In:Null Objects from a Cross-Linguistic and Developmental Perspective
Edited by Pilar Barbosa and Cristina Flores
[Language Faculty and Beyond 19] 2025
► pp. 82–111
Null object licensing in Guaraní
A person-split pro-drop account
Published online: 15 April 2025
https://doi.org/10.1075/lfab.19.04roe
https://doi.org/10.1075/lfab.19.04roe
Abstract
This article discusses object (and subject) omission in three Guaraní languages, providing evidence
for agreement–based direct object drop and genuine pro in internal argument position. The empirical
facts show that 1p and 2p object omission behaves very similarly to classical, even consistent, and
agreement–based subject drop in better-studied languages (Barbosa, 2011a;
Roberts & Holmberg, 2010). On the other hand, we see that Guaraní languages additionally allow for discourse-anchored
3p null arguments, occurring in parallel fashion in both external and internal positions. These patterns
approximate Guaraní-style null argument licensing to what was previously described for radical pro-drop languages
(Barbosa, 2011b; Holmberg,
2005; Huang, 1984; Tomioka,
2003). Hence, the resulting system referred to here as person-split pro-drop integrates
both agreement–based pro-drop and the licensing of agreement-independent argument omission, in a system where several
argument omission types not only co-exist but also interact in mixed argument configurations. Core to the pattern is the asymmetric null argument licensing mainly along the lines of
1/2p(erson) versus 3p features rather than along the line of grammatical function. Even though I differentiate two classes of empty nominals in the system, namely weak pronouns and
empty nominals [NP e], this distinction alone cannot fully account for the Guaraní-style pro-drop pattern.
Central to modelling argument omission encountered in the Guaraní data is to employ theoretical proposals on the role
of highly articulated agree probes [u3, u2, u1] — generating sensitivity to Person Hierarchy (PH) effects in the
(narrow) syntax — into the overall generative debate on null argument licensing (Béjar, 2003; Béjar & Rezac, 2008; Oxford, 2014, 2017, 2019).
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.Null objects in generative grammar theory
- 3.Multiple marking and syntactic raising of (some) direct objects
- 4.Guaraní-style null argument licensing: Basic data
- 4.1Null objects in discourse-independent simple transitive constructions
- 4.2Pro-drop in discourse-independent embedded clauses
- 5.Describing Guaraní-style person-split pro-drop systems
- 6.Modelling the Guarani-style person-split pro-drop
- 6.1On the nature of empty pronoun in Guaraní languages
- 6.2On the nature of agreement heads, φ-probes in person-split pro-drop
- 7.Conclusion
Notes Abbreviations References
References (57)
Anand, P., & Nevins, A. (2004). Shifty
Operators in Changing Contexts (R. Young, Ed.) Proceedings
of SALT 14. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University.
Barbosa, P. (2011a). Pro-Drop
and Theories of pro in the Minimalist Program Part 1: Consistent Null Subject Languages and the Pronominal-AGR
Hypothesis. Linguistics and Language
Compass, 5(8), 551–570.
(2011b). Pro-Drop
and Theories of pro in the Minimalist Program Part 2: Pronoun Deletion Analyses of Null Subjects and Partial,
Discourse and Semi Pro-Drop. Language and Linguistic
Compass, 5(8), 571–587.
(2019). Pro
as a minimal nP: Towards a Unified Approach to Pro—Drop. Linguistic
Inquiry, 50(3), 487.
Béjar, S. (2003). Phi—Syntax:
A Theory of
Agreement. Dissertation. University of Toronto.
Bossong, G. (1991). Differential
Object Marking in Romance and Beyond. In D. Kibbee & D. Wanner (Eds.), New
Analyses in Romance
Linguistics (pp. 143–170). Amsterdam, Philadelphia: Benjamins.
Cardinaletti, A. & Starke, M. (1999). The
typology of structural deficiency: A case study of the three classes of
pronouns. In H. van Riemsdijk (ed.) Clitics
in the languages of
Europe. (pp. 145–235), Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Cardoso, V. F. (2008). Aspectos
Morfosintácticos da Língua Kaiowá (Guaraní). Ph.D.
Dissertation, Universidade Estadual de Campinas.
Chomsky, Noam. (2000). Minimalist
inquiries: the framework. In Roger Martin, David Michaels & Juan Uriagereka (eds.), Step
by step: Essays on Minimalist syntax in honor of Howard
Lasnik, 89–156. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
. (2001). Derivation
by phase. In Michael Kenstowicz (ed.), Ken Hale: A life in language, 1–52. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Cyrino, S. (2013). Null
objects in Brazilian Portuguese revisited. Invited talk at
the Workshop on Portuguese Syntax. Università Ca’Foscari di
Venezia, May 2–3.
Cyrino, S., & Lopes, R. (2016). Null
objects are ellipsis in Brazilian Portuguese. The Linguistic
Review, 33, 483–502.
Deal, A. R. (2014). Nez
Perce embedded indexicals. In H. Greene (Ed.), Proceedings
of
SULA, Volume 7 (pp. 23–40). Amherst: GLSA.
(2018). Indexiphors:
Notes on embedded indexicals, shifty agreement, and logophoricity. University of California, Berkeley. Retrieved
from [URL]
Dooley, R. (2006). Léxico
Guarani, Dialeto Mbyá and Introdução: Informações Gerais, Esboço Gramatical and
Refererências. Working Paper. Summer Institute of Linguistics.
Freitas, M. L. (2011). Person
Hierarchy in Avá Guaraní: Syntactic and Morphological
Aspects. LIAMES, 12, 1–20.
Gregores, E., & Suárez, J. (1967). A
Description of Colloquial Guaraní. Den Haag; Paris: Mounton de Gruyter.
Hauck, J. D., Roessler, E.-M., & Thompson, W. (2010). A
Multimedia Documentation and Linguistic Corpus of the Aché Language,
TLA; MPI, Nijmegen. Retrieved
from [URL]
Holmberg, A. (2005). Is
There a Little Pro? Evidence from Finnish. Linguistic
Inquiry, 36(4), 533–564.
Holmberg, A., Nayudu, A., & Sheehan, M. (2009). Three
Partial Null-Subject Languages: A Comparison of Brazilian Portuguese, Finnish and
Marathi. Studia
Linguistica, 63(1), 59–97.
Huang, C.-T. J. (1984). On
the Distribution and Reference of Empty Pronouns. Linguistic
Inquiry, 15, 531–574.
(1989). Pro
drop in Chinese: a generalized control
approach. In O. Jaeggli & K. J. Safir (Eds.), The
Null Subject
Parameter (pp. 185–214). Dordrecht: Kluwer.
(1991). Remarks
on the Status of the Null Object. In Freidin, R. (ed.). Principles
and Parameters in Comparative
Grammar. Cambridge: MIT Press, 56–76.
Irimia, M., & Roessler, E.-M. (2022). DOM
and other object marking strategies: how many syntactic
probes? In A. Nevins, et al. (Eds), Angles
of Object Agreement, Oxford Studies in Theoretical Linguistics (pp. 241–262). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Jensen, C. (1990). Cross-referencing
changes in some Tupí-Guaraní languages. In: Payne, D. (ed.). Amazonian
Linguistics. Studies in Lowland South American
Languages. (p. 117–158), Austin: Austin University.
(1998). Comparative
Tupi-Guarani Morphosyntax. In C. D. Desmond & G. K. Pullum (Eds.), Handbook
of Amazonian
Languages. (pp. 489–618). Berlin, New York: Mountin Gruyter.
Oxford, W. (2014). Microparameters
of agreement: A diachronic perspective on Algonquian, Ph.D.
Dissertation, University of Toronto.
(2017). Inverse
Marking as Impoverishment. In A. Kaplan et al. (Eds.), Proceedings
of the 34th West Cost Conference on Formal
Linguistics (pp. 413–422). Somerville: Cascadilla ed.
(2019). Inverse
Marking and Multiple Agree in Algonquin: Complementarity and
Variability, Natural Language and Linguistic
Theory. 37, 955–996.
Payne, D. (1994). The
Tupí-Guaraní Inverse. In: Fox, B. & Hopper, P. (Eds.). Voice:
Form and
Function. (pp. 313–340), Amsterdam, Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Perlmutter, D. M. (1971). Deep
and Surface Constraints in Syntax. New York: Holt, Rinehard and Winston.
Roberts, I. (2010a). A
Deletion Analysis of Null Subjects. In T. Biberauer et al. (Eds.), Parametric
Variation — Null Subject in Minimalist
Theory (pp. 58–87). Cambridge, New York: Cambridge University Press.
(2010b). Agreement
and Head Movement: Clitics, Incorporation, and Defective Goals. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
Roberts, I., & Holmberg, A. (2010). Introduction:
Parameters in Minimalist Theory. In T. Biberauer et al. (Eds.), Parametric
Variation — Null Subject in Minimalist
Theory (pp. 1–57). Cambridge, New York: Cambridge University Press.
Rodrigues, A. (1985). Relações
internas na família lingüística Tupí-Guaraní. Revista de
Antropologia, v. 27/28, 33–53.
(1990). You
and I = neither you nor I: the personal system of
Tupinamabá. In Amazonian Linguistics. Studies in
Lowland South American
Languages (pp. 393–405). Austin: University of Texas Press.
Roessler, E.-M. (2015). Inflectional
morphology restructuring in Ache — Discussing grammatical change and language contact in Tupí-Guaraní
subgroup - 1. Boletim do Museu Paraense Emilio Goeldi: Ciencias Humanas, 10(2).
(2018). Syntactic
effects of inflectional morphology restructuring in aché: on language change and language contact in
Tupí-Guaraní Subgroup-1. Ph.D
Dissertation, University of Campinas.
(2019). Differential
Marking and Object Scrambling in the Guaraní Language
Cluster. In M. A. Irimia & A. Pineda (Eds.), Differential
Objects and Dative: A Homophonous Class? Lingvisticæ
Investigationes, 42(1), 32–55.
Ruda, M. (2017). On
the V-Stranding VP Ellipsis Analysis of Missing Objects in Polish. Proceedings
of the Third Central European Conference in Linguistics for Postgraduate
Students (pp. 60–85). Budapest: Pázmány Péter Catholic University.
(2020). Analyses
of null arguments meet a bare NP, consistent NS, partial NO language. Paper
presented at the 9th Cambridge Comparative Syntax
Conference, September 8–11. University of Cambridge.
(2021). Null
arguments and diagnostic issues: argument ellipsis vs. null pronouns. Paper
presented at the Workshop on Null
Objects, January 29–30. University of
Minho.
Sandalo, F. (2010). Person
Hierarchy and inverse voice in Kadiwéu. LIAMES: Línguas Indígenas Americanas,
Campinas,
SP, 9, n. 1, 27–40.
(2023). On
the Guaikuruan Inverse System: Interpreting Kadiwéu and Mocoví Person
Hierarchies. International Journal of American
Linguistics, 89, n. 1. 105–135.
Shain, C., & Tonhauser, J. (2011). The
Synchrony and Diachrony of Differential Object Marking in Paraguayan
Guaraní. Language Variation and
Change, 22, 321–246.
Sundaresan, S. (2012). Context
and (Co-)reference in the syntax and its interfaces. Doctoral
Dissertation, University of Tromsø (CASTL)/Universität.Stuttgart, Tromsø.
(2018). Perspective
is syntactic: evidence from anaphora. Glossa: A Journal of General
Linguistics, 3(1), 128.
Tomioka, S. (2003). The
semantics of Japanese null pronouns and its cross-linguistic
implications. In K. Schwabe & S. Winkler (Eds.), The
interfaces: Deriving and interpreting omitted
structures (pp. 321–340). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Tonhauser, J. (2006). The
Temporal Semantics of Noun Phrases: Evidence from Guaraní. Ph.D
Dissertation, Stanford University.
