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lehmann, C. (1982). Thoughts on grammaticalization. München, Newcastle: Lincom.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Marchello-Nizia, C. (1997). La langue française aux XIVe et XVe siècles. Paris: Colin.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pinkster, H. (1988). Sicut unus pater familias: opmerkingen over het gebruik van ille en unus in verband met de ontwikkeling in de Romaanse talen. ([URL])Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Prévost, S. (2003). La grammaticalisation: unidirectionnalité et statut. Le français moderne, 711, 144–166.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. (2015). Recul de la non-expression et de l’inversion du sujet pronominal du 12e au 14e siècle. In A. Carlier, M. Goyens, & B. Lamiroy (Eds.), Le français en diachonie (pp. 431–460). Bern: Lang.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Quine, W.V.O. (1960). Word and object. Cambridge Ms.: MIT Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ramat, P. (1992). Thoughts on degrammaticalization. Linguistics, 301, 549–560. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wierzbicka, A. (1988). Oats and wheat: The fallacy of arbitrariness. In Wierzbicka, A. (Ed.), The semantics of grammar (pp. 499–560). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Winter-Froemel, E.. (2012). Les changements sémantiques et les ambiguïtés au niveau du discours: l’exemple du fr. on, Actes du CMLF 20121, pp. 247–259.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Woledge, B.. (1956). The plural of the indefinite article in Old French. Modern Language Review 511, 17–32. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (2)

Cited by two other publications

Alexiadou, Artemis
2024. Double plural marking and the building blocks of nominals. Glossa: a journal of general linguistics 9:1 DOI logo
Acquaviva, Paolo & Laure Gardelle
2023. Pluralia tantumandsingularia tantum. In The Wiley Blackwell Companion to Morphology, ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 25 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue