Cover not available

Article published In: Lingvisticæ Investigationes
Vol. 38:1 (2015) ► pp.133–182

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload PDF
authorization required

Sémantique des énoncés itératifs

Une approche formelle

 | GREYC, Université de Caen Normandie et CNRS

Article language: French

Published online: 18 September 2015
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/li.38.1.05enj
This article is about the semantics of iterative statements, expressing repetition in time of a type-eventuality. With these statements are associated frequency properties, quantified by iterative adverbs (often, sometimes, sporadically, n times out of p…). Our purpose is to design a formal representation, with a method allowing to compute it from the text. The interpretation of an iterative statement closely relies on its information structure so that we first study precisely the topic-focus partition for a significant range of configurations. In the formal model, the occurrences of iterative eventualities or circumstants are represented by sequences of intervals. The temporal semantic of a sentence is then formalised as an instanciation of generic formulas using two types of generalised quantifiers.
References (46)
Abeillé, A., Doetjes, J., Molendijk, A., & de Swart, H. (2004). Adverbs and quantification. In F. Corblin & H. de Swart (Eds.), Handbook of French semantics (pp. 185–210). Stanford, CA: CSLI.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Allen, J.F. (1983). Maintaining knowledge about temporal intervals. Communications of the ACM, 26(11), 832–843. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Becher, G. (1996). First order modal temporal logic with generalized intervals. In Proceedings 3rd International workshop on temporal representation and reasoning (TIME’96) (pp. 29–36). Los Alamitos, CA: IEEE Computer Society.
Becher, G., Clérin-Debart, F., & Enjalbert, P. (2000). A qualitative model for time granularity. Computational Intelligence, 16(2), 137–168. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bilhaut, F. (2006). Analyse automatique de structures discursives. Application à la recherche d’information. Thèse de doctorat de l’Université de Caen-Basse Normandie.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Borillo, A., Bras, M., Le Draoulec, A., Vieu, L., Molendijk, A., de Swart, H., Verkuyl, K., Co Vet & Vetters, C. (2004). Tense, connectives and discourse structure. In F. Corblin & H. de Swart (Eds.), Handbook of French semantics (pp. 309–348). Stanford, CA: CSLI.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bouchon-Meunier, B. (1999). La logique Floue. Coll. Que Sais-je, N° 2702, Paris, F: Presses Universitaires de France.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Carlson, G.N., & Spejewski, B. (1997). Generic passages. Natural Language Semantics, 5(2), 101–165. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Carlson, G.N. (2005). Generics, habituals, and iteratives. In K. Brown (Ed.), The encyclopedia of language and linguistics, 2nd ed. Oxford, UK: Elsevier.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Chafe, W.L. (1976). Givenness, constrastiveness, definiteness, subjects, topics and point of view. In C. Li (Ed.), Subject and topic (pp. 25–55). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cukierman, D., & Delgrande, J. (1996). Characterising temporal repetition. In Proceedings 3rd International Workshop on Temporal Representation and Reasoning (TIME-96) (pp. 80–87). Los Alamitos, CA: IEEE Computer Society. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dik, S.C. (1989). The theory of Functionnal Grammar I. Dordrecht, NL: Foris.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
von Fintel, K. (2004). A minimal theory of adverbial quantification. In B. Partee & H. Kamp (Eds.), Context dependance in the analysis of linguistic meaning, Current research in the semantics/pragmatics interface, 11 (pp. 137–175). Amsterdam, NL: Elsevier.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Van Geenhoven, V. (2005). Atelicity, pluriactionality and adverbial quantification. In H. Verkuyl, H. de Swart, & A. van Hout (Eds.), Perspectives on aspect (pp. 107–124). Dordrecht, NL: Kluwer. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Genette, G. (1972). Figures III. Paris, F: Seuil.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gosselin, L. (1996). Sémantique de la temporalité en français. Louvain-la-Neuve, B: Duculot.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gosselin, L., Mathet, Y., Enjalbert, P., & Becher, G. (2013). Aspects de l’itération. L’expression de la répétition en français : analyse linguistique et formalisation. Bern, CH: Peter Lang.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kamp, H., & Reyle, U. (1993). From discourse to logic. Dordrecht, NL: Kluwer Academic Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Keenan, E. (1996). The semantics of determiners. In S. Lappin (Ed.), The handbook of contemporary semantic theory (pp. 41–63). Oxford, UK: Blackwell.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kleiber, G. (1987). Du côté de la référence verbale. Les phrases habituelles. Bern, CH: Peter Lang.