Cover not available

Article published In: Lingvisticæ Investigationes
Vol. 41:1 (2018) ► pp.1–15

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload PDF
authorization required
Thematic section

Microvariation morphosyntaxique galloromane

Enjeux et défis

 | University of Zurich

Article language: French

Published online: 27 August 2018
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/li.00010.mas
Article outline
  • 1.Le dialogue indispensable entre dialectologie et linguistique générale
  • 2.Le contexte scientifique actuel et les défis de l’entreprise MiMoGa
  • 3.Présentation des articles
  • Remarques
  • Œuvres citées
  • Liens Internet des colloques et projets
References (43)
Œuvres citées
ALN=Brasseur, P. (1980–2011). Atlas linguistique et ethnographique normand. Paris: Éd. du C.N.R.S./Caen : Presses universitaires de Caen.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
ALAVAL. Atlas linguistique audiovisuel du francoprovençal valaisan. URL: [URL]
Auger, J. (2003a). Le redoublement des sujets en picard. Journal of French Language Studies, 131, 381–404. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2003b). Les pronoms clitiques sujets en picard : une analyse au confluent de la phonologie, de la morphologie et de la syntaxe. Journal of French Language Studies, 131, 1–22. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Avanzi, M., Stark, E. (à paraître). A crowdsourcing approach to the description of regional variation in French object clitic clusters. Belgian Journal of Linguistics.
Barbiers, S. (2009). Locus and limits of syntactic microvariation. Lingua, 1191, 607–623. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Barra Jover, M., Brun-Trigaud, G., Dalbera, J.-Ph., Sauzet, P., & Scheer, T. (Eds.) (2012). Études de linguistique gallo-romane. Saint-Denis: PUV, coll. Sciences du Langage.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2012). Introduction. Dialectologie, diachronie et linguistique théorique : un dialogue possible et nécessaire. In M. Barra-Jover et al. (Eds.) (2012) (pp. 5–17).Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Barra-Jover, M., & Sauzet, P. (2012). L’évolution des marques du pluriel nominal roman à la lumière de l’occitan. In M. Barra-Jover et al. (Eds.) (2012) (pp. 201–216).Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Benincà, P. (1989). Introduction. In Paola Benincà (Ed.), Dialect variation and the theory of grammar : proceedings of the GLOW Workshop in Venice (pp.1–8). Dordrecht: Foris. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(1994). La variazione sintattica. Studi di dialettologia romanza. Roma: Il Mulino.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Burnett, H., & Dagnac, A. (en prép.). Hard and Soft Patterns in Picard Negative Concord. Actes du colloque SyMiLa 2015. Toulouse, juin 2015.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cornips, L., & Poletto, C. (2005). On standardising syntactic elicitation techniques (part 1). Lingua, 115(7), 939–957. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(s.a.). Field linguistics meets formal research: how a microcomparative view can deepen our theoretical investigation. Part 2 (sentential negation). Ms.
Dagnac, A. (à par.), La variation régionale des proformes faibles en français. In Abeillé, A., & Godard, D. (Eds.), Grande Grammaire du français.
Greub, Y. (2013). Recension de Barra Jover et alii 2012. BSL 108/2.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Guilliot, N. (en prép.). Negative Concord in Gallo. Actes du colloque SyMiLa 2015. Toulouse, juin 2015.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hinzelin, M. O., & Kaiser, G. A. (2012). Le paramètre du sujet nul dans les variétés dialectales de l’occitan et du francoprovençal. In Barra-Jover et al. (Eds.) (2012) (pp. 247–260).Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hauser, M. D., Chomsky, N., & Fitch, W. T. (2002). The Faculty of Language : What Is It, Who Has It, and How Did It Evolve? Science 2981. 1569–1579. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kaiser, G. A., Oliviéri, M., & Palasis, K. (2013). Impersonal constructions in northern Occitan. In Carrilho, Ernestina et al. (Eds.) Current Approaches to Limits (pp. 345–367). Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Loporcaro, M. (1988). Grammatica storica del dialetto di Altamura. Pisa: Giardini.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(22013 [2009]). Profilo linguistico dei dialetti italiani. Roma/Bari: Laterza.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Massot, B. (2016). L’énigme des contraintes grammaticales sur les sujets poyaudins. Actes du Congrès Mondial de Linguistique Française 2016, Tours. .Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2008). Français et diglossie. Décrire la situation linguistique française contemporaine comme une diglossie : arguments morphosyntaxiques. Thèse de doctorat, Université Paris 8, Saint-Denis. URL : [URL]Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2012). Deux faits de morphologie du nombre en poyaudin (et un peu en français), In M. Barra-Jover et al. (Eds) (2012), 279–294.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
MacKenzie, I. (2013), Participle object agreement in French and the theory of grammatical viruses. Journal of Romance Studies, 13(1), 19–33. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Oliviéri, M. (2011). Typologie or reconstruction. In J. Berns, H. Jacobs & T. Scheer, (Eds.), Romance languages and linguistic theory 2009: selected papers from “Going Romance” Nice. 2009 (pp. 239–253). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
PICARTEXT. Responsables: J. -M. Eloy & Ch. Rey, laboratoire CERCLL-LESCLAP, Université de Picardie Jules Verne. URL: [URL]
Poletto, C. (1993). La sintassi del soggetto nei dialetti italiani settentrionali. Padova: Unipress.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2000). The higher functional field: evidence from Northern Italian Dialects. Oxford/New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pomino, N. (2012). Partial or complete lack of plural agreement: The role of morphology. In Sascha Gaglia & Marc-Olivier Hinzelin (Eds.), Inflection and Word Formation in Romance Languages (pp. 201–229). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Savoia, L., & Manzini, R. (2005). I dialetti italiani e romanci : morfosintassi generativa. Torino: Edizioni dell’Orso.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sobin, N. (1997). Agreement, default rules, and grammatical viruses. Linguistic Inquiry 281. 318–343.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Thésoc (Thesaurus occitan). Responsables: M. Oliviéri & J.-Ph. Dalbera, Laboratoire Bases, Corpus, Langage, Université de Nice Sophia-Antipolis. URL: [URL]
Zribi-Hertz. (2013). De la notion de grammaire standard dans une optique diglossique du français. Journal of French Language Studies, 23(1): L’hypothèse d’une diglossie en France, B. Massot & P. Rowlett (Eds.). 59–85. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Liens Internet des colloques et projets
Journée d’études MiMoGa, Zurich, septembre 2016: [URL]
Projet SyMiLa: [URL], [URL]
Journées d’études internationales SyMiLa, Toulouse, juin 2015: [URL]
Pôle de recherche Langage et Espace, Zurich: [URL]
Conférences TEAM (Theoretical and Empirical Approaches to Microvariation), Padoue: [URL]
Edisyn: [URL], [URL]
DADDIPRO (volet occitan): [URL]
ASIt: [URL]
Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue