Cover not available

In:The Ziggurat of Grammar: In honor of Ur Shlonsky
Edited by Lena Baunaz, Giuliano Bocci and Andrew Nevins
[Language Faculty and Beyond 20] 2025
► pp. 511531

References (64)
References
Ahrenberg, Lars. 2007. LinES: An English-Swedish parallel treebank. In Joakim Nivre, Heiki-Jaan Kaalep, Kadri Muischnek & Mare Koit (eds.), Proceedings of the 16th Nordic Conference of Computational Linguistics (NODALIDA 2007) (Tartu, Estonia, 25–26 May 2007), 270–273. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Baker, Mark C. 1988. Incorporation: A theory of grammatical function changing. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Belletti, Adriana, Naama Friedmann, Dominique Brunato & Luigi Rizzi. 2012. Does gender make a difference? Comparing the effect of gender on children’s comprehension of relative clauses in Hebrew and Italian. Lingua 122(10), 1053–1069. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2012. Does gender make a difference? Comparing the effect of gender on children’s comprehension of relative clauses in Hebrew and Italian. Lingua 122(10). 1053–1069. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Belletti, Adriana & Luigi Rizzi. 2013. Intervention in grammar and processing. In Ivano Caponigro & Carlo Cecchetto (eds.), From grammar to meaning: The spontaneous logicality of language, 293–311. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Belletti, Adriana & Ur Shlonsky. 1995. The order of verbal complements: A comparative study. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 13(3). 489–526. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bosco, Cristina, Felice Dell’Orletta, Simonetta Montemagni, Manuela Sanguinetti & Maria Simi. 2014. The EVALITA 2014 dependency parsing task. In Roberto Basili, Alessandro Lenci & Bernardo Magnini (eds.), Proceedings of the First Italian Conference on Computational Linguistics CLiC-it 2014 and of the Fourth International Workshop EVALITA 2014: 9–11 December 2014, 1–8. Pisa: Pisa University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bybee, Joan & Sandra A. Thompson. 2021. Interaction and grammar: Predicative adjective constructions in English conversation. Languages 7(1). 1–2. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam. 1977. On wh-movement. In Peter W. Culicover, Thomas Wasow & Adrian Akmajian (eds.), Formal syntax, 71–133. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cinque, Guglielmo. 1999. Adverbs and functional heads: A cross-linguistic perspective. New York: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2005. Deriving Greenberg’s Universal 20 and its exceptions. Linguistic Inquiry 36(3). 315–332. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2024. Externalization and meaningless movement. In Ángel J. Gallego & Dennis Ott (eds.), Cartography and explanatory adequacy. Oxford: Oxford University Press. [online edn., Oxford Academic, 22 Aug. 2024]. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Costa, João, Naama Friedmann, Carolina Silva & Maya Yachini. 2014. The boy that the chef cooked: Acquisition of PP relatives in European Portuguese and Hebrew. Lingua 150. 386–409. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
de Marneffe, Marie-Catherine, Christopher D. Manning, Joakim Nivre & Daniel Zeman. 2021. Universal Dependencies. Computational Linguistics 47(2). 255–308. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dotlačil, Jakup. 2007. Clitic omission in Czech as across-the-board extraction. In Mojmír Dočekal, Petr Karlík & Jana Zmrzlíková (eds.), Czech in generative grammar, 65–88. Munich: Lincom Academic Publishers.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dryer, Matthew S. & Martin Haspelmath (eds.) 2013. The World Atlas of Language Structures. Online, Leipzig, Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Durrleman, Stéphanie, Theo Marinis & Julie Franck. 2016. Syntactic complexity in the comprehension of wh-questions and relative clauses in typical language development and autism. Applied Psycholinguistics 37(6). 1501–1527. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Endo, Yoshio. 2022. Non-standard questions in English, German, and Japanese. Linguistics Vanguard 8(S2). 251–260. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Erteschik-Shir, Nomi, Lena Ibnbari & Sharon Taube. 2013. Missing objects as topic drop. Lingua 136. 145–169. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Friedmann, Naama, Adriana Belletti & Luigi Rizzi. 2009. Relativized relatives: Types of intervention in the acquisition of A-bar dependencies. Lingua 119(1). 67–88. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2021. Growing trees: The acquisition of the left periphery. Glossa: A journal of general linguistics 6(1). 1–38.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Haegeman, Liliane. 2013. The syntax of registers: Diary subject omission and the privilege of the root. Lingua 130. 88–110. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Haider, Hubert & Luka Szucsich. 2002. Slavic languages — “SVO” languages without SVO qualities? Theoretical Linguistics 48(1–2). 1–39. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Huang, Cheng-Teh James. 1982. Logical relations in Chinese and the theory of grammar. PhD dissertation. Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
Ibbotson, Paul. 2013. The scope of usage-based theory. Frontiers in Psychology 4. 255. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kiss, Katalin É. 2003. Argument scrambling, operator movement, and topic movement in Hungarian. In Simin Karimi (ed.), Word order and scrambling, 22–43. Wiley. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Larson, Richard K. 1988. On the double object construction. Linguistic Inquiry 19(3). 335–391.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Massaro, Angelapia & Giuseppe Samo. 2023. Prompting metalinguistic awareness in large language models: ChatGPT and bias effects on the grammar of Italian. Verbum 14. 1–33. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Merlo, Paola. 2015. Predicting word order universals. Journal of Language Modelling 3(2). 317–344. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2016. Quantitative computational syntax: Some initial results. Italian Journal of Computational Linguistics 2(1). 11–30. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Merlo, Paola & Giuseppe Samo. 2022. Exploring T3 languages with quantitative computational syntax. Theoretical Linguistics 48(1–2). 73–83. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Nivre, Joakim. 2015. Towards a universal grammar for natural language processing. In Alexander Gelbukh (ed.), International conference on intelligent text processing and computational linguistics, 3–16. Cham: Springer. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Riolfi, Alessandro. 2019. A history of the concept of parameter in generative grammar. PhD dissertation. University of Verona.
Rizzi, Luigi. 1997. The fine structure of the left periphery. In Liliane Haegeman (ed.), Elements of grammar, 281–337. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1990. Relativized minimality. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2004. Locality and the left periphery. In Adriana Belletti (ed.), Structures and beyond, 223–251. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2013. Locality. Lingua 130. 169–186. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2015. Notes on labeling and subject positions. In Elisa Di Domenico, Cornelia Hamann & Simona Matteini (eds.), Structures, strategies and beyond: Studies in honour of Adriana Belletti, 17–46. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2018. Intervention effects in grammar and language acquisition. Probus 30(2). 339–367. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rizzi, Luigi & Ur Shlonsky. 2006. Satisfying the subject criterion by a non-subject: English locative inversion and heavy NP shift. In Mara Frascarelli (ed.), Phases of interpretation, 341–361. Berlin/New York: De Gruyter Mouton. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Roberts, Ian. 2004. The C-system in Brythonic Celtic languages, V2, and the EPP. In Luigi Rizzi (ed.), The structure of CP and IP (The cartography of syntactic structures), vol. 2, 297–328. Oxford/New York: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2019b. Cartography and locality in German. Rivista di Grammatica Generativa 63–91.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2022. Move to ModP or base-generated in FrameP? A quantitative cartographic study. Revue Roumaine de Linguistique LXVII(4). 345–361Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2023. Testing cartographic proposals on locality effects in V2: A quantitative study. Journal of Historical Syntax 7(24). 1–32.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. to appear. Adverbs and non-arguments in the left periphery: A computational cartographic study. In Marco Coniglio, Kalle Müller & Markus Steinbach (eds.), Adverbs and particles at the form-meaning interface. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company.
. to appear. A computational cartographic study on the merge nature of topics in stages of French. Canadian Journal of Linguistics/Revue canadienne de linguistique.
Samo, Giuseppe & Elena Isolani. 2024. Comparing models on the optionality of complementizer omission: A quantitative computational study on German and Italo-Romance. Annali di Ca’ Foscari. Serie occidentale 58(58). 287–308. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Samo, Giuseppe & Paola Merlo. 2019. Intervention effects in object relatives in English and Italian: A study in quantitative computational syntax. In Xinying Chen & Ramon Ferrer-i-Cancho (eds.), Proceedings of the First Workshop on Quantitative Syntax (Quasy, SyntaxFest 2019), 46–56. Paris: Association for Computational Linguistics. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2021. Intervention effects in clefts: A study in quantitative computational syntax. Glossa: a journal of general linguistics 6. 1–39.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sanguinetti, Manuela, Cristina Bosco, Alberto Lavelli, Alessandro Mazzei & Fabio Tamburini. 2018. PoSTWITA-UD: An Italian Twitter Treebank in Universal Dependencies. In Nicoletta Calzolari, Khalid Choukri, Christopher Cieri, Thierry Declerck, Sara Goggi, Koiti Hasida, Hitoshi Isahara, Bente Maegaard, Joseph Mariani, Hélène Mazo, Asuncion Moreno, Jan Odijk, Stelios Piperidis & Takenobu Tokunaga (eds.), Proceedings of the Eleventh International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC 2018), 1768–1775. Miyazaki, Japan: European Language Resources Association (ELRA).Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Shlonsky, Ur, Sandra Villata & Julie Franck. 2020. Covert movement in multiple-wh questions: Experimental and theoretical investigations. Syntax 23(2). 185–202. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Si, Fuzhen. 2021. Towards a cartography of light verbs. In Fuzhen Si & Luigi Rizzi (eds.), Current issues in syntactic cartography: A crosslinguistic perspective, 217–241. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Starke, Michal. 2001. Move dissolves into merge: A theory of locality. PhD dissertation, University of Geneva.
Stepanov, Arthur. 2000. The timing of adjunction. In Proceedings of NELS 30, 597–612.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tescari Neto, Aquiles. 2022. “Adverbs and functional heads” twenty years later: Cartographic methodology, verb raising and macro/micro-variation. The Linguistic Review 39(2). 293–331. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tsafarty, Reut. 2013. A unified morpho-syntactic scheme of Stanford dependencies. In Hinrich Schuetze, Pascale Fung & Massimo Poesio (eds.), Proceedings of the 51st Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 2: Short Papers), 578–584. Sofia, Bulgaria: Association for Computational Linguistics.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Volk, Martin, Johannes Graën & Elena Callegaro. 2014. Innovations in parallel corpus search tools. In Nicoletta Calzolari, Khalid Choukri, Thierry Declerck, Hrafn Loftsson, Bente Maegaard, Joseph Mariani, Asuncion Moreno, Jan Odijk & Stelios Piperidis (eds.), Proceedings of the Ninth International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC’14) (Reykjavik, Iceland, 26–31 May 2014), 1–7. Paris: European Language Resources Association (ELRA).Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Zeldes, Amir, Nick Howell, Noam Ordan & Yifat Ben Moshe. 2022. A second wave of UD Hebrew treebanking and cross-domain parsing. In Yoav Goldberg, Zornitsa Kozareva & Yue Zhang (eds.), Proceedings of the 2022 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, 4331–4344. Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates: Association for Computational Linguistics. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Zhao, Yu, Giuseppe Samo, Heini Utunen, Oliver Stucke & Gaya Gamhewage. 2021. Evaluating complexity of digital learning in a multilingual context: A cross-linguistic study on WHO’s emergency learning platform. In John Mantas, Lăcrămioara Stoicu-Tivadar, Catherine Chronaki, Arie Hasman, Patrick Weber, Parisis Gallos, Mihaela Crişan-Vida, Emmanouil Zoulias & Oana Sorina Chirila (eds.), Proceedings of MIE 2021 (Studies in Health Technology and Informatics), 516–517. Amsterdam, Berlin, Washington, DC: IOS Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue