In:Mass and Count in Linguistics, Philosophy, and Cognitive Science
Edited by Friederike Moltmann
[Language Faculty and Beyond 16] 2020
► pp. 1–12
Introduction
Published online: 17 December 2020
https://doi.org/10.1075/lfab.16.01mol
https://doi.org/10.1075/lfab.16.01mol
Article outline
- 1.The syntactic mass-count distinction
- 2.Approaches to the semantic mass-count distinction
- 3.Numeral classifiers
- 4.Contributions in this volume
Acknowledgment Notes References
References (37)
Barner, D., & Snedeker, J. (2005). Quantity
judgements and individuation: Evidence that mass nouns
count. Cognition, 97, 41–66.
Bisang, W. (1999). Classifiers
in East and Southeast Asian languages. Counting and
beyond. In J. Gvozdanovic (Ed.), Numeral
types and changes
worldwide (pp. 113–185). Berlin: De Gruyter.
Champollion, L., & M. Krifka (2017).
Mereology
. In P. Dekker, & M. Aloni (Eds), Cambridge
handbook of
semantics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Cheng, C.-Y. (1973). Comments
on Moravcsik’s
paper. In J. Hintikka, J. Moravcsik, & P. Suppes (Eds.), Approaches
to natural
language (pp. 286–288). Dordrecht: Reidel.
Chierchia, G. (1998). Plurality
of mass nouns and the notion of ‘semantic
parameter’. In S. Rothstein (Ed.), Events
and
grammar (pp. 53–103). Dordrecht: Kluwer.
(2015). ‘How
universal is the mass/count distinction? Three grammars of
Counting. In Li, Simpson, & Tsai (Eds.), Chinese
Syntax in a cross-linguistic
perspective. Oxford: Oxford University Press
Doetjes, J. S. (2012). Count/mass
distinctions across
languages. In C. Maienborn, K. von Heusinger, & P. Portner (Eds.), Semantics:
An international handbook of natural language meaning, Part
III (pp. 2559–2580). Berlin: De Gruyter.
Gillon, B. S. (1987). The
readings of plural noun phrases in
English. Linguistics and
Philosophy, 10, 199–219.
(1992). Towards
a common semantics for English count and mass
nouns. Linguistics and
Philosophy, 15, 597–639.
Grandy, R. (2007). Sortals. In Ed N. Zalta (Ed.), The
Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Stanford,
online.
Jespersen, O. (1924). The
philosophy of grammar. Reprinted in 1992 by
Chicago University Press, Chicago.
Krifka, M. (1989). Nominal
reference, temporal constitution and quantification in event
semantics. In R. Bartsch, J. van Benthem, & P. van Emde Boas (Eds.), Semantics
and contextual
expression (pp. 75–115). Dordrecht: Foris.
Link, G. (1983). The
logical analysis of plural and mass terms: A lattice theoretical
approach. In R. Bäuerle, C. Schwarze, & A. von Stechow (Eds.), Meaning,
use and interpretation of
language (pp. 302–323). Berlin: De Gruyter.
(2004). Two
kinds of universals and two kinds of
collections. Linguistics and
Philosophy, 27(6), 739–776.
(2016). Plural
reference and reference to a plurality. Linguistic facts and
semantic
analyses. In M. Carrara, A. Arapinis, & F. Moltmann (Eds.), Unity
and plurality. Logic, philosophy, and
semantics (pp. 93–120). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Pelletier, F. (1979a). Mass
terms, count terms, and sortal
terms. In F. Pelletier (Ed.), Mass
terms (pp. vii–xi). Dordrecht: Reidel.
(1979b). Non-singular
reference: Some
preliminaries. In F. Pelletier (Ed.), Mass
terms (pp. 1–14). Dordrecht: Reidel.
Rothstein, S. (2010). Counting
and the mass/count
distinction. Journal of
Semantics, 27(3), 343–397.
Schwarzschild, R. (2011). Stubborn
distributivity, multiparticipant nouns and the count/mass
distinction. In S. Lima, K. Mullin, & B. Smith (Eds.), Proceedings
of the 39th Meeting of the North East Linguistic Society (NELS
39) (pp. 661–678). Amherst, MA: GSLA.
Senft, G. (2000). What
do we really know about nominal classification
systems. In G. Senft (Ed.), Systems
of nominal
classification (pp. 11–49). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Cited by (1)
Cited by one other publication
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 25 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
