Cover not available

In:Structuring the Argument: Multidisciplinary research on verb argument structure
Edited by Asaf Bachrach, Isabelle Roy and Linnaea Stockall
[Language Faculty and Beyond 10] 2014
► pp. 83–118

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload Book PDF
authorization required

Luigi piace a Laura?

Electrophysiological evidence for thematic reanalysis with Italian dative object experiencer verbs

 | Department of Germanic Linguistics, University of Marburg, Marburg, Germany
 | RBCS – Robotics, Brain and Cognitive Sciences, IIT – Italian Institute of Technology, Genova, Italy
 | Department of Germanic Linguistics, University of Marburg, Marburg, Germany | School of Psychology, Social Work and Social Policy, University of South Australia, Adelaide, Australia
Published online: 24 July 2014
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/lfab.10.05dro
The syntactic properties of psych verbs have been debated in theoretical linguistics since the seminal paper by Belletti and Rizzi (1988). However, surprisingly little is known about the neural processes underlying the comprehension of psych verb constructions. Here, we report an electrophysiological study on Italian piacere-class verbs, which were presented in sentences with subject-verb-object (SVO) and object-verb-subject (OVS) orders and contrasted with Agent-Theme (“active”) verbs. At the verb position, we observed a biphasic N400–late positivity pattern for active versus piacere-class verbs in object-initial orders and a late positivity for piacere-class versus active verbs in subject-initial orders. These results demonstrate that thematic expectations are generated incrementally and may be based upon only a single argument. They further support the idea of structural differences between piacere-class verbs and other verb classes in Italian and suggest that these are used rapidly to inform language processing.
References (67)
References
Altmann, Gerry T.M. and Steedman, Mark. 1988. “Interaction with context during human sentence processing.” Cognition 30: 191–238. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Baker, Mark C. 1988. Incorporation: A Theory of Grammatical Function Changing . Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1997. “Thematic Roles and Syntactic Structure.” In Elements of Grammar , Liliane Haegeman (Ed.), 73–137. Dordrecht: Kluwer. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bates, Elizabeth, McNew, Sandra, MacWhinney, Brain, Devescovi, Antonella and Smith, Stan. 1982. “Functional constraints on sentence processing: A cross-linguistic study.” Cognition 11: 245–299. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bayer, Joseph, Bader, Markus and Meng, Michael. 2001. “Morphological underspecification meets oblique case: Syntactic and processing effects in German.” Lingua 111: 465–514. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Belletti, Adriana. 2001. “Inversion as Focalization.” In Subject Inversion in Romance and the Theory of Universal Grammar , Aafke Hulk and Jean-Yves Pollock (Eds), 60–90. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2004. “Aspects of the Low IP Area.” In The Structure of CP and IP [The Cartography of Syntactic Structures 2], Luigi Rizzi (Ed.), 16–51. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Belletti, Adriana and Rizzi, Luigi. 1988. “Psych-verbs and θ-theory.” Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 6: 291–352. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bennis, Hans. 2004. “Unergative Adjectives and Psych Verbs.” In The Unaccusativity Puzzle: Explorations of the Syntax-Lexicon Interface [Oxford Studies in Theoretical Linguistics 5], Artemis Alexiadou, Elena Anagnostopoulou and Martin Everaert (Eds), 84–114. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Blumenthal, Peter and Rovere, Giovanni. 1998. PONS: Wörterbuch der italienischen Verben: Konstruktionen, Bedeutungen, Übersetzungen . Stuttgart: Klett.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bornkessel, Ina, McElree, Brian, Schlesewsky, Matthias and Friederici, Angela D. 2004. “Multi-dimensional contributions to garden path strength: Dissociating phrase structure from case marking.” Journal of Memory and Language 51: 495–522. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bornkessel, Ina and Schlesewsky, Matthias. 2006. “The extended Argument Dependency Model: A neurocognitive approach to sentence comprehension across languages.” Psychological Review 113: 787–821. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bornkessel, Ina, Schlesewsky, Matthias and Friederici, Angela D. 2003. “Eliciting thematic reanalysis effects: The role of syntax-independent information during parsing.” Language and Cognitive Processes 18: 268–298. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bornkessel, Ina, Zysset, Stefan, Friederici, Angela D., von Cramon, D. Yves and Schlesewsky, Matthias. 2005. “Who did what to whom? The neural basis of argument hierarchies during language comprehension.” NeuroImage 26: 221–233. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bornkessel-Schlesewsky, Ina and Schlesewsky, Matthias. 2008a. “An alternative perspective on ‘semantic P600’ effects in language comprehension.” Brain Research Reviews 59: 55–73. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2008b. “Unmarked transitivity: a processing constraint on linking.” In Investigations of the syntax-semantics-pragmatics interface , Robert Van Valin, Jr. (Ed.), 413–434. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2009a. “The Role of Prominence Information in the Real-Time Comprehension of Transitive Constructions: A Cross-Linguistic Approach.” Language and Linguistics Compass 3: 19–58. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2009b. Processing Syntax and Morphology . A Neurocognitive Perspective . Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Burzio, Luigi. 1986. Italian Syntax . Dordrecht: Reidel. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cardinaletti, Anna. 1997. “Subjects and Clause Structure.” In The New Comparative Syntax , Liliane Haegeman (Ed.), 33–63. London: Longman.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2001. “A second thought on emarginazione: Destressing vs. ‘Right Dislocation’.” In Current Studies in Italian Syntax: Essays Offered to Lorenzo Renzi [North-Holland Linguistic Series: Linguistic Variations 59], Guglielmo Cinque and Giampaolo Salvi (Eds), 117–136. Amsterdam: Elsevier Science.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2004. “Toward a cartography of subject positions.” In The Structure of CP and IP [The Cartography of Syntactic Structures 2], Luigi Rizzi (Ed.), 115–165. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam. 1981. Lectures on Government and Binding . Dordrecht: Foris Publications.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1995. The Minimalist Program . Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2000. “Minimalist Inquiries: The Framework.” In Step by Step: Essays on Minimalist Syntax in Honor of Howard Lasnik , Roger Martin, David Michaels and Juan Uriagereka (Eds), 89–155. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2001. “Derivation by Phase.” In Ken Hale: A Life in Language , Michael Kenstowicz (Ed.), 1–52. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Corrigan, Roberta. 1988. “Who Dun It? The Influence of Actor-Patient Animacy and Type of Verb in the Making of Causal Attributions.” Journal of Memory and Language 27: 447–465. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Crain, Stephen and Steedman, Mark. 1985. “On not being led up the garden path: The use of context by the psychological parser.” In Natural language parsing: Psychological, computational, and theoretical perspectives , David Dowty, Lauri Karttunen and Arnold Zwicky (Eds), 320–357. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Crocker, Matthew W. 1994. “On the nature of the principle-based sentence processor.” In Perspectives on sentence processing, Charles Clifton, Lyn Frazier and Keith Rayner (Eds), 245–266. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Inc.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
DeLong, Katherine A., Urbach, Thomas P. and Kutas, Marta. 2005. “Probabilistic word pre-activation during language comprehension inferred from electrical brain activity.” Nature Neuroscience 8: 1117–1121. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Federmeier, Kara D. and Kutas, Marta. 1999. “A Rose by Any Other Name: Long-Term Memory Structure and Sentence Processing.” Journal of Memory and Language 41: 469–495. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ferreira, Fernanda. 1994. “Choice of Passive Voice Is Affected by Verb Type and Animacy.” Journal of Memory and Language 33: 715–736. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fodor, Janet D. 1998. “Learning to parse.” Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 27: 285–319. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Frazier, Lyn and Fodor, Janet D. 1978. “The sausage machine: A new two-stage parsing model.” Cognition 6: 291–326. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gabriel, Christoph and Müller, Natascha. 2008. Grundlagen der generativen Syntax: Französisch, Italienisch, Spanisch . Tübingen: Niemeyer.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gattei, Carolina, Vasishth, Shravan and Dickey, Michael W. 2011. The Role of Semantic Arguments Order and the Syntax-Semantics Interface in Spanish Sentence Comprehension . Poster presented at Structuring the Argument/Structurer l’argument (CNRS/Paris 8), Paris, France, September 5–7.
Gennari, Silvia P. and MacDonald, Maryellen C. 2008. “Semantic indeterminacy in object relative clauses.” Journal of Memory and Language 58: 161–187. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Grimshaw, Jane. 1990. Argument Structure . Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hruska, Claudia and Alter, Kai. 2004. “Prosody in dialogues and single sentences: How prosody can influence sentence perception.” In Information structure: Theoretical and empirical evidence , Anita Steube (Ed.), 211–226. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Huynh, Huynh and Feldt, Leonard S. 1970. “Conditions under which the mean square ratios in repeated measurement designs have exact F-distributions.” Journal of the American Statistical Association 65: 1582–1589. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kaan, Edith, Harris, Anthony, Gibson, Edward and Holcomb, Phillip. 2000. “The P600 as an index of syntactic integration difficulty.” Language and Cognitive Processes 15: 159–201. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kailuweit, Rolf. 2005. Linking: Syntax und Semantik französischer und italienischer Gefühlsverben . Tübingen: Niemeyer. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kamide, Yuki. 2008. “Anticipatory Processes in Sentence Processing.” Language and Linguistics Compass 2: 647–670. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kasper, Simon. 2008. A comparison of ‘thematic role’ theories. Unpublished Master’s Thesis. Philipps-Universität, Marburg.
Kretzschmar, Franziska, Bornkessel-Schlesewsky, Ina, Staub, Adrian, Roehm, Dietmar and Schlesewsky, Matthias. 2012. “Prominence facilitates ambiguity resolution: On the interaction between referentiality, thematic roles and word order in syntactic reanalysis.” In Case, word order and prominence. Interacting cues in language production and comprehension [Studies in Theoretical Psycholinguistics 40], Monique Lamers and Peter de Swart (Eds), 239–271. Berlin: Springer. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kutas, Marta, DeLong, Katherine A. and Smith, Nathaniel J. 2011. “A Look around at What Lies Ahead: Prediction and Predictability in Language Processing.” In Predictions in the Brain: Using Our Past to Generate a Future , Moshe Bar (Ed.), 190–207. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kutas, Marta and Hillyard, Steven A. 1984. “Brain potentials during reading reflect word expectancy and semantic association.” Nature 307: 161–163. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kutas, Marta, Van Petten, Cyma and Kluender, Robert. 2006. “Psycholinguistics electrified II (1994–2005).” In Handbook of Psycholinguistics , 2nd edition, Matthew J. Traxler and Morton A. Gernsbacher (Eds), 659–724. London: Elsevier. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Landau, Idan. 2010. The Locative Syntax of Experiencers . Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
MacWhinney, Brian, Bates, Elizabeth and Kliegl, Reinhold. 1984. “Cue Validity and Sentence Interpretation in English, German, and Italian.” Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 23: 127–150. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mauchly, John W. 1940. “Significance test for sphericity of a normal n-variate distribution.” Annual of Mathematical Statistics 11: 204–209. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Osterhout, L. and Holcomb, P. 1992. “Event-related brain potentials elicited by syntactic anomaly.” Journal of Memory and Language 31: 785–806. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pesetsky, David. 1995. Zero Syntax: Experiencers and Cascades . Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Primus, Beatrice. 1999. Cases and Thematic Roles – Ergative, Accusative and Active . Tübingen: Niemeyer. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2004. “Protorollen und Verbtyp: Kasusvariation bei psychischen Verben.” In Semantische Rollen , Rolf Kailuweit and Martin Hummel (Eds), 377–401. Tübingen: Narr.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rizzi, Luigi. 1982. Issues in Italian Syntax . Dordrecht: Foris. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1986. “Null Objects in Italian and the Theory of pro.” Linguistic Inquiry 17: 501–557.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1997. “The Fine Structure of the Left Periphery.” In Elements of Grammar , Liliane Haegeman (Ed.), 281–337. Dordrecht: Kluwer. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2004. “Locality and Left Periphery.” In Structures and Beyond [The Cartography of Syntactic Structures 3], Adriana Belletti (Ed.), 223–251. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2005. “On Some Properties of Subjects and Topics.” In Contributions to the 30th Incontro di Grammatica Generativa , Laura Brugè, Giuliana Giusti, Nicola Munaro, Walter Schweikert and Giuseppina Turano (Eds), 203–224. Venezia: Università Ca’ Foscari Venezia.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2006. “On the Form of Chains: Criterial Positions and ECP Effects.” In Wh-Movement: Moving On , Lisa Cheng and Norbert Corver (Eds), 97–134. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Schlesewsky, Matthias and Bornkessel, Ina. 2006. “Context-sensitive neural responses to conflict resolution: Electrophysiological evidence from subject-object ambiguities in language comprehension.” Brain Research 1098: 139–152. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Thompson, Cynthia K. and Lee, Miseon. 2009. “Psych verb production and comprehension in agrammatic Broca’s aphasia.” Journal of Neurolinguistics 22: 354–369. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Van Berkum, Jos J.A., Brown, Colin M., Zwitserlood, Pienie, Kooijman, Valesca and Hagoort, Peter. 2005. “Anticipating Upcoming Words in Discourse: Evidence From ERPs and Reading Times.” Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 31: 443–467. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Van de Meerendonk, Nan, Kolk, Herman H.J., Chwilla, Dorothee J. and Vissers, Constance Th. W.M. 2009. “Monitoring in language perception.” Language and Linguistics Compass 3: 1211–1224. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wicha, Nicole Y.Y., Moreno, Eva M. and Kutas, Marta. 2004. “Anticipating Words and Their Gender: An Event-related Brain Potential Study of Semantic Integration, Gender Expectancy, and Gender Agreement in Spanish Sentence Reading.” Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 16: 1272–1288. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wolff, Susann, Schlesewsky, Matthias, Hirotani, Masako and Bornkessel-Schlesewsky, Ina. 2008. “The neural mechanisms of word order processing revisited: Electrophysiological evidence from Japanese.” Brain and Language 107: 133–157. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (3)

Cited by three other publications

Chacón, Dustin A. & Liina Pylkkänen
2025. Disentangling semantic prediction and association in processing filler-gap dependencies: an MEG study in English. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience 40:4 ► pp. 451 ff. DOI logo
Mewe, Jana
2020. Case(mis)matching in German free relative clauses in the self-paced reading paradigm. In Typical and Impaired Processing in Morphosyntax [Language Acquisition and Language Disorders, 64], ► pp. 11 ff. DOI logo
Caroline Féry & Shinichiro Ishihara
2016. The Oxford Handbook of Information Structure, DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 25 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue