Cover not available

In:Structuring the Argument: Multidisciplinary research on verb argument structure
Edited by Asaf Bachrach, Isabelle Roy and Linnaea Stockall
[Language Faculty and Beyond 10] 2014
► pp. 169–183

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload Book PDF
authorization required

Argument structure

Between linguistics and neuroimaging

Published online: 24 July 2014
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/lfab.10.08she
References (44)
References
Bachrach, Asaf. 2008. Imaging neural correlates of syntactic complexity in a naturalistic context . Doctoral dissertation, MIT.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ben-Shachar, Michal, Hendler, Talma, Kahn, Itamar, Ben-Bashat, Dafna and Grodzinsky, Yosef. 2003. The neural reality of syntactic transformations: Evidence from fMRI. Psychological Science 14: 433–440. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Borer, Hagit. 2004. The grammar machine. In The Unaccusativity Puzzle , Artemis Alexiadou, Elena Anagnostopoulou and Martin Everaert (Eds), 288–331. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bouchard, Dan. 1984. On the content of empty categories . Foris, Dordrecht.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Burzio, Luigi. 1986. Italian syntax . Dordrecht: Reidel. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Caplan, David. 2007. Functional neuroimaging studies of syntactic processing in sentence comprehension: A critical selective review. Language and Linguistic compass 1: 32–47. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Chafe, Wallace L. 1970. Meaning and the Structure of Language . Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam. 1965. Aspects of the theory of syntax . Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Chierchia, Gennaro. 1989. A semantics for unaccusatives and its syntactic consequences . Ms., Cornell University.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2004. A semantics for unaccusatives and its syntactic consequences. In The Unaccusativity Puzzle , Artemis Alexiadou, Elena Anagnostopoulou and Martin Everaert (Eds), pp. 22–59. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Coltheart Max. 2006. What has functional neuroimaging told us about the mind (so far)? Cortex 42: 323–333. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Friederici, Angela D. and Frisch, Stefan. 2000. Verb argument structure processing: The role of verb-specific and argument specific information. Journal of Language and Memory 43: 476–507. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Grimshaw, Jane. 1979. Complement selection and the lexicon. Linguistic Inquiry 10: 279–326.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1982. On the lexical representation of Romance reflexive clitics. In The mental representation of grammatical relations , Joan Bresnan (Ed.). MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Grodzinsky, Yosef and Friederici, Angela D. 2006. Neuroimaging of syntax and syntactic processing. Current Opinion in Neurobiology 16: 240–246. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Henson, Richard. 2006. Forward inference using functional neuroimaging: Dissociations versus associations. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 10: 64–69. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Horvath, Julia and Siloni Tal. 2009. Hebrew idioms: The organization of the lexical component. Brill’s Annual of Afroasiatic Languages and Linguistics 1: 283–310. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
van Hout, Angeliek. 1992. Linking and projection based on event structure . Ms, Tilburg: Tilburg University.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Just, Marcel A., Carpenter, Patricia A., Keller, Timothy A., Eddy, William F. and Thulborn, Keith R. 1996. Brain activation modulated by sentence comprehension. Science 274: 114–116. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kaan, Edith and Swaab, Tamara. 2002. The brain circuitry of syntactic comprehension. Trends in cognitive neuroscience 6: 350–356. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kayne, Richard. 1988. Romance se/si. Abstract presented at the GLOW 11 Colloquium, Budapest, GLOW newsletter 20: 33.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Levin, Beth A. and Rappaport-Hovav, Malka. 1995. Unaccusativity . Cambridge, MA: MIT PressGoogle Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Marantz, Alec. 1984. On the nature of grammatical relations . MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Moro, A., Tettamanti, M., Perani, D., Donati, C., Cappa, S.F., & Fazio, F. 2001. Syntax and the brain: Disentangling grammar by selective anomalies. Neuroimage 13: 110–118.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
den Ouden, Dirk-Bart, Fix, Steve, Parrish, Todd B. and Thompson, Cynthia K. 2009. Argument Structure effects in action verb naming in static and dynamic conditions. Journal of Neurolinguistics 22: 196–215. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Poeppel, David and Embick, David. 2005. Defining the relation between linguistics and neuroscience. In Twenty-first century psycholinguistics: Four cornerstones , Anne Cutler (Ed.). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Perlmutter, David M. 1978. Impersonal passives and the unaccusative hypothesis. In Proceedings of the Fourth Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistic Society, 159–189. Berkeley, CA: Berkeley Linguistics Society.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Perlmutter, David M. and Postal, Paul M. 1984. The 1-advancement exclusiveness hypothesis. In Studies in relational grammar 2 , David M. Perlmutter and Carol Rosen (Eds), 81–126. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pesetsky, David M. 1995. Zero syntax: Experiencer and cascades. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Reinhart, Tanya. 1996. Syntactic effects of lexical operations: Reflexives and unaccusatives. OTS Working Papers in Linguistics. Utrecht University, OTS, Utrecht.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2002. The theta system: An overview. Theoretical Linguistics 28: 229–290.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Reinhart, Tanya and Siloni, Tali. 2004. Against the unaccusative analysis of reflexives. In The Unaccusativity Puzzle , Artemis Alexiadou, Elena Anagnostopoulou and Martin Everaert (Eds), pp. 159–180. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2005. The lexicon-syntax parameter: Reflexivization and other arity operations. Linguistic Inquiry 36: 389–436. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Shapiro, Lewis P., Gordon, Betty, Hack, Nancy and Killackey, Jennifer. 1993. Verb argument processing in complex sentences in Broca and Wernicke’s aphasia. Brain and Language 45: 423–447. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Shetreet, Einat and Friedmann, Naama. 2012. Stretched, jumped and fell: An fMRI investigation of reflexive verbs and other intransitives. NeuroImage .Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Shetreet, Einat, Friedmann, Naama and Hadar, Uri. 2009. An fMRI study of syntactic layers: Sentential and lexical aspects of embedding. Neuroimage 48: 707–716. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2010a. The neural correlates of linguistic distinctions: Unaccusative and unergative verbs. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 22: 2306–2315. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2010b. The representation of optional complements: The theoretical contribution of fMRI. Human Brain Mapping 31: 770–785. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Shetreet, Einat, Linzen, Tal and Friedmann, Naama. 2011. The effects of complement predictability on the processing of verb’s complementation options. Poster presented at the 3rd Neurobiology of Language Conference, Annapolis, MD, USA.
Shetreet, Einat, Palti, Dafna, Friedmann, Naama and Hadar Uri. 2007. Cortical representation of verb processing in sentence comprehension: Number of complements, subcategorization and thematic frames. Cerebral Cortex 17: 1958–1969. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Siloni, T. 2008. On the Hitpa’el template. In Theoretical Hebrew Linguistics , Galia Hatav (Ed.), pp. 111–138. Jerusalem: The Hebrew University Magnes Press. (In Hebrew)Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Stromswold, Karin, Caplan, David, Alpert, Nathaniel and Rauch, Scott. 1996. Localization of syntactic comprehension by positron emission tomography. Brain and Language 52: 452–473. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Thompson, Cynthia K., Bonakdarpour, Borna, Fix, Stephen C., Blumenfeld, Henrike K., Parrish, Todd B., Gitelman, Darren R. and Mesulam, M. -Marsel. 2007. Neural correlates of verb argument structure processing. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 19: 1753–1767. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
van Valin, Robert D. 2001. An introduction to syntax . Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue