In:Individual Differences in Anaphora Resolution: Language and cognitive effects
Edited by Georgia Fotiadou and Ianthi Maria Tsimpli
[Language Faculty and Beyond 18] 2023
► pp. 142–164
Measures of anaphoric-reflexive acquisition in Chinese
Published online: 2 November 2023
https://doi.org/10.1075/lfab.18.06spe
https://doi.org/10.1075/lfab.18.06spe
Abstract
This chapter investigates the second language acquisition of the
Chinese reflexive ziji ‘self’ by
English and Korean speakers. The aim is to utilize cognitive and behavioural measures in order to investigate the hypothesis that Chinese and
Korean reflexives are pragmatically regulated, while English
reflexives are syntactically governed. The measures
used are reaction timing, confidence levels and knowledge source
attribution. The experiment specifically examines how a processing
account of reflexives can support a pragmatic/syntactic distinction
of reflexive regulation in linguistic theory by observing how
long-distance and local binding is achieved in neutral and biased
contexts. Results reveal that English and Korean learners of Chinese
have differing sources of language transfer affecting their
interpretation of Chinese ziji.
Overall, the measures obtained shows their power in understanding what underlies traditional antecedent judgements.
Keywords: Chinese, Korean, English, ziji, reflexive pronoun, pragmatics, syntax
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.Background on ziji
- 2.1Properties of ziji
- 2.2Theoretical background on ziji
- 2.3Experiments with ziji
- 3.Methodology
- 4.Results and discussion
- 4.1Antecedent choice
- 4.2Confidence measures
- 4.3Timing measures
- 4.4Knowledge source measures
- 4.5Summary
- 4.6Individual variation
- 5.Conclusion
Acknowledgments Notes Appendix References
References (29)
Chen, D. (1996). The
L2 acquisition of Chinese reflexive
ziji. McGill
Working Papers in
Linguistics, 12, 1–15.
Cole, P. & Sung, L.-M. (1997). Long
distance reflexives and islandhood in Chinese head movement
versus adjunction to
IP. Journal
of Chinese
Linguistics, 25(2), 177–192.
Dienes, Z. & Scott, R. (2005). Measuring
unconscious knowledge: Distinguishing structural knowledge
and judgment
knowledge. Psychological
Research, 69, 338–351.
Dugarova, E. (2008). Interpretation
of the Chinese reflexive 'ziji' by English
speakers. In Yuan, B. (Ed.), Theoretical
and empirical approach to applied Chinese language
studies (pp. 7–16). London: Cypress Book Company.
Gao, L., Z. Liu & Huang, Y. (2005). Ziji shi shei? Dui yueshu yuanze de shiyan yanjiu. Yuyan Kexue, 4, 39–50.
Hu, J., H. Pan & Xu, L. (2001). Is there a finite vs. nonfinite distinction in Chinese? Linguistics, 39(6), 1117–1148.
Huang, C.-T. J. & Liu, C.-S. L. (2001). Logophoricity, attitudes and ziji at the interface. In Cole, P., Hermon, G. & Huang, C.-T. J. (Eds), Syntax
and semantics 33: Long-distance
Reflexives (pp. 141–195). New York: Academic Press.
Huang, Y. (1994). The
syntax and pragmatics of anaphora: A study with special
reference to
Chinese. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Kong, S. (2009). The
interpretation of Chinese monomorphemic and polymorphemic
anaphors by adult English
speakers. Hong
Kong Journal of Applied
Linguistics, 12(1), 45–62.
(2011). Monomorphemic
and polymorphemic anaphors in L2
Chinese. Journal of Chinese Linguistics, 39(2), 451–477.
Li, D. C.-H. & Kaiser, E. (2009). Overcoming
structural preference: Effects of context on the
interpretation of the Chinese reflexive
ziji. In Devi, S. L., Branco, A. & Mitkov, R. (Eds), Proceedings
of the 7th discourse anaphora and anaphor resolution
colloquium (pp. 64–72). Chennai: Computational Linguistics Research Group.
Li, X. & Zhou, X. (2010). Who
is ziji? ERP responses to the Chinese reflexive pronoun
during sentence
comprehension. Brain
Research, 1331, 96–104.
Liu, Z. (2009). The
cognitive process of Chinese reflexive
morphology. Journal
of Chinese
Linguistics, 37(1), 1–27.
Nicol, J., D. Swinney, T. Love & Hald, L. (2006). The
on-line study of sentence comprehension: An examination of
dual task
paradigms. Journal
of Psycholinguistic
Research, 35, 215–231.
Safir, K. (2013). Syntax,
binding, and patterns of
anaphora. In den Dikken, M. (Ed.), The
Cambridge handbook of generative
syntax (pp. 515–76). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Schumacher, P., Bisang, W. and Sun, L.. (2011). Perspective in the processing of the Chinese reflexive ziji: ERP evidence. . In Hendrickx, I., Lalitha Devi, S., Branco, A., Mitkov, R. (Eds), Anaphora processing and applications: 8th Discourse Anaphora and Anaphor Resolution Colloquium, DAARC 2011, Faro Portugal, October 6-7, 2011. Revised Selected Papers (pp. 119–131). Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg.
Selinker, L. (1972). Interlanguage. International
Review of Applied Linguistics in Language
Teaching, 10(3), 209–31.
Sperlich, D. (2015). Assessing
anaphoric relations via the phased choice
methodology. International
Review of Applied Linguistics in Language
Teaching, 53(4), 355–388.
