In:Sonic Signatures: Studies dedicated to John Harris
Edited by Geoff Lindsey and Andrew Nevins
[Language Faculty and Beyond 14] 2017
► pp. 215–230
Segmental loss and phonological representation
Published online: 30 November 2017
https://doi.org/10.1075/lfab.14.c13
https://doi.org/10.1075/lfab.14.c13
This paper discusses how complex onset reduction impacts phonological representation, intending to contribute to the debate on the abrupt or gradual nature of segmental loss. Complex onset reduction involves cases where adjacent consonants occur in the same syllable and can be simplified to a single consonant as in Brazilian Portuguese data: outro ou[tɾ]o > ou[t]o ‘another one’ and brasileiro [bɾ]asileiro > [b]asileiro ‘Brazilian’. We will examine r-loss in complex onsets in Samothraki Greek and Brazilian Portuguese, intending to show that it evolves through different pathways in each language. In Samothraki Greek, complex onset reduction is a regular and productive phonological process, whereas in Brazilian Portuguese complex onset reduction is a variable phenomenon with lexical conditioning. Samothraki Greek complex onset reduction promotes vowel lengthening, which is clearly audible and can be empirically observed by acoustic inspection of spectrograms. In Brazilian Portuguese complex onset reduction also promotes vowel lengthening, but it is not perceived by speakers although it can be examined experimentally. Complex onset reduction in Samothraki Greek interacts with palatalization and vowel centralization in order to prevent opaque forms. On the other hand, in Brazilian Portuguese opaque forms occur as a consequence of palatalization or post-tonic gliding, both of which are related to complex onset reduction. We suggest that complex onset reduction in Samothraki Greek and Brazilian Portuguese provide evidence for either an abrupt or gradual impact of segmental loss on phonological representations.
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.Complex onset reduction in Brazilian Portuguese
- 3.Segmental loss and phonological representation in Brazilian Portuguese
- 4.Discussion
- 5.Conclusion
Acknowledgements Notes References
References (33)
Abaurre, Maria B.M. & Emílio G. Pagotto. 2002. A palatalização das oclusivas dentais no português do Brasil. In
Gramática do português falado VII: novos estudos descritivos
, 557–602. Campinas: Editora da Unicamp.
Barboza, Clerton. 2013. Efeitos da palatalização das oclusivas alveolares do português brasileiro no percurso de construção da fonologia do inglês língua estrangeira. Tese de Doutorado. UFCE.
Barry, William & Bistra Andreeva. 2001. Cross-language similarities and differences in spontaneous speech patterns. Journal of the International Phonetic Association 31(1): 51–66.
Bermudez-Otero, Ricardo. 2007. Diachronic phonology. In Paul De Lacy (ed.), The Cambridge Handbook of Phonology, 497–517. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Boersma, Paul & Weenink, David. 2016. Praat: doing phonetics by computer [Programa de computador]. Versão 6.0.16. Disponível em: [URL].
Broselow, Ellen. 1996. Skeletal Positions and Moras. In John Goldsmith (ed.), The Handbook of Phonological Theory. Cambridge: Blackwell.
Bybee, Joan L. 2013. Usage-based theory and exemplar representation. In Thomas Hoffman and Graeme Trousdale (eds.) The Oxford Handbook of Construction Grammar, 49–69. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Carvalho, Ana Maria. 2004. I speak like the guys on TV: Palatalization and the urbanization of Uruguayan Portuguese. Language Variation and Change 16(2): 127–141.
Cohn, Abigail C., Cecile Fougeron & Marie K. Huffman (Orgs.). 2012. The Oxford Handbook of Laboratory Phonology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Cole, Jennifer & José I. Hualde. 2011. Underlying representations. In Marc van Oostendorp, Colin Ewen, Elizabeth Hume & Keren Rice (eds.), The Blackwell Companion to Phonology, 1–26. Malden, MA & Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
Cristófaro Silva, Thaïs. 1992. Nuclear Phenomena in Brazilian Portuguese. PhD thesis. University of London.
. 2002. Branching onsets in Brazilian Portuguese. Revista de Estudos da Linguagem, 91–107. Belo Horizonte.
. 2004. Palatalisation in Brazilian Portuguese. In Stefan Ploch (ed.), Living on the Edge: 28 Papers Honour of Jonathan Kaye (Studies in Generative Grammar 62), 1st edn., 243–257. Berlin-New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
Cristófaro Silva, Thaïs & Maria M. Cantoni. 2011. On the emergence of contrast. In Wai-Sum Lee & Eric Zee (eds.), Proceedings of the 17th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences, Vol. 1, 536–539. Hong Kong: University of Hong Kong.
Foulkes, Paul & Gerrard J. Docherty. 2006. The social life of phonetics and phonology. Journal of Phonetics 34: 409–438.
Freitas, Edir R. 2001. Aprendizagem da estrutura silábica CCV: oralidade e escrita. MA dissertation. UFMG.
Harris, John. 1989. Towards a lexical analysis of sound change in progress. Journal of Linguistics 25(1): 35–56. CUP.
. 2007. Representation. In The Cambridge Handbook of Phonology, 119–137. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
. 2011. Deletion. In M. van Oostendorp, C.J. Ewen, E.V. Hume & K. Rice (eds.), The Blackwell Companion to Phonology, 1597–1621. Oxford, UK: Wiley-Blackwell.
Honeybone, Patrick. 2008. Lenition, weakening and consonantal strength: Tracing concepts through the history of phonology. In J. Brandão de Carvalho, T. Scheer & P. Ségéral (eds.), Lenition and Fortition. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Johnson, Keith. 1997. Speech perception without speaker normalization: An exemplar model. In K. Johnson & J.W. Mullennix (eds.), Talker Variability in Speech Processing, 145–166. San Diego: Academic Press.
. 2006. Resonance in an exemplar-based lexicon: The emergence of social identity and phonology. Journal of Phonetics 34: 485–499.
Li, Fangfang, Jan Edwards & Mary E. Beckman. 2009. Contrast and covert contrast: The phonetic development of voiceless sibilant fricatives in English and Japanese toddlers. Journal of Phonetics 37: 111–124.
Mezzomo, Carolina L., Helena B. Mota, Roberta F. Dias & Vanessa Giacchini. 2008. O uso da estratégia de alongamento compensatório em crianças com desenvolvimento fonológico normal e desviante. Letras de Hoje, Porto Alegre 43(3): 35–41, jul./set.
Miranda, Izabel C. 2007. Aquisição e variação estruturada de encontros consonantais tautossilábicos. Unpublished PhD Dissertation. Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais.
Munson, Benjamin, Jan Edwards, Sarah Schellinger, Mary Beckman & Marie K. Meyer. 2010. Deconstructing phonetic transcription: Covert contrast, perceptual bias, and an extraterrestrial view of Vox Humana. Clinical Linguistics & Phonetics, April–May. 24(4–5): 245–260.
Oliveira, Nívia. 2017. Variação em encontros consonantais tautossilábicos no Português Brasileiro. MA thesis. Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais.
Pierrehumbert, Janet. 2001. Exemplar dynamics: Word frequency, lenition, and contrast. In J. Bybee & P. Hopper (eds.), Frequency Effects and the Emergence of Linguistic Structure, 137–157. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
. 2002. Word-specific phonetics. In Carlos Gussenhoven & Natasha Warner (eds.), Laboratory Phonology 7, 101–139. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Scobbie, James, Fiona Gibbon, William Hardcastle & Paul Fletcher. 2000. Covert contrast as a stage in the acquisition of phonetics and phonology. Papers in Laboratory Phonology 5: 194–207.
Topintzi, Nina. 2010. Onsets: Suprasegmental and Prosodic Behaviour (Cambridge Studies in Linguistics 125). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Topintzi, Nina & Marc van Oostendorp. 2009. Palatalization and Centralization in SG. In Proceedings of the
29th Annual Meeting of the Linguistics Department 2008
, 385–399. Aristotle University of Thessaloniki. Downloaded on 20th October 2016 from: [URL].
