In:Mass and Count in Linguistics, Philosophy, and Cognitive Science
Edited by Friederike Moltmann
[Language Faculty and Beyond 16] 2020
► pp. 103–140
Countability and grammatical number
An Aristotelian view and its challenges
Published online: 17 December 2020
https://doi.org/10.1075/lfab.16.06oje
https://doi.org/10.1075/lfab.16.06oje
Abstract
The purpose of this paper is to define number categories as government classes, and to interpret said categories semantically against models which are rich enough to support the desired interpretations. Defining number categories as government classes in terms of their cooccurrence with numerals leads to a system of five pairs of binary categories in complementary opposition: SINGULAR/COSINGULAR, DUAL/CODUAL, PAUCAL/COPAUCAL, MESAL/COMESAL, and UNIVERSAL/COUNIVERSAL. To support the interpretation of these ten categories we focus on Boolean models and compare those that split dualistically into atomistic and atomless portions with those that are uniformly atomless instead. After arguing that models for the interpertation of number should be uniformly atomless, we show how these models can support the interpretation of all count nouns regardless of number category. Particularly their cooccurrence with numerals. Key to such interpretations will be the ability to refer to atomistic structures embedded deeply within atomless models.
Article outline
- 1.Grammatical numbers as government classes
- 2.Further grammatical numbers: The universal and the co-universal
- 3. Interpreting the categories of grammatical number: A first pass
- 4.Models for the interpretation of grammatical number
- 5.The semantics of grammatical number: A Platonic view
- 6.The semantics of grammatical number: An Aristotelian view
- 7.The collective numbers
- 8.The conceptional neuter
- 9.Challenges for the Aristotelian view
Notes References
References (86)
Anderson, S. (1985). Grammatical
categories. In T. Shopen (Ed.), Language,
Typology, and Syntactic Description, Volume III: Grammatical
Categories and the
Lexicon. Cambridge University Press.
Bahl, K. C. (1975) A
grammatical sketch of
Panjabi. In R. Nigam (Ed.), grammatical
sketches of Indian languages with comparative vocabulary and
texts [= Census of India, 1971. Series 1:
India. Language Monographs, Number
21]. Controller of Publications (Delhi).
Beard, R. (1992). Number. In W. Bright (Ed.), International
encyclopedia of linguistics. Oxford University Press.
Biermann, A. (1982). Die
grammatische Kategorie
Numerus. In H. Seiler et al. (Eds.), Apprehension:
Das sprachliche Erfassen von Gegenständen. Teil I: Berich und
Ordnung der Phänomene [= Language Universals
Series, Volume I/1]. Gunter Narr Verlag.
Bosson, J. (1964). Modern
Mongolian [= Uralic and Altaic Series,
38]. Indiana University Publications / Mouton & Co.
Brugmann, K. (1907). Die
distributiven und die kollektiven numeralia der indogermanischen
Sprachen. B. G. Teubner.
Brugnatelli, V. (1982). Questioni
di morfologia e sintassi dei numerali cardinali
semitici [= Publicazioni della Facoltà di
Lettere e Filosofia dell’Università di Milano,
93]. Nuova Italia.
Capell, A., & Coate, H. (1984). Comparative
studies in Northern Kimberley
languages. Australian National University.
Chierchia, G. (1998). Plurality
of mass nouns and the notion of “semantic
parameter”. In S. Rothstein (Ed.), Events
and grammar [= Studies in Linguistics and
Philosophy, 70]. Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Corbett, G. (1992). A
typology of number systems [= EUROTYP
Working Papers, Theme 7: Noun Phrase Structure. Working Paper Number
15]. European Science Foundation, Progam in Language and Typology.
(1995). Minor
number and the plurality
split. In A. Borg, & F. Plank (Eds.), The
Maltese noun phrase meets typology [=
EUROTYP Working Papers, Theme 7: Noun Phrase Structure. Working
Paper Number 25].
(2003). The
interaction between numerals and
nouns. In F. Plank (Ed.), Noun
Phrase Structure in the Languages of
Europe [= Empirical Approaches to Language
Typology, 20–27]. Mouton de Gruyter.
Cruse, D. (1994). Number
and number
systems. In R. Asher (Ed.), The
encyclopedia of language and
linguistics. Pergamon Press.
Diakonoff, I. (1988). Afrasian
languages. Moscow: Institute of Oriental Studies, USSR Academy of Sciences.
Galand, L. (1967). La
construction du nom de nombre dans les parlers
berbères. Zeitschrift für
Mundartforschung, 3, 253–259.
Gamkrelidze, T., & Ivanov, V. (1995). Indoeuropean
and the Indoeuropeans [= Trends in
Linguistics, Studies and Monographs,
80]. Mouton de Gruyter.
Greenberg, J. (1977). Numeral
classifiers and substantival number: Problems in the genesis of a
linguistic
type. In A. Makkai et al. (Eds.), Linguistics
at the crossroads. Liviana Editrice and Jupiter Press.
(1978). Generalizations
about number
systems. In J. Greenberg (Ed.), Universals
of Human Language (Vol.
3). Stanford: Stanford University Press.
Hayward, R. (1979). Bayso
revisited: Some preliminary linguistic observations –
II [= Bulletin of the School of Oriental and
African Studies, LXII].
Howell, M. (1900) A
Grammar of the Classical Arabic language. Part
I. Allahabad: Published under the authority of the Northwest Provinces and the Government of Oudh.
Hurford, J. (2003). The interaction between numerals and nouns. In F. Plank (Ed.), Noun phrase structure in the languages of Europe. Mouton de Gruyter.
Ito, M. (1999). Semantic analysis of Japanese plural forms. Unpublished manuscript, Linguistics Department. University of California at Davis.
Kononov, A. (1960). Grammar
of contemporary literary Uzbek [in
Russian]. Institute of Far Eastern Studies, Academy of Sciences, USSR.
Krifka, M. (1989). Nominal
reference, temporal constitution, and quantification in event
semantics. In R. Bartsch et al. (Eds.), Semantics
and contextual expressions [=
Groningen-Amsterdam Studies in Semantics,
11]. Foris.
Landman, F. (2011). Count
nouns, mass nouns, neat nouns, mess
nouns. The Baltic International
Yearbook of Cognition, Logic, and Communication. Volume 6: Formal
Semantics and Pragmatics. Discourse, Context, and
Models, 1–67.
Lehman, W. (1958). On
earlier stages of the Indo-European nominal
inflection. Language, 34, 179–202.
Link, G. (1983). The
logical analysis of plurals and mass terms: A lattice-theoretical
approach. In Rainer Bäuerle et al. (Eds.), Meaning,
use and interpretation of
language. Walter de Gruyter.
Lorimer, D. (1935) The
Burushaski language (Vol.
I). Oslo: Instituttet for Sammenlignende Kulturforskning.
Lucy, J. (1992) Grammatical
categories and cognition [= Studies in the
Social and Cultural Foundations of Language,
13]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Massey, G. (1976). Tom,
Dick, Harry, and all the king’s
men. American Philosophical
Quarterly, 13, 89–107.
McKenna, M. (1988). A
handbook of modern spoken Breton [=
Buchreihe der Zeitschrift für celtische Philologie, Band
6]. Max Niemeyer Verlag.
Moravcsik, E. (1978a). Reduplicative
constructions. In J. Greenberg (Ed.), Universals
of human language. Stanford University Press.
Nebel, A. (1948). Dinka
grammar (Rek-Mahal Dialect) [= Museum
Combonianum, 2]. Misioni Africani (Verona).
Ojeda, A. (1992a). The
semantics of number in
Arabic. In C. Barker et al. (Eds.), Proceedings
of the Second Conference on Semantics and Linguistic
Theory [= Cornell Working Papers in
Linguistics, 40]. Cornell University, Department of Modern Languages and Linguistics.
(1993) Linguistic
individuals [= CSLI Lecture Notes,
31]. Center for the Study of Language and Information, Stanford University.
(1997a). How
to define number categories: A lesson from
Semitic. Papers from the 33rd
Regional Meeting, Chicago Linguistic
Society.
(2005). The
paradox of mass
plurals. In S. Mufwene et al. (Eds.), Polymorphous
linguistics. Jim McCawley’s
Legacy. MIT Press.
Ojeda, A., & Grivičić, T. (2003). The
semantics of Serbo-Croatian
collectives. In C. O. Orgun, & P. Sells (Eds.), Morphology
and the web of
grammar. Stanford: Center for the Study of Language and Information, Stanford University.
Pedersen, H. (1913). Vergleichende Grammatik der keltischen Sprachen. Volume II: Bedeutungslehre (Wortlehre). Vandenhoek und Ruprecht.
Pott, A. (1862). Doppelung
(Reduplication, Gemination) als eines der wichtigsten Bildungsmittel
de Sprache, beleuchtet aus Sprachen aller Welttheile durch Aug.
Friedr.
Pott. Meyer.
Ravila, P. (1941). Über
die Verwendung der Numeruszeichen in den uralischen
Sprachen. Finnisch-Ugrische
Forschungen, 28, 1–136.
Rijkhoff, J. (1992).
The
noun phrase: A typological study of its form and
structure
(Ph. D.
dissertation). Universiteit van Amsterdam.
Rukeyser, A. (1994). A
survey of nominal number in Australian
languages. Unpublished
manuscript.
Schimidt, W. (1926). Die
Sprachfamilien und Sprachkreise der
Erde. Reprinted in 1977 by Helmut Buske
Verlag.
Silver, S. (1966).
The
Shasta language
(Ph. D.
Dissertation). University of California at Berkeley.
Sturtevant, E. (1951). A
comparative grammar of the Hittite
language (rev.
ed.). Yale University Press.
Tobler, L. (1887). Ueber
den Begriff und besondere Bedeutungen des Plurals bei
Substantiven. Zeitschrift für
Völkerpsychologie, 14, 410–434.
Vendryes, J. (1937). Sur
le nombre duel. Reprinted in his
Choix d’Études Linguistiques et Celtiques.
Libraire C. Klincksieck, 1952, pp. 91–101, which we have
consulted.
Wald, J. (1977).
Stuff
and words: A semantic and linguistic analysis of nonsingular
reference
(Ph. D.
Dissertation). Brandeis University.
(1995). Noun
classification in
Kiowa-Tanoan.
Paper
presented at
SSILA/LI-95
, University of New
Mexico.
