Cover not available

In:Minimalism and Beyond: Radicalizing the interfaces
Edited by Peter Kosta, Steven L. Franks, Teodora Radeva-Bork and Lilia Schürcks
[Language Faculty and Beyond 11] 2014
► pp. 392–415

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload Book PDF
authorization required

The role of arbitrariness from a minimalist point of view

Published online: 24 September 2014
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/lfab.11.16bie
The problem pursued in this paper concerns the role of Arbitrariness in linguistic expressions. Saussurean Arbitrariness is due to the conventional sound-meaning-relation of linguistic expressions. It is systematically projected (but not reduced) from Lexical Items to linguistic expressions of unrestricted complexity by the operation of Merge. This raises the question, whether this arbitrariness is an incidental byproduct of the systems complexity, which could be avoided under conditions of optimal design. With this perspective, language is compared to mental systems of comparable complexity, but without arbitrariness. Obviously, neither the visual system nor the system of music (which consists like language in auditory signals with combinatorial structure) involves arbitrariness in any sense akin to language. The by no means trivial conclusion is, that due to the conventional nature of symbolic signs, linguistic expressions can correspond to structures of any possible domain, differing thereby especially from iconic signs. The upshot of this conclusion: arbitrariness provides the space, by means of which language allows to talk about anything that can be subject to mental awareness. Arbitrariness does not fall short of optimal design, but rather allows language to be the organ of thought and its expression, which it is.
References (22)
References
Berlin, Brent and Kay, Paul. 1969. Basic Color Terms. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bloom, Paul. 2002. How Children Learn the Meaning of Words. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bierwisch, Manfred. 2011. “Completeness and limitation of natural languages.” Linguistics 49: 791–833. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam. 1995. The Minimalist Program,Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2000. “Minimalist inquiries.” In Step by Step, Roger Martin, David Michaels, Juan Uriagereka (eds), 89–155. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2005. “Three factors in language design”. Linguistic Inquiry 36: 1–22. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Clements, George N. 1985. “The geometry of phonological features”. In Phonology Yearbook 2, 225–252. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fodor, Jerry A. 1983. The Modularity of Mind. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hanslick, Eduard. 1854. Vom musikalisch Schönen. Leipzig: Rudolph Weigel.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hjelmslev, Louis. 1953. Prolegomena to a Theory of Language. Madison: The University of Wisconsin Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ionin, Tania and Matushansky, Ora. 2006. “The composition of complex cardinals”. Journal of Semantics 23: 315–360. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jackendoff, Ray. 2002. Foundations of Language. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2010. Meaning and the Lexicon. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jackendoff, Ray and Lerdahl, Fred. 2006. “The capacity for music: What’s special about it?” Cognition 100: 33–72. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Katz, Jonah and Pesetsky, David. 2009. “The identity thesis for language and music”. LingBuzz /000959.
Kayne, Richard. 1994. The Antisymmetry of Syntax. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Klima, Edward and Bellugi, Ursula. 1979. The Signs of Language. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lerdahl, Fred and Jackendoff, Ray. 1983. A Generative Theory of Tonal Music. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Marr, David. 1982. Vision. San Francisco: Freeman.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Meyer, Leonard B. 1956. Emotion and Meaning in Music. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Saussure, Ferdinand de. 1916. Course de linguistique générale. Paris: PayotGoogle Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wilder, Christopher. 1995. “Derivational economy and the analysis of V2”. FAS Papers in Linguistics I: 117–156. Berlin.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (3)

Cited by three other publications

Balcarras, David
2023. Functionalism and tacit knowledge of grammar. Philosophical Perspectives 37:1 ► pp. 18 ff. DOI logo
Wiślicki, Jan
2021. Light heads and predicate formation: on two scopes of discontinuity. Linguistics 59:6 ► pp. 1389 ff. DOI logo
Blutner, Reinhard
2017. Modelling tonal attraction: tonal hierarchies, interval cycles, and quantum probabilities. Soft Computing 21:6 ► pp. 1401 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 25 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue