Cover not available

Article published In: Lingvisticæ Investigationes
Vol. 45:1 (2022) ► pp.83–115

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload PDF
EPUB logo with download linkDownload EPUB
authorization required

Evaluating morphosemantic demotivation through experimental and distributional methods

 | Université de Fribourg
 | Université Sorbonne Nouvelle
 | Université Toulouse Jean Jaurès
 | Université Toulouse Jean Jaurès
 | Université Toulouse Jean Jaurès
 | Université de Fribourg
Published online: 5 December 2022
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/li.00068.wau
Summary
The lexicalization of morphologically complex words, i.e. their inclusion in the lexicon, can involve a loss of semantic compositionality. Such a phenomenon, called demotivation, has been overlooked in both morphological and lexical studies, notably regarding its gradual nature. This paper compares two measures of demotivation based on experimental and distributional semantics approaches. It builds on the evaluation of 78 pairs of French verbs and derived nouns selected to represent three levels of demotivation. The comparison of the two approaches using speakers’ judgements and word vector similarity indicates convergence on the identification of demotivation degrees within a continuum, while also highlighting specific aspects of each method. The study provides direction to further research on morphosemantic demotivation, bridging together semantic, morphological and methodological considerations.
Article outline
  • Introduction
  • 1.Material selection
    • 1.1Characteristics of the verb-noun pairs
    • 1.2Data collection
  • 2.Experimental approach
    • 2.1Method
      • 2.1.1Participants
      • 2.1.2Procedure
    • 2.2Results
  • 3.Automatic measurement of demotivation
    • 3.1Design
    • 3.2Results
  • 4.Discussion
    • 4.1Convergence of experimental and distributional scores
    • 4.2Discrepancies between the two methods
    • 4.3Going further into the diachronic dimension of demotivation
  • 5.Conclusion
  • Acknowledgements
  • Notes
  • References
References (54)
References
Baayen, H. 1993. On frequency, transparency and productivity. In Yearbook of morphology 1992, p. 181–208. Springer. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Baayen, R. H., Milin, P. & Ramscar, M. 2016. Frequency in lexical processing. Aphasiology, 30 (11), 1174–1220. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Barca, L., Benedetti, F. & Pezzulo, G. 2016. The effects of phonological similarity on the semantic categorisation of pictorial and lexical stimuli: evidence from continuous behavioural measures. Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 28(2), 159–170. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bauer, L. 1983. English word-formation. Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Benjamini, Y. & Hochberg, Y. 1995. Controlling the false discovery rate: a practical and powerful approach to multiple testing. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B, 57 (1), 289–300. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Blank, A. 2001. Pathways of lexicalization. In M. Haspelmath, E. König, W. Oesterreicher & W. Raible, Eds., Language Typology and Language Universals, 1596–1608. De Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Boleda, G. 2020. Distributional semantics and linguistic theory. Annual Review of Linguistics, 61, 213–234. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bonami, O. & Paperno, D. 2018. Inflection vs. derivation in a distributional vector space. Lingue e Linguaggio, 17(2), 173–195.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bonami, O. & Thuilier, J. 2019. A statistical approach to rivalry in lexeme formation: French-iser and-ifier. Word structure, 12(1), 4–41. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bonami, O. & Tribout, D. 2021. Échantinom: a hand-annotated morphological lexicon of French nouns. In Proceedings of the Third International Workshop on Resources and Tools for Derivational Morphology (DeriMo 2021), 33–42, ATILF & CLLE, Université de Lorraine, Nancy, France.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Brinton, L. J. & Traugott, E. C. 2005. Lexicalization and language change. Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bullinaria, J. A. & Levy, J. P. 2007. Extracting semantic representations from word co-occurrence statistics: A computational study. Behavior research methods, 39(3), 510–526. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Christensen, R. H. B. 2019. ordinal — regression models for ordinal data. R package version 2019.12-10. [URL]
Corbin, D. 1987. Morphologie dérivationnelle et structuration du lexique. Mouton De Gruyter.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Creemers, A., Goodwin Davies, A., Wilder, R. J., Tamminga, M. & Embick, D. 2020. Opacity, transparency, and morphological priming: A study of prefixed verbs in dutch. Journal of Memory and Language, 1101. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Daneman, M. & Reingold, E. M. 2000. Chapter 17 - Do Readers Use Phonological Codes to Activate Word Meanings? Evidence from Eye Movements. In A. Kennedy, R. Radach, D. Heller & J. Pynte, Eds., Reading as a perceptual process, 447–474: Elsevier. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dendien, J. & Pierrel, J.-M. 2003. Le trésor de la langue française informatisé: un exemple d’ informatisation d’un dictionnaire de langue de référence. Traitement automatique des langues, 44(2), 11–37.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dohmes, P., Zwitserlood, P. & Bölte, J. 2004. The impact of semantic transparency of morphologically complex words on picture naming. Brain and Language, 901, 203–212. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Firth, J. R. 1957. A synopsis of linguistic theory, 1930–1955. In J. R. Firth, Ed., Studies in Linguistic Analysis, 1–32. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gagné, C. L., Spalding, T. L. & Nisbet, K. A. 2017. Processing English compounds: Investigating semantic transparency. SKASE Journal of Theoretical Linguistics, 13 (2), 2–22.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Harris, Z. S. 1954. Distributional structure. Word, 10 (2–3), 146–162. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hathout, N., Sajous, F. & Calderone, B. 2014. GLÀFF, a Large Versatile French Lexicon. In Proceedings of the Ninth International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC’14), Reykjavik, Iceland.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hilpert, M. 2019. Lexicalization in morphology, In Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Linguistics, 1–18. Oxford University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hohenhaus, P. 2005. Lexicalization and institutionalization. In Handbook of word-formation, 353–373. Springer. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hollander, M. & Wolfe, D. A. 1973. Nonparametric Statistical Methods. New York: John Wiley and Sons, Inc.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kielar, A. & Joanisse, M. F. 2011. The role of semantic and phonological factors in word recognition: An ERP cross-modal priming study of derivational morphology. Neuropsychologia, 491, 161–177. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lenci, A. 2018. Distributional models of word meaning. Annual Review of Linguistics, 41, 151–171. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lenth, R. V. 2016. Least-squares means: The R package lsmeans. Journal of Statistical Software, 69(1), 1–33. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Libben, G. 2010. Compound words, semantic transparency, and morphological transcendence. In S. Olsen, Ed., New impulses in word-formation, 212–232. Hamburg: Buske.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lipka, L. 1977. Lexikalisierung, idiomatisierung und hypostasierung als probleme einer synchronischen wortbildungslehre. In H. E. Brekle & D. Kastovsky, Eds., Perspektiven der Wortbildungsforschung, 155–164. Bonn: Bouvier Verlag Herbert Grundmann.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
1992. Lexicalization and institutionalization in English and German. Linguistica Pragensia/Akademie Ved CR, Ústav pro Jazyk Ceský, 1–13.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Longtin, C.-M., Segui, J. & A. H. P. 2003. Morphological priming without morphological relationship. Language and Cognitive Processes, 18(3), 313–334. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Marelli, M. & Baroni, M. 2015. Affixation in semantic space: Modeling morpheme meanings with compositional distributional semantics. Psychological Review, 122(3), 485–515. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Marslen-Wilson, W., Komisarjevsky Tyler, L., Waksler, R. & Oldername, L. 1994. Morphology and meaning in the English mental lexicon. Psychological Review, 101(1), 1–33. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Meunier, F. & Segui, J. 1999. Frequency effects in auditory word recognition: The case of suffixed words. Journal of Memory and Language, 41(3), 327–344. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mikolov, T., Chan, K., Corrado, G. & Dean, J. 2013. Efficient estimation of word representations in vector space. In Proceedings of International Conference on Learning Representations (ICLR), Scottsdale.