Cover not available

In:Sonic Signatures: Studies dedicated to John Harris
Edited by Geoff Lindsey and Andrew Nevins
[Language Faculty and Beyond 14] 2017
► pp. 117–132

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload Book PDF
authorization required

Uniqueness in element signatures

 | University of Essex
Published online: 30 November 2017
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/lfab.14.c7
Representations of segments using elements or features face the challenge of whether cross-linguistic representations of the same sound should have the same representation. In line with a universal view of phonology, it is generally argued that the same phonetic output should have identical representations across systems. This paper discusses some cases where this position is challenged, particularly in cases involving language change and so-called crazy rules. It is argued that the phonological patterning of segments is what should be the crucial deciding factor in their representation, allowing different elemental combinations of the same sound from different languages to map onto identical patterns in the speech signal.
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Elemental representations and signatures
  • 3.Disparate phonological representations
  • 4.Diachrony as motivating contrasting representations
  • 5.Possible evidence for synchronic knowledge of diachronic processes
    • 5.1Bemba spirantization
    • 5.2Tswana sound alternations
  • 6.Conclusion
  • Acknowledgements
  • Notes
  • References
References (33)
References
Bach, Emmon & R.T. Harms. 1972. How do languages get crazy rules? In Robert Stockwell & Ronald Macaulay (eds.), Linguistic Change and Generative Theory, 1–21. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Backley, Philip. 2011. An Introduction to Element Theory. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Backley, Phillip & Kuniya Nasukawa. 2009. Headship as melodic strength. In Kuniya Nasukawa & Phillip Backley (eds.), Strength Relations in Phonology, 47–77. Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Batibo, Herman. 2015. The classical laws and rules in Bantu languages: How plausible are they. In Nancy C. Kula & Maxwell Kadenge (eds.), Special issue of Southern African Linguistics and Applied Language Studies 33(3): 247–260.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bellem, Alex. 2007. Towards a comparative typology of emphatics. Across Semitic and into Arabic dialect phonology. PhD dissertation, SOAS.
Bostoen, Koen. 2008. Bantu Spirantization: Morphologization, lexicalization and historical classification. Diachronica 25(3): 299–356.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Botma, Bert. 2004. Phonological Aspects of Nasality. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Amsterdam. Utrecht: LOT Publications.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Botma, Bert, Nancy C. Kula & Kuniya Nasukawa. 2013. Features. In Nancy C. Kula, Bert Botma & Kuniya Nasukawa (eds.), Bloomsbury Companion to Phonology, 33–63. London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cole, D.T. 1955. An Introduction to Tswana Grammar. Gaborone: Longman.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cyran, Eugeniusz. 1996. The parametric occurrence of elements in phonological systems. In Henryk Kardela & Bogdan Szymanek (eds.), A Festschrift for Edmund Gussmann from His Friends and Colleagues, 75–98. Lublin: Redakcja Wydawnictw KUL.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2014. Between Phonology and Phonetics: Polish Voicing. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Harris, John. 1990. Segmental complexity and phonological government. Phonology 7: 255–300. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Harris, John & Geoff Lindsey. 1992. Segmental decomposition and the signal. In W.U. Dressler, M. Prinzhorn & J.R. Rennison (eds.), Phonologica 1992: Proceedings of the 11th International Phonology Meeting, 96–106. Torino: Rosenberg and Sellier.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1995. The elements of phonological representation. In Jacques Durand & Francis Katamba (eds.), Frontiers of Phonology, 34–79. Harlow, Essex: Longman.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Huber, Daniel. 2003. Velars and empty-headedness in Government Phonology. Rivista di Grammatica Generativa 28: 45–56.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hyman, Larry M. 1994. Cyclic phonology and morphology in ChiBemba. In Jennifer Cole & Charles Kisseberth (eds.), Perspectives in Phonology, 81–112. Stanford: CSLI Publications.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kaye, Jonathan D. 2000. A users' guide to Government Phonology. Ms., University of Ulster.
Kaye, Jonathan, Jean Lowenstamm & Jean-Roger Vergnaud. 1990. Constituent structure and government in phonology. Phonology 7: 193–231. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kula, Nancy C. 1999. On the representation of NC clusters in Bemba. In R. van Bezooijen & R. Kager (eds.), Linguistics in the Netherlands 1999, 135–148. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2000. The Phonology/Morphology interface: Consonant mutations in Bemba. In Helen de Hoop & Ton van der Wouden (eds.), Linguistics in the Netherlands 1999, 171–183. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2002. The Phonology of Verbal Derivation in Bemba. PhD dissertation, University of Leiden. Utrecht: LOT Publications.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2012. On the representation of tone in Element Theory. In Cyran, et al., (eds.), Sound Structure and Sense, 353–367. Lublin: Wynadictwo.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kula, Nancy C. & Lutz Marten. 1998. Aspects of nasality in Bemba. SOAS Working Papers in Phonetics and Linguistics 8: 191–208.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ngolo, Naledi. 2014. The mental representation of Setswana deverbative nouns: A psycholinguistic analysis of Class 1 and 9 nominalisations. PhD dissertation, University of Essex.
Labroussi, Catherine. 1999. Vowel systems and spirantization in Southwest Tanzania. In J.M. Hombert & L.M. Hyman (eds.), Bantu Historical Linguistics: Theoretical and Empirical Perspectives, 335–377. Stanford: CSLI Publications.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mogapi, K. 1984. Thutapuo ya Setswana. Gaborone: Longman.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Nasukawa, Kuniya. 1998. An integrated approach to nasality and voicing. In Eugeniusz Cyran (ed.), Structure and Interpretation. Studies in Phonology, 205–225. Lublin: Folium.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2005. A Unified Approach to Nasality and Voicing. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ploch, Stefan 1999. Nasals on My Mind: The Phonetic and the Cognitive approach to the Phonology of Nasality. Ph.D. dissertation, SOAS.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Schadeberg, Thilo C. 1995. Spirantization and the 7-to-5 Vowel Merger in Bantu. In M. Dominicy & D. Demolin (eds.), Sound Change, 73–84. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Scheer, Tobias. 1996. Une théorie de l’interaction directe entre consonnes. Doctoral dissertation, Université Paris 7.
. 1999. A theory of consonantal interaction. Folia Linguistica 32: 201–237.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2015. How diachronic is synchronic grammar? Crazy rules, regularity and naturalness. In Patrick Honeybone & Joseph C. Salmons (eds.), The Handbook of Historical Phonology, 313–336. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue