In:Mass and Count in Linguistics, Philosophy, and Cognitive Science
Edited by Friederike Moltmann
[Language Faculty and Beyond 16] 2020
► pp. 141–158
Comparatives in Brazilian Portuguese
Counting and measuring
Published online: 17 December 2020
https://doi.org/10.1075/lfab.16.07rot
https://doi.org/10.1075/lfab.16.07rot
Abstract
Comparatives in Brazilian Portuguese show that Bale and Barner’s (2009)
generalizations do not hold cross-linguistically; this leads to
reconsidering the role of cardinality in mass and count syntax. The paper
discusses contrasts in the use of naturally atomic, or object, mass nouns in
Brazilian Portuguese and English. Brazilian Portuguese has a productive bare
singular, which is analysed, following Pires de Oliveira and Rothstein (2011) as an object mass noun
with a count counterpart. However, in comparative constructions it does not
behave as Bale and Barner predict. We give an account of the relation
between counting and measuring which explains the data and we show, using
data from Hungarian, that the contrasts with English are not unique to
Brazilian Portuguese.
Keywords: semantics, comparatives, bare singulars, measuring, counting, Brazilian Portuguese
Article outline
- 1. Bale and Barner (2009)
- 2.Brazilian Portuguese bare singular
- 3.Naturally atomic (object) mass nouns in English
- 4. Hungarian
- 5.Theoretical analysis
- 6.Flexible nouns: English and Brazilian Portuguese
- 7.Summary
Acknowledgements Notes References
References (18)
Bale, A., & Barner, D. (2009). The
interpretation of functional heads: Using comparatives to explore
the mass/count distinction. Journal
of
Semantics, 26, 217–252.
Barner, D., & Snedeker, J. (2005). Quantity
judgements and individuation: Evidence that mass nouns
count. Cognition, 97, 41–66.
Chierchia, G. (1998). Plurality
of mass nouns and the notion of 'semantic
parameter. In S. Rothstein (Ed.), Events
and
Grammar (pp. 53–103). Dordrecht: Kluwer.
Grimm, S., & Levin, B. (2012). ‘Who
has more furniture?’ An exploration of the bases for
comparison.
Paper
presented at the Paris Colloquium on Mass/Count in Linguistics,
Philosophy and Cognitive Science. École Normale
Supérieure
, Paris, December
20–21, 2012.
Landman, F. (2010). Count
nouns – mass nouns – neat nouns – mess
nouns. The Baltic International
Yearbook of Cognition, Logic and
Communication, 6.
Li, X., & Rothstein, S. (2012). Measure
readings of Mandarin classifier phrases and the particle
de
. Language and
Linguistics, 13(4), 693–741.
Lima, S. (2014).
On
the grammar of individuation and
counting
(Ph. D.
Dissertation). UMass Amherst.
Pires de Oliveira, R., & Rothstein, S. (2011). Bare
nouns in are mass in Brazilian
Portuguese. Lingua, 121, 2153–2175.
Pires de Oliveira, R., & Mendes de Souza, L. (2013). O
singular nu e a comparação: uma proposta de derivação
semântica. Revista
LinguíStica. 9(1).
Rothstein, S. (2010). Counting
and the mass-count
distinction. Journal of
Semantics, 27(3), 343–397.
(2011). Counting,
measuring and the semantics of
classifiers. The Baltic International
Yearbook of Cognition, Logic and
Communication. 6.
(to
appear). Counting, measuring and
approximation. In H. Filip (Ed.), Counting
and measuring in natural
language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Schmitt, C., & Munn, A. (1999). Against
the nominal mapping parameter: bare nouns in Brazilian
Portuguese.
Proceedings of
NELS 29
.
Schvarcz, B., & Rothstein, S. (2017). Hungarian
classifier constructions and the mass/count
distinction. In A. Liptak, & H. van der Hulst (Eds.), Approaches
to Hungarian
15 (pp. 183–209). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Cited by (5)
Cited by five other publications
Kleineberg, Désirée & Wiltrud Mihatsch
2025. Diachronic evidence for Spanish object mass nouns as a peripheral category. In The Diachrony of Word Class Peripheries [Studies in Language Companion Series, 238], ► pp. 17 ff.
Mihatsch, Wiltrud & Désirée Kleineberg
Pires de Oliveira, Roberta
Huang, Aijun, Jingjing Li & Luisa Meroni
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 25 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
