Cover not available

In:Sonic Signatures: Studies dedicated to John Harris
Edited by Geoff Lindsey and Andrew Nevins
[Language Faculty and Beyond 14] 2017
► pp. 231–262

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload Book PDF
authorization required

The phonology of handshape distribution in Maxakalí sign

 | University College London
 | University College London
Published online: 30 November 2017
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/lfab.14.c14
We provide an analysis of the distribution of handshapes on the dominant and non-dominant hand in the incipient village sign language found in the Maxakalí community in Brazil. The most frequent handshapes reflect tendencies in choosing from the crosslinguistically unmarked set of handshapes, and are particularly well-suited to quantitative analyses of handshape complexity found in models such as Ann (2006) and Brentari (2003), in addition to favouring a core set chosen from the most maximally dispersed handshapes.
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
    • 1.1Village sign languages
    • 1.2Data and methods
  • 2.Results of handshapes and discussion of models
    • 2.1Handshape dispersion and distinctness in Maxakalí
    • 2.2Maximal dispersion of handshapes and Sandler et al 2011’s model
    • 2.3The inventory of unmarked handshapes and how to derive them
    • 2.4Selected finger parameters in van der Hulst’s (1996a) model
    • 2.5 Battison’s (1978) Symmetry and Dominance conditions
    • 2.6Towards a quantitatively verifiable metric of ease of articulation
    • 2.7 Brentari’s (1998) handshape complexity model
    • 2.8Perceptual distinctness
  • 3.The non-dominant hand
  • 4.Conclusion
  • Appendix
  • Acknowledgements
  • Notes
  • References
References (52)
References
Anderson, John M. & Colin J. Ewen. 1987. Principles of Dependency Phonology (Cambridge Studies in Linguistics 47). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ann, J. 2006. Frequency of Occurrence and Ease of Articulation of Sign Language Handshapes: The Taiwanese Example. Washington, DC: Gallaudet University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Backley, P. 2011. An Introduction to Element Theory. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Battison, R. 1974. Phonological deletion in American Sign Language. Sign Language Studies 5: 5–19.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1978. Lexical Borrowing in American Sign Language. Silver Spring, MD: Linstok Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Blevins, J. 1993. The nature of constraints on the nondominant hand in ASL. Phonetics and Phonology 3: 43–62.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Boyes-Braem, P. 1990. Acquisition of the handshape in American Sign Language: A preliminary analysis. In V. Volterra & C.J. Erting (eds.), (1994) From Gesture to Language in Hearing and Deaf Children, 107–127. Washington, DC: Gallaudet University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Brentari, D. 1998. A Prosodic Model of Sign Language Phonology. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2011. Sign language phonology. In J. Goldsmith, J. Riggle, & A. Yu (eds.), The Handbook of Phonological Theory, 2nd edn, 691–721. UK: Wiley-Blackwell. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Brentari, D., M. Coppola, P.W. Cho & A. Senghas. 2016. Handshape complexity as a precursor to phonology: Variation, emergence, and acquisition. Language Acquisition, accepted for publication. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Brentari, D, M. Coppola, L. Mazzoni & S. Goldin-Meadow. 2012. When does a system become phonological? Handshape production in gesturers, signers, and homesigners. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 30(1): 1–31. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Corina, D., & W. Sandler. 1993. On the nature of phonological structure in sign language. Phonology 10(2), 165–207. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Crasborn, O. 2011. The other hand in Sign Language Phonology. In M. van Oostendorp, C. Ewen, E. Hume & K. Rice (eds.), (2011) The Blackwell Companion to Phonology, 223–240. UK: Blackwell Publishing. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
de Vos, C. 2007, August. Kata Kolok: A village-based Sign Language of Northern Bali. In International Symposium On the Languages of Java . Semarang, Java, Indonesia.
Frishberg, N. 1975. Arbitrariness and iconicity: Historical change in American Sign Language. Language 51: 696–719. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1985. Dominance relations and discourse structures. In W. Stokoe & V. Volterra (eds.), SLR ’83: Proceedings of the 3rd International Symposium on Sign Language Research, 79–90. Rome: Consiglo Nazionale delle Ricerche.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Greenberg, J. 1966. Language Universals: With Special Reference to Feature Hierarchies. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Harris, John & Geoff Lindsey. 1995. The elements of phonological representation. In Jacques Durand & Francis Katamba (eds.), Frontiers of Phonology, 34–79. Harlow, Essex: Longman.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hulst, H.G. van der. 1996a. Acquisitional evidence for the phonological composition of handshape. In C. Koster & F. Wijnen (eds.), (1985) Proceedings of Gala, 39–56.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1996b. On the other hand. Lingua: International Review of General Linguistics 98(1–3): 121–143. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Johnston, T. & A. Schembri. 2007. Australian Sign Language: An Introduction to Sign Language Linguistics. UK: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kakumasu, J. 1968. Urubu Sign Language. International Journal of American Linguistics 34: 275–281. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kisch, S. 2012. Demarcating generations of signers in the dynamic sociolinguistic landscape of a shared sign-language: The case of the Al-Sayyid Bedouin. In U. Zeshan & C. de Vos (eds.), (2012) Sign Languages in Village Communities, 87–125. Boston, MA: Mouton de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Klima, E. & U. Bellugi. 1979. The Signs of Language. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lane, H., P. Boyes-Braem & U. Bellugi. 1980. A featural analysis of handshapes. In E. Klima & U. Bellugi (eds.), (1980) The Signs of Language, 164–180. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Liljencrants, J. & B. Lindblom. 1972. Numerical simulation of vowel quality systems: The role of perceptual contrast. Language 48(4): 839–862. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mandel, M.A. 1981. Phonotactics and Morphophonology in ASL. Ph.D. dissertation, Department of Linguistics, University of California, Berkeley.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Matthews, P.H. 2014. The Oxford Concise Dictionary of Linguistics. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
McGregor, W. 2015. Linguistics: An Introduction. London, UK: Bloomsbury Publishing Plc.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Meurant, L., A. Sinte, M. van Herreweghe & M. Vermeerbergen (eds.). 2013. Sign Language Research, Uses and Practices: Crossing Views on Theoretical and Applied Sign Language Linguistics. Nijmegen, The Netherlands: Mouton de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Morgan, H. & R. Mayberry. 2012. Complexity in two-handed signs in Kenyan Sign Language. Sign Language Linguistics 15(1): 147–174. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Miller, C. 1994. Simultaneous constructions in Quebec Sign Language. In M. Brennan & G. Turner (eds.), (1994) Word-Order Issues in Sign Language, 89–112. Durham, NC: ISLA.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Nespor, M. & I. Vogel. 1986. Prosodic Phonology. Dordrecht: Foris.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Prillwitz, S., R. Leven, H. Zienert, T. Hanke & J. Henning. 1989. HamNoSys, version 2.0; Hamburg Notation System for Sign Languages: An introductory guide. International Studies on Sign Language and Communication of the Deaf 5 . Hamburg: Signum.
Rice, K. 2007. Markedness in phonology. In P. De Lacy (eds.), (2007) The Cambridge Handbook of Phonology, 79–97. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rozelle, L. 2003. The Structure of Sign Language Lexicons: Inventory and Distribution of Handshape and Location. PhD dissertation, University of Washington.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sandler, W. 1993. Hand in hand: The roles of the nondominant hand in Sign Language Phonology. The Linguistic Review 10(4): 337–390. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1995. Markedness in American Sign Language Handshapes: A componential analysis. In H.G. van der Hulst & J.M. van de Weijer (eds.), Leiden in Last: HIL Phonology Papers I. The Hague: Distributed by Holland Academic Graphics.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1996. Representing handshapes. In W. Edmondson & R. Wilbur (eds.), (1996) International Review of Sign Linguistics, Vol. 1, 115–159. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2011. The phonology of movement in Sign Language. In M. van oostendorp, C. Ewen, E. Hume & K. Rice (eds.), (2011) The Blackwell Companion to Phonology, 577–603. UK: Blackwell Publishing. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2012. The phonological organization of Sign Languages. Language and Linguistics Compass 6(3): 162–182. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sandler, W., I. Meir, C. Padden & M. Aronoff. 2005. The emergence of grammar in a new sign language. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 102(7): 2661–2665. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sandler, W. & D. Lillo-Martin. 2006. Sign Language and Linguistic Universals. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sandler, W., M. Aronoff, I. Meir & C. Padden. 2011. The gradual emergence of phonological form in a new language. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 29: 503–543. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Schein, J. & D. Stewart. 2002. Language in Motion. Washington, DC: Gallaudet University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Stoianov, D. 2016. Phonological Dispersion in Maxakalí Sign. Unpublished M.A. thesis, Department of Psychology and Language Sciences, University College London.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Stokoe, W. 1960. Sign language structure: An outline of the visual communications systems. Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education 10(1): 3–37. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Stungis, J. 1981. Identification and discrimination of handshape in American Sign Language. Perception and Psychophysics 29: 261–276. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sturm, V. 1987, July. The Phonemic Nature of Sign Language. In Deseret Language and Linguistic Society Symposium . Utah, U.S.A.
van der Kooij, E. 2002. Phonological categories in Sign Language of the Netherlands. The Role of Phonetic Implementation and Iconicity. Utrecht: LOT.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Washabaugh, W. 1979. Hearing and deaf signers on Providence Island. Sign Language Studies 24: 191–214. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Woodward, J. 1987. Universal constraints across Sign Languages: Single finger contact handshapes. Sign Language Studies 0(57): 375–385. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (2)

Cited by two other publications

Costa, Edivaldo da Silva, Erich Teles Bezerra & Leoni Ramos Souza Nascimento
2022. Etnoterminologia de etnias das línguas de sinais das terras indígenas brasileiras. LIAMES: Línguas Indígenas Americanas 22 ► pp. e022006 ff. DOI logo
Reed, Lauren W.
2020. “Switching caps”. Asia-Pacific Language Variation 6:1 ► pp. 13 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 25 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue