Review published In: Lingvisticæ Investigationes
Vol. 25:1 (2002) ► pp.171–179
Book review
. Wh-scope marking. Amsterdam/ Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Co., 2000. . [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today, 37].
Reviewed by
Published online: 20 August 2003
https://doi.org/10.1075/li.25.1.11gut
https://doi.org/10.1075/li.25.1.11gut
References (11)
. 2000. Minimalist inquiries: The framework. In R. Martin, D. Michaels, and J. Uriagereka (eds.), Step by step. Essays on minimalist syntax in honor of Howard Lasnik, 89–156, Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
Dayal, Veneeta. 1994. Scope marking as indirect wh-dependency. Natural Language Semantics 21: 137–170.
Fanselow, Gisbert and Anoop Mahajan. 1996. Partial movement and successive ciclycity. In U. Lutz, and G. Müller (eds.), Papers on wh-scope marking, 131–161, Stuttgart and Tübingen: Arbeitspapiere des Sonderforschungsbereichs, 340–76.
Horvath, Julia. 1995. Partial wh-movement and wh-scope markers. In I. Kenesei (ed.), Levels and structures, 69–124, Szeged: JATE.
. 1997. The status of wh-expletives and the partial wh-movement construction in Hungarian. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 151: 509–572.
Lutz, Uli and Gereon Müller (eds.). 1996. Papers on wh-scope marking. Stuttgart and Tübingen: Arbeitspapiere des Sonderforschungsbereichs 340–76.
McDaniel, Dana. 1989. Partial andmultiple wh-movement. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 71: 565–604.
