Article published In: Lingvisticæ Investigationes
Vol. 11:2 (1987) ► pp.337–356
Limites Et Possibilites De La Reconstruction Syntaxique
Published online: 1 January 1987
https://doi.org/10.1075/li.11.2.05dar
https://doi.org/10.1075/li.11.2.05dar
In the nineteenth century, reconstruction of syntactic relations was neglected by genetic comparative grammar, because the neo-grammarians concentrated on sound change mainly. Nowadays scholars are trying to fill the gap; but, since they encounter many theoretical problems, which some of them even believe not to be solvable, reconstruction of syntactic relations has still a long way to go. The purpose of this paper is to sort problems out, to analyse the obstacles that arise especially when reconstructing syntactic relations and to show, on the basis of Romance evidence, how these obstacles could be overcome.
The fact that a reconstructed proto-language is "langue" only, never "parole," and the fact that syntactic relational features do not evolve in a regular way are the main obstacles. The means to overcome them are firstly the reconstruction of structures rather than of isolated elements, and the reconstruction of their evolution in time and space within the proto-language (provided the external history of the language family is known) and secondly, perhaps to a lesser degree, language universais and diachronic tendencies (in the absence of diachronic regularities).
Cited by (2)
Cited by two other publications
Wright, Roger
1993. Review of Bauer (1992): Du latin au français: le passage d’une langue SOV à une langue SVO. Studies in Language 17:2 ► pp. 469 ff.
Wright, Roger
1997. Review of de Dardel (1996): A la recherche du protoroman. Studies in Language 21:2 ► pp. 461 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 25 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
