Cover not available

In:A0 – The Lexical Status of Adjectives
Edited by Phoevos Panagiotidis and Moreno Mitrović
[Language Faculty and Beyond 17] 2022
► pp. 219–256

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload Book PDF
EPUB logo with download linkDownload Book EPUB
authorization required

On the extended projection of German adjectives

 | The University of Arizona
Published online: 24 November 2022
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/lfab.17.07nit
Abstract
This chapter proposes a possible Extended Projection (EP) for German adjectives. It builds on previous work by Neeleman et al. (2004) on the English and Dutch adjectival EP. Based on work by Bobaljik (2012), this work also proposes that the comparative and superlative heads are part of the EP. We show that this proposal can be unified with the Neeleman et al. (2004) structure, by assuming Matushansky (2006)-style head-movement. The chapter then considers how different functional heads fit in the adjectival EP. Based on tests proposed by Neeleman et al. (2004), we find that some functional heads, such as viel (much) and zu (too), are part of the EP, while others, such as differentials, are not. While Neeleman et al. (2004) do not consider English “much" part of the adjectival EP, we show that, by the measure of their own tests, its German equivalent (viel) should be part of the German EP.
Article outline
  • Introduction
  • 1.Extended Projections
    • 1.1Extended Projections in adjectives of Dutch and English
    • 1.2The role of superlative and comparative in the EP of adjectives
  • 2.On the nature of German viel
  • 3.Extended Projections in German adjectives
    • 3.1Excessives and equatives
    • 3.2On the internal structure of comparatives
  • 4.The class-2 modifier sehr
  • 5.Differentials
  • 6.The dichotomy of viel
  • 7.Mapping the EP
  • 8.Discussion and conclusion
  • Notes
  • References
References (29)
References
Alrenga, Peter & Kennedy, Christopher. 2014. No more shall we part: quantifiers in english comparatives. Natural Language Semantics 22. 1–53. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bhatt, Rajesh & Roumyana, Pancheva. 2004. Late merger of degree clauses. Linguistic Inquiry 35(1). 1–45. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Biberauer, Theresa, Anders, Holmberg & Ian, Roberts. 2014. A syntactic universal and its consequences. Linguistic Inquiry 45(2). 169–225. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bobaljik, Jonathan 2012. Universals in comparative morphology: suppletion, superlatives, and the structure of words (Current Studies in Linguistics). Cambridge Mass.: MIT Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2017. Distributed Morphology. Oxford Research Encyclopedia for Linguistics. Retrieved 15 Nov.2021, from https://oxfordre.com/linguistics/view/10.1093/acrefore/9780199384655.001.0001/acrefore-9780199384655-e-131.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bośković, Źeljko 2014. Now i’m a phase, now i’m not a phase: on the variability of phases with extraction and ellipsis. Linguistic Inquiry 45(1). 27–89. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Brame, Micheal 1981. The head–selector theory of lexical specifications and the nonexistence of coarse categories. Linguistic Analysis 10. 321–325.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bresnan, Joan 1973. Syntax of the comparative clause construction in english. Linguistic Inquiry 4(3). 275–343.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Carlson, Gregory N. 1977. References to kinds in english. University of Massachusetts Amherst dissertation.
Chomsky, Noam 1995. The minimalist program. [2015 edition]. Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Corver, Norbert 1997a. Much-support as last resort. Linguistic Inquiry 28. 119–164.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Corver, Norber. 1997b. The internal syntax of the dutch extended adjectival projection. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 15. 289–368. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Emonds, Joe 1985. A unified theory of syntactic categories (Studies in Generative Grammar 19). Dordrecht, Holland: Foris Publications. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Grimshaw, Jane 1991. Extended projections. Ms. Brandeis University.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2000. Locality and extended projection. In Peter, Coopmans, Martin, Everaert & Jane, Grimshaw (eds.), Lexical specification and insertion (Current Issues in Linguistic Theory), 115–135. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Co. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Grosu, Alexander & Julia, Horvath. 2006. Reply to bhatt and pancheva’s “late merger of degree clauses”: the irrelevance of (non)conservativity. Linguistic Inquiry 37(3). 457–483. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Halle, Morris & Alec, Marantz. 1993. Distributed morphology and the pieces of inflection. In Kenneth, Hale & Samuel Jay, Keyser (eds.), The view from building 20, chap. 3, 111–176. Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1994. Some key features of distributed morphology. In Andrew, Camie, Heide, Harley & Tony, Bures (eds.), Papers on phonology and morphology, 275–288. Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Heim, Irene 2000. Degree operators and scope. In Brendan, Jackson & Tanya, Matthews (eds.), Salt 10. Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hellan, Lars 1986. The headedness of nps in norwegian. In Muysken, Pieter & Riemsdijk Henk, van (eds.), Features and projections. 81–122. Dodrecht: Foris. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kennedy, Christopher (ed.) 1999. Projecting the adjective : the syntax and semantics of gradability and comparison. New York: Garland.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kratzer, Angelika 1995. Stage-level and individual-level predicates. In Greg N., Carlson & Francis Jeffry, Pelletier (eds.), The generic book, chap. 2, 125–175. Chicago: Chicago University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lechner, Winfried 2001. Reduced and phrasal comparatives. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 19. 683–735. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Matushansky, Ora 2006. Head movement in linguistic theory. Linguistic Inquiry 37(1). 69–109. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mitrović, Moreno & Panagiotidis, Phoevos, (2020) “Adjectives exist, adjectivisers do not: a bicategorial typology”, Glossa: a journal of general linguistics 5(1): 58. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Neeleman, Ad, Hans van, de Koot & Jenny, Doetjes. 2004. Degree expressions. Linguistic Review 21(1). 1–66. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Osborne, Timothy 2009. Comparative coordination vs. comparative subordination. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 27. 427–454. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Schwarzschild, Roger 2008. The semantics of comparatives and other degree constructions. Language and Linguistics Compass 2(2). 308–331. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue