In:Null Objects from a Cross-Linguistic and Developmental Perspective
Edited by Pilar Barbosa and Cristina Flores
[Language Faculty and Beyond 19] 2025
► pp. 141–170
Animacy and schooling in the production of null objects and accusative clitics in the acquisition of two varieties of Portuguese
Published online: 15 April 2025
https://doi.org/10.1075/lfab.19.06lir
https://doi.org/10.1075/lfab.19.06lir
Abstract
This study investigates the encoding of 3rd person co-referential direct objects in Brazilian (BP)
and European (EP) varieties of Portuguese. Both varieties admit null objects, though they differ regarding the
productivity of the accusative clitic — highly productive in EP; overridden by the strong pronoun in oral, informal
BP. The implications of the type of pronominal direct object in each variety for the effect of animacy and the
syntactic restrictions applying to the null object are considered, with the strong pronoun favouring [+ animate]
antecedents. Our study reports an elicited production experiment, which was conducted with BP and EP-speaking
pre-schoolers and schoolchildren. Adult speakers of each variety were presented with the same task in the oral and the
written modalities. The results demonstrate differential sensitivity to animacy and syntactic context in the two
varieties, with a stronger effect of schooling in BP, due to the late incorporation of the 3rd person accusative
clitic.
Keywords: Animacy, null object, accusative clitic, elicited production
Article outline
- Introduction
- 1.Differences in the pronominal systems of Brazilian and European Portuguese
- 2.An experimental investigation with BP-speaking children, adolescents and adults
- 2.1Method
- 2.1.1Participants
- 2.1.2Material and procedures
- 2.2Results
- 2.3Discussion
- 2.1Method
- 3.Experiment with EP-speaking children and adolescents
- 3.1Method
- 3.1.1Participants
- 3.1.2Material and procedures
- 3.2Results
- 3.3Discussion
- 3.1Method
- 4.Comparing null forms and clitics in BP and EP
- 5.Concluding remarks
Notes References
References (58)
Almor, A. (1999). Noun-phrase
anaphora and focus: The informational load hypothesis. Psychological
Review, 106, 748–765.
Barbosa, P., Duarte, M. E. L. & Kato, M. A. (2005). Null
subjects in European and Brazilian Portuguese. Journal of Portuguese
Linguistics, 4 (2), 11–52.
Cardinaletti, A. & Starke, M. (1999). The
typology of structural deficiency: a case study of the three classes of
pronouns. In H. V. Riemsdijkp (Ed), Eurotyp. (5) Clitics
in the languages of Europe, Part 1. [Empirical Approaches to Language
Typology] (pp. 145–234). Berlin/New York: Mouton De Gruyter.
Casagrande, S. (2007). A
aquisição do objeto direto anafórico em português brasileiro. MA
dissertation. Florianópolis: UFSC.
Castro, T., Rothman, J. & Westergaard, M. (2017). On
the Directionality of Cross-Linguistic Effects in Bidialectal
Bilingualism. Frontiers in
Psychology 8, 1382.
Chomsky, N. (1981). Lectures
on Government and Binding: The Pisa
Lectures. Dordrecht: Foris Publications.
Costa, J. & Duarte, I. (2013). Objecto
nulo. In E. B. P. Raposo, M. F. B. do Nascimento, M. A. C. da Mota, L. Segura & A. Mendes (Orgs.), Gramática
do
Português. (2) (pp. 2337–2348). Lisboa: Fundação Calouste Gulbenkian.
Costa, J. & Lobo, M. (2011). Objecto
nulo na aquisição do português europeu: pro ou
variável? In XXVI Encontro da Associação Portuguesa
de Linguística. Textos
Selecionados. (pp. 197–207). APL: Lisboa.
(2007). Clitic
omission, null objects or both in the acquisition of European
Portuguese? In S. Baauw, F. Drijkoningen & M. Pinto (Eds.). Romance
Languages and Linguistic Theory 2005. Selected Proceedings of Going
Romance (pp. 59–71). Amsterdam / Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
(2009). Clitic
omission in the acquisition of European Portuguese: data from
comprehension. In J. Rothman & A. Pires (Eds.), Minimalist
Inquiries into Child and Adult Language Acquisition: Case Studies across
Portuguese (pp. 63–84). Berlin/New York: Mouton De Gruyter.
(2014). Crosslinguistic
variation in the acquisition of null categories: Portuguese vs.
Japanese. In T. Neokleous & K. K. Grohmann (Eds.), Developments
in the Acquisition of
Clitics (p. 272–287). Cambridge: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
Costa, J., Lobo, M. & Silva, C. (2012). Which
category replaces an omitted clitic? The case of European
Portuguese. In: P. Guijarro-Fuentes & M. P-Larrañaga (Eds.), Pronouns
and clitics in early
acquisition (p. 105–130). Berlin/New York: Mouton De Gruyter.
Cyrino, S. M. L. (1997). O
objeto nulo no português do Brasil: um estudo
sintático-diacrônico. PhD diss. [UNICAMP,
1994]. Londrina: UEL.
(2016). Null
objects in Romania Nova. In Kato, M. A. & Ordoñez, F. (Eds.) The
morphosyntax of Portuguese and Spanish in Latin
America (pp. 177–203). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Cyrino, S. M. L., Duarte, M. E. L., Kato, M. A. (2000) Visible subjects and invisible clitics in Brazilian Portuguese. In Kato, M. A., Negrão, E. V. (Orgs.) Brazilian portuguese and the null subject parameter, (pp. 55–73). Frankfurt: Iberoamericana, 2000.
de Oliveira, C. S. & Rocha, R. M. (2017). The
acceptability of clitic and tonic accusative 3rd person pronouns in written Brazilian
Portuguese. Revista
Diadorim [Online], 19, 197–218. Web. 31 Ago. 2021.
Duarte, M. E. L. (1989). Clítico
acusativo, pronome lexical e categoria vazia no português do
Brasil. In F. Tarallo (Org.). Fotografias
sociolinguísticas. Campinas, Pontes.
Duarte, I. & Matos, G. (2000). Romance
clitics and the Minimalist Program. In J. Costa (Org). Portuguese
syntax: New comparative
studies, (pp. 116–142). Oxford, Oxford University Press.
Duarte, I., Matos, G., & Faria, I. (1995). Specificity
of European Portuguese clitics in Romance. In I. Hub Faria & M. J. Freitas (Eds.), Studies
on the acquisition of
Portuguese (pp. 129–154). APL/Colibri.
Duarte, M. E. L. & Ramos, J. M. (2015). Uma
fotografia sociolinguística da realização dos clíticos acusativo, dativo, e reflexivo e suas formas variantes
na fala brasileira. In M. A. Martins, & J. Abraçado. Mapeamento
sociolinguístico do Português brasileiro. São Paulo: Contexto.
Farrell, P. (1990). Null
Objects in Brazilian Portuguese. Natural Language and Linguistic
Theory 8, 325–346.
Fiéis, A., Madeira, A., & Teixeira, J. (2022). Microvariation
in the resolution of pronominal subjects in Romance: European Portuguese vs.
Italian. Isogloss 8.5/4, 1–20.
Flores, C., Rinke, E. & Sopata, A. (2020). Acquiring
the distribution of null and overt direct objects in European
Portuguese. Journal of Portuguese
Linguistics, 19, (1), 5.
Galves, C. M. C. (1989). O
Objeto Nulo no Português Brasileiro: Percurso de uma Pesquisa./ The null object in Brazilian
Portuguese. Cadernos de Estudos
Linguísticos, 17, (pp. 65–90). Campinas: Unicamp.
Guindaste, R. M. G. (1988). A
categoria vazia na posição de objeto em português: uma abordagem gerativa
representacional. Dissertação
(Mestrado). Curitiba: Universidade Federal do Paraná.
Kato, M. A. (2011). A
natureza do objeto nulo e do nome nulo no português europeu e no português
brasileiro. Intercâmbio, XXIII. São Paulo: LAEL/PUCSP, 13–27.
(1993). The
Distribution of Pronouns and Null Elements in Object Position in Brazilian
Portuguese. In W. Ashby, M. M. G. Perissinotto & E. Raposo (Orgs.). Linguistic
Perspectives on the Romance
Languages, Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
(2001). Null
Objects, Resumptives and VP-Ellipsis in European and Brazilian
Portuguese. In J. Quer et al. (Org.). Romance
languages and linguistic
theory, (pp. 131–153). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Kato, M. A. & Raposo, E. (2001). O
objecto nulo definido no português europeu e no português brasileiro: convergências e
divergências. Actas do XVI Encontro Nacional da Associação Portuguesa de
Linguística, (pp. 673–685). Lisboa: APL.
(2005). Obje(c)tos
e artigos nulos em português europeu e português
brasileiro. In D. Moura & J. Farias (Org.). Reflexões
sobre a sintaxe do
Português. (pp. 73–96). Maceió: EDUFAL.
Kenedy, E. & Abraçado, J. (2012). Léxico
e computações lexicais. In J. Ferrari Neto & C. Silva (Orgs). Programa
minimalista em foco: princípios e
debates, (pp. 41–69). Curitiba: CRV.
Kenedy, E. & Mota, C. (2012). Orientação
de anáforas nulas e pronominais para sujeitos e tópicos no
PB. LinguíStica 8, 2.
Leitão, M. M. (2005a). O
processamento do objeto direto anafórico no português brasileiro. PhD
dissertation. Rio de Janeiro: UFRJ.
Lobo, M. & Vitorino, I. (2021). Acquisition
of clitic climbing by European Portuguese
children. In L. Avram, A. Sevcenco & V. Tomescu (Eds.), L1
Acquisition and L2 Learning: The view from
Romance, (pp. 13–38). John Benjamins.
Lopes, R. E. V. & Cyrino, S. M. L. (2005a). Animacy
as a driving cue in change and acquisition in Brazilian
Portuguese. In S. Kepser, S. & M. Reis (Eds). Linguistic
evidence: empirical, theoretical and computational perspectives. [1.
Ed.] (pp. 87–104). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
(2005b). Evidence
for a cue-based theory of language change and language acquisition: The null object in Brazilian
Portuguese. In T. Geerrs & H. Jacobs (Eds). Romance
Languages and Linguistic
Theory, (pp. 343–359). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Lopes, R. E. V. & Quadros, R. M. (2005). Traços
semânticos na aquisição da linguagem: há efeitos de modalidade de
língua? Revista da
ABRALIN, (4), 1/2, 75–108.
Maia, M. A. R. (1997). The
Processing of Object Anaphora in Brazilian Portuguese. Revue Linguistique de
Vincennes, 26, 151–176.
Menuzzi, S. & Lobo, M. (2016). Binding
theory and pronominal anaphora in Brazilian Portuguese.
1999. In W. L. Wetzels; J. Costa; S. Menuzzi (eds.). The
Handbook of Portuguese
Linguistics. (pp. 338–355). London: Wiley-Blackwell.
Merchant, J. (2016). Ellipsis:
A survey of analytical approaches. In J. Van Craenenbroeck, & T. Temmerman (Eds.). A
handbook of ellipsis. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Nunes, J. M. (1996). Direção
de cliticização, objeto nulo e pronome tônico na posição de objeto em português
brasileiro. In M. A. Kato & I. Roberts (Orgs.). Português
brasileiro: uma viagem diacrônica. [2.
ed.] (pp. 207–222) São Paulo: UNICAMP.
Raposo, E. P. (1986). On
the null object in European Portuguese. In O. Jaeggli; C. Silva-Corvalán. (Eds.). Studies
in Romance
Linguistics (pp. 373–390) Foris: Dordrecht.
Rinke, E., Flores, C., & Barbosa, P. (2018). Null
objects in the spontaneous speech of monolingual and bilingual speakers of European
Portuguese. Probus, 30, 93–119.
Ruda, M. (2021). Null
Arguments and Diagnostic Issues. Argument Ellipsis vs. Null Pronouns. [Handout]. Null objects from a
crosslinguistic and developmental perspective International
Meeting. University of Minho. 29–30 January, 2021. [Due to COVID-19, the
conference was held online].
Schwenter, S. A. (2006). Null
Objects across South America. In T. L. Face & C. A. Klee (Eds.) Selected
Proceedings of the 8th Hispanic Linguistics
Symposium, (pp. 23–36). Somerville, Cascadilla Proceedings Project.
(2014). Two
kinds of Differential Object Marking in Portuguese and
Spanish. In P. Amaral & A. M. Carvalho (Eds.). Portuguese-Spanish
Interfaces: diachrony, synchrony, and contact. Issues in Hispanic and Lusophone
Linguistics, (1) (pp. 237–260).
Schwenter, S. A. & Silva, G. (2002). Overt
x Null Direct Object in Spoken Brazilian Portuguese: A Semantic/Pragmatic
Account. Hispania, (85), 3, 577–586.
(2003). Anaphoric
Direct Objects in Spoken Brazilian Portuguese: Semantics and
Pragmatics. Revista Internacional de Linguística
Iberoamericana, (1), 2. 99–123.
Silva, M. C. V. F. (2009). O
objeto nulo no português rural baiano: teoria temática e elipse de DP. PhD
dissertation. Salvador: Universidade Federal da Bahia.
Tancredi, C. (1992). Deletion,
Deaccenting, and
Presupposition. Dissertation. Massachusetts: MIT.
Taylor, W. L. (1953). Cloze
procedure: A new tool for measuring readability. Journalism and Mass
Communication
Quarterly. 30 (4): 415–433.
Tomaz, M., Lobo, M., Madeira, A., Soares-Jesel, C., & Vaz, S. (2019). Omissão
e colocação de clíticos por crianças bilingues Português-Francês. Revista Da
Associação Portuguesa De
Linguística, (5), 385–412.
