Cover not available

In:Minimalism and Beyond: Radicalizing the interfaces
Edited by Peter Kosta, Steven L. Franks, Teodora Radeva-Bork and Lilia Schürcks
[Language Faculty and Beyond 11] 2014
► pp. 236–266

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload Book PDF
authorization required

Flavors of movement

Revisiting the A/A′ distinction

 | Universität Potsdam, Germany
 | Universidad Nacional de La Plata, Argentina
Published online: 24 September 2014
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/lfab.11.09kos
In this paper we revisit a distinction that has been core to GB and Minimalist approaches to the property of displacement in natural languages: the opposition between A(rgumental) and A′ (non-argumental) positions, as sources and targets of the general operation Move-α. Minimalism brought an additional requirement for the establishment of chains generated via movement, the Chain Uniformity Principle, requiring that all members of a chain be in uniform positions with respect to a certain property. We will argue that such chains, even if possible in principle, are not desirable for both theoretical and empirical reasons, with Radical Minimalism as our theoretical framework. The rejection of the Chain Uniformity Principle will ultimately lead us to revisit the A/A′ distinction as a real and relevant theoretical concept.
References (85)
References
Abels, Klaus. 2003. “Successive Cyclicity, Anti-locality and Adposition Stranding.” Ph.D. Thesis, University of Connecticut, Storrs.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2012. Phases: An Essay on Cyclicity. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Abels, Klaus and Bentzen, Kristine. 2009. “A note on the punctuated nature of movement paths.” Catalan Journal of Linguistics 8: 19–40.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Baddeley, Alan. 2003. “Working memory and language: An overview.” Journal of Communication Disorders 36: 189–208. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bayer, Josef and Kornflit, Jaklin. 1994. “Against scrambling as an instance of move-alpha.” In Studies on Scrambling. Movement and Non-Movement Approaches to Free Word Order Phenomena, Norbert Corver and Henk van Reimdisjk (eds). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Boeckx, Cedric. 2003. “Free word order in minimalist syntax.” Folia Linguistica 37(1–2): 77–102. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2008. “Treelets, not trees”. Talk presented at BCGL 3 – Trees and Beyond, May 21–23.
. 2010. Defeating Lexicocentrism. lingBuzz/001130
Bresnan, Joan. 1971. “Sentence stress and syntactic transformations”. Language 47(2): 257–281. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cable, Seth. 2010. The Grammar of Q: Q-Particles, Wh-Movement and Pied-Piping. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam. 1986. Barriers. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1995. The Minimalist Program. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1999. “Derivation by phase.” MIT Occasional Papers in Linguistics 18.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2000. “Minimalist inquiries: The framework.” In Step by Step: Essays on Minimalist Syntax in Honor of Howard Lasnik, Roger Martin, David Michaels and Juan Uriagereka (eds), 89–155. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2005. On Phases. Ms., MIT.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2007. “Approaching UG from below.” In Interfaces + Recursion = Language? Chomsky’s Minimalism and the View from Syntax-Semantics, Uli Sauerland and Hans-Martin Gaetrner (eds), 1–30. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2013. “Problems of projection”. Lingua. Special Issue in Syntax and Cognition: Core Ideas and Results in Syntax. 33–49. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam and Lasnik, Howard. 1977. “On filters and control”. Linguistic Inquiry 8: 425–504.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1993. “The theory of principles and parameters.” In Syntax: An International Handbook of Contemporary Research, Volume 1, Joachim Jacobs, Arnim vos Stechow, Wolfgang Sternfeld, Theo Vennemann (eds), 506–569. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Corver, Norbert and van Riemsdijk, Henk (eds). 1994. Studies on Scrambling: Movement and Non-Movement Approaches to Free Word Order Phenomena. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Croft, William and Cruse, Alan. 2004. Cognitive Linguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Culicover, Peter. 1991. “Topicalization, inversion and complementizers in English.” In Going Romance and Beyond, OTS Working Papers, Denis Delfitto, Martin Everaert, Arnold Evers and Frits Stuurman (eds), 1–45. Research Institute for Language and Speech, University of Utrecht.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Culicover, Peter and Jackendoff, Ray. 2005. Simpler Syntax. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Davies, Christopher. 2013. “The role of focus particles in Wh-Interrogatives: Evidence from a southern Ryukyuan language.” Presented in West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics 31 , Arizona State University, February 8, 2013.
Di Sciullo, Anna-Maria and Isac, Daniela. 2008. “The asymmetry of merge.” Biolinguistics 2(4): 260–290.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dehaene, Stanislas (ed.). 2011. Space, Time and Number in the Brain: Searching for the Foundations of Mathematical Thought. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Epstein, Samuel and Seely, T. Daniel. 2002. “Rule applications as cycles in a level free syntax.” In Derivation and Explanation in the Minimalist Program, Sanuel D. Epstein and T. Daniel Seely (eds), 65–89. Oxford: Blackwell. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fanselow, Gisbert. 2003. “Free constituent order: A minimalist interface account.” Folia Linguistica. 37(1–2): 191–232. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2004. “Cyclic phonology-syntax-interaction: Movement to first position in German.” In Interdisciplinary Studies on Information Structure Vol. 1 (Working Papers of the SFB 632), 1–42. Potsdam: Universitätsverlag Potsdam.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gallego, Angel. 2010. Phase Theory. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Green, Georgia. 2011. “Elementary principles of HPSG.” In Non-Transformational Syntax. Formal and Explicit Models of Grammar, Borsley, Robert and Kresti Börjars (eds), 9–53. London:Blackwell. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hale, Kenneth and Kayser, Samuel Jay. 2002. Prolegomena to a Theory of Argument Structure. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hauser, Macr D., Chomsky, Noam and Fitch, W. Tecumseh. 2002. “The faculty of language: what is it, who has it, and how does it evolve?” Science 298: 1569–1579. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Heck, Fabian and Müller, Gereon. 2007. Extremely local optimization.” In Proceedings of the 26th WECOL , Erin Brainbridge and Brian Agbayani (eds), 170–183. California State University, Fresno.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Horn, Lawrence. 1988. “Pragmatic theory.” In Linguistics: The Cambridge Survey. Volume I, Linguistic Theory: Foundations, Frederick Newmayer (ed.), 113–145. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jackendoff, Ray. 1983. Semantics and Cognition. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2002. Foundations of Language. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Junghanns, Uwe and Zybatow, Gerhild. 2009. “Grammatik und Informationsstruktur.” In The Slavic Languages. An International Handbook on their Structure, History and Investigation, Kempgen, Sebastian, Peter Kosta, Tilman Berger and Karl Gutschmidt (eds), 684–706. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter (HSK 32.1).Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kayne, Richard. 1994. The Antisymmetry of Syntax. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kitahara, Hisatsugu. 1997. Elementary Operations and Optimal Derivations. Linguistic Inquiry Monographs 31. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kosta, Peter. 2006. “On free word order phenomena in Czech as compared to German: Is clause internal scrambling A-movement, A-bar-movement or is it base generated?” Zeitschrift für Slawistik 51(3): 306–321. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kosta, Peter and Schürcks, Lilia. 2007. “The focus feature revisited.” In Linguistic Investigations into Formal Description of Slavic Languages. Contributions of the Sixth European Conference held at Potsdam University, November 30-December 3 2005, Peter Kosta, Lilia Schürcks (eds), 245–267. Peter Lang Verlag. (Potsdam Linguistic Investigations; 1)Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2009. “Word order in slavic.” In The Slavic Languages. An International Handbook on their Structure, History and Investigation, Sebastian Kempgen, Peter Kosta, Tilman Berger and Karl Gutschmidt (eds), 654–683.Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter (HSK 32.1).Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kosta, Peter and Krivochen, Diego. 2012. “Some thoughts on language diversity, UG and the importance of language typology: Scrambling and non-monotonic merge of adjuncts and specifiers in Czech and German.” Zeitschrift für Slawistik. 57(4): 377–407 Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Krivochen, Diego. 2011. “An introduction to radical minimalism I: On merge and agree.” IBERIA 3(2): 20–62.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2012a. Towards a Geometrical Syntax: A Formalization of Radical Minimalism. Ms., Universität Potsdam. Under Review. [URL]Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2012b. The Syntax and Semantics of the Nominal Construction. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang Publishers. (Potsdam Linguistic Investigations; 8).Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2013a. A Frustrated Mind. Ms., Under Review. [URL].Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2013b. Tokens vs. Copies: Displacement Revisited. Ms., Under Review. [URL].Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Krivochen, Diego and Kosta, Peter. 2013. Eliminating Empty Categories: A Radically Minimalist View on their Ontology and Justification. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang Publishers. (Potsdam Linguistic Investigations; 11).Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Langacker, Ronald. 2009. Investigations in Cognitive Grammar. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Larson, Bradley and Hornstein, Norbert. 2012. Copies and Occurrences. Ms., lingbuzz/001484Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Larson, Richard. 1988. “On the double object construction.” Linguistic Inquiry 19 (3). 335–391.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lasnik, Howard. 1999. Minimalist Analysis. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lasnik, Howard, Uriagereka, Juan and Boeckx, Cedric. 2005. A Course in Minimalist Syntax. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mateu Fontanals, Jaume. 2002. “Argument Structure. Relational Construal at the Syntax-Semantics Interface.” Ph.D. dissertation, Bellaterra: UAB. [URL].Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2005. “Impossible primitives.” In The Compositionality of Meaning and Content: Foundational Issues, Markus Werning, Edouard Machery, Gerhard Schurz (eds), 213–229. Frankfurt: Ontos.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Martin, Roger and Uriagereka, Juan. this volume. “On the nature of chains in minimalism.”
Miyagawa, Shigeru. 2010. Why Agree? Why Move? Unifying Agreement-Based and Discourse-Configurational Languages. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Molnárfi, Lazlo. 2003. “On optional movement and feature checking in West Germanic.” Folia Linguistica 37(1–2): 129–162. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Müller, Gereon. 2011. Constraints on Displacement: A Phase-Based Approach. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, LFAB Series volume 7. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Nunes, Jairo. 2004. Linearization of Chains and Sidewards Movement. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ouali, Hamid. 2008. “On C-to-T Phi-feature transfer: The nature of agreement and anti-agreement in Berber.” In Agreement Restrictions, Roberta D’Alessandro, Gunar Hrafnjargarson and Susann Fischer (eds), 151–180. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pesetsky, David and Torrego, Esther. 2007. “The syntax of valuation and the interpretability of features.” In Phrasal and Clausal Architecture: Syntactic Derivation and Interpretation, Simin Karimi, Vida Samiian, Wendy K. Wilkins (eds), 262–294. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pollock, Jean-Yves. 1989. “Verb movement, UG and the structure of IP.” Linguistic Inquiry 20: 365–424.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Prince, Alan and Smolensky, Paul. 2004. Optimality Theory. Constraint Interaction in Generative Grammar. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Putnam, Michael (ed.). 2010. Exploring Crash-Proof Grammars. LFAB Series volume 3. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2011. The Thing that Should not Be: Rethinking the A-A’ distinction. Universitet i Tromso CASTL Linguistics Colloquium, October 7, 2010.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Putnam, Michael and Stroik, Thomas. 2011. “Syntax at ground zero.” Linguistic Analysis 37(3–4): 389–404.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rizzi, Luigi. 1997. “The fine structure of the left periphery.” In Elements of Grammar, Liliane Haegeman (ed.), 281–337. Kluwer, Dordrecht. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2004. “Locality and left periphery.” In Structures and Beyond – The Cartography of Syntactic Structures, Volume 3, Adriana Belletti (ed.), 223–251. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2006. “On the form of chains: Criterial positions and ECP effects.” In Wh-Movement: Moving on, Lisa Cheng, Norbert Corver (eds). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rezac, Milan. 2004. “Elements of Cyclic Syntax: Agree and Merge.” PhD thesis, University of Toronto.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sag, Ivan and Wasow, Tom. 2011. “Performance-compatible competence grammar.” In Non Transformational Syntax, Robert Borsley and Kresti Börjars (eds), 359–377. Oxford: Blackwell. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Shieber, Stuart. 1986. An Introduction to Unification-Based Approaches to Grammar. Stanford: CSLI.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Starke, Michal. 2001. “Move dissolves into Merge.” PhD thesis, University of Geneva.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Stroik, Thomas. 2009. Locality in Minimalist Syntax. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Stroik, Thomas and Putnam, Michael. 2013. The Structural Design of Language. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Taylor, Kristen, Devereux, Barry and Tyler, Lorraine. 2011. “Conceptual structure: Towards an integrated neurocognitive account.” Language and Cognitive Processes 26(9): 1368–1401. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Uriagereka, Juan. 1998. Rhyme and Reason. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2002. “Multiple Spell-Out.” In Derivations: Exploring the Dynamics of Syntax, Juan Uriagereka (ed.), 45–65. London: Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2008. Syntactic Anchors: On Semantic Restructuring. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2012. Spell-Out and the Minimalist Program. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wilson, Deirdre and Sperber, Dan. 2003. “Relevance theory.” In Handbook of Pragmatics, Lawrence Horn and Gregory Ward (eds), 607–628. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (1)

Cited by one other publication

Kosta, Peter & Petr Karlík
2020. Die Nominalisierung von Nebensätzen im Tschechischen. Zeitschrift für Slawistik 65:4 ► pp. 479 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 25 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue