Cover not available

Article published In: Dialogue and Ethics
Edited by Ronald C. Arnett and François Cooren
[Language and Dialogue 7:1] 2017
► pp. 26–44

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload PDF
authorization required

Rhetoric, ethics, and the principle of charity

Pragmatist clues to the democratic riddle

 | University of Texas at Austin (USA)
Published online: 29 June 2017
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/ld.7.1.03str
Abstract
This article examines the challenge of partisanship to the free and open communication entailed by rich notions of democracy. Exploring the vexing riddle of how democratic citizens can balance openness and assertiveness in their dialogic interactions, I turn to the American pragmatist tradition for two important starting points. Drawing from William James and John Dewey, I highlight how the pragmatist tradition provides a nuanced reading of charity, both towards individuals and to situations. Charity is a choice of disposition, and it has vital implications for pragmatist rhetoric’s drive to instantiate a deep sense of democratic communication.
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.The democratic riddle
  • 3.The Jamesian clue to individual charity
  • 4.The Deweyan clue to situation charity
  • 5.Toward a democratic future
  • References
References (32)
References
Bitzer, Lloyd. 1968. “The Rhetorical Situation.” Philosophy and Rhetoric 1(1): 1–14.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Booth, Wayne. 1979. Critical Understanding: The Powers and Limits of Pluralism. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Crick, Nathan. 2010. Democracy and Rhetoric: John Dewey on the Arts of Becoming. Columbia: University of South Carolina Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Danisch, Robert. 2007. Pragmatism, Democracy, and the Necessity of Rhetoric. Columbia: University of South Carolina Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2015. Building a Social Democracy: The Promise of Rhetorical Pragmatism. Lanham, MD: Lexington Books.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Davidson, D. 1984. “On the Very Idea of a Conceptual Scheme.” Inquiries into Truth and Interpretation. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dewey, John. 1888/1969. “The Ethics of Democracy.” In Jo Ann Boydston (ed.), The Early Works of John Dewey, Vol. 41 (pp. 227–252). Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1925/1988. Experience and Nature. In Jo Ann Boydston (ed.), The Later Works of John Dewey, Vol. 11. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1930/1984. “Three Independent Factors in Morals.” In Jo Ann Boydston (ed.), The Later Works of John Dewey, Vol. 81 (pp. 279–288). Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1932/1989. Ethics. In Jo Ann Boydston (ed.), The Later Works of John Dewey, Vol. 71. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ehrenhaus, Peter. 2001. “Why We Fought: Holocaust Memory in Spielberg’s Saving Private Ryan .” Critical Studies in Media Communication 181: 321–337. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fesmire, Steven. 2003. John Dewey and Moral Imagination: Pragmatism in Ethics. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
James, William. 1899/1977. “On a Certain Blindness in Human Beings,” in J. J. McDermott, The Writings of William James. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1977.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kunda, Ziva. 1990. “The Case for Motivated Reasoning.” Psychological Bulletin 108 (3): 480–98. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Leff, Michael C. 2001. “Lincoln at Cooper Union: Neo-Classical Criticism Revisited.” Western Journal of Communication 65 (3): 232–248. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
McGee, Michael Calvin. 1980. “The ‘Ideograph’: A Link Between Rhetoric and Ideology.” Quarterly Journal of Speech 66 (1): 1–16. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
McKerrow, Raymie E.. 1989. Critical Rhetoric: Theory and Praxis. Communication Monographs, 561: 91–111. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Miller, Carolyn R. 1984. “Genre as Social Action.” Quarterly Journal of Speech 70 (2): 151–167. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pappas, Gregory F. 2008. John Dewey’s Ethics: Democracy as Experience. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Perkins, David N., Michael Farady, and Barbara Bushey. 1991. “Everyday Reasoning and the Roots of Intelligence.” In Informal Reasoning and Education, ed. James F. Voss, David N. Perkins, and Judith W. Segal, 83–105. Hillsdale, N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Quine, W. V. O. 1960. Word and Object. Cambridge, Mass: The MIT Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rorty, Richard. 1989. Contingency, Irony, and Solidarity. New York: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Stob, Paul. 2011. “Pragmatism, Experience, and William James’s Politics of Blindness.” Philosophy and Rhetoric 44 (3): 227–49. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2013. William James and the Art of Popular Statement. East Lansing: Michigan State University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Stroud, Natalie. 2011. Niche News: The Politics of News Choice. New York: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Stroud, Scott R. 2011. John Dewey and the Artful Life: Pragmatism, Aesthetics, and Morality University Park: Pennsylvania State Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2012. “William James and the Impetus of Stoic Rhetoric.” Philosophy and Rhetoric, 45 (3): 246–268. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2014. “Comprehensive Rhetorical Pluralism and the Demands of Democratic Discourse: Partisan Perfect Reasoning, Pragmatism, and the Freeing Solvent of Jaina Logic.” Philosophy and Rhetoric 47 (3): 297–322. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2015. “The Challenge of Speaking with Others: A Pragmatist Account of Democratic Rhetoric,” Journal of Speculative Philosophy, 29 (1): 91–106. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2016. “Democracy, Partisanship, and the Meliorative Value of Sympathy in John Dewey’s Philosophy of Communication,” Journal of Speculative Philosophy, 30 (1): 75–93. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Vallone, Robert P., Lee Ross, and Mark R. Lepper. 1985. “The Hostile Media Phenomenon: Biased Perception and Perceptions of Media Bias in Coverage of the Beirut Massacre.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 49 (3): 577–85. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wason, Peter C. 1960. “On the Failure to Eliminate Hypotheses in a Conceptual Task.” Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 121: 129–40. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (3)

Cited by three other publications

Pruś, Jakub & Piotr Sikora
2023. The Dialectical Principle of Charity: A Procedure for a Critical Discussion. Argumentation 37:4 ► pp. 577 ff. DOI logo
Sery, Joseph
2022. The Rhetorical Roots of Legal Pragmatism. Journal for the History of Rhetoric 25:3 ► pp. 303 ff. DOI logo
Craig, Robert T.
2018. Reframing the Paradox of Pluralism as a Communication Problem. Javnost - The Public 25:1-2 ► pp. 193 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 25 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue