Cover not available

In:Minimalism and Beyond: Radicalizing the interfaces
Edited by Peter Kosta, Steven L. Franks, Teodora Radeva-Bork and Lilia Schürcks
[Language Faculty and Beyond 11] 2014
► pp. 287–303

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload Book PDF
authorization required

A minimalist approach to roots

 | University of Cyprus
Published online: 24 September 2014
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/lfab.11.11pan
The necessity for roots to be categorized in syntax is recast as an interface condition, resulting from the SEM-deficient character of free acategorial roots. The question of how much descriptive content roots (may) bear is linked to the idiomatic, non-compositional interpretation of the First Phase. The consequences of such a version of syntactic decomposition of words for the morphological realization of roots are outlined, as well as this account’s compatibility with conceptual atomism.
References (55)
References
Acquaviva, Paolo. 2008. Roots and Lexicality in Distributed Morphology. Paper given at the Fifth York-Essex Morphology Meeting , [URL].Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2009. “The roots of nominality, the nominality of roots.” Unpublished Ms., University College Dublin.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Acquaviva, Paolo and Panagiotidis, Phoevos. 2012. “Lexical decomposition meets conceptual atomism.” Lingue e Linguaggio XI(2): 105–120.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Alexiadou, Artemis and Anagnostopoulou, Elena. 2008. “Structuring participles.” In Proceedings of the 26th West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics, Charles B. Chang and Hannah J. Haynie (eds), 33–41. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Proceedings Project.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Anagnostopoulou, Elena and Samioti, Yota. 2009. Domains for Idioms. Paper presented at the Roots II Workshop, University of Stuttgart.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Arad, Maya. 2003. “Locality constraints on the interpretation of roots: The case of Hebrew denominal verbs.” Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 2: 737–778. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2005. Roots and Patterns: Hebrew Morpho-syntax. Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Aronoff, Mark. 1976. Word Formation in Generative Grammar. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1994. Morphology by Itself. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2007. “In the Beginning was the Word.” Language 83: 803–830. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Baker, Mark. 2003. Lexical Categories: Verbs, Nouns and Adjectives. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Basilico, D. 2008. “Particle verbs and benefactive double objects in English: High and low attachments.” Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 26: 731–729. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Boeckx, Cedric. 2010. “Defeating lexicocentrism.” Unpublished Ms., ICREA, Universitat Autónoma de Barcelona.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Borer, Hagit. 2003. “Exo-skeletal vs. endo-skeletal explanations: syntactic projections and the lexicon.” In The Nature of Explanation in Linguistic Theory, John Moore and Maria Polinsky (eds), 31–67. Stanford: CSLI.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2005. Structuring Sense. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2009. Roots and Categories. Paper presented at the 19th Colloquium on Generative Grammar . University of the Basque Country, Vitoria-Gasteiz.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam. 1970. “Remarks on nominalization.” In Readings in English Transformational Grammar, Roderick Jacobs and Peter Rosenbaum (eds), 184–221. Waltham, MA.: Ginn & Company.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cruse, D.A. 1982. Lexical Semantics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
De Belder, Marijke. 2011. Roots and Affixes: Eliminating Lexical Categories from Syntax. Utrecht: LOT.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Embick, David. 2000. “Features, syntax, and categories in the Latin perfect.” Linguistic Inquiry 31: 185–230. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Embick, David and Marantz, Alec. 2008. “Architecture and blocking.” Linguistic Inquiry 39: 1–53. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Emonds, Joseph. 1985. A Unified Theory of Syntactic Categories. Dordrecht: Foris Publications.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2001. Lexicon and Grammar: the English Syntacticon. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Raffaella, Folli, Harley, Heidi and Karimi, Simin. 2003. “Determinants of event type in Persian complex predicates.” In Cambridge Occasional Papers in Linguistics, Luisa Astruc and Marc Richards (eds), 1: 100–120. Cambridge: University of Cambridge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fodor, Jerry. 1970. “Three reasons for not deriving ‘kill’ from ‘cause to die’.” Linguistic Inquiry 1: 429–438.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fodor, Jerry and Lepore, Ernest. 1996. “The red herring and the pet fish: why concepts still can’t be prototypes.” Cognition 58: 253–270. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1998. “The emptiness of the lexicon, critical reflections on James Pustejovsky’s ‘The generative Lexicon’.” Linguistic Inquiry 29: 269–288. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Galani, Alexandra. 2005. “The morphosyntax of verbs in Modern Greek.” Unpublished Ph.D. thesis, University of York.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hale, Kenneth and Keyser, Samuel Jay. 1993. “On argument structure and the lexical expression of syntactic relations.” In The View from Building 20, Kenneth Hale and Samuel Jay Keyser (eds), 53–109. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2002. Prolegomenon to a Theory of Argument Structure. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Harley, Heidi. 2005a. “How do verbs get their names? Denominal verbs, Manner Incorporation and the ontology of verb roots in English.” In The Syntax of Aspect: Deriving Thematic and Aspectual Interpretation, Nomi Erteschik-Shir and Tova Rapoport (eds), 42–64. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2005b. “Bare phrase structure, a-categorial roots, one-replacement and unaccusativity.” In Harvard Working Papers on Linguistics 9, Slava Gorbachov and Andrew Nevins (eds), 1–19. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2007. The Bipartite Structure of Verbs Cross-Linguistically, or Why Mary Can’t Exhibit John her Paintings. Talk presented at the 2007 ABRALIN Congres in Belo Horizonte, Brazil, March 2007.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2009. “The morphology of nominalizations and the syntax of vP.” In Quantification, Definiteness, and Nominalization, Anastasia Giannakidou and Monika Rathert (eds), 320–342. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2012. On the Identity of Roots. Unpublished Ms., University of Arizona.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Harley, Heidi and Noyer, Rolf. 2000. “Formal versus encyclopedic properties of vocabulary: Evidence from nominalisations.” In The Lexicon-Encyclopedia Interface, Bert Peeters (ed.), 349–374. Current Research in the Semantics/pragmatics Interface v. 5. Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Haugen, Jason. 2009. “Hyponymous objects and late insertion.” Lingua 119: 242–262. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kiparsky, Paul. 1982. “Word-formation and the lexicon.” In Proceedings of the Mid-America Linguistics Conference, F. Ingemann (ed.). Lawrence, Kansas.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Levin, Beth and Hovav, M. Rappaport. 1995. Unaccusativity. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2005. Argument Realization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lowenstamm, Jean. 2008. “On n, √, and types of nouns.” In Sounds of silence: empty elements in syntax and phonology. [North Holland Linguistic Series, Linguistic Variations Volume 63]. 107–144. Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Marantz, Alec. 1997. “No escape from syntax: Don’t try morphological analysis in the privacy of your own lexicon.” University of Pennsylvania Working Papers in Linguistics 4: 201–225.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Marantz Alec. 2000. “Words.” Unpublished Ms., MIT.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2005. “Rederived generalizations.” Unpublished Ms., MIT.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2006. “Phases and words.” Unpublished Ms., NYU.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
McGinnis, Martha. 2002. “On the systematic aspect of idioms.” Linguistic Inquiry 33: 665–672. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Geoffrey, Nunberg, Sag, Ivan and Wasow, Thomas. 1994. “Idioms.” Language 70: 491–538. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Panagiotidis, Phoevos. 2005. “Against category-less roots in syntax and word learning: objections to Barner and Bale (2002).” Lingua 115: 1181–1194. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2011. “Categorial features and categorizers.” The Linguistic Review 28: 325–346. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2014. Categorial Features: A generative theory of word class categories. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pullum, Geoffrey. 2010. “Pullum 2010. Isms, gasms, etc.” The Language Log. [URL].Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Siddiqi, Daniel. 2006. “Minimize Exponence: Economy Effects on a Model of the Morphosyntactic Component of the Grammar.” Unpublished Ph.D. thesis, University of Arizona.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Svenonius, Peter. 2005. “Idioms and domain boundaries.” Unpublished Ms., CASTL, University of Tromsø.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Volpe, Mark. 2009. “Root and deverbal nominalizations: Lexical flexibility in Japanese.” Unpublished Ms., available from [URL].
Cited by (10)

Cited by ten other publications

Borg, Emma
2025. The Problems of Polysemy. In The Oxford Handbook of Contemporary Philosophy of Language, ► pp. 287 ff. DOI logo
Carston, Robyn
2021. Polysemy: Pragmatics and sense conventions. Mind & Language 36:1 ► pp. 108 ff. DOI logo
Carston, Robyn
2023. The relevance of words and the language/communication divide. Frontiers in Psychology 14 DOI logo
Carston, Robyn
2024. Words and Roots – Polysemy and Allosemy – Communication and Language. Review of Philosophy and Psychology 15:4 ► pp. 1055 ff. DOI logo
Steriopolo, Olga, Giorgos Markopoulos & Vassilios Spyropoulos
2021. A morphosyntactic analysis of nominal expressive suffixes in Russian and Greek. The Linguistic Review 38:4 ► pp. 645 ff. DOI logo
Nóbrega, Vitor A. & Phoevos Panagiotidis
2020. Headedness and exocentric compounding. Word Structure 13:2 ► pp. 211 ff. DOI logo
Saab, Andrés & Nicolás Lo Guercio
2020. No Name: The Allosemy View. Studia Linguistica 74:1 ► pp. 60 ff. DOI logo
Revithiadou, Anthi, Giorgos Markopoulos & Vassilios Spyropoulos
2019. Changing shape according to strength: Evidence from root allomorphy in Greek. The Linguistic Review 36:3 ► pp. 553 ff. DOI logo
Armoskaite, Solveiga & Päivi Koskinen
2017. Serial nouns in Finnish. Canadian Journal of Linguistics/Revue canadienne de linguistique 62:2 ► pp. 280 ff. DOI logo
Murphy, Elliot
2016. Evolutionary monkey oscillomics: Generating linking hypotheses from preserved brain rhythms. Theoretical Linguistics 42:1-2 ► pp. 117 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 25 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue