Cover not available

Article published In: Morphology and its interfaces: Syntax, semantics and the lexicon
Edited by Dany Amiot, Delphine Tribout, Natalia Grabar, Cédric Patin and Fayssal Tayalati
[Lingvisticæ Investigationes 37:2] 2014
► pp. 256–274

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload PDF
authorization required

Bleaching, productivity and debonding of prefixoids

A corpus-based analysis of ‘giant’ in German and Swedish

 | Humboldt Universität zu Berlin
 | F.R.S.-FNRS & Université catholique de Louvain
Published online: 22 May 2015
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/li.37.2.05nor
In this paper, we present a contrastive survey of a morpheme originally meaning ‘giant’ in German and Swedish. In both languages, this morpheme has developed into a prefixoid with simile or intensifying meaning. More recently, these prefixoids have been shown to occur as free morphemes as well, and it is the purpose of this paper to explore whether a quantitative analysis of synchronic corpus data can be used to determine whether the free forms are spelling variants, or whether they are truly new constructions that are the result of debonding. Drawing data from the COW corpus of contemporary web text, we compare bound and free forms on the levels of R1 collocations, semantic bleaching, and productivity. Our analysis suggests that the German prefixoid has undergone debonding, whereas the Swedish free forms are mere spelling variants.
References (25)
Baayen, H. (2009). Corpus linguistics in morphology: Morphological productivity. In A. Luedeling, & M. Kyto (Eds.), Corpus linguistics. An international handbook (pp. 900–919). Berlin: De Gruyter.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Booij, G. (2009). Compounding and construction morphology. In R. Lieber, & P. Štekauer (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of compounding (pp. 201–216). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. (2010). Construction morphology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Booij, G., & Hüning, M. (2014). Affixoids and constructional idioms. In R. Boogaart, T. Colleman, & G. Rutten (Eds.), Extending the scope of construction-based grammar (pp. 77–105). Berlin: De Gruyter.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Haspelmath, M. (1999). Why is grammaticalization irreversible? Linguistics, 37(6), 1043–1068. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Heine, B. (2002). On the role of context in grammaticalization. In I. Wischer, & G. Diewald (Eds.), New reflections on grammaticalization (pp. 83–101). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hoeksema, J. (2012). Elative compounds in Dutch: Properties and developments, In G. Oebel (Ed.), Intensivierungskonzepte bei Adjektiven und Adverben im Sprachvergleich (pp. 97–142). Hamburg: Verlag Dr. Kovac.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hopper, P. J. (1991). On some principles of grammaticization. In E. C. Traugott, & B. Heine (Eds.), Approaches to grammaticalization, vol. I1 (pp. 17–35). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Klara, L. (2012). Steinreich ist saucool: Adjektivische Steigerungsbildungen des Gegenwartdeutschen. In G. Oebel (Ed.), Intensivierungskonzepte bei Adjektiven und Adverben im Sprachvergleich (pp. 143–170). Hamburg: Verlag Dr. Kovac.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Leuschner, T. (2010). Ausnahmepianist Fettgeschreckt-inbleich! Deutsche, Nierländische und Schwedische präfixoide im Spannungsfeld von Genealogie, Kreativität und Norm. In A. Dammel, S. Kürschner, & D. Nübling (Eds.), Kontrastive Germanistische Linguistik (Germanistische Linguistik, 206–209) (pp. 863–892). Hildesheim: Georg Olms Verlag.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Norde, M. (2009). Degrammaticalization. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Norde, M., Beijering, K., & Lenz, A. (2013). Current trends in grammaticalization research. Language Sciences, 361, 1–6. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Norde, M., & Van Goethem, K. (2015). Emancipatie van affixen en affixoïden: degrammaticalisatie of lexicalisatie? To appear in Nederlandse Taalkunde.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Oebel, Guido. (2012). Elation im Schwedischen. In G. Oebel (Ed.), Intensivierungskonzepte bei Adjektiven und Adverben im Sprachvergleich (pp. 183–248). Hamburg: Verlag Dr. Kovac.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sachs, Emmy. (2012). On “steinalt”, “stock-still” and similar formations. In G. Oebel (Ed.), Intensivierungskonzepte bei Adjektiven und Adverben im Sprachvergleich (pp. 59–79). Hamburg: Verlag Dr. Kovac.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Schäfer, R., & Bildhauer, F. (2012). Building large corpora from the web using a new efficient tool chain. In N. Calzolari, K. Choukri, T. Declerck et al. (Eds.), Proceedings of the Eight International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC 2010) (pp. 486–493). Valletta, Malta: European language resources distribution agency.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. (2013). Web corpus construction (synthesis lectures on human language technologies). San Francisco: Morgan & Claypool.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Schlücker, B. (2013). Non-classifying compounds in German. Folia Linguistica 47(2), 449–480. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
SRB (2005) = Språkriktighetsboken. Utarbetad av Svenska Språknämnden. Stockholm: Norstedts.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Taylor, J. R. (2002). Cognitive Grammar. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Van Goethem, K. (2008). Oud-leerling versus ancien élève. A comparative study of adjectives grammaticalizing into prefixes in Dutch and French. Morphology, 181, 27–49. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. (2014). Reuze bedankt, het was echt top! Een vergelijkend onderzoek naar loskoppeling van samenstellingscomponenten. Internationale Neerlandistiek, 52(1), 27–46. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Van Goethem, K., & Hiligsmann, Ph. (2014). When two paths converge: Debonding and clipping of Dutch reuze ‘lit. giant; great’. Journal of Germanic Linguistics, 26(1), 31–64. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (14)

Cited by 14 other publications

Lightfoot, Douglas
2025. Germanic affixoids in Jacob Grimm. Historiographia Linguistica DOI logo
Rosenberg, Maria & Linda Sandström
2025. Exploring Ways to Intensify Verbs in Swedish. European Journal of Scandinavian Studies 55:1 ► pp. 208 ff. DOI logo
Hoeksema, Jack
2023. Elative Compounds. In The Wiley Blackwell Companion to Morphology, ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Van Goethem, Kristel & Isa Hendrikx
2021. Intensifying constructions in second language acquisition. In Constructions in Contact 2 [Constructional Approaches to Language, 30], ► pp. 375 ff. DOI logo
Van Goethem, Kristel & Muriel Norde
2020. Extravagant “fake” morphemes in Dutch. Morphological productivity, semantic profiles and categorical flexibility. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory 16:3 ► pp. 425 ff. DOI logo
Hartmann, Stefan
2019. Compound worlds and metaphor landscapes: Affixoids, allostructions, and higher-order generalizations. Word Structure 12:3 ► pp. 297 ff. DOI logo
Hendrikx, Isa, Kristel Van Goethem & Stefanie Wulff
2019. Intensifying constructions in French-speaking L2 learners of English and Dutch. International Journal of Learner Corpus Research 5:1 ► pp. 63 ff. DOI logo
Battefeld, Malte, Torsten Leuschner & Gudrun Rawoens
2018. Evaluative morphology in German, Dutch and Swedish. In Category change from a constructional perspective [Constructional Approaches to Language, 20], ► pp. 229 ff. DOI logo
Norde, Muriel & Caroline Morris
2018. Derivation without category change. In Category change from a constructional perspective [Constructional Approaches to Language, 20], ► pp. 47 ff. DOI logo
Norde, Muriel & Kristel Van Goethem
2018. Debonding and Clipping of Prefixoids in Germanic: Constructionalization or Constructional Change?. In The Construction of Words [Studies in Morphology, 4], ► pp. 475 ff. DOI logo
Sicherl, Eva
2018. A comparison of diminutive expressions in English and Slovene as exemplified by Roald Dahl’s Matilda . Languages in Contrast 18:2 ► pp. 283 ff. DOI logo
Van Goethem, Kristel & Nikos Koutsoukos
2018. “Morphological transposition” as the onset of recategorization: The case of luxe in Dutch. Linguistics 56:6 ► pp. 1369 ff. DOI logo
Van Goethem, Kristel, Muriel Norde, Evie Coussé & Gudrun Vanderbauwhede
2018. Category change from a constructional perspective. In Category change from a constructional perspective [Constructional Approaches to Language, 20], ► pp. 3 ff. DOI logo
Heine, Bernd, Heiko Narrog & Haiping Long
2016. Constructional change vs. grammaticalization. Studies in Language 40:1 ► pp. 137 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 25 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue