Cover not available

In:Minimalism and Beyond: Radicalizing the interfaces
Edited by Peter Kosta, Steven L. Franks, Teodora Radeva-Bork and Lilia Schürcks
[Language Faculty and Beyond 11] 2014
► pp. 109–128

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload Book PDF
authorization required

On the uninterpretability of interpretable features

ORCiD logo with link | Georg-August-Universität Göttingen
Published online: 24 September 2014
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/lfab.11.05zei
In this paper I present several arguments that argue against the assumption in current generative syntactic theory that certain formal features are semantically active as well (so-called interpretable formal features). Instead, I propose that the set of formal features and the set of semantic features (to the extent that they are featural in the first place) are fully independent. An acquisitional and diachronic theory further constrains the possible combinations of syntactic and semantic features that can be lexically stored, which results in the apparent overlap in the distribution of particular syntactic and semantic features (which has originally been the cause of taking them on a par).
References (42)
References
Beghelli, Filippo and Stowell, Tim. 1997. “Distributivity and negation. The syntax of each and every.” In Anna Szabolcsi (ed.), Ways of Scope Taking, 71–107. Dordrecht: Kluwer. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bobaljik, Jonathan David and Thrainsson, Höskuldur. 1998. “Two heads aren’t always better than one.” Syntax 1: 37–71. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Borer, Hagit. 1984. Parametric Syntax: Case Studies in Semitic and Romance Languages. Dordrecht: Foris Publications. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Brown, Sue. 1999. The Syntax of negation in Russian: A Minimalist approach. Stanford: CSLI Publications.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Chierchia, Gennaro. 2006. “Broaden your views. Implicatures of domain widening and the “Logicality” of language.” Linguistic Inquiry 37: 535–590. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2011. “Meaning as an inferential system. Polarity and free-choice phenomena.” Ms., Harvard University.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam. 1995. The Minimalist Program. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2002. “Derivation by phase.” In Ken Hale: A Life in Language, Michael J. Kenstovicz (ed.), 1–54. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2005. “Three factors in language design.” Linguistic Inquiry 36: 1–22. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cinque, Guglielmo. 1999. Adverbs and Functional Heads. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(ed.). 2002. Functional Structure in DP and IP. The Cartography of Syntactic Structures, Volume 1. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(ed.). 2006. Restructuring and Functional Heads. The Cartography of Syntactic Structures, Volume 4. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Epstein, Samuel David, Groat, Erich M., Kawashima, Ruriko and Kitahara, Hisatsugu. 1998. A Derivational Approach to Syntactic Relations. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Epstein, Samuel David and Seely, Daniel. 2002. Derivation and Explanation in the Minimalist Program. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Grimshaw, Jane. 1997. “Projections, heads and optimality.” Linguistic Inquiry 28: 373–442.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Haegeman, Liliane and Zanuttini, Raffaella. 1991. “Negative heads and the neg criterion.” The Linguistic Review 8: 233–251. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1996. “Negative concord in West Flemish.” In Parameters and Functional Heads. Essays in Comparative Syntax, Adriana Belletti and Luigi Rizzi (eds), 117–179. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Haegeman, Liliane and Lohndal, Terje. 2010. “Negative concord and multiple agree: A case study of West Flemish.” Linguistic Inquiry 41: 181–211. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Herburger, Elena. 2001. “The negative concord puzzle revisited.” Natural Language Semantics 9: 289–333. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Iatridou, Sabine. 1990. “About AgrP.” Linguistic Inquiry 21: 421–459.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jäger, Agnes. 2010. “Anything is nothing is something. On the diachrony of polarity types of indefinites.” Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 28: 787–822. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kadmon, Nirit and Landman, Fred. 1993. “Any.” Linguistics and Philosophy 16: 353–422. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kayne, Richard. 2000. Parameters and Universals, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Koeneman, Olaf. 2000. “The Flexible Nature of Verb Movement.” Ph.D. dissertation, Utrecht University.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Krifka, Manfred. 1995. “The semantics and pragmatics of polarity items in assertion.” Linguistic Analysis 15: 209–257.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Laka, I. 1990. “Negation in Syntax: On the Nature of Functional Categories and Projections.” Ph.D. dissertation, MIT.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Miyagawa, Shigeru. 2010. Why Agree? Why Move? Unifying Agreement-based and Discourse Configurational Languages. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Nilsen, Øystein. 2003. Eliminating Positions: Syntax and Semantics of Sentential Modification. Ph.D. disseration, Universiteit Utrecht.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pesetsky, David and Torrego, Esther. 2007. “The syntax of valuation and the interpretability of features.” In Phrasal and Clausal Architecture: Syntactic derivation and interpretation, Simin Karimi, Vida Samiian and Wendy W. Wilkins (eds), 262–294. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pollock, Jean-Yves. 1989. “Verb movement, universal grammar, and the structure of IP.” Linguistic Inquiry 20: 365–424.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Postal, Paul. 2000. “An introduction to the grammar of squat.” Ms., NYU.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Progovac, Ljiljiana. 2005. “Negative and positive feature checking and the distribution of polarity items.” In Negation in Slavic, S. Brown & A. Przepiórkowski (eds), Slavica Publishers.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rizzi, Luigi. 1997. “The fine structure of the left periphery.” In Elements of grammar. Handbook in generative syntax, Liliane Haegeman (ed.), 281–337. Dordrecht: Kluwer.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2004. The structure of CP and IP. The Cartography of Syntactic Structures, Volume 2. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Roberts, Ian and Roussou, Anna. 2003. Syntactic Change. A Minimalist Approach to Grammaticalisation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Starke, Michal. 2001. “Move Dissolves Into Merge: A Theory of Locality.” Ph.D. dissertation, University of Geneva.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2004. “On the Inexistence of Specifiers and the Nature of Heads.” In Structures and Beyond. The Cartography of Syntactic Structures, Volume 3, Adriana Belletti (ed.), 252–268. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Svenonius, Peter. 2006. “Interpreting uninterpretable features.” Linguistic Analysis 33: 375–413.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Zanuttini, Raffaella. 1991. “Syntactic Properties of Sentential Negation.” Ph.D. dissertation, University of Pennsylvania.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Zeijlstra, Hedzer Hugo. 2004. “Sentential Negation and Negative Concord.” Ph.D. dissertation, University of Amsterdam.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2008. “On the syntactic flexibility of formal features.” In Theresa Biberauer (ed.), The Limits of Syntactic Variation, 143–174. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2010. “On French negation.” In Proceedings of the 35th Annual Meeting of the Berkely Linguistics Society, Iksoo Kwon, Hannah. Pritchett & Justin Spence (eds). Berkely, CA: BLS.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (57)

Cited by 57 other publications

Liang, Yiming, Pascal Amsili & Heather Burnett
2025. Soft locality restrictions in negative concord: Evidence from the French future polarity effect. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 43:3 ► pp. 1731 ff. DOI logo
Manzini, Maria Rita & Diego Pescarini
2024. Negative concord by phase: multiple downward agree and the parametrization of edge features. The Linguistic Review 41:4 ► pp. 661 ff. DOI logo
Adenuga, Priscilla
2022. Nominal Attributive Modifiers (NAMs) in Ògè. In A0 – The Lexical Status of Adjectives [Language Faculty and Beyond, 17], ► pp. 155 ff. DOI logo
Larson, Richard
2022. Adjectives, case and concord. In A0 – The Lexical Status of Adjectives [Language Faculty and Beyond, 17], ► pp. 73 ff. DOI logo
Amsili, Pascal & Claire Beyssade
2021.  Plus in the French negative system. In Romance Languages and Linguistic Theory 2017 [Current Issues in Linguistic Theory, 355], ► pp. 29 ff. DOI logo
Iatridou, Sabine & Hedde Zeijlstra
2021. The Complex Beauty of Boundary Adverbials:In YearsandUntil. Linguistic Inquiry 52:1 ► pp. 89 ff. DOI logo
Beaver, David & Kristin Denlinger
2020. Negation and Presupposition. In The Oxford Handbook of Negation, ► pp. 369 ff. DOI logo
Bohn, Manuel, Josep Call & Christoph J. Völter
2020. Evolutionary Precursors of Negation in Non-Human Reasoning. In The Oxford Handbook of Negation, ► pp. 577 ff. DOI logo
Breitbarth, Anne
2020. The Negative Cycle and Beyond. In The Oxford Handbook of Negation, ► pp. 530 ff. DOI logo
Christensen, Ken Ramshøj
2020. The Neurology of Negation. In The Oxford Handbook of Negation, ► pp. 725 ff. DOI logo
De Clercq, Karen
2020. Types of Negation. In The Oxford Handbook of Negation, ► pp. 58 ff. DOI logo
de Swart, Henriëtte
2020. Double Negation Readings. In The Oxford Handbook of Negation, ► pp. 479 ff. DOI logo
Delfitto, Denis
2020. Expletive Negation. In The Oxford Handbook of Negation, ► pp. 255 ff. DOI logo
Dwivedi, Veena D.
2020. Individual Differences in Processing of Negative Operators. In The Oxford Handbook of Negation, ► pp. 713 ff. DOI logo
Viviane Déprez & M. Teresa Espinal
2020. The Oxford Handbook of Negation, DOI logo
Fleisher, Nicholas
2020. Calculating the Scope of Negation. In The Oxford Handbook of Negation, ► pp. 269 ff. DOI logo
Francis, Naomi & Sabine Iatridou
2020. Modals and Negation. In The Oxford Handbook of Negation, ► pp. 285 ff. DOI logo
Fălăuş, Anamaria
2020. Negation and Alternatives. In The Oxford Handbook of Negation, ► pp. 333 ff. DOI logo
Giannakidou, Anastasia
2020. Negative Concord and the Nature of Negative Concord Items. In The Oxford Handbook of Negation, ► pp. 458 ff. DOI logo
Gianollo, Chiara
2020. Evolution of Negative Dependencies. In The Oxford Handbook of Negation, ► pp. 546 ff. DOI logo
Gianollo, Chiara
2020. The Morpho-Syntactic Nature of the Negative Marker. In The Oxford Handbook of Negation, ► pp. 117 ff. DOI logo
Grodzinsky, Yosef, Virginia Jaichenco, Isabelle Deschamps, María Elina Sánchez, Martín Fuchs, Peter Pieperhoff, Yonatan Loewenstein & Katrin Amunts
2020. Negation and the Brain. In The Oxford Handbook of Negation, ► pp. 694 ff. DOI logo
Hochmann, Jean-Rémy
2020. Cognitive Precursors of Negation in Preverbal Infants. In The Oxford Handbook of Negation, ► pp. 589 ff. DOI logo
Horn, Laurence R.
2020. Negation and Opposition. In The Oxford Handbook of Negation, ► pp. 7 ff. DOI logo
Horn, Laurence R.
2020. Neg-raising. In The Oxford Handbook of Negation, ► pp. 199 ff. DOI logo
Joshi, Shrikant
2020. Affixal Negation. In The Oxford Handbook of Negation, ► pp. 75 ff. DOI logo
Kaup, Barbara & Carolin Dudschig
2020. Understanding Negation. In The Oxford Handbook of Negation, ► pp. 635 ff. DOI logo
Larrivée, Pierre
2020. The Role of Pragmatics in Negation Change. In The Oxford Handbook of Negation, ► pp. 563 ff. DOI logo
Martins, Ana Maria
2020. Metalinguistic Negation. In The Oxford Handbook of Negation, ► pp. 349 ff. DOI logo
Mayr, Clemens
2020. Intervention Effects with Negation. In The Oxford Handbook of Negation, ► pp. 216 ff. DOI logo
Moeschler, Jacques
2020. Negative Predicates. In The Oxford Handbook of Negation, ► pp. 26 ff. DOI logo
Muller, Hanna & Colin Phillips
2020. Negative Polarity Illusions. In The Oxford Handbook of Negation, ► pp. 656 ff. DOI logo
Papeo, Liuba & Manuel de Vega
2020. The Neurobiology of Lexical and Sentential Negation. In The Oxford Handbook of Negation, ► pp. 740 ff. DOI logo
Pearce, Elizabeth
2020. Negation and Constituent Ordering. In The Oxford Handbook of Negation, ► pp. 152 ff. DOI logo
Poletto, Cecilia
2020. The Possible Positioning of Negation. In The Oxford Handbook of Negation, ► pp. 135 ff. DOI logo
Prieto, Pilar & M. Teresa Espinal
2020. Negation, Prosody, and Gesture. In The Oxford Handbook of Negation, ► pp. 677 ff. DOI logo
Quer, Josep
2020. The Expression of Negation in Sign Languages. In The Oxford Handbook of Negation, ► pp. 177 ff. DOI logo
Ripley, David
2020. Denial. In The Oxford Handbook of Negation, ► pp. 47 ff. DOI logo
Romero, Maribel
2020. Form and Function of Negative, Tag, and Rhetorical Questions. In The Oxford Handbook of Negation, ► pp. 235 ff. DOI logo
Schein, Barry
2020. Negation in Event Semantics. In The Oxford Handbook of Negation, ► pp. 301 ff. DOI logo
Sánchez, Liliana & Jennifer Austin
2020. Negation in L2 Acquisition and Beyond. In The Oxford Handbook of Negation, ► pp. 615 ff. DOI logo
Thornton, Rosalind
2020. Negation and First Language Acquisition. In The Oxford Handbook of Negation, ► pp. 599 ff. DOI logo
Tortora, Christina & Frances Blanchette
2020. Negation in Non-Standard Varieties. In The Oxford Handbook of Negation, ► pp. 515 ff. DOI logo
Tovena, Lucia M.
2020. Negative Polarity Items. In The Oxford Handbook of Negation, ► pp. 391 ff. DOI logo
Tubau, Susagna
2020. Minimizers and Maximizers as Different Types of Polarity Items. In The Oxford Handbook of Negation, ► pp. 407 ff. DOI logo
van der Auwera, Johan & Olga Krasnoukhova
2020. The Typology of Negation. In The Oxford Handbook of Negation, ► pp. 91 ff. DOI logo
Wallage, Phillip
2020. Quantitative Studies of the Use of Negative (Dependent) Expressions. In The Oxford Handbook of Negation, ► pp. 499 ff. DOI logo
Weir, Andrew
2020. Negative Fragment Answers. In The Oxford Handbook of Negation, ► pp. 441 ff. DOI logo
Zeijlstra, Hedde
2020. Negative Quantifiers. In The Oxford Handbook of Negation, ► pp. 426 ff. DOI logo
Zeijlstra, Hedde
2022. Negation and Negative Dependencies, DOI logo
Biberauer, Theresa
2019. Some thoughts on the complexity of syntactic complexity . Theoretical Linguistics 45:3-4 ► pp. 259 ff. DOI logo
Bjorkman, Bronwyn M. & Hedde Zeijlstra
2019. Checking Up on (ϕ-)Agree. Linguistic Inquiry 50:3 ► pp. 527 ff. DOI logo
Walkden, George & Anne Breitbarth
2019. Interpreting (un)interpretability. Theoretical Linguistics 45:3-4 ► pp. 309 ff. DOI logo
[no author supplied]
2020. Abbreviations. In The Oxford Handbook of Negation, ► pp. xi ff. DOI logo
[no author supplied]
2020. Copyright Page. In The Oxford Handbook of Negation, ► pp. iv ff. DOI logo
[no author supplied]
2020. Introduction. In The Oxford Handbook of Negation, ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
[no author supplied]
2021. The Syntax of Information-Structural Agreement [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today, 268], DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 25 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue