In:Sonic Signatures: Studies dedicated to John Harris
Edited by Geoff Lindsey and Andrew Nevins
[Language Faculty and Beyond 14] 2017
► pp. 73–100
Deconstructing tongue root harmony systems
Published online: 30 November 2017
https://doi.org/10.1075/lfab.14.c5
https://doi.org/10.1075/lfab.14.c5
This article discusses various manifestations of tongue root (TR) harmony in African languages. I will propose an account within a model that uses variable elements and licensing. The primary goal is to deconstruct the general label ‘tongue root harmony’ into a number of subtypes, based on the formal treatment of these harmonies. Casali (2003) has shown that dominance of [+ATR] correlates with having an ATR-distinction among high vowels. If such as distinction is present we speak of a 2H system. If such a distinction is missing, we deal with a 1H system and in this case Casali observes [−ATR] dominance. I will discuss this correlation and then show that the RcvP model provides a formal basis, where the crucial point is that in the RcvP model, languages that have a contrast among two series of high vowels necessarily have a different formal representation (namely one that activates the ATR element) than languages that lack this contrast (which do not require this element to be active). This implies that the contrast between [ɛ~e] or [ɔ~o] is phonologically represented in different ways, with the consequence that in the latter (with two series of high vowels), the unary element [ATR] is active (and needs licensing to account for harmony), whereas in the former harmony can only be expressed in terms of ‘head alignment’ for the element |A|. This account suggests that both types of ‘tongue root’ harmony are fundamentally different in formal terms, which may correlate with a difference in the phonetic mechanisms.
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.The framework
- 2.1ATR as headedness
- 3.Asymmetries in African TR systems
- 4.Toward an explanatory account
- 5.Conclusions and unresolved issues
Acknowledgements Notes References
References (73)
Anderson, John M. 2011. Phonology-Syntax Analogies, 3 vols. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press.
Anderson, John M. & Colin J. Ewen. 1987. Principles of Dependency Phonology (Cambridge Studies in Linguistics 47). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Anderson, John M. & Charles Jones. 1974. Three theses concerning phonological representations. Journal of Linguistics 10: 1–26.
Anderson, Stephen R. 1980. Problems and perspectives in the description of vowel harmony. In Robert M. Vago (ed.), Issues in Vowel Harmony, 1–48. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Aoki, Haruo. 1968. Toward a typology of vowel harmony. International Journal of American Linguistics 34(2): 142–5.
. 2001. Vowel harmony and cyclicity in Eastern Nilotic. Berkeley Linguistics Society (BLS) 27: 1–12.
Booij, Geert E. & Jerzy Rubach. 1987. Postcyclic versus postlexical rules in Lexical Phonology. Linguistic Inquiry 18: 1–44.
Calabrese, Andrea. 2005. Markedness and Economy in a Derivational Model of Phonology. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Casali, Roderic F.. 1996. Resolving Hiatus. PhD dissertation, University of California at Los Angeles.
. 2003. [ATR] value asymmetries and underlying vowel inventory structure in Niger-Congo and Nilo-Saharan. Linguistic Typology 7: 307–382.
. 2014. Assimilation, markedness and inventory structure in tongue root harmony systems. Ms, Trinity Western University. [URL].
. forthcoming. Some inventory-related asymmetries in the patterning of tongue root harmony systems. Ms, Trinity Western University.
Charette, Monik & Asli Göksel. 1998. Licensing constraints and vowel harmony in Turkic languages. In Eugeniusz Cyran (ed.), Structure and Interpretation: Studies in Phonology, Vol. 4, 65–89. Lublin: PASE.
Clements, George N. 1981. Akan vowel harmony: A nonlinear analysis. Harvard Studies in Phonology 2: 108–88.
Dresher, B. Elan. 2009. The contrastive hierarchy in phonology (Cambridge studies in linguistics 121). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Dresher, B. Elan & Harry van der Hulst. 1998. Head-dependent asymmetries in phonology. Phonology 15: 317–52.
Edmondson, Jerold A. & John H. Esling. 2006. The valves of the throat and their functioning in tone, vocal register and stress: Laryngoscopic case studies. Phonology 23(2): 157–91.
Hall, Beatrice L., R.M.R. Hall, Martin D. Pam, Amy Myers, Stephen A. Antell & Godfrey K. Cherono. 1974. African vowel harmony systems from the vantage point of Kalenjin. Afrika und Übersee 57: 241–67.
Hall, Beatrice & Eluzai M. Yokwe. 1981. Bari vowel harmony: The evolution of a cross-height vowel harmony system. Occasional Papers in the Study of Sudanese Languages 1: 55–63.
Harris, John. 1989. Towards a lexical analysis of sound change in progress. Journal of Linguistics 25(1): 35–56.
. 1994b. Monovalency and opacity: Chichewa height harmony. UCL Working Papers in Linguistics 6: 509–547.
Harris, John & Geoff Lindsey. 1995. The elements for phonological representation. In Jacques Durand & Francis Katamba (eds.), Frontiers of Phonology: Atoms, Structures, Derivations, 34–79. London: Longman.
Harris, John & Francis Moto. 1994. Bantu height harmony: Monovalency and opacity. Ms, University College London.
Hyman, Larry M. 2002. Is there a right-to-left bias in vowel harmony? In John Rennison, Friedrich Neubarth & Markus Pöchtrager (eds.), Phonologica 2002. Berlin: Mouton.
Inkelas, Sharon. 1995. The consequences of optimization for under specification. In Jill N. Beckman (ed.), Proceedings of the North East Linguistic Society 25, 287–302. Amherst, Mass.: GLSA.
Innes, Gordon. 1966. An Introduction to Grebo. London: School of Oriental and African Studies (SOAS).
Ka, Omar. 1988. Wolof Phonology and Morphology: A Non-Linear Approach. PhD dissertation, University of Illinois.
Kaye, Jonathan, Jean Lowenstamm & Jean-Roger Vergnaud. 1985. The internal structure of phonological elements: A theory of charm and government. Phonology Yearbook 2: 305–28.
Kiparsky, Paul. 1982. From cyclic phonology to Lexical Phonology. In Harry van der Hulst & Norval Smith (eds.), The Structure of Phonological Representations, Vol. 1, 131–175. Dordrecht: Foris.
Kiparsky, Paul & Karl Pajusalu. 2003. Towards a typology of disharmony. The Linguistic Review 20(2–4): 217–41.
Kutsch Lojenga, Constance. 1994. KiBudu: A Bantu language with nine vowels. Africana Linguistica 11: 127–133.
. 2008. Nine vowels and ATR vowel harmony in Lika, a Bantu language in D.R. Congo. Africana Linguistica 14: 63–84.
Leitch, Myles F. 1996. Vowel harmonies of the Congo Basin: An Optimality Theory analysis of variation in the Bantu zone C. PhD dissertation, University of British Columbia.
Morén, Bruce. 2003. The Parallel Structures Model of feature geometry. Working Papers of the Cornell Phonetics Laboratory 15: 194–270.
Mous, Maarten. 1986. Vowel harmony in Tunen. In Koen Bogers, Harry van der Hulst & Maarten Mous (eds.), The Phonological Representation of Suprasegmentals, 281–295. Dordrecht: Foris.
Orie, Olanike Ola. 2001. An alignment-based account of vowel harmony in Ife Yoruba. Journal of African Languages and Linguistics 22: 117–43.
Polgárdi, Krisztina. 1998. Vowel Harmony: An Account in Terms of Government and Optimality. PhD dissertation, Leiden University.
Ribeiro, Eduardo R. 2000. [ATR] vowel harmony and palatalization in Karajá. Santa Barbara Papers in Linguistics 10: 80–92.
Ringen, Catherine O. 1975. Vowel Harmony: Theoretical Implications. PhD dissertation, Indiana University (New York: Garland, 1988).
Ritter, Nancy A. 1995. The Role of Universal Grammar in Phonology: A Government Phonology Approach to Hungarian. PhD dissertation, New York University.
Salting, Don. 1998. The Nested Subregister Model of Vowel Height. PhD dissertation, Indiana University.
Singler, John V. 2008. The restructuring of the Klao vowel system and its morphophonemic consequences. Handout of paper presented at the Association of Contemporary African Linguistics 39, April 18, 2008.
Steriade, Donca. 1981. Parameters of metrical vowel harmony rules. Ms, MIT.
Stewart, John M. 1967. A theory of the origin of Akan vowel harmony. International Congress of Phonetic Sciences 6: 863–865.
. 1983. Akan vowel harmony: The word structure conditions and the floating vowels. Studies in African Linguistics 14: 111–139.
van der Hulst, Harry. 1988a. The geometry of vocalic features. In Harry van der Hulst & Norval Smith (eds.), Features, Segmental Structure and Harmony Processes, Vol. 2, 77–125. Dordrecht: Foris.
van der Hulst, Harry. 1995. Radical CV Phonology: The categorial gesture. In Jacques Durand & Francis Katamba (eds.), Frontiers of Phonology: Atoms, Structures, Derivations, 80–116. London: Longman.
. 2012. A minimal framework for vowel harmony. In Bert Botma & Roland Noske (eds.), Phonological Explorations: Empirical, Theoretical and Diachronic Issues, 155–190. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
. 2014. Lowering harmony in Bantu. In Sabrina Bendjaballah, Noam Faust, Mohamed Lahrouchi & Nicola Lampitelli (eds.), The Form of Structure, the Structure of Form: Essays in Honor of Jean Lowenstamm (Language Faculty and Beyond 12), 13–36. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
. 2015a. The laryngeal class in RcvP and voice phenomena in Dutch. In Johanneke Caspers, et al. (eds.), Above and Beyond the Segments, 323–349. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
. 2015b. The opponent principle in RcvP: Binarity in a unary system. In Eric Raimy & Charles Cairns (eds.), The Segment in Phonetics and Phonology, 149–179. London: Wiley-Blackwell.
. in prep. Principles of Radical cv Phonology. Ms, University of Connecticut.
. to appear a. Asymmetries in Vowel Harmony – A Representational Account. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
. to appear b. A representational account of vowel harmony in terms of variable elements and licensing. In Harry van der Hulst & Anikó Liptak (eds.), The structure of Hungarian. Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on the Structure of Hungarian. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
van der Hulst, Harry & Norval Smith. 1986. On neutral vowels. In Koen Bogers, Harry van der Hulst & Norval Smith (eds.), The Phonological Representation of Suprasegmentals, 233–279. Dordrecht: Foris.
Cited by (3)
Cited by three other publications
van der Hulst, Harry & Jeroen van de Weijer
2018. Degrees of complexity in phonological segments. In Substance-based Grammar – The (Ongoing) Work of John Anderson [Studies in Language Companion Series, 204], ► pp. 385 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 25 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