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Morris, J., Grainger, J. & Holcomb, P. J. 2013. Tracking the consequences of morpho-orthographic decomposition using ERPs. Brain Research, 15291, 92–104. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Padó, S., Herbelot, A., Kisselew, M. & Šnajder, J. 2016. Predictability of distributional semantics in derivational word formation. In Proceedings of COLING 2016, the 26th International Conference on Computational Linguistics: Technical Papers, 1285–1296.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Park, J., Sana, F., Gagné, C. L. & Spalding, T. L. 2020. Is inhibition involved in the processing of opaque compound words? A study of individual differences. The Mental Lexicon, 15(2), 258–294. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pollatsek, A., Rayner, K. & Lee, H.-W. 2000. Chapter 15 - Phonological Coding in Word Perception and Reading. In A. Kennedy, R. Radach, D. Heller & J. Pynte, Eds., Reading as a perceptual process, 339–426. Elsevier. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
R Core Team 2015. R: A language and environment for statistical computing.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rastle, K., Davis, M. H. & New, B. 2004. The broth in my brother’s brothel: Morpho-orthographic segmentation in visual word recognition. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 11(6), 1090–1098. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rayner, K. & Duffy, S. A. 1986. Lexical complexity and fixation times in reading: Effects of word frequency, verb complexity, and lexical ambiguity. Memory & cognition, 14(3), 191–201. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Reddy, S., McCarthy, D. & Manandhar, S. 2011. An empirical study on compositionality in compound nouns. In Proceedings of the 5th International Joint Conference on Natural Language Processing, 210–218. Chiang Mai, Thailand.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ripley, B. D. 1996. Pattern Recognition and Neural Networks. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Roché, M. 2004. Mot construit ? Mot non construit ? Quelques réflexions à partir des dérivés en ‑ier(e). Verbum, 26(2), 459–480.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sahlgren, M. & Lenci, A. 2016. The effects of data size and frequency range on distributional semantic models. arXiv preprint arXiv:1609.08293. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Schäfer, R. & Bildhauer, F. 2012. Building large corpora from the web using a new efficient tool chain. In N. Calzolari, K. Choukri, T. Declerck, M. Uğur Doğan, B. Maegaard, J. Mariani, A. Moreno, J. Odijk & S. Piperidis, Eds., Proceedings of the Eight International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC’ 12), 486–493. Istanbul, Turkey.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Smolka, E. & Libben, G. 2017. ‘Can you wash off the hogwash?’ – semantic transparency of first and second constituents in the processing of german compounds. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience, 32(4), 514–531. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Smolka, E., Libben, G. & Dressler, W. U. 2019. When morphological structure overrides meaning: evidence from german prefix and particle verbs. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience, 34(5), 599–614. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Urieli, A. 2013. Robust French Syntax Analysis: reconciling statistical methods and linguistic knowledge in the Talismane toolkit. PhD thesis, University of Toulouse Jean Jaurès, Toulouse.
Varvara, R., Lapesa, G. & Padó, S. 2021. Grounding semantic transparency in context. Morphology, 311, 213–234. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Venables, W. N. & Ripley, B. D. 2007. Modern Applied Statistics with S. New York: Springer.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wauquier, M. 2020. Confrontation des procédés dérivationnels et des catégories sémantiques dans les modèles distributionnels. PhD thesis, Université Toulouse 2 – Jean Jaurès.
Cited by (2)

Cited by two other publications

Varvara, Rossella & Richard Huyghe
2025. The linguistic factors of semantic transparency: Evidence from verb-to-noun derivation in French. Journal of Linguistics ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Wauquier, Marine
2022. Apports de la sémantique distributionnelle pour la morphologie dérivationnelle. Corpus :23 DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 25 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue