Cover not available

Article published In: Styles, Standards and Meaning in Lesser-Studied Languages
Edited by Uri Horesh, Jonathan R. Kasstan and Miriam Meyerhoff
[Language Ecology 4:1] 2020
► pp. 115–130

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload PDF
authorization required

Style variation in the second formant

What does it mean to be “refined” in Baba Malay?

 | National University of Singapore
Published online: 27 July 2021
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/le.00012.lee
Abstract
Baba Malay speakers perceive words ending with [al], [aɾ], and [as] as kasar ‘coarse’, and their counterparts ending with [ɛ] as halus ‘refined’. The contrast is neither phonetic, phonological or morphological. Instead, it may be mitigated by sound symbolism operationalized by F2. The frontness of [ɛ] is associated with a smaller articulatory space in the oral cavity, and hence refinedness, as compared to the more backwards coarse forms. This study employs a matched-guise perceptual task. Refined forms are elicited from speakers. The F2 in the relevant endings is adjusted twice upwards and twice downwards in steps of 100Hz. Listeners rate these guises on a scale of 1 to 5, 5 being most associated with ‘refined’ values. Results show that the higher F2 is, the more likely listeners are to associate the guise with ‘refined’ values.
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction: The kasar-halus phenomenon in Baba Malay and its issue for linguistics
  • 2.Methodology: Within-subject matched guise
    • 2.1Within-subject matched guise
    • 2.2Tokens
    • 4.3Task
    • 2.4Participants
  • 3.Results: F2 and refinedness
  • 4.Implications: The role of sound symbolism in style variation
  • Notes
  • References
References (37)
References
Ansaldo, Umberto; Lisa Lim; and Salikoko S. Mufwene. 2007. The sociolinguistic history of the Peranakans: What it tells us about “creolization.” Deconstructing Creole. Typological Studies in Language. 731, ed. by Umberto Ansaldo, Stephen Matthews, and Lisa Lim, 203–226. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bell, Allan. 1984. Language style as audience design. Language in Society 131.145–204. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Boersma, Paul; and David Weenink. 2013. Praat: doing phonetics by computer [Computer program]. Version 5.3.59, retrieved 20 November 2013 from [URL]
Calder, Jeremy. 2019. The fierceness of fronted /s/: Linguistic rhematization through visual transformation. Language in Society 481.31–64. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
D’Onofrio, Annette. 2014. Phonetic Detail and Dimensionality in Sound-shape Correspondences: Refining the Bouba-Kiki Paradigm. Language and Speech 571. SAGE Publications Ltd. 367–393. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Drager, Katie. 2013. Experimental Methods in Sociolinguistics. Research Methods in Sociolinguistics: A practical guide, ed. by Janet Holmes and Kirk Hazen, 58–73. Oxford: Wiley Blackwell.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Eckert, Penelope. 2019. The limits of meaning: Social indexicality, variation, and the cline of interiority 95.27. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Geertz, Clifford. 1976. The religion of Java. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gonda, J. 1949. The functions of word duplication in Indonesian languages. Lingua 21.170–197. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gordon, Matthew; and Jeffrey Heath. 1998. Sex, Sound Symbolism, and Sociolinguistics. Current Anthropology 391.421–449. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gwee, William Thian Hock. 2006. A Baba Malay Dictionary: The First Comprehensive Compendium of Straits Chinese Terms and Expressions. Singapore: Tuttle Publishing.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kasstan, Jonathan R. 2019. Emergent sociolinguistic variation in severe language endangerment. Language in Society 481.685–720. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hildebrandt, Kristine A.; Carmen Jany; and Wilson Silva. 2017. Introduction: Documenting Variation in Endangered Languages. Language Documentation & Conservation 131.1–5.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kendall, Maurice George. 1955. Rank Correlation Methods. New York: Hafner Publishing Co.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ladefoged, Peter; and Keith Johnson. 2011. A Course in Phonetics, Sixth Edition. International Edition. Canada: Wadsworth Cengage Learning.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lambert, Wallace E.; Richard Hodgson; Robert C. Gardner; and Samuel Fillenbaum. 1960. Evaluational reactions to spoken languages. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology 601.44–51. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lee, Nala H. 2014. A grammar of Baba Malay with sociophonetic considerations. Manoa: University of Hawai’i PhD dissertation.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2019. Peranakans in Singapore: Responses to language endangerment and documentation. (Ed.) Mário Pinharanda-Nunes and Cardoso, Hugo C. Language Documentation & Conservation. Special issue on Documentation and conservation of contact languages in Southeast Asia and East Asia: Current issues and ongoing initiatives 191.123–140.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2020. Utilizing the Matched-guise as a Method of Examining Perceptual Change in an Endangered Creole. Applied Linguistics. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Levon, Erez. 2014. Categories, stereotypes, and the linguistic perception of sexuality. Language in Society 431.539–566. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lim, Lisa. 2016. The art of losing: Beyond java, patois and postvernacular vitality – Repositioning the periphery in global Asian ecologies. Endangered languages and languages in danger: Issues of documentation, policy, and language rights, ed. by Luna Filipović and Martin Pütz, 283–312. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mansfield, John; and James Stanford. 2017. Documenting Sociolinguistic Variation in Lesser- studied Indigenous Communities: Challenges and Practical Solutions. Language Documentation & Conservation 131.116–136.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
McCune, Keith Michael. 1985. The internal structure of Indonesian roots. Jakarta: Badan Penyelenggara Seri Nusa, Universitas Katolik Indonesia Atma Jaya.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
McLeod, A. Ian. 2014. Kendall. R package version 2.2 [URL]
Meyerhoff, Miriam. 2019. Unnatural bedfellows? The sociolinguistic analysis of variation and language documentation. Journal of the Royal Society of New Zealand 491. Taylor & Francis. 229–241. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ohala, John J. 1994. The frequency code underlies the sound-symbolic use of voice pitch. Sound symbolism, ed. By Leanne Hinton, Johanna Nichols and John J. Ohala, 222–236. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Omar, Asmah Haji. 1986. Sociolinguistic varieties of Malay. The Fergusonian impact: In honor of Charles A. Ferguson on the occasion of his 65th birthday. Sociolinguistics and the Sociology of Language Vol. 2, ed. by Joshua A. Fishman, Andrée Tabouret-Keller, Michael Clyne, Bh. Krishnamurti, and Mohamed Abdulaziz, 191–206. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Plichta, Bartłomiej. 2013. Akustyk: Speech analysis and synthesis plug-in for Praat. Previously available at: [URL]
Poedjosoedarmo, Soepomo. 1968. Javanese speech levels. Indonesia 61. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pratt, Teresa. 2020. Embodying “tech”: Articulatory setting, phonetic variation, and social meaning. Journal of Sociolinguistics 241.328–349. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Şahin, Hülya. 2015. Cross-linguistic influences: Dutch in contact with Papiamento and Turkish. LOT Dissertations Series, 405. Utrecht: Landelijke Onderzoekschool Taalwetenschap.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sapir, Edward. 1929. A study in phonetic symbolism. Journal of Experimental Psychology 121. US: Psychological Review Company. 225–239. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Silverstein, Michael. 1995. Relative motivation in denotational and indexical sound symbolism of Wasco-Wishram Chinookan. Sound Symbolism, ed. by Johanna Nichols, John J. Ohala, and Leanne Hinton, 40–60. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press . [URL].
Stevens, Alan M. 1965. Language levels in Madurese. Language 411.294–302. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tan, Chee Beng. 1979. Baba and Nyonya: a study of the ethnic identity of the Chinese Peranakan in Malacca. New York: Cornell University.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wessing, Robert. 1974. Language levels in Sundanese. Man 91.5–22. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (2)

Cited by two other publications

Lee, Nala H.
2024. The early Baba Malay continuum. Journal of Pidgin and Creole Languages 39:2 ► pp. 339 ff. DOI logo
Meyerhoff, Miriam & Norma Mendoza-Denton
2022. Aesthetics in Styles and Variation: A Fresh Flavor. Annual Review of Anthropology 51:1 ► pp. 103 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 25 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue