In:The Ziggurat of Grammar: In honor of Ur Shlonsky
Edited by Lena Baunaz, Giuliano Bocci and Andrew Nevins
[Language Faculty and Beyond 20] 2025
► pp. 403–415
Get fulltext
Chapter 19Insights into post-verbal argument reordering in Hebrew and Italian
Available under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial (CC BY-NC) 4.0 license.
For any use beyond this license, please contact the publisher at rights@benjamins.nl.
Published online: 13 November 2025
https://doi.org/10.1075/lfab.20.19che
https://doi.org/10.1075/lfab.20.19che
Abstract
Reordering the direct and indirect arguments of ditransitive predicates can be achieved either by
moving the first argument over the second or vice versa. The first strategy is subject to strict structural
constraints. Here we discuss some of these structural, prosodic, and semantic constraints as examined in a pilot
experiment in Italian and Hebrew.
Article outline
- 1.Theoretical background
- 1.1Hierarchy and position of post-verbal arguments
- 1.2Focalization of shifted NPs and Why questions
- 1.3From theory to practice: Bridging the gap between minimalist derivation and experimental evidence
- 2.Experimental evidence
- 2.1Materials and methods
- Materials
- Analysis
- Participants
- 2.2Results
- 2.1Materials and methods
- 3.Discussion
- 4.Conclusion
References
References (18)
Baayen, Harald, Douglas Davidson & Douglas M. Bates. 2008. Mixed-effects
modeling with crossed random effects for subjects and items. Journal of Memory
and
Language 59(4). 390–412.
Baker, Mark. 1988. Incorporation:
A theory of grammatical function
changing. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Bates, Douglas, Reinhold Kliegl, Shravan Vasishth & Harald Baayen. 2015. Parsimonious
mixed models. arXiv
preprint arXiv:1506.04967.
Belletti, Adriana. 2004. Aspects
of the low IP area. In Luigi Rizzi (ed.), The
structure of CP and IP. The cartography of syntactic
structures 2. 16–51. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Belletti, Adriana & Luigi Rizzi. 1988. Psych-verbs
and θ-theory. Natural Language and Linguistic
Theory 6(3). 291–352.
Belletti, Adriana & Ur Shlonsky. 1995. The
order of verbal complements: A comparative study. Natural Language and
Linguistic
Theory 13(3). 489–526.
Beltrame, Francesco. 2018. Focus
and topic propositions in why questions: An experimental study on
Italian. Siena: University of Siena dissertation.
Beltrame, Francesco & Cristiano Chesi. 2021. Why-questions
and focus in Italian. The Linguistic
Review. 38(4). 687–726
Carrier-Duncan, Jill. 1985. Linking
of thematic roles in derivational word formation. Linguistic
Inquiry 16(1). 1–34.
De Leeuw, Joshua R. 2015. jsPsych: A
JavaScript library for creating behavioral experiments in a Web
browser. Behavior Research
Methods 47(1). 1–12.
Keenan, Edward & Bernard Comrie. 1977. Noun
phrase accessibility and universal grammar. Linguistic
Inquiry 8(1). 63–99.
R Core Team. 2023. R: A
language and environment for statistical
computing. Vienna: R Foundation for Statistical Computing. [URL]
