Cover not available

Article published In: Similatives: Semantic sources, pathways, and types of usage
Edited by Anna Kisiel, Hélène Vassiliadou, Valentina Benigni, Beatrice Bernasconi, Lieselotte Brems and Dejan Stosic
[Lingvisticæ Investigationes 48:2] 2025
► pp. 323–347

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
EPUB logo with download linkDownload EPUB
authorization required

“Stylish” similatives

A corpus-based study of style nouns in Italian and Russian

 | Roma Tre University
 | University of Turin
Published online: 19 February 2026
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/li.00133.ben
Abstract
In this contribution, we investigate two specific constructions with the lexical item ‘style’ that have developed similative uses. By looking at Russian v stile ‘in the style of’ and Italian (in) stile ‘(in) style’, we claim that the similarity mechanism that underlies these style-noun constructions does not depend on taxonomic relationships (as for type nouns) but rather relies on the context and knowledge shared by the interlocutors. In these constructions, the right-hand slot evokes a reference frame in which the left-hand element is inserted through similarity. Relying on corpus data, we analyze and compare the two constructions in terms of the mechanisms exploited to express similarity, the kind of similarity encoded, the grammaticalization pathway undergone by each construction, and the variety of functions they can perform. In addition, a comparative, contrastive analysis between the two languages allows to identify other functionally equivalent constructions that demonstrate the existence of a category of style-noun constructions.
Article outline
  • Introduction
  • 1.style-based similarity markers in the literature
  • 2.Methodology
  • 3.Two corpus-based studies on style-noun constructions
    • 3.1Russian v stile
    • 3.2Italian [X (Prep) stile Y]
    • 3.3Ru. v stile and It. stile: Some comparative and contrastive considerations
  • Concluding remarks
  • Acknowledgements
  • Notes
  • References
References (30)
References
Benigni, V. (2014). Strategie di approssimazione lessicale in russo e in italiano. In O. Inkova, M. di Filippo & F. Esvan (Eds), L’archittetura del testo. Studi contrastivi slavo-romanzi, 203–224. Alessandria: Edizione dell’Orso.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2023). The complementizer function of type-nouns in ad hoc concept construction: Evidence from Italian and Russian. In W. Mihatsch et al. (Eds) (2023), 619–654. Berlin, Boston: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Channell, J. (1994). Vague language: A major descriptive study of linguistic vagueness in English. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fillmore, C. J. (1982). Frame Semantics. In The Linguistic Society of Korea (Ed.), Linguistics in the morning calm, 111–137. Seoul: Hanshin Publishing Company.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fortescue, M. (2010). Similitude: A conceptual category. Acta Linguistica Hafniensia, 42(2), 117–142.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gavrilenko, V. V. (2015). Semantiko-sintagmatičeskaja specifika sravnitel’no-opredelitel’nyx predložnyx novoobrazovanij v forme, v vide, v oblike, v stile, v manere. Filologičeskie nauki. Voprosy teorii i praktiki, 10 (52), 58–61.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2020). Predložnye novoobrazovanija sravnitelʹnoj semantiki, postroennye po modeli « v + N6 »: uslovija grammatikalizacii [Dissertation for the degree of Candidate of Philological Sciences]. Vladivostok.
Goldstone, R. L. (1994). The role of similarity in categorization: providing a groundwork. Cognition, 52(2), 125–157.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hahn, U. & M. Ramscar (Eds). (2001). Similarity and categorization. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Haspelmath, M. & Buchholz, O. (1998). Equative and similative constructions in the languages of Europe. In J. van der Auwera (Ed.), Adverbial Constructions in the Languages of Europe, 277–334. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kisiel, A. (2023). Polish w stylu and the rise of hedges. In W. Mihatsch et al. (Eds) (2023), 545–569. Berlin, Boston: Mouton de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kisiel, A. & Kolyaseva, A. (2025). Similarity strategies in Russian and Polish: structures with prepositions. Zeitschrift für Slawistik, 70(1), 1–39. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kolyaseva, A. (2022). The divergent paths of pragmaticalization: The case of the Russian particles tipa and vrode. Journal of Pragmatics, 2011, 181–196. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kolyaseva, A. & Davidse, K. (2018). A typology of lexical and grammaticalized uses of Russian tip, tipa, po tipu. Russian Linguistics, 42(2), 191–220. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
König, E. (2017). The deictic identification of similarity. In Y. Treis & M. Vanhove (Eds), Similative and Equative Constructions, 143–164. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Krzeszowski, T P. (1990). Contrasting languages: The scope of contrastive linguistics. Berlin, New York: Mouton de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lakoff, G. (1973). Hedges: a study in meaning criteria and the logic of fuzzy concepts. Journal of Philosophical Logic, 41, 458–508. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Levshina, N. (2017). Online film subtitles as a corpus: an n gram approach. Corpora, 12(3), 311–338.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lison, P. & Tiedemann, J. (2016). OpenSubtitles2016: Extracting large parallel corpora from movie and TV subtitles. In N. Calzolari et al. (Eds), Proceedings of the Tenth International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC 2016), 923–929. European Language Resources Association.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Masini, F. & Mauri, C. (2020). Questione di stile. L’espressione analitica della maniera indessicale. Testi e linguaggi, 141, 259–271.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mihatsch, W., I. Hennecke, Kisiel, A., Kolyaseva, A., Davidse, K. & Brems, L. (Eds) (2023). Type Noun Constructions in Slavic, Germanic and Romance Languages. Berlin, Boston: Mouton de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ožegov, S. I. & Švedova, N. Ju. (1992). Tolkovyj slovarʹ russkogo jazyka. Moskva: Az’’.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sakhno, S. (2017). Polyfonctionnalité et transcategorialité des morphèmes russes vrode, tipa: fonctionnement et aspects typologiques. In T. Ponchon, H. Bat-Zeev Shyldkrot & A. Bertin (Eds), Mots de liaison et d’intégration : Prépositions, conjonctions et connecteurs, 197–214. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sergeeva, E. N. (2010). Tipa kak evidencialnyj marker v russkoj razgovornoj reči. In N. N. Kazanskij (Ed.), Acta Linguistica Petropolitana. Trudy Instituta Lingvističeskix Issledovanij, VI(3), 149–153. Sankt-Peterburg: Nauka.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sovran, T. (1992). Between similarity and sameness. Journal of Pragmatics, 18(4), 329–344.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Treis, Y. & Vanhove, M. (Eds). (2017). Similative and Equative Constructions: A cross-linguistic perspective. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Trišin, V. N. (2013). Slovar’ sinonimov: èlektronnyj slovar’ spravočnik sinonimov russkogo jazyka sistemy ASIS. Retrieved from [URL]
Voghera, M. (2014). Da nome tassonomico a segnale discorsivo: una mappa delle costruzioni di tipo in italiano contemporaneo. Studi di grammatica italiana, 231, 197–221.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wälchli, B. (2005). Co-compounds and natural coordination. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wilson, D., & Carston, R. (2007). A unitary approach to lexical pragmatics: Relevance, inference and ad hoc concepts. In N. Burton-Roberts (Ed.), Pragmatics, 230–259. London: Palgrave. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue