Cover not available

Article published In: Lingvisticæ Investigationes
Vol. 44:2 (2021) ► pp.204–235

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload PDF
authorization required

Signaling irony, displaying politeness, replacing words

The eight linguistic functions of emoji in computer-mediated discourse

 | Université Catholique de Louvain
Published online: 21 March 2022
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/li.00062.esc
Abstract
This paper aims to identify and define the different linguistic functions that emoji can carry in French and English computer-mediated discourse (CMD). Emoji are graphical icons, representing attitudes or concepts, that can be used on any smartphone or computer with a variety of communicative roles inside a conversation. Using a multimodal corpus containing 1200 emoji and the messages in which they were used, we tested an initial typology of emoji functions inspired by previous frameworks. The quantitative analysis of the data, along with the detailed examination of specific examples, led to the construction of a new, more refined typology consisting of three primary functions (expressive, interpretative and referential) and five secondary functions (relational, politeness, emphatic, structural and aesthetic).
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.The linguistic functions of emoji
    • 2.1The expressive function
    • 2.2The interpretative function
    • 2.3The relational function
    • 2.4The politeness function
    • 2.5The emphatic function
    • 2.6The structural function
    • 2.7The referential function
    • 2.8Summary
  • 3.Methodology
    • 3.1Corpus
    • 3.2Annotation
    • 3.3Methods
  • 4.Findings
    • 4.1Preliminary observations
    • 4.2Distribution of emoji functions
    • 4.3The influence of internal factors
      • 4.3.1Emoji types
      • 4.3.2Emoji categories
      • 4.3.3Emoji positions
  • 5.Discussion
    • 5.1Review of the initial typology
    • 5.2A revised typology of emoji functions
  • 6.Conclusion
  • Note
  • References
References (52)
References
Alshenqeeti, H. 2016. Are Emojis Creating a New or Old Visual Language for New Generations? A Socio-semiotic Study. Advances in language and Literary Studies, 7: 6, 56–69.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Amaghlobeli, N. 2012. Linguistic features of typographic emoticons in SMS discourse. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 2: 2, 348–354. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Aull, B. 2019. A study of phatic emoji use in WhatsApp communication. Internet Pragmatics, 1–34. John Benjamins Publishing Company. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Austin, J. L. 1962. How to do things with words. (2nd Ed.) Edited by J. O. Urmson & M. Sbisà. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Baayen, R. H. 2009. Corpus linguistics in morphology: morphological productivity. Corpus linguistics. An international handbook, 900–919.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Baron, N. & Ling, R. 2011. Necessary Smileys & Useless Periods: redefining punctuation in electronically-mediated communication. Visible Language, 451, 45–67.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Beißwenger, M. & Pappert, S. 2019. How to be polite with emojis: a pragmatic analysis of face work strategies in an online learning environment. European Journal of Applied Linguistics, 7: 2, 225–253. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Benenson, F. 2010. Emoji Dick, Lulu.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Brown, P. & Levinson, S. C. 1987. Politeness. Some universals in language usage. Cambridge: University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cougnon, L. A. & Draelants, H. 2018. Language Ideologies and Writing Systems in CMC: a Sociolinguistic Approach. Language and the new (instant) media, Cahiers du Cental, 91, 88–99.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cramer, H., de Juan, P. & Tetreault, J. 2016. Sender-Intended Functions of Emojis in US Messaging. Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction with Mobile Devices and Services, 504–509. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Danesi, M. 2016. The semiotics of emoji: The rise of visual language in the age of the internet. Bloomsbury Publishing.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dresner, E. & Herring, S. 2010. Functions of the Non-Verbal in CMC: Emoticons and Illocutionnary Force. Communication Theory, 201, 249–268. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dürscheid, C. & Siever, C. M. 2017. Jenseits des Alphabets–Kommunikation mit Emojis. Zeitschrift für germanistische Linguistik, 45: 2, 256–285. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fleiss, J. L. & Cohen, J. 1973. The equivalence of weighted kappa and the intraclass correlation coefficient as measures of reliability. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 331, 613–619. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fullwood, C., Quinn, S., Chen-Wilson, J., Chadwick, D. & Reynolds, K. 2015. Put on a smiley face: Textspeak and personality perceptions. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 18: 3, 147–151. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Goldmark, A. 2014. Inside the Mind That Translated Moby Dick into Emoji. New Tech City. Retrieved 27 November 2019 from [URL].
González-Ibáñez, R., Muresan, S. & Wacholder, N. 2011. Identifying sarcasm in Twitter: a closer look. Proceedings of the 49th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics: shortpapers (ACL-2011).Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Grice, P. 1975. Logic and conversation. In P. Cole & J. Morgan (Eds.). Syntax and semantics. 3: Speech acts, 41–58. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gwet, K. L. 2014. Handbook of Inter-Rater Reliability (4th Edition). Chapter 6. Gaithersburg: Advanced Analytics, LLC.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2001. Computer-mediated discourse. In D. Tannen, D. Schiffrin & H. Hamilton (Eds.), Handbook of Discourse Analysis, 612–634. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2019. The co-evolution of computer-mediated communication and computer-mediated discourse analysis. In P. Bou-Franch & P. Garcés-Conejos Blitvich (Eds.). Analysing digital discourse: New insights and future directions, 25–67. London: Palgrave Macmillan. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Herring, S. C. & Dainas, A. 2017. “Nice picture comment!” Graphicons in Facebook comment threads. Proceedings of the 50th Hawaii international conference on system sciences, 2185–2194. Waikoloa, Hawaii. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hilte, L., Vandekerckhove, R. & Daelemans, W. 2016. Expressiveness in Flemish online teenage talk: A corpus-based analysis of social and medium-related linguistic variation. Proceedings of the 4th Conference on CMC and Social Media Corpora for the Humanities, 30–33.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Janssen, J. H., IJsselsteijn, W. A. & Westerink, J. H. D. M. 2014. How affective technologies can influence intimate interactions and improve social connectedness. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 7211, 33–43. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kelly, R. & Watts, L. 2015. Characterising the Inventive Appropriation of Emoji as Relationally Meaningful in Mediated Close Personal Relationships. Experiences of Technology Appropriation: Unanticipated Users, Usage, Circumstances, and Design.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lu, X., Ai, W., Liu, X., Li, Q., Wang, N., Huang, G. & Mei, Q. 2016. Learning from the ubiquitous language: an empirical analysis of emoji usage of smartphone users. Proceedings of the 2016 ACM International Joint Conference on Pervasive and Ubiquitous Computing, 770–780. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Marcoccia, M. & Gauducheau, N. 2007. L’analyse du rôle des smileys en production et en réception: un retour sur la question de l’oralité des écrits numériques. Glottopol. Revue de sociolinguistique en ligne, 101, 38–55.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Markman, K. M. & Oshima, S. 2007. Pragmatic play? Some possible functions of English emoticons and Japanese kaomoji in computer-mediated discourse. In Association of Internet Researchers Annual Conference, 81.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
McCulloch, G. 2019. Because Internet. Understanding the new rules of language. New York City: Riverhead Books.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
McCulloch, G. & Gawne, L. 2018. Emoji grammar as beat gestures. Proceedings of the First International Workshop on Emoji Understanding and Applications in Social Media, 1–4.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Medlock, B. & McCulloch, G. 2016. The Linguistic Secrets Found in Billions of Emoji. Presented at SXSW, March 11–20, 2016. Retrieved 19 October 2019 from [URL]
Miller, H., Thebault-Spieker, J., Chang, S., Johnson, I., Terveen, L. & Hecht, B. 2016. “Blissfully happy” or “ready to fight”: Varying interpretations of emoji. Proceedings of ICWSM 2016, 259–268.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Na’aman, N., Provenza, H. & Montoya, O. 2017. MojiSem: Varying linguistic purposes of emoji in (Twitter) context. Proceedings of the 55th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics – Student Research Workshop, 136–141.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Novak, P. K., Smailović, J., Sluban, B. & Mozetič, I. 2015. Sentiment of Emojis. PloS One, 10(12).Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Panckhurst, R., Détrie, C., Lopez, C., Moïse, C., Roche, M. & Verine, B. 2016. 88milSMS. A corpus of authentic text messages in French. Banque de corpus CoMeRe. Ortolang: Nancy.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Panckhurst, R. & Frontini, F. 2020. 4 Evolving interactional practices of emoji in text messages. In Visualizing Digital Discourse, 81–104. De Gruyter Mouton. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Panckhurst, R., Lopez, C. & Roche, M. 2020. A French text-message corpus: 88milSMS. Synthesis and usage. Corpus, 201. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Provine, R. R., Spencer, R. & Mandell, D. 2007. Emotional expression online: Emoticons punctuate website text messages. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 26: 3, 299–307. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sampietro, A. 2016. Exploring the punctuating effect of emoji in Spanish Whatsapp chats. Lenguas Modernas, 471, 91–113.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Schneebeli, C. 2017. The interplay of emojis, emoticons and verbal modalities in CMC: a case study of YouTube comments. VINM 2017: visualizing (in) the new media.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Searle, J. 1969. Speech acts: An essay in the philosophy of language. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Skovholt, K., Grønning, A. & Kankaanranta, A. 2014. The Communicative Functions of Emoticons in Workplace E-Mails: :-). Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 191, 780–797. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Spina, S. 2018. Role of Emoticons as Structural Markers in Twitter Interactions. Discourse Processes, 56: 4, 345–362. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Steinmetz, K. 2015 (November 16). Oxford’s 2015 Word of the Year Is This Emoji. Time. Retrieved 15 January 2021 from [URL]
Tang, Y. & Hew, K. F. 2019. Emoticon, Emoji, and Sticker Use in Computer-Mediated Communication: A Review of Theories and Research Findings. International Journal of Communication, 131, 2457–2483.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Troiano, G. & Nante, N. 2018. Emoji: What does the scientific literature say about them? A new way to communicate in the 21st century. Journal of Human Behavior in the Social Environment, 28: 4, 528–533. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Unicode. 2019 (October 18). Emoji frequency. The most frequent emoji. Retrieved 16 September 2021 from [URL]
Weissman, B. & Tanner, D. 2018. A strong wink between verbal and emoji-based irony: How the brain processes ironic emojis during language comprehension. PLoS ONE 13(8). Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Zipf, G. 1935. The psychobiology of language. Boston: Houghton Miffin.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (13)

Cited by 13 other publications

Dias, Dominique & Nadine Rentel
2025. The presentation of Guerrilla gardening in social media – a contrastive analysis of multimodal strategies in French and German. Multimodal Communication DOI logo
Gardam, Caroline, Michelle Riedlinger, Daniel Angus & Xue Ying (Jane) Tan
2025. Multimodal narratives of climate denial: A novel, visual-first methodology for analysing conspiracy theory discourse on Instagram. Discourse, Context & Media 68 ► pp. 100946 ff. DOI logo
Kádár, Dániel Z., Juliane House, Fengguang Liu & Dan Han
2025. Offering gifts in Chinese: An interaction ritual approach. Journal of Pragmatics 236 ► pp. 60 ff. DOI logo
Maíz-Arévalo, Carmen
2025. Striking the balance between friendliness and professionality. Internet Pragmatics 8:2 ► pp. 241 ff. DOI logo
Ping, Wanlin & Ayeshah Syed
2025. Emoji types and functions in online medical consultations on a Chinese medical platform. Journal of World Languages 11:2 ► pp. 343 ff. DOI logo
Tariq, Muhammad Usman
2025. Emojis and Emoticons. In Sociocultural and Multicultural Meanings in Online Communication, ► pp. 23 ff. DOI logo
Wu, Yanmin & Yiqiong Zhang
2025. Face-work on Chinese social media. Internet Pragmatics 8:2 ► pp. 186 ff. DOI logo
Yus, Francisco
2025. Pragmatic Functions of Emojis. In Emoji Pragmatics, ► pp. 49 ff. DOI logo
Zappavigna, Michele & Lorenzo Logi
2025. How emoji make meaning and enact ambient affiliation: a social semiotic account of emoji-text relations in TikTok comments. Social Semiotics 35:4 ► pp. 617 ff. DOI logo
Carneiro, Marisa
2024. BUY MY EMOJI: AN ANALYSIS OF ADS IN TWITTER/X. Linguagem em (Dis)curso 24 DOI logo
Holtgraves, Thomas
2024. Emoji, Speech Acts, and Perceived Communicative Success. Journal of Language and Social Psychology 43:1 ► pp. 83 ff. DOI logo
Koutrouba, Irini & Mariza Georgalou
2024. Constructing ethnocultural identities on Instagram and TikTok: evidence from new Greek immigrants in the USA and Korea. Journal of Multicultural Discourses 19:1-2 ► pp. 47 ff. DOI logo
[no author supplied]
2025. Evaluative Discourse Metaphor in Online Communities [Discourse Approaches to Politics, Society and Culture, 106], DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 25 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue