Cover not available

Article published In: Language Ecology
Vol. 1:2 (2017) ► pp.137–157

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload PDF
authorization required

Influence of Malayalam on temporal clauses in Malabar Indo-Portuguese

 | Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin | The University of Melbourne
Published online: 12 January 2018
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/le.1.2.02kra
Abstract
Temporal clauses with the subordinators kandə (< Portuguese quando) and k(w)a in Malabar Indo-Portuguese creole (MIP) are used to express any kind of temporal relation between two clauses, typically sequence or simultaneity. These temporal clauses are ubiquitous in contexts in which Portuguese, the lexifier of MIP, could not employ temporal quando clauses. In this paper, I show that the morphosyntax and semantics of temporal clauses with kandə and k(w)a in MIP differ from corresponding Portuguese strategies, and that these differences can be explained by the influence of Malayalam (Dravidian), the substrate and adstrate language of MIP. One of the most salient properties of Malayalam adverbial subordination present in MIP is clause chaining. I position this study within the debate on creole exceptionalism, and show that the South Asian typological profile of MIP can only be explained within the view that language ecology determines the typology of a creole (Ansaldo, Umberto. 2009. Contact Languages: Ecology and Evolution in Asia. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar).
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.TMA marking and types of clause linkage
  • 3. Kandə and k(w)a clauses in comparison with quando clauses
    • 3.1Deranking and chaining
    • 3.2Temporal relations
  • 4.Malayalam influence
  • 5.South Asian typology and ecology
  • 6.Conclusion
  • Acknowledgements
  • Notes
  • Sources
  • References
References (50)
Sources
Cardoso, Hugo C. 2006–2015. Oral corpus of Cannanore Indo-Portuguese Creole. Unpublished. [Version received on 2 March 2016.]Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2007–2010. Oral corpus of Vypeen [Cochin] Indo-Portuguese Creole. Unpublished. [Version received on 2 March 2016.]Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Smith, Ian R. 2013. Sri Lanka Portuguese structure dataset. In Susanne M. Michaelis, Philippe Maurer, Martin Haspelmath and Magnus Huber, eds. Atlas of Pidgin and Creole Language Structures Online. Leipzig: Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology. Available online at [URL]; accessed on 18 Jan 2017.
Vicente, Gil. 2007. Pranto de Maria Parda. Available online at [URL]; accessed on 29 Apr 2017.
References
Aboh, Enoch O. and Norval Smith, eds. 2009. Complex Processes in New Languages. Amsterdam/ Philadelphia: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ansaldo, Umberto. 2009. Contact Languages: Ecology and Evolution in Asia. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2017. Creole complexity in sociolinguistic perspective. Language Sciences 601: 26–35. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ansaldo, Umberto and Stephen Matthews. 2007. Deconstructing Creole: The rationale. In Umberto Ansaldo, Stephen Matthews and Lisa Lim, eds. Deconstructing Creole. Amsterdam/ Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 1–18. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Asher, Ronald E. and T. C. Kumari. 1997. Malayalam. London, New York: Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bakker, Peter, Aymeric Daval-Markussen, Mikael Parkvall and Ingo Plag. 2011. Creoles are typologically distinct from non-creoles. Parth Bhatt and Tonjes Veenstra, eds. Creoles and Typology, Special issue, Journal of Pidgin and Creole Languages 26(1): 5–42. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Baxter, Alan N. 1996. Portuguese and Creole Portuguese in the Pacific and the Western Pacific rim. In Stephen A. Wurm, Peter Mühlhäusler and Darrell T. Tryon, eds. Atlas of Languages of Intercultural Communication in the Pacific, Asia, and the Americas Vol. II(1). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. 299–338. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bickel, Balthasar. 1998. Converbs in cross-linguistic perspective. Review article of Haspelmath and König, eds. Converbs in Cross-Linguistic Perspective, Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter 1995. Linguistic Typology 21: 381–397.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Blasi, Damián E., Susanne Maria Michaelis and Martin Haspelmath. 2017. Grammars are robustly transmitted even during the emergence of creole languages. Nature Human Behaviour 1(10): 723-729. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cardoso, Hugo C. 2009. The Indo-Portuguese Language of Diu. Utrecht: LOT.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2012. Luso-Asian comparatives in comparison. In Hugo C. Cardoso, Alan N. Baxter and Mário Pinharanda Nunes, eds. Ibero-Asian Creoles: Comparative Perspectives. Amsterdam/ Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 81–123. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2014a. The Indo-Portuguese Creoles of the Malabar: Historical cues and questions. In Pius Malekandathil, ed. Minutes of the XIV International Seminar on Indo-Portuguese History. Primus Books.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2014b. The case of addressees in Dravido-Portuguese. PAPIA 24(2): 307–342.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2015. Vector verbs in Malabar Indo‐Portuguese. 31st South Asian Languages Analysis Roundtable, Lancaster University, UK. 14–16 May 2015.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cardoso, Hugo C., Alan N. Baxter and Mário Pinharanda Nunes, eds. 2012. Ibero-Asian Creoles: Comparative Perspectives. Amsterdam/ Philadelphia: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2012. Notes on the phonology and lexicon of some Indo-Portuguese creoles. In Hugo C. Cardoso, Alan N. Baxter and Mário Pinharanda Nunes, eds. Ibero-Asian Creoles: Comparative Perspectives. Amsterdam/ Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 15–46. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Clements, J. Clancy and Andrew J. Koontz-Garboden. 2002. Two Indo-Portuguese creoles in contrast. Journal of Pidgin and Creole Languages 17(2): 191–236. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Coupe, Alexander R. 2005. Converbs. In Keith Brown, ed. Encyclopedia of Languages and Linguistics, Vol. III1. 2nd ed. Oxford: Elsevier. 145–152.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cristofaro, Sonia. 2003. Subordination. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Croft, William. 2001. Radical Construction Grammar. New York: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cunha, Luís Filipe and Purificação Silvano. 2009. O papel das restrições aspectuais nas relações retóricas: o caso das frases complexas com quando . Textos Seleccionados. XXIV Encontro Nacional da Associação Portuguesa de Linguística, Lisboa, APL. 239–250.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
DeGraff, Michel. 2001. On the origin of Creoles: A Cartesian critique of Neo-Darwinian linguistics. Linguistic Typology 5(2/3): 213–310.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Foley, William A. 1986. The Papuan Languages of New Guinea. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Haspelmath, Martin. 1995. The converb as a cross-linguistically valid category. In Martin Haspelmath and Ekkehard König, eds. Converbs in Cross-Linguistic Perspective. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. 1–55.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Holm, John. 2000. An Introduction to Pidgins and Creoles. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jayaseelan, K. A. 2003. The serial verb construction in Malayalam. In Veneeta Dayal and Anoop Mahajan, eds. Clause Structure in South Asian Languages. Dordrecht: Kluwer. 67–92.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Krajinović, Ana. 2015. O sistema verbal dos crioulos indo-portugueses do Malabar. MA dissertation. Universidade de Lisboa.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2016. TMA markers in Malabar Indo-Portuguese: Diachrony and grammaticalisation. Ms.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kubota, Yusuke, Jungmee Lee, Anastasia Smirnova, and Judith Tonhauser. 2009. Cross-linguistic variation in temporal adjunct clauses. In Selected Proceedings of Chronos 8. Available online at [URL]; accessed on 1 May 2017.
Lopes, David. 1936. A expansão da língua portuguesa no Oriente, durante os séculos XVI, XVII e XVIII. Barcelos: Portucalense Editora.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Luís, Ana R. 2008. Tense marking and inflectional morphology in Indo-Portuguese creoles. In Susanne Michaelis, ed. Roots of Creole Structures. Amsterdam/ Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 83–122. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
McWhorter, John. 2001. The world’s simplest grammars are creole grammars. Linguistic Typology 51: 125–166. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2005. Defining Creole. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Michaelis, Susanne Maria. 2017. Avoiding bias in comparative creole studies: Stratification by lexifier and substrate. Ms. Available online at [URL]; accessed on 1 May 2017.
Michaelis, Susanne Maria, Philippe Maurer, Martin Haspelmath and Magnus Huber, eds. 2013. Atlas of Pidgin and Creole Language Structures Online. Leipzig: Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology. Available at [URL]; accessed 14 Jan 2017.
Mufwene, Salikoko S. 2001. Ecology of Language Evolution. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pradeep, K. 2010. Tribute to Cochin Creole Portuguese. The Hindu. 26 September 2010. Available at [URL]. Accessed 24 Sept 2015.
Schuchardt, Hugo. 1889. Beiträge zur Kenntnis des kreolischen Romanisch. VI. Zum Indoportugiesischen von Mahé und Cannanore. Zeitschrift für Romanische Philologie 131: 516–524. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1882. Kreolische Studien II. Über das Indoportugiesische von Cochim. Sitzungsberichte der Kaiserlichen Akademie der Wissenschaften zu Wien (Philosophisch-historische Klasse) 1021: 799–816.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Siegel, Jeff. 2004. Morphological simplicity in pidgins and creoles. Journal of Pidgin and Creole Languages 19(1): 139–162. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Smith, Ian R. 1979. Convergence in South Asia: A creole example. Lingua 481: 193–222. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Smith, Norval. 1994. An annotated list of creoles, pidgins, and mixed languages. In Jacques Arends, Pieter Muysken and Norval Smith, eds. Pidgins and Creoles: An Introduction. Amsterdam/ Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 331–374. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Van Valin, Robert D., Jr. 1984. A typology of syntactic relations in clause linkage. Proceedings of the Tenth Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society, 542–558. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2005. Exploring the Syntax-Semantics Interface. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Zúñiga, Fernando. 1998. Nomina sunt odiosa: A critique of the converb as a cross-linguistically valid category. Ms, University of Zürich. Available at [URL]; accessed 4 May 2017.
Cited by (1)

Cited by one other publication

Krajinović, Ana
2019. Existence, location, possession, and copula in Malabar Indo-Portuguese. Journal of South Asian Languages and Linguistics 6:1 ► pp. 27 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 25 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue