Cover not available

In:The Ziggurat of Grammar: In honor of Ur Shlonsky
Edited by Lena Baunaz, Giuliano Bocci and Andrew Nevins
[Language Faculty and Beyond 20] 2025
► pp. 219

References (34)
References
Adani, Flavia, Heather K. J. van der Lely, Matteo Forgiarini & Maria-Teresa Guasti. 2010. Grammatical feature dissimilarities make relative clauses easier: A comprehension study with Italian children. Lingua 120(9). 2148–2166. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Adani, Flavia. 2011. Rethinking the acquisition of relative clauses in Italian: Towards a grammatically based account. Journal of Child Language 38(1). 141–165. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Angelopoulos, Nikos, Eleftheria Geronikou, & Arhonto Terzi. 2022. Locality and intervention in the acquisition of Greek relative clauses. Languages 7(4). 275. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Arnon, Inbal. 2005. Relative clause acquisition in Hebrew: Towards a processing-oriented account. In Alejna Brugos, M. Renée Clark-Cotton, & Seungwan Ha (eds.), Proceedings of the 29th Boston University Conference on Language Development, 37–48. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2010. Rethinking child difficulty: The effect of NP type on children’s processing of relative clauses in Hebrew. Journal of Child Language 37. 27–57. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Arosio, Fabrizio, Maria-Teresa Guasti & Natale Stucchi. 2011. Disambiguating information and memory resources in children’s processing of Italian relative clauses. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 40(2). 137–154. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bates, Douglas, Martin, Maechler, Ben, Bolker, & Steve, Walker. 2015. Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. Journal of Statistical Software 67(1). 1–48. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Belletti, Adriana, Naama Friedmann, Dominique Brunato & Luigi Rizzi. 2012. Does gender make a difference? Comparing the effect of gender on children’s comprehension of relative clauses in Hebrew and Italian. Lingua 122. 1053–1069. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bentea, Anamaria & Stephanie Durrleman. 2017. Now you hear it, now you don’t: Number mismatch in the comprehension of relative clauses in French. In Maria LaMendola & Jennifer Scott (eds.), Procedings of the Boston University Conference on Language Development (BUCLD) 41, 60–73. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2021. Number mismatch and intervention in the absence of lexical restriction: An investigation of celui/celle-headed relatives in French. In Danielle Dionne & Lee Ann Vidal Covas (eds.) Proceedings of the Boston University Conference on Language Development (BUCLD) 45. 40–51. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bentea, Anamaria, Stephanie Durrleman, & Luigi Rizzi. 2016. Refining intervention: The acquisition of featural relations in object A-bar dependencies. Lingua 169. 21–41. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Biondo, Nicoletta, Elena Pagliarini, Vincenzo Moscati, Luigi Rizzi & Adriana Belletti. 2023. Features matter: The role of number and gender features during the online processing of subject- and object-relative clauses in Italian. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience 38(6). 802–820. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Brown, Violet A. 2021. An introduction to linear mixed-effects modeling in R. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science 4(1). Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Contemori, Carla & Adriana Belletti. 2014. Relatives and passive object relatives in Italian-speaking children and adults: Intervention in production and comprehension. Applied Psycholinguistics 35(6). 1021–1053. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Contemori, Carla & Theodoros Marinis. 2014. The impact of number mismatch and passives on the real-time processing of relative clauses. Journal of Child Language. 41(3): 658–689. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Corrêa, Leticia. 1995. An alternative assessment of children’s comprehension of relative clauses. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 24. 183–203. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Costa, Joao, Maria Lobo & Carmen Silva. 2011. Subject–object asymmetries in the acquisition of Portuguese relative clauses: Adults vs. children. Lingua 121. 1083–1100. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Durrleman, Stephanie & Anamaria Bentea. 2021. Locality in the acquisition of object A’-dependencies: Insights from French. Glossa: A Journal of General Linguistics 6(1), 106. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Durrleman, Stephanie, Theodoros Marinis & Julie Franck. 2016. Syntactic complexity in the comprehension of wh-questions and relative clauses in typical language development and autism. Applied Psycholinguistics 37(6). 1501–1527. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Friedmann, Naama, Adriana Belletti & Luigi Rizzi. 2009. Relativized relatives: Types of intervention in the acquisition of A-bar dependencies. Lingua 119. 67–88. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Friedmann, Naama & Rama Novogrodsky. 2004. The acquisition of relative clause comprehension in Hebrew: A study of SLI and normal development. Journal of Child Language 31. 661–681. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hamburger, Henry & Steve Crain. 1982. Relative acquisition. In Stan A. Kuczaj II (ed.), Language Development, Vol. 1: Syntax and Semantics, 245–274. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum. In S. Kuczaj (ed.), Language development, Vol. 1: Syntax and semantics. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hu, Shenai, Anna Gavarró, Mirta Vernice & Maria Teresa Guasti. 2016. The acquisition of Chinese relative clauses: Contrasting two theoretical approaches. Journal of Child Language 43. 1–21. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Koopman, Hilda & Dominique Sportiche. 1991. The position of subjects. Lingua 85(2–3). 211–258. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
R Development Core Team. 2020. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing. [URL]
Rizzi, Luigi. 1990. Relativized minimality. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2004. Locality and the left periphery. In Adriana Belletti (ed.), Structures and beyond: The cartography of syntactic structures (Vol. 3). 223–251. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2013. Locality. Lingua 130. 169–186. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2018. Intervention effects in grammar and language acquisition. Probus 30(2). 339–367. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Shlonsky, Ur. 1997. Clause structure and word order in Hebrew and Arabic. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Starke, Michal. 2001. Move dissolves into Merge: A theory of locality (Doctoral dissertation, University of Geneva).
Varlokosta, Spyridoula, Michaela Nerantzini, & Despina Papadopoulou. 2015. Comprehension asymmetries in language acquisition: A test for Relativized Minimality. Journal of Child Language 42. 618–661. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wickham, Hadley. 2016. ggplot2: Elegant graphics for data analysis. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue