Cover not available

In:Mass and Count in Linguistics, Philosophy, and Cognitive Science
Edited by Friederike Moltmann
[Language Faculty and Beyond 16] 2020
► pp. 61–82

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload Book PDF
authorization required

A comparison of abstract and concrete mass nouns in terms of their interaction with quantificational determiners

 | Bergische Universität Wuppertal
Published online: 17 December 2020
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/lfab.16.04hin
Abstract
In this paper, I compare concrete mass nouns such as water with abstract mass nouns derived from gradable adjectives like generosity in terms of their interaction with quantificational determiners. The main focus is on vague quantifiers such as a lot and little, on the one hand, and specificity markers such as a certain, on the other. In both cases the crucial factor setting the abstract mass nouns apart from the concrete ones is that the latter make available only a quantity/cardinality related scale for measurement and identification. The former, in contrast, give rise to an additional reading since they are associated with a second scale – namely one that orders the states denoted by the respective noun according to the degree with which they instantiate the corresponding property.
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2. Data to be accounted for
    • 2.1Vague quantificational determiners
    • 2.2Specificity markers
  • 3.Vague quantificational determiners and abstract mass nouns: The analysis
    • 3.1Background: Gradable adjectives and the nouns derived from them
    • 3.2The analysis
  • 4.Specificity markers and mass nouns: The analysis
    • 4.1Background
    • 4.2The analysis
  • 5.Conclusion
  • Notes
  • References
References (49)
References
Abusch, D., & Rooth, M. (1997). Epistemic NP modifiers. In A. Lawson (Ed.), Proceedings of SALT 7 (pp. 1–18). CLC Publications. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Aloni, M. (2001). Quantification under conceptual covers (Doctoral Dissertation). University of Amsterdam.
(2008). Concealed questions under cover. In F. Lihoreau (Ed.), Knowledge and questions [Grazer Philosophische Studien 77] (pp. 191–216). Rodopi. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Anderson, C., & Morzycki, M. (2015). Degrees as kinds. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 33(3), 791–828. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bale, A. C. (2008). A universal scale of comparison. Linguistics and Philosophy, 31(1), 1–55. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Barner, D., & Snedeker, J. (2005). Quantity judgments and individuation: Evidence that mass nouns count. Cognition, 97(1), 41–66. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Beaver, D., & Clark, B. (2008). Sense and sensitivity: How focus determines meaning. Blackwell. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bunt, H. C. (1985). Mass terms and model-theoretic semantics. Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Burge, T. (1972). Truth and mass terms. Journal of Philosophy, 69(10), 263–282. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(1975). Mass terms, count nouns, and change. Synthese, 31(3-4), 459–478. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Champollion, L. (2015). Stratified reference: the common core of distributivity, aspect, and measurement. Theoretical Linguistics, 41(3–4), 109–149. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2017). Parts of a whole. Distributivity as a bridge between aspect and measurement. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Chierchia, G. (1998a). Plurality of mass nouns and the notion of “semantic parameter”. In S. Rothstein (Ed.), Events and Grammar (pp. 53–103). Kluwer. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(1998b). Reference to kinds across languages. Natural Language Semantics, 6(4), 339–405. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2010). Mass nouns, vagueness and semantic variation. Synthese, 174(1), 99–149. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cresswell, M. J. (1977). The semantics of degree. In B. H. Partee (Ed.), Montague grammar (pp. 261–292). Academic Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dayal, V. (2004). Number marking and (in)definiteness in kind terms. Linguistics and Philosophy, 27(4), 393–450. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ebert, C., Ebert, C., & Hinterwimmer, S. (2012). The interpretation of the German specificity markers bestimmt and gewiss . In C. Ebert, & S. Hinterwimmer (Eds.), Different kinds of specificity across languages (pp. 31–74). Springer.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Farkas, D. (2002). Varieties of indefinites. In B. Jackson (Ed.), Proceedings of SALT 12 (pp. 59–83). CLC Publications. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gillon, B. (1992). Towards a common semantics for English count and mass nouns. Linguistics and Philosophy, 15(6), 597–639. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Grimm, S. (2014). Individuating the Abstract. In U. Etxeberria, A. Fălăuş, A. Irurtzun, & B. Leferman (Eds.), Proceedings of Sinn und Bedeutung 18 (pp. 182–200).Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Herburger, E. (2000). What counts: Focus and quantification. MIT Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hinterwimmer, S., & Umbach, C. (2015). Grading and hedging by gewiss . In L. Alonso-Ovalle & P. Menéndez-Benito (Eds.), Epistemic indefinites: Exploring modality beyond the verbal domain (pp. 163–183). Oxford University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Houghton, D. F. (2000). Something about anything: A semantic study of a, any, the and certain (Doctoral Dissertation). State University of New York.
Jayez, J., & Tovena, L. M. (2002). Determiners and (un)certainty. In B. Jackson (Ed.), Proceedings of SALT 12 (pp. 164–183). CLC Publications. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2006). Epistemic determiners. Journal of Semantics, 23(3), 217–250. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kennedy, C. (1999). Projecting the adjective: The syntax and semantics of gradability and comparison. Garland Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2007). Vagueness and grammar: The semantics of relative and absolute gradable adjectives. Linguistics and Philosophy, 30(1), 1–45. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kennedy, C., & McNally, L. (2005). Scale structure and the semantic typology of gradable predicates. Language, 81(2), 1–37. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Koontz-Garboden, A., & Francez, I. (2017). Semantics and morphosyntactic variation qualities and the grammar of property concepts. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Landman, F. (2000). Events and plurality. Kluwer. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2011). Count nouns, mass nouns, neat nouns, mess nouns. In B. H. Partee, M. Glanzberg, & J. Skilters (Eds.), Formal semantics and pragmatics: Discourse, context and models. The Baltic international yearbook of cognition, logic and communication (Vol. 6). New Prairie Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Link, G. (1983). The logical analysis of plurals and mass terms: A lattice-theoretical approach. In R. Bäuerle, C. Schwarze, & A. Stechow (Eds.), Meaning, use, and interpretation of language (pp. 302–323). de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Moltmann, F. (1997). Parts and wholes in semantics. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2004). Properties and kinds of tropes: New linguistic facts and old philosophical insights. Mind, 113(449), 1–41. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2009). Degree structure as trope structure: A trope-based analysis of positive and comparative adjectives. Linguistics and Philosophy, 32(1), 51–94. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2013). Abstract objects and the semantics of natural language. Oxford University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2015). States versus tropes. Comments on Curt Anderson and Marcin Morzycki: ‘Degrees as kinds‘. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 33(3), 829–841. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Nicolas, D. (2010). Towards a semantics for mass expressions derived from gradable expressions. Recherches Linguistiques de Vincennes, 39, 163–198. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Parsons, T. (1990). Events in the semantics of English. MIT Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pelletier, F. J., & Schubert, L. K. (1989). Mass expressions. In D. Gabbay, & F. Guenthner (Eds.), Handbook of philosophical logic (pp. 327–408). Reidel. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Quine, W. Van O. (1960). Word and object. MIT Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Potts, C. (2005). The logic of conventional implicatures. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rett, J. (2014). The semantics of evaluativity. Oxford University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rothstein, S. (2010). Counting and the mass/count distinction. Journal of Semantics, 27(3), 343–397. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2017). Semantics for counting and measuring. Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
von Stechow, A.(1984). Comparing semantic theories of comparison. Journal of Semantics, 3(1–2), 1–77. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tovena, L. M. (2001). Between mass and count. In K. Mergerdoomian, & L. A. Bar-el (Eds.), Proceedings of WCCFL (pp. 565–578). Cascadilla Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Yi, B-U. Mass nouns, gradable attributes and comparative relations. Unpublished manuscript, University of Toronto. Available at [URL]. Accessed September 2, 2013.
Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue