In:The Ziggurat of Grammar: In honor of Ur Shlonsky
Edited by Lena Baunaz, Giuliano Bocci and Andrew Nevins
[Language Faculty and Beyond 20] 2025
► pp. 438–460
Get fulltext
Chapter 21The focalizing ser construction in Brazilian Portuguese
Available under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial (CC BY-NC) 4.0 license.
For any use beyond this license, please contact the publisher at rights@benjamins.nl.
Published online: 13 November 2025
https://doi.org/10.1075/lfab.20.21qua
https://doi.org/10.1075/lfab.20.21qua
Abstract
This article investigates the grammatical properties of the Focalizing ser
Construction (FSC) in Brazilian Portuguese (BP). It is shown that the FSC does not behave like the pseudo-cleft
construction (Mioto 2012; Kato and
Mioto 2016). The goal of this study is to propose an analysis that accounts for the FSC in two distinct
contexts: informational focus and contrastive focus, given that the FSC in BP appears in both. The analysis presented
here incorporates vP movement, low and high peripheries (Belletti 2001,
2004; Rizzi 1997), and the
Se(lect)lF(ocus) head (Shlonsky 2024).
Keywords: focus, ser-construction, sentence peripheries, Brazilian Portuguese
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.Focusing strategies in Brazilian Portuguese
- 3.The focalizing ser-construction is not a pseudo-cleft
- 4.Grammatical properties of focalizing ser-construction
- 5.FSC analysis based on Shlonsky (2024)
- 6.Conclusion
Acknowledgements Notes References
References (31)
Belletti, Adriana. 2001. Inversion
as focalization. In Aafke Hulk & Jean-Yves Pollock (eds.), Subject
inversion in Romance and the theory of Universal
Grammar, 60–90. New York: Oxford University Press.
. 2004. Aspects
of the low IP area. In Luigi Rizzi (ed.), The
structure of CP and IP: The cartography of syntactic
structures 4. 16–51. New York: Oxford University Press.
. 2009. Answering
strategies: New information subjects and the nature of
clefts. In Adriana Belletti (ed.), Structures
and strategies. New York: Routledge.
Belletti, Adriana & Giuliano Bocci. 2024. Subject
versus object clefts: A fresh perspective on a robust
asymmetry. In Claudia Bonan & Adam Ledgeway (eds.), It-clefts:
Empirical and theoretical surveys and
advances, 81–104. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.
Bosque, Ignacio. 1999. On
focus vs. wh-movement: The case of Caribbean Spanish. Sophia Linguistica:
Working Papers in
Linguistics 44–45. 1–32.
Camacho, José. 2006. In
situ focus in Caribbean Spanish: Towards a unified account of
focus. In Manuel Díaz-Campos (ed.), Proceedings
of the 9th Hispanic Linguistics
Symposium, 13–23. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Proceedings Project.
Cinque, Guglielmo. 1999. Adverbs
and functional heads: A crosslinguistic
perspective. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Costa, João & Inê Duarte. 2003. Minimizando
a estrutura: Uma análise unificada das construções de clivagem em
português. In Clara Nunes Correia & Anabela Gonçalves (eds.), Actas
do XVI Encontro Nacional da
APL, 627–638. Lisboa.
Guesser, Simone. 2011. La
sintassi delle frasi cleft in portoghese brasiliano. Ph.D.
dissertation, Università degli Studi di Siena.
Guesser, Simone & Sandra Quarezemin. 2013. Focalização,
cartografia e sentenças clivadas do português brasileiro. Revista
LinguíStica 18(1). 188–208.
Kato, Mary Aizawa, Braga, Maria Luiza, Corrêa, Vilma Reche, Lopes-Rossi, Maria Aparecida, & Sikansi, Nilmara Soares. 1996. As
construções-Q no português brasileiro falado: Perguntas, clivadas e
relativas. In Ingedore G. Villaça Koch (Ed.), Gramática
do português
falado (pp. 303–368). Campinas, SP: Editora da Unicamp.
Kato, Mary A. & Carlos Mioto. 2016. Pseudo-clefts
and semi-clefts. In Mary A. Kato & Francisco Ordóñez (eds.), The
morphosyntax of Portuguese and Spanish in Latin
America, 286–306. New York: Oxford University Press.
Mioto, Carlos. 2008. Pseudo-clivadas
reduzidas em espanhol caribenho e em português brasileiro. III Workshop on
Romania Nova Montevideo.
Méndez Vallejo, Dunia Catalina. 2009. Focalizing
ser (‘to be’) in Colombian Spanish. Ph.D.
dissertation, Indiana University.
. 2010. Syntactic
variation in Colombian Spanish: The case of the Focalizing Ser (FS)
structure. In Sonia Colina, Antxon Olarrea & Ana Maria Carvalho (eds.), Current
issues in linguistic
theory 315. 169–186. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Mioto, Carlos. 2012. Reduced
pseudoclefts in Caribbean Spanish and Brazilian
Portuguese. In Valentina Bianchi & Cristiano Chesi (eds.), Enjoy
linguistics! Papers offered to Luigi Rizzi on the occasion of his 60th
birthday, 287–302. Siena: CISCL.
Quarezemin, Sandra. 2009. Estratégias
de focalização no português brasileiro: Uma abordagem cartográfica. Ph.D.
dissertation, Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina, Florianópolis.
. 2014. Assimetria
sujeito-objeto focalizados nas sentenças clivadas e pseudoclivadas. Veredas
On-line — Sintaxe das Línguas
Brasileiras, 60–78.
. 1991. Residual
verb second and the
Wh-Criterion. Geneva: University of Geneva, Département de Linguistique, Geneva Working Papers in Linguistics.
. 2004. Locality
and left periphery. In L. Rizzi (Ed.), The
structure of CP and IP: The cartography of syntactic
structures, volume 2 (pp. 223–251). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
. 1997. The
fine structure of the left periphery. In Liliane Haegeman (ed.), Elements
of grammar: Handbook of generative
syntax, 281–337. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
. 2006. On
the form of chains: Criterial positions and ECP
effects. In Lisa Lai-Shen Cheng & Norbert Corver (eds.), Wh-movement:
Moving on, 97–134. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
. 2012. Delimitation
effects and the cartography of the left
periphery. In Günther Grewendorf & Thomas Ede Zimmermann (eds.), Discourse
and grammar: From sentence types to lexical
categories, 115–146. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
. 2015. Cartography,
criteria, and labeling. In Ur Shlonsky (ed.), Beyond
the functional
sequence, 314–338. New York: Oxford University Press.
Rizzi, Luigi & Ur Shlonsky. 2007. Strategies
of subject extraction. In Hans-Martin Gärtner & Uli Sauerland (eds.), Interfaces
+ recursion = language? Chomsky’s Minimalism and the view from
syntax-semantics, 115–160. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Shlonsky, Ur. 2021. Focus
movement in the “low” IP area and some of its consequences. Lecture presented
at Abralin Ao Vivo, 25
January.
. 2024. From
Bantu subject-object reversal to inverted copular sentences: How “low” focalization and smuggling circumvent
Relativized Minimality violations. In Giuliano Bocci, Daniele Botteri, Claudia Manetti & Vincenzo Moscati (eds.), Rich
descriptions and simple explanation in language structure and
acquisition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
