Cover not available

Article published In: Lexical plurals and beyond
Edited by Peter Lauwers and Marie Lammert
[Lingvisticæ Investigationes 39:2] 2016
► pp. 217–233

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload PDF
authorization required

Structures for plurals

 | University College Dublin |
Published online: 30 March 2017
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/li.39.2.01acq
This paper presents a hypothesis about the innermost structure of noun phrases, which aims at explaining the interaction of number and countability in nouns. This is based on a constructionist approach which views nouns as substructures of the noun phrase, and word formation and inflection as the morphological spellout of structures assembled and interpreted at an abstract syntactic level. It argues that nouns fundamentally identify entity types, and the rest of the DP specifies their denotation in part-structural and quantificational terms. This provides the framework for a new unified analysis of nouns like furniture, waters, and contents, where number and countability interact in a non-canonical way, which accounts for their morphology and their semantics.
Article outline
  • Introduction
  • 1.Nouns as pieces of DP
  • 2.Nouns as entity-defining expressions
  • 3.The division of reference
    • 3.1Part structure
    • 3.2Countability
  • 4.Number
  • 5.Three non-canonical patterns
    • 5.1Fake mass nouns
    • 5.2Mass plurals
    • 5.3 Contents-like plurals
  • Conclusion
  • Notes
  • References
References (28)
References
Acquaviva, P. (2006). Plural mass nouns and the compositionality of number. Verbum, 26, 4, 387–401.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. (2008). Lexical Plurals. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. (2014). The root of nominality, the nominality of roots. In A. Alexiadou, H. Borer, & F. Schäfer (Eds.), The Syntax of Roots and the Roots of Syntax (pp. 33–56). Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Alexiadou, A. (2015). Deriving fake mass nouns. In T. Bui & D. Ozyildiz (Eds.), Proceedings of the 45th Annual Meeting of the North Eastern Linguistics Society,Vol. 11 (pp. 11–24).GLSA, University of Massachusetts, Amherst.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Borer, H. (2005). In Name Only. Oxford: Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. (2013). Taking Form. Oxford: Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Borik, O. & M. T. Espinal. (2014). Reference to kinds and to other generic expressions: definiteness and number. The Linguistic Review, 321, 167–225.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Butler, L. (2012). Non-Number plurals. Ms., Rutgers University. Available at [URL]
Chierchia, G. (2010). Mass nouns, vagueness and semantic variation. Synthese, 1741, 99–149. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Corbett, G. (2000). Number. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
De Belder, M. (2011). Roots and affixes: eliminating lexical categories from syntax. Utrecht: LOT.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Deal, A. (2013). Apportionment and the mass-count distinction in Nez Perce. Ms., University of California at Santa Cruz. Available at [URL]
Ghaniabadi, S. (2012). Plural marking beyond count nouns. In D. Massam (Ed.), Count and Mass Across languages (pp. 112–128). Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Harbour, D. (2014). Paucity, abundance, and the theory of number. Language, 901, 185–229. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Harley, H. (2014). On the identity of roots. Theoretical Linguistics, 401, 225–276. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Massam, D. (Ed.). (2012). Count and Mass across Languages. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mathieu, E. (2012). On the mass/count distinction in Ojibwe. In D. Massam (Ed.), Count and Mass Across Languages (pp. 172–198). Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Moltmann, F. (2009). Degree structure as trope structure: a trope-based analysis of positive and comparative adjectives. Linguistics and Philosophy, 321, 51–94. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mueller-Reichau, O. (2006). Sorting the world: on the relevance of the kind-level /object-level distinction to referential semantics. PhD diss., Universität Leipzig.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Panagiotidis, P. (2014). Categorial Features : A Generative Theory of Word Class Categories. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ouwayda, S. (2014). Where number lies. PhD Diss., University of Southern California.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rijkhoff, J. (2002). The Noun Phrase. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Schwarzschild, R. (2011). Stubborn distributivity, multiparticipant nouns and the count/mass distinction. In K. Mullin, S, Lima & B. Smith (Eds.), Proceedings of the 39th Conference of the Northeast Linguistic Society (pp. 661–678). Amherst: GLSA Publications, University of Massachussetts.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Svenonius, P. (2008). The position of adjectives and other phrasal modifiers in the decomposition of DP. In L. McNally & C. Kennedy (Eds.), Adjectives and Adverbs (pp. 16–42). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tsoulas, G. (2009). On the grammar of number and mass terms in Greek. In C. Halpert, J. Hartman & D. Hill (Eds.), MIT Working Papers in Linguistics. vol. 571, MITWPL, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wierzbicka, A. (1988). The Semantics of Grammar. Amsterdam: John Benjamin. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wiltschko, M. (2014). The Universal Strucure of Categories. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Zhang, N. (2012). Countability and numeral classifiers in Mandarin Chinese. In D. Massam (Ed.), Count and Mass Across Languages (pp. 220–237). Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (7)

Cited by seven other publications

Börstell, Carl & Ryan Lepic
2025. Non-signers favor two-handed gestures when expressing inherently plural meanings. Linguistics Vanguard DOI logo
NAGANO, AKIKO
2023. Affixal rivalry and its purely semantic resolution among English derived adjectives. Journal of Linguistics 59:3 ► pp. 499 ff. DOI logo
Fisher, Rose, David Natvig, Erin Pretorius, Michael T. Putnam & Katharina S. Schuhmann
2022. Why Is Inflectional Morphology Difficult to Borrow?—Distributing and Lexicalizing Plural Allomorphy in Pennsylvania Dutch. Languages 7:2 ► pp. 86 ff. DOI logo
Sadler, Louisa
2020. Abdelkader Fassi Fehri, Constructing feminine to mean: Gender, number, numeral, and quantifier extensions in Arabic. Folia Linguistica 54:1 ► pp. 261 ff. DOI logo
Corbett, Greville G.
2019. Pluralia tantum nouns and the theory of features: a typology of nouns with non-canonical number properties. Morphology 29:1 ► pp. 51 ff. DOI logo
Östling, Robert, Carl Börstell & Servane Courtaux
2018. Visual Iconicity Across Sign Languages: Large-Scale Automated Video Analysis of Iconic Articulators and Locations. Frontiers in Psychology 9 DOI logo
[no author supplied]
2021. A Theory of Distributed Number [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today, 269], DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 25 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue