Cover not available

Article published In: Retour(s) sur la cataphore
Edited by Anne Theissen and Annie Kuyumcuyan
[Lingvisticæ Investigationes 46:1] 2023
► pp. 6288

References (19)
Références
Ariel, M. 1990. Accessing Noun Phrase Antecedents. Londres: Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2001. Accessibility Theory : an overview. In T. Sanders et al. (Eds), Text Representation : Linguistic and Psycholinguistic Aspects, 29–88. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bolinger, D. 1979. Pronouns in discourse. In T. Givon (Ed.), Syntax and Semantics, Vol. 12, Discourse and Syntax, 289–309. New York: Academic Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Carden, G. 1982. Backwards anaphora in discourse context. Journal of Linguistics, 18 (2), 361–387. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Combettes, B. 1998. Les constructions détachées en français. Paris: Ophrys.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2013. Quelques aspects de la subordination en ancien et moyen français. In J.-M. Debaisieux (Ed.), Analyses linguistiques sur corpus. Subordination et insubordination en français, 99–139. Paris: Hermès.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Givon, T. 1983. Topic continuity in discourse : an introduction. In T. Givon (Ed.), Topic Continuity in Discourse. A Quantitative Cross-Language Study, 1–41. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gordon, P. & Hendrick, R. 1997. Intuitive knowledge of linguistic coreference. Cognition, 621, 325–370. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Langacker, R. 1969. On pronominalization and the chain of command. In D. Reibel & S. Schane (Eds), Modern Studies in English : Readings in Transformational Grammar, 160–200. Englewoood Cliffs: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Marchello-Nizia, C. et al. 2020. Grande Grammaire historique du français. Berlin: de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Prince, E. 1981. Towards a taxonomy of given-new information. In P. Cole (Ed.), Radical Pragmatics, 223–255. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Reinhart, T. 1981. Definite NP-anaphora and c-command domains. Linguistic Inquiry, 121, 605–635.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
1983. Anaphora and Semantic Interpretation. Londres: Croom Helm.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ross, J. R. 1969. On the cyclic nature of English pronominalization. In D. Reibel & S. Schane (Eds), Modern Studies in English : Readings in Transformational Grammar, 187–200. Englewoood Cliffs: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Seguin, J.-P. 2003. Enchaînement et usage du point. In B. Combettes (Ed.), Évolution et variation en français préclassique, 69–137. Paris: Champion.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Siouffi, G. 2020. L’invention de la phrase moderne. In G. Siouffi (Ed.), Une histoire de la phrase française, 171–216. Arles: Actes Sud.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Trnavac, R. & Tamoada, M. 2016. Cataphora, backgrounding and accessibility in discourse. Journal of Pragmatics, 931, 68–84. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
van Hoek, K. 1995. Conceptual reference points: a cognitive grammar account of pronominal anaphora constraints. Language, 71 (2), 310–340. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
1997. Anaphora and Conceptual Structure. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue