Cover not available

Introduction published In: Differential objects and datives – a homogeneous class?
Edited by Monica Alexandrina Irimia and Anna Pineda
[Lingvisticæ Investigationes 42:1] 2019
► pp. 1–6

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload PDF
Introduction

Differential objects and datives

A homogeneous class?

 | Università di Modena e Reggio Emilia
 | Universitat Pompeu Fabra


This article is available free of charge.

Published online: 10 July 2019
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/li.00026.iri
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • References
References (32)
References
Aissen, J. 2003. Differential object marking: iconicity vs. economy. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 21(3), 435–483. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Anand, P. & Nevins, A. 2006. The locus of ergative Case assignment: Evidence from scope. In A. Johns, D. Massam & J. Ndayiragije (Eds.), Ergativity: Emerging issues, 143–171. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Aoun, J. 1999. Clitic-doubled arguments. In K. Johnson & I. Roberts (Eds.), Beyond principles and parameters: Essays in memory of Osvaldo Jaeggli, 13–42. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bárány, A. 2018. dom and dative case. Glossa, 3 (1), 97.1–40. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bhatt, R. & Anagnostopoulou, E. 1996. Object shift and specificity: evidence from ko-phrases in Hindi. In L. M. Dobrin, K. Singer & L. McNair (Eds.), Papers from the 32nd Regional Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society, 11–22. Chicago: Chicago Linguistic Society.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bossong, G. 1991. Differential object marking in Romance and beyond. In D. Kibbee & D. Wanner (Eds.), New analyses in Romance linguistics, 143–170. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
1998. Le marquage différentiel de l’object dans les langues de l’Europe. In J. Feuillet (Ed.), Actance et valence dans les langues d’Europe, 193–259. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Butt, M. 1993. Object specificity and agreement in Hindi-Urdu. In C. Beals et al. (Eds.), Papers from the 29th Regional Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society, 89–103. Chicago: Chicago Linguistic Society.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Comrie, B. 1979. Definite and animate direct objects: a natural class. Linguistica Silesiana 31. (Katowice: University of Silesia), 13–21.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
1981. Language universals and linguistic typology. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Croft, W. 1988. Agreement vs. case marking and direct objects. In M. Barlow & C. A. Ferguson (Eds.), Agreement in natural language. Approaches, theories, description, 159–180. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
1990. Typology and universals. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fernández, B. & Rezac, M. 2016. Differential object marking in Basque varieties. In B. Fernández, J. Ortiz de Urbina (Eds.), Microparameters in the grammar of Basque, 93–138. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Givón, T. 1984. Direct objects and dative shifting: Semantic and pragmatic case. In F. Plank (Ed.), Objects. Towards a theory of grammatical relations, 151–183. London: Academic Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Glushan, Z. 2010. Deriving Case syncretism in Differential Object marking systems. [URL]
Irimia, M. A. 2018. Differential objects and other structural objects. Proceedings of the Linguistic Society of America, 3 (50), 1–15. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
To appear. Differential objects and other structural objects. Some remarks on differential object marking in Romanian. Ms.
Jaeggli, O. 1982. Topics in Romance syntax. Dordrecht: Foris.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Katz, D. 1987. Grammar of the Yiddish language. London: Duckworth.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lazard, G. 2001. Le marquage différential de l’objet. In M. Haspelmath, E. König, W. Österreicher & W. Raible (Eds.), Language typology and linguistic universals. An international handbook, vol 21, 873–885. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
López, L. 2012. Indefinite objects. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Manzini, M. R. & Franco, L. 2016. Goal and dom datives. Natural language and linguistic theory, 34(1), 197–240. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mohanan, T. 1994. Argument structure in Hindi. Stanford, CA. CSLI Publications.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Moravcsik, E. A. 1978. On the case marking of objects. In J. H. Greenberg, C. A. Ferguson & E. A. Moravcsik (Eds.), Universals of human language. Syntax. Volume IV1, 249–289. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2017. Differential object marking and datives in Basque syntax. PhD thesis, University of the Basque Country.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ormazabal, J. & Romero, J. 2007. The object agreement constraint. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 25 (2), 315–347. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2010. The derivation of dative alternations. In M. Duguine, S. Huidobro & N. Madariaga (Eds.), Argument Structure and Syntactic Relations from a Crosslinguistic Perspective, 203–232. Amsterdam / Philadelphia: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2013. Differential Object Marking, Case and Agreement. Borealis. An International Journal of Hispanic Linguistics, 2 (2), 221–239. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Raz, S. 1980. Tigre syntax and Semitic Ethiopian. Bulletin of the School of Oriental and African studies, 43 (2), 235–250. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Shain, C. A. 2008. Differential object marking in Paraguayan Guaraní. BA thesis. University of Columbus, Ohio.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
de Swart, P. 2007. Cross-linguistic variation in object marking. Radbound: University of Nijmegen doctoral dissertation.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (2)

Cited by two other publications

Irimia, Monica Alexandrina
2022. Differential object marking, oblique morphology, and enriched case hierarchies. In Points of Convergence in Romance Linguistics [Current Issues in Linguistic Theory, 360], ► pp. 81 ff. DOI logo
Bárány, András
2021. Partially ordered case hierarchies. Glossa: a journal of general linguistics 6:1 DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 25 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue