In:Null Objects from a Cross-Linguistic and Developmental Perspective
Edited by Pilar Barbosa and Cristina Flores
[Language Faculty and Beyond 19] 2025
► pp. 28–48
Null arguments and diagnostic issues
Argument ellipsis vs. null pronouns
Published online: 15 April 2025
https://doi.org/10.1075/lfab.19.02rud
https://doi.org/10.1075/lfab.19.02rud
Abstract
Argument ellipsis (AE) has recently been gaining in prominence as the analytical tool employed to
account for null argument data in a wide range of languages. The choice between this analysis and the null pronoun
alternative is frequently determined based on two types of data, namely, a comparison of the interpretive properties
of the null argument and an overt pronoun and the availability of null arguments in the absence of a linguistic
antecedent. In this contribution, I look more closely at the nature of the AE-null pronoun distinction, showing first
that the frequently-employed diagnostics require reconsideration. I probe into the predictions of the two analyses
with respect to the behaviour of null and overt pronouns, as well as full, lexical NP arguments, focussing on two
factors, that is the interpretive differences between null and overt pronouns and the conclusion that null pronouns
are needed on either account. I then consider the issue of the representation of exophoric null arguments in relation
to the representation of exophoric overt pronouns and exophoric ellipsis in general. As these phenomena have not been sufficiently
explored in the existing literature, using exophoric null arguments as a basis in developing approaches to
representing null arguments is inherently problematic. These issues lead the discussion towards considering the
representation of null arguments with the language acquirer in mind, the complex picture of licensing null arguments
observed both cross-linguistically and intra-linguistically potentially resulting from an interplay of different
properties of the grammars of the particular languages.
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.Interpretation
- 2.1A null argument vs. an overt pronoun
- 2.1.1Interpretation of null and overt pronouns
- 2.1.2The general need for a null pronoun
- 2.2A null argument vs. a full NP
- 2.1A null argument vs. an overt pronoun
- 3.Extralinguistic antecedents
- 4.AE vs. null pronouns: Theoretical considerations
- 5.Conclusions
?ack? Notes References
References (83)
Aoun, J., & Li, Y.-h. A. (2008). Ellipsis
and missing objects. In R. Freidin, C. P. Otero, & M. L. Zubizarreta (Eds.), Foundational
issues in linguistic theory: Essays in honor of Jean-Roger
Vergnaud (pp. 251–273). Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
Bailyn, J. F. (2017). Against
a VP ellipsis account of Russian verb-stranding
constructions. In A. Vovin (Ed.), Studies
in Japanese and Korean linguistics and
beyond (pp. 93–109). Leiden: Brill.
Baltin, M. (2012). Deletion
versus pro-forms: An overly simple dichotomy? Natural Language and Linguistic
Theory, 30, 381–423.
Barbosa, P. (1995). Null
subjects (Unpublished doctoral
dissertation). Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA.
(2019). pro
as a minimal nP: Toward a unified approach to
pro-drop. Linguistic
Inquiry, 50, 487–526.
Boškovič, Ž. (2018). On
pronouns, clitic doubling, and argument ellipsis: Argument ellipsis as predicate
ellipsis. English
Linguistics, 35, 1–37.
Cyrino, S., & Lopes, R. (2016). Null
objects are ellipsis in Brazilian Portuguese. The Linguistic
Review, 33(4), 483–502.
Cyrino, S., & Matos, G. (2016). Null
objects and VP ellipsis in European and Brazilian
Portuguese. In W. L. Wetzels, J. Costa, & S. Menuzzi (Eds.), The
handbook of Portuguese
linguistics (pp. 294–317). Oxford: Wiley.
Duguine, M. (2014). Argument
ellipsis: A unitary approach to pro-drop. The Linguistic
Review, 31, 515–549.
Dvořák, V. (2015). Syntax
of generic null objects revisited. In A. E. Jurgensen, H. Sande, S. Lamoureux, K. Baclawski, & A. Zerbe (Eds.), Proceedings
of the 41st Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics
Society (pp. 71–97). Berkeley, CA: Berkeley Linguistics Society.
(2017). Generic
and indefinite null objects (Unpublished doctoral
dissertation). New Brunswick, NJ.
Erteschik-Shir, N., Ibnbari, L., & Taube, S. (2013). Missing
objects as topic
drop. Lingua, 136, 145–169.
Gribanova, V. (2013a). A
new argument for verb-stranding Verb Phrase ellipsis. Linguistic
Inquiry, 41, 145–157.
(2013b). Verb-stranding
Verb Phrase ellipsis and the structure of the Russian verbal complex. Natural
Language and Linguistic
Theory, 31, 91–136.
(2017). Head
movement and ellipsis in the expression of Russian polarity focus. Natural
Language and Linguistic
Theory, 35(4), 1079–1121.
Han, C.-h., Kim, K.-m., Moulton, K., & Lidz, J. (2020). Null
objects in Korean: Experimental evidence for the argument ellipsis
analysis. Linguistic
Inquiry, 51(2), 319–340.
Herbeck, P. (2018). Deriving
null, strong and emphatic pronouns in Romance pro-drop
languages. In P. Patel-Grosz, P. G. Grosz, & S. Zobel (Eds.), Pronouns
in embedded contexts at the syntax-semantics
interface (pp. 171–213). Dordrecht: Springer.
(2010). Null
subject parameters. In T. Biberauer, A. Holmberg, I. Roberts, & M. Sheehan (Eds.), Parametric
variation: Null subjects in minimalist
theory (pp. 88–124). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Huang, C.-T. J. (1982). Logical
relations in Chinese and the theory of grammar (Unpublished doctoral
dissertation). Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA.
Jarrah, M., & Altakhaineh, A. R. (2021). The
distribution of dropped objects in Jordanian Arabic, presentation, 9th Cambridge
Comparative Syntax Conference, Part II, online, January
2021.
Kim, S. (1999). Sloppy/strict
identity, empty objects, and NP ellipsis. Journal of East Asian
Linguistics, 8, 255–284.
Kurafuji, T. (2018). A
choice function approach to null arguments. Linguistics and
Philosophy, 42(1), 3–44.
Landau, I. (2018). Missing
objects in Hebrew: Argument ellipsis, not VP ellipsis. Glossa: A journal of
general
linguistics, 3(1), 1–37.
(2023). Argument
ellipsis as external merge after transfer. Natural Language and Linguistic
Theory, 41, 793–845.
Lowenstamm, J. (2008). On
little n, √, and types of nouns. In J. Hartmann, V. Hegedűs, & H. van Riemsdijk (Eds.), Sounds
of silence: Empty elements in syntax and
phonology (p. 105–144). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
McShane, M. J. (1999). The
ellipsis of accusative direct objects in Russian, Polish and Czech. Journal of
Slavic
Linguistics, 7, 45–88.
Mendes, G. (2020). Investigations
on salvation and non-salvation by deletion (Unpublished doctoral
dissertation). University of Maryland, College Park, MD.
Mendes, G., Ruda, M., Willer-Gold, J., Arsenijević, B., Ristić, B., Čordalija, N., … Nevins, A. (2024). Agreement
switch in verb-echo answers: Evidence for Distributed Ellipsis. Linguistic
Inquiry, Online Early, 1–74.
Merchant, J. (2010). Three
kinds of ellipsis. In F. Recanati, I. Stojanovic, & N. Villanueva (Eds.), Context-dependence,
perspective, and
relativity (pp. 141–192). Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.
(2013). Diagnosing
ellipsis. In L. L.-S. Cheng & N. Corver (Eds.), Diagnosing
syntax (pp. 537–542). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
(2014). Revisiting
conditions on predicate anaphora. In P. Hofmeister & E. Norcliffe (Eds.), The
core and the periphery: Data-driven perspectives on syntax inspired by Ivan A.
Sag (pp. 1–4). Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.
(2018). Ellipsis:
A survey of analytical approaches. In J. van Craenenbroeck & T. Temmerman (Eds.), The
Oxford handbook of
ellipsis (pp. 19–45). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
(2019). Roots
don’t select, categorial heads do: Lexical-selection of PPs may vary by
category. The Linguistic
Review, 36(3), 325–341.
Miller, P., & Pullum, G. K. (2014). Exophoric
VP ellipsis. In P. Hofmeister & E. Norcliffe (Eds.), The
core and the periphery: Data-driven perspectives on syntax inspired by Ivan A.
Sag (pp. 1–28). Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.
Montalbetti, M. M. (1984). After
binding (Unpublished doctoral
dissertation). Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA.
Oku, S. (1998). A
theory of selection and reconstruction in the minimalist
perspective (Unpublished doctoral
dissertation). University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT.
Pérez-Leroux, A. T., Pirvulescu, M., & Roberge, Y. (2008). Null
objects in child language: Syntax and the
lexicon. Lingua, 118, 370–398.
Pérez-Leroux, A. T., Pirvulescu, M., Roberge, Y., & Castilla, A. (2013). On
the development of null implicit objects in L1 English. The Canadian Journal of
Linguistics/La revue canadienne de
linguistique, 58, 443–464.
Portelance, E. (2020). Genuine
verb stranding VP-ellipsis in Lithuanian. In M. Asatryan, Y. Song, & A. Whitmal (Eds.), Proceedings
of the 50th Annual Meeting of the North East Linguistics
Society (pp. 59–72). Amherst, MA: Graduate Linguistic Students’ Association.
Postal, P. (1969). On
so-called pronouns in English. In D. Reibel & S. Schane (Eds.), Modern
studies in English: Readings in transformational
grammar (pp. 201–224). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Raposo, E. P. (1986). On
the null object in European Portuguese. In O. Jaeggli & C. Silva-Corvalán (Eds.), Studies
in Romance
linguistics (p. 373–390). Dordrecht: Foris.
Roberts, I. (2010). Agreement
and head movement. Clitics, incorporation, and defective goals. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
Ruda, M. (2014a). The
impersonal subject -N/T construction in Polish and the typology of Voice
heads. Studies in Polish
Linguistics, 9, 203–243.
(2014b). Missing
objects in special registers: The syntax of null objects in English. Canadian
Journal of Linguistics/Revue canadienne de
linguistique, 59, 339–372.
(2016). NP
ellipsis (effects) in Polish and Hungarian: FFs on Fs, Agree, and Chain
Reduction. The Linguistic
Review, 33, 649–677.
(2017). On
the syntax of missing objects. A study with special reference to English, Polish, and
Hungarian. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
(2021a). Polish
personal pronouns: [PersP Pers [NumP Num [n]]] and [NumP Num [n]]. Studies in
Polish
Linguistics, 16, 23–40.
(2021b). Strict
and sloppy readings of pronominal objects in Polish. Studies in Polish
Linguistics, 16, 121–144.
(2022a). Interpreting
null subjects in Polish: Against left-peripheral
linking. In G. Dalmi, E. Tsedryk, & P. Cegłowski (Eds.), Null
subjects in Slavic and Finno-Ugric: Licensing, structure and
typology (pp. 105–132). Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.
(2022b). Verb-echo
answers in Polish as V-stranding VoiceP/vP
ellipsis. In Özge Bakay, B. Pratley, E. Neu, & P. Deal (Eds.), NELS
52: Proceedings of the Fifty-Second Annual Meeting of the North East Linguistic
Society (pp. 47–60). Amherst, MA: Graduate Linguistics Student Association.
Runić, J. (2013). A
new look at clitics: Evidence from Slavic. In S. Franks, M. Dickinson, G. Fowler, M. Witcombe, & K. Zanon (Eds.), Formal
Approaches to Slavic Linguistics: The third Indiana meeting
2012 (pp. 275–288). Ann Arbor, MI: Michigan Slavic Publications.
Saab, A. (2020). Remarks
on Oku’s generalization. Anti-agreement and subject deletion in Spanish and
Japanese. Temas em estudos formais da
linguagem, 6(1), 14–40.
(2024). Agree,
agreement dissociation and subject ellipsis. Towards a new characterization of the Null Subject
Parameter. Probus, 36, 217–250.
Sakamoto, Y. (2015). Disjunction
as anew diagnostic for (argument) ellipsis. In T. Bui & D. Özyildiz (Eds.), Proceedings
of the 45th Annual Meeting of the North East Linguistics
Society (pp. 15–28). Amherst, MA: Graduate Linguistic Students’ Association.
Sato, Y., & Maeda, M. (2018). Particle
stranding ellipsis involves PF-deletion. Natural Language and Linguistic
Theory, 37(1), 357–388.
Sauerland, U. (2007). Flat
binding. In U. Sauerland & H.-M. Gärtner (Eds.), Interfaces
+ recursion =
language? (pp. 197–253). Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.
(2019b). Topicality in
Icelandic: Null arguments and narrative
inversion. In V. Molnár, V. Egerland, & S. Winkler (Eds.), Architecture
of
topic (pp. 249–272). Berlin: De Gruyter.
Soltan, U. (2020). On
null objects in Egyptian Arabic. Brill’s Journal of Afroasiatic Languages and
Linguistics, 12(2), 204–259.
Takahashi, D. (2008). Quantificational
null objects and argument ellipsis. Linguistic
Inquiry, 39, 307–326.
Tancredi, C. D. (1992). Deletion,
deaccenting and presupposition (Unpublished doctoral
dissertation). Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA.
Tomioka, S. (2003). The
semantics of Japanese null pronouns and its cross-linguistic
implications. In K. Schwabe & S. Winkler (Eds.), The
interfaces: Deriving and interpreting omitted
structures (pp. 321–339). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
(2014a). Micro-parameters
in discourse pro-drop languages: Comments on ‘Born empty’ by Yen-hui Audrey
Li. Lingua, 151, 69–77.
(2014b). Remarks
on missing arguments in Japanese. In S. Kawahara & M. Igarashi (Eds.), Proceedings
of FAJL 7: Formal Approaches to Japanese
Linguistics (pp. 251–263). Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
Tsimpli, I. M., & Papadopoulou, D. (2006). Aspect
and argument realization: A study on antecedentless null objects in
Greek. Lingua, 116, 1595–1615.
Willim, E. (2012). On
the feature valuation/interpretability biconditional in Minimalist Theory. The case of (un)interpretable
gender. In E. Cyran, H. Kardela, & B. Szymanek (Eds.), Sound,
structure and sense. Studies in memory of Edmund
Gussmann (pp. 761–806). Lublin: Wydawnictwo KUL.
(2024). A
dedicated null human impersonal pronoun in Polish and the Null Subject
Parameter. (Ms., Jagiellonian University in Kraków)