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Krifka, M., Pelletier, F.J., Carlson, G.N., ter Meulen, A., Chierchia, G., & Link, G. (1995). Genericity: An introduction. In G.N. Carlson & F.J. Pelletier (Eds.), The generic book (pp. 1–124). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Krifka, M. (1995). Focus and the interprétation of generic sentences. In G.N. Carlson & F.J. Pelletier (Eds.), The generic book (pp. 238–264). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. (2007). Basic notions of information structure. In C. Fery & M. Krifka (Eds.), Interdisciplinary studies of information structure, 6 (pp. 13–55). Potsdam, D: Universitätsverlag.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kröger, F., et Merz, S. (2008). Temporal logic and state systems. Berlin, Heidelberg, D: Springer.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Laca, B. (2006). Pluriactionnalité. In D. Godard, L. Roussarie, & F. Corblin (Eds.), Sémanticlopédie: dictionnaire de sémantique, GDR Sémantique & Modélisation, CNRS. [URL].Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ladkin, P. (1996). Time representation: A taxonomy of interval representation. In Proceedings 4th AAAI Conference On Artificial Intelligence (AAAI-86) (pp. 360–366). San Francisco, CA: Morgan-Kaufman.
Lambrecht, K. (1994). Information structure and sentence form: Topic, focus, and the mental representations of discourse referents. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lebranchu, J. (2011). Etude des phénomènes itératifs en langue: Inscription discursive et calcul aspectuo-temporel. Vers un traitement automatisé. Thèse de doctorat de l’Université de Caen-Basse Normandie.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Le Goffic, P. (1994). Grammaire de la phrase française. Paris, F: Hachette.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ligozat, G. (1991). On generalized interval Calculi. In Proceedings 9th AAAI Conference on artificial intelligence (AAAI-91) (pp. 234–240). Cambridge MA: AAAI Press/MIT Press.
Molendijk, A., & de Swart, H. (1998). Frequency and tense use in French. Belgian journal of linguistics, 121, 43–60. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Nølke, H. (2001). Le regard du locuteur 2: Pour une linguistique des traces énonciative. Paris, F: Kimé.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Nute, D. (2003). Defeasible logic. Lecture notes in computer science, vol. 25431. Amsterdam, NL: Springer. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ogihara, T. (1995). Non-factual before and adverbs of quantification. In M. Simon & T. Galloway (Eds.), Proceedings of semantics and linguistic theory V (pp. 273–291). Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Payne, T.E. (1997). Describing morphosyntax: A guide for field linguists. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Polanyi, L., van den Berg, M., & Ahn, D. (2003). Discourse structure and sentential information structure. An initial proposal. Journal of Logic, Language and Information, 12(3), 337–350. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rimell, L. (2005). Habitual sentences and generic quantification. In V. Chand, A. Kelleher, A.J. Rodríguez, & B. Schmeiser (Eds.), Proceedings 23rd West Coast conference on formal linguistics (pp. 663–676). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rooth, M. (1985). Association with focus. PhD Dissertation, University of Massachusetts, Amherst.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. (1995). Indefinite, adverbs of quantification, and focus semantics. In G.N. Carlson & F.J. Pelletier (Eds.), The generic book (pp. 265–291). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. (1999). Association with focus or association with presupposition? In P. Bosch & R. van der Sandt (Eds.), Focus: Linguistic, cognitive, and computational perspectives (pp. 232–246). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rothstein, S. (1995). Adverbial quantification over events. Natural Language Semantics, 3(1), 1–31. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Shoham, Y. (1988). Reasoning about change: Time and causation from the standpoint of artificial intelligence. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
de Swart, H. (1996). Quantification over time. In J. van der Does & J. van Eijck (Eds.), Quantifiers, logic, and language (pp. 311–336). Stanford, CA: CSLI Lecture Notes.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Thayse, A. (1988). Approche Logique de l’Intelligence Artificielle. Paris, F: Dunod.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Vogeleer, S. 2006. La quantification adverbiale et l’indéfini objet des phrases génériques. Linx 551, 153–172. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. (2007). La lecture habituelle: quantification, atélicité et nombre. Verbum, XXIX(3-4), 259–272.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (1)

Cited by one other publication

Gosselin, Laurent
2015. Séries itératives, phases et agglomérats de procès. Syntaxe & Sémantique N° 16:1 ► pp. 67 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 25 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue