Cover not available

Article published In: Lingvisticæ Investigationes
Vol. 47:1 (2024) ► pp.97–120

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload PDF
EPUB logo with download linkDownload EPUB
authorization required

Contrastive study of verbal structures in medical and general corpora in French

 | Univ. Lille, CNRS, UMR 8163 — STL — Savoirs Textes LangageLille
 | Univ. Lille, CNRS, UMR 8163 — STL — Savoirs Textes LangageLille
Published online: 31 October 2024
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/li.00105.ivc
Summary
This study examines the syntactic features of French medical and general texts to clarify their complexity and implications for comprehension. By analysing corpora from both domains, we found significant differences in the use of passive voice, present participles, negation and gerund constructions. In medical texts, the passive voice and present participles are more frequent, reflecting specialized discourse and precision. In contrast, negation and gerunds are more common in general texts, emphasizing the diversity of syntactic structures, and specific stylistic and argumentative effects. Our findings underline the need for clear communication in medical texts and provide empirical evidence for the simplification.
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Related work
    • 2.1Readability of texts
    • 2.2Simplification of texts
  • 3.Objectives
  • 4.Description of the data analyzed
    • 4.1Corpora
      • 4.1.1General-Language corpus
      • 4.1.2Medical-Language corpus
    • 4.2Syntactic structures
      • 4.2.1Passive voice
      • 4.2.2Present participle
      • 4.2.3Gerund
      • 4.2.4Syntactic negation
  • 5.Approach for the contrastive analysis of corpora
    • 5.1Identification of sentences with the four syntactic structures
      • 5.1.1Passive voice
      • 5.1.2Gerund
      • 5.1.3Present participle
      • 5.1.4Syntactic negation
    • 5.2Analysis and evaluation
  • 6.Results on extraction of syntactic structures and their comparison
    • 6.1Preprocessing
    • 6.2Passive voice
    • 6.3Gerund
    • 6.4Present participle
    • 6.5Syntactic negation
    • 6.6Comparison between syntactic structures
  • 7.Conclusion and future work
  • Notes
  • References
References (38)
References
Abdaoui, A., Tchechmedjiev, A., Digan, W., Bringay, S. & Jonquet, C. (2017). French ConText: Détecter la négation, la temporalité et le sujet dans les textes cliniques français. In SIIM 2017 — 4ème Symposium sur l’Ingénierie de l’Information Médicale, Toulouse, France.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ahlfeldt, H., Borin, L., Daumke, P., Grabar, N., Hallett, C., Hardcastle, D., Kokkinakis, D., Mancini, C., Marko, K., Merkel, M., Pietsch, C., Power, R., Scott, D., Silvervarg, A., Gronostaj, M. T., Williams, S. & Willis, A. (2006). Literature Review on Patient-Friendly Documentation Systems. Rapport interne, NoE Semantic Mining. WP 27, Del. 1.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Arnavielle, T. (2010). Centre and periphery in conjugation. the case of the french gerund. Echo des etudes romanes, 6(1), 129–142. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Audiau, A. (2009). L’information pour tous. Règles européennes pour une information facile à lire et à comprendre. Rapport interne, Nous aussi, UNAPEI.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Baker, L. & Gollop, C. (2004). Medical textbooks: Can lay people read and understand them? Library trends, 531, 336–347.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Biber, D. (1988). Variation across Speech and Writing. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Binnick, R. I. (2012). The Oxford Handbook of Tense and Aspect. Oxford University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Brouwers, L., Bernhard, D., Ligozat, A.-L. & François, T. (2014). Syntactic sentence simplification for French. In PITR workshop, 47–56. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Brunato, D., Dell’Orletta, F., Venturi, G. & Montemagni, S. (2014). Defining an annotation scheme with a view to automatic text simplification. In CLICIT, 87–92.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Canut, E. & Husianycia, M. (2023). Référentiel pour l’analyse linguistique de textes et la rédaction intelligible de types d’ecrits (Guide ALT&RITE). Rapport interne, AsFoRel.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cartoni, B. & Deléger, L. (2011). Découverte de patrons paraphrastiques en corpus comparable: une approche basée sur les n-grammes. In Traitement Automatique des Langues Naturelles (TALN), 1–6.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dalloux, C., Claveau, V., Grabar, N. & Moro, C. (2018). Portée de la négation : détection par apprentissage supervisé en français et portugais brésilien. In TALN 2018, 1–6.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dalloux, C., Claveau, V., Grabar, N., Oliveira, L., Moro, C., Gumiel, Y. & Carvalho, D. (2020). Supervised learning for the detection of negation and of its scope in French and Brazilian Portuguese biomedical corpora. Natural Language Engineering journal, 27(2), 181–201. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Deléger, L. & Zweigenbaum, P. (2008). Paraphrase acquisition from comparable medical corpora of specialized and lay texts. In Ann Symp Am Med Inform Assoc (AMIA), 146–50.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Duchowski, A. (2007). Eye Tracking Methodology. Theory and practice. London, UK: Springer.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gala, N., François, T., Javourey-Drevet, L. & Ziegler, J. C. (2018). La simplification de textes, une aide à l’apprentissage de la lecture. Langue française, 199(3), 123–131. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Grabar, N. & Cardon, R. (2018). Clear — simple corpus for medical French. In Workshop on Automatic Text Adaption (ATA), 1–11. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Grabar, N., Dalloux, C. & Claveau, V. (2020). CAS: corpus of clinical cases in French. Journal of BioMedical Semantics, 11(1), 1–7. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Honnibal, M., Montani, I., Van Landeghem, S. & Boyd, A. (2020). spaCy: Industrial-strength natural language processing in python. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ibrahim, H. & Idrus, H. (2021). Investigating the syntactic structures of patient information leaflets. SHS Web of Conferences, 1241, 01004. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Javourey-Drevet, L., Dufau, S., François, T., Gala, N., Ginestié, J. & Ziegler, J. C. (2022). Simplification of literary and scientific texts to improve reading fluency and comprehension in beginning readers of French. Applied Psycholinguistics, 431, 485–512. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kauchak, D. & Leroy, G. (2016). Moving beyond readability metrics for health-related text simplification. IT Professional, 18(3), 45–51. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Leroy, G., Kauchak, D. & Coster, W. (2012). A Systematic grammatical analysis of easy and difficult medical text. American Medical Informatics Association (AMIA) Fall Symposium.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
L’Homme, M.-C. (2002). What can verbs and adjectives tell us about terms ? Terminology and Knowledge Engineering, Nancy, France. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
McCray, A. (2005). Promoting health literacy. J of Am Med Infor Ass, 121, 152–163. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Meisner, C., Robert-Tissot, A. & Stark, E. (2015). L’absence et la présence du ne de négation. In Encyclopédie Grammaticale du Français, en ligne : encyclogram.fr. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Millar, N. & Budgell, B. S. (2019). The passive voice and comprehensibility of biomedical texts: An experimental study with 2 cohorts of chiropractic students. Journal of Chiropractic Education, 33(1), 16–20. Epub 2018 Aug 2. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
OCDE (2015). Guide de style de l’OCDE Troisième édition: Troisième édition. OECD Publishing.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pearson, K. (1900). On the criterion that a given system of deviations from the probable in the case of a correlated system of variables is such that it can be reasonably supposed to have arisen from random sampling. Philosophical Magazine, 50(302), 157–17. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rihs, A. (2009). Gérondif, participe présent et expression de la cause. Nouveaux cahiers de linguistique française, 291, 197–214.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ruel, J., Kassi, B., Moreau, A. & Mbida-Mballa, S. (2011). Guide de rédaction pour une information accessible. Gatineau: Pavillon du Parc.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sackett, D., Rosenberg, W., Gray, J., Haynes, R. & Richardson, W. (1996). Evidence based medicine: what it is and what it isn’t. BMJ, 312(7023), 71–2. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Saggion, H. (2017). Automatic Text Simplification, volume 321 of Synthesis Lectures on Human Language Technologies. University of Toronto: Morgan & Claypool. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Seretan, V. (2012). Acquisition of syntactic simplification rules for French. In N. Calzolari et al. (Eds.), Proceedings of the Eighth International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC’12), 4019–4026, Istanbul, Turkey.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Street, R. L. J., Makoul, G., Arora, N. K. & Epstein, R. M. (2009). How does communication heal? pathways linking clinician-patient communication to health outcomes. Patient Education and Counseling, 74(3), 295–301. Epub 2009 Jan 15. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tchami, O. W. (2014). The descriptive approaches of the verb in linguistics, terminology and nlp (les modèles de description du verbe dans les travaux de linguistique, terminologie et tal) [in french]. In JEP/TALN/RECITAL.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
van der Auwera, J. & Krasnoukhova, O. (2020). The typology of negation. In V. Déprez & M. T. Espinal (Eds), The Oxford Handbook of Negation, 91–116. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Vincze, V., Szarvas, G., Farkas, R., Móra, G. & Csirik, J. (2008). The bioscope corpus: biomedical texts annotated for uncertainty, negation and their scopes. BMC Bioinformatics, 91. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue