Article published In: French Syntax in Contrast
Edited by Karen Lahousse, Béatrice Lamiroy and Kristel Van Goethem
[Lingvisticæ Investigationes 33:2] 2010
► pp. 239–252
Inalienable possession in French and in Bulgarian
Published online: 3 December 2010
https://doi.org/10.1075/li.33.2.07mos
https://doi.org/10.1075/li.33.2.07mos
In this paper I try to find the ways of expression of Inalienable possession (IA) in Bulgarian, in comparison with French. I discuss the morphology and the interpretation of the determiners of these two languages, likely to function as A-bound morphemes according to Guéron’s (1985, 2005) binding hypothesis concerning the IA construal, based on the presence of phi-features on the determiners. I use an additional condition for a determiner to be A-bound (which comes from Vergnaud & Zubizarreta 1992), namely the possibility for a determiner to have expletive uses. I claim that only the French definite article and the Bulgarian null determiner are subject to binding, the Bulgarian definite article being excluded due to its strong referential power.
Cited by (1)
Cited by one other publication
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 25 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
