In:A0 – The Lexical Status of Adjectives
Edited by Phoevos Panagiotidis and Moreno Mitrović
[Language Faculty and Beyond 17] 2022
► pp. 155–186
Nominal Attributive Modifiers (NAMs) in Ògè
Published online: 24 November 2022
https://doi.org/10.1075/lfab.17.05ade
https://doi.org/10.1075/lfab.17.05ade
Abstract
This paper examines the syntax of adjectives in the Ògè language and argues that attributive adjectives in Ògè are nominal. Attributive
adjectives are called Nominal Attributive Modifiers (NAMs) in this work. Adopting the notion of dependent and independent
features as introduced in Zeijlstra (2020), this paper shows that the grammaticality of
NAM depends on the modified noun in attributive expressions in Ògè. For NAMs that are not in a local relationship with
the modified noun, evidence is given to show that such expressions are genitives or possessives. Accordingly, I analyze NAM as
adjuncts in modification expressions. Finally, I show that the adjunct (NAM) is involved in feature checking which further
contributes to the label ‘[N]’ for the concatenation of a NAM with a Noun.
Keywords: nominal, attributive, predicative, adjunct, genitives, modifier, Ògè, independent, dependent, features
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.Internal syntax of NAMs in Ògè
- 2.1Nominal Attributive Modifiers (NAMs) in Ògè
- 2.1.1í-NAMs in Ògè
- 2.1.2Nominalizations in Ògè
- 2.1.3Internal structure of í-NAMs
- 2.2Verbal status of predicative forms in Ògè
- 2.1Nominal Attributive Modifiers (NAMs) in Ògè
- 3.Implications of the analysis
- 4.External syntax of NAMs
- 4.1NAMs in argument positions
- 4.2Adjunction analysis of attributive adjectives
- 4.2.1Optionality of NAMs in attributive positions
- 4.2.2Problems with the label of adjuncts in the Minimalist Program
- 4.2.3Problems of the traditional analysis of adjuncts for NAMs
- 4.2.4Zeijlstra (2020)
- 4.3NAMs are dependent on the modified noun
- 5.Conclusions
Notes References
References (37)
Abney, Steven 1987. The English noun phrase in its sentential aspect. Ph. D. dissertation, MIT,Cambridge, MA.
Adénúgà, Priscilla Lola 2017. Negation in Ògè. Alore: Journal of the Humanities, University of Ilorin, Kwara State. Nigeria.
Alexiadou, Artmis 2010. Nominalisations: A probe into the architecture of grammar Part 1: The nominalization puzzle. Language & Linguistics compass, 4(7). 496–511.
Aljovic, Nadira 2010. Syntactic positions of attributive adjectives. In Hofherr, Patricia Cabredo & Ora, Matushansky (eds.), Adjectives: Formal analyses in syntax and semantics, 29–51. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. http://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/senc/detail.action?docID=623315.
Bernstein, Judy 1991. DPs in French and Walloon: Evidence for parametric variation in nominal head movement. Probus 2, 1–26.
Bosque, Ignacio & Picallo, Carme. 1996. Postnominal adjectives in Spanish DPs. Journal of linguistics 32(2), 349–385.
Bruening, Benjamin 2010. Ditransitive asymmetries and a theory of idiom formation. Linguistic Inquiry, 41(4), 519–562.
Cecchetto, Carlo & Donati, Caterina. 2010. On labeling: Principle c and head movement. Syntax 13:241–278.
Chomsky, Noam 1970. Remarks on Nominalization. In R.A., Rosenbaum (Ed.), Readings in Transformational Grammar 184–221. Waltham, MA: Ginn.
1981. Lectures on Government and Binding. Dordrecht: Foris ChomskyLectures on Government and Binding.
1995. Bare phrase structure. In Gert., Webelhuth (eds.), Government and binding theory and the minimalist program, 383–439. Massachusetts. Basil Blackwell Inc.
2000. Minimalist inquiries: The framework. Step by step: Essays on minimalist syntax in honor of Howard Lasnik. In Roger, Martin, David, Michaels, & Juan, Uriagereka (eds.), Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 89–155.
Cinque, Guglielmo 1994. On the evidence of partial N-movement in the Romance DP. In Guglielmo C, Jan Koster, Jean-Yves, Pollock, Luigi, Rizzi (eds.). Paths towards Universal Grammar: Studies in honor of Richard S. Kayne., 85–110. Washington, DC: Georgetown Press.
2014. The Semantic Classification of Adjectives. A View from Syntax. Studies in Chinese Linguistics, Vol. 35, No. 1, 1–30.
Collins, Chris 2002. Eliminating labels. In S.D., Epstein & T.D., Seely (eds.), Derivation and explanation in the minimalist program, 45–61. Oxford: Blackwell.
Cormack, Annabel & Breheny, Richard. 1994. Projections for Functional Categories. UCL Working Papers in Linguistics 6: 35–61.
Hornstein, Norbert 2009. A theory of syntax: Minimal operations and universal grammar. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Marantz, Alec 2001. Words: Paper presented at WCCFL XX, University of Southern California, Los Angeles.
Seely, T. Daniel 2006. Merge, derivational c-command, and subcategorization. In C., Boeckx (eds.), Minimalist essays, 182–217. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Sigurodsson, Halldór. Á. 1993. The structure of the Icelandic NP. Studia Linguistica, 47(2), 177–197.
1995. Clitic constructions. Phrase structure and the lexicon. In Johan, Rooryck and Laurie, Zaring (eds.), 213–276. Springer, Dordrecht.
Svenonius, Peter 1993. Selection, Adjunction, and Concord in the DP. Studia Linguistica 47 (2), 198–220. Working Papers in Scandinavian Syntax 49.95–121.
1994. ‘the structural location of the attributive adjective’. In E., Duncan,D., Farkas, and P., Spaelti (eds.), Proceedings of the 12th West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics, Stanford, pp.439–454. CSLI.
Zeijlstra, Hedzer 2014. On the uninterpretability of interpretable features In P., Kosta, S., Franks, T., Radeva-Bork & L., Schürcks (eds.), Minimalism and beyond, 109–129. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
