Cover not available

Article published In: Language and Dialogue
Vol. 5:3 (2015) ► pp.355–380

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload PDF
authorization required

Identity as a resource to shape mediation in dialogic interaction

 | University of Massachusetts Amherst
Published online: 17 December 2015
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/ld.5.3.01vas
This article examines how mediators contribute to formulating a particular type of interactivity by bringing to the forefront institutionally appropriate identities of participants. An existing collection of 18 transcripts from audio recordings of mediation sessions at a mediation center in the western United States serves as a source of interactional data. The study shows that mediators act as designers to construct mediation as a collaborative activity. They invoke identities as an exercise in articulating what is possible in this interaction and exerting control over interactants. Mediators are not just doing what is appropriate for this institutional context; their actions are an act of constructing identities out of what is available there. Participants can act in different ways (e.g., as an ex-husband and an ex-wife). However, relative to the institutional agenda of the meeting, they are encouraged to perform in the capacity of parents and to be collaborators.
References (42)
Aakhus, Mark. 2003. “Neither Naïve nor Normative Reconstruction: Dispute Mediators, Impasse, and the Design of Argumentation.” Argumentation: An International Journal on Reasoning 171: 265–290. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2007. “Communication as Design.” Communication Monographs 741: 112–117. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Aakhus, Mark, and Sally Jackson. 2005. “Technology, Interaction, and Design.” In Handbook of Language and Social Interaction, ed. by Kristine Fitch and Robert Sanders, 411–435. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Baraldi, Claudio, and Federico Farini. 2011. “Dialogic Mediation in International Groups of Adolescents.” Language and Dialogue 11: 207–232. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Clark, Herbert H. 1996. “Joint Activities.” In Using Language, 29–58. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Donohue, William. 1991. Communication, Marital Dispute, and Divorce Mediation. Hillsdale, New Jersey: Erlbaum.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Drew, Paul, and John Heritage. 1992. “Analyzing Talk at Work: An Introduction.” In Talk at Work, ed. by Paul Drew and John Heritage, 3–65. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fraser, Bruce. 2001. “The Mediator as Power Broker.” In Negotiation and Power in Dialogic Interaction, ed. by Edda Weigand and Marcelo Dascal, 19–37. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Garcia, Angela. 1991. “Dispute Resolution without Disputing: How the Interactional Organization of Mediation Hearings Minimizes Argument.” American Sociological Review 561: 818–835. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Garcia, Angela, Kristie Vise, and Stephen Paul Whitaker. 2002. “Disputing Neutrality: A Case Study of a Bias Complaint during Mediation.” Conflict Resolution Quarterly 201: 205–230. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Glenn, Phillip. 2010. “A Mediator’s Dilemma: Acknowledging or Disregarding Stance Displays.” Negotiation Journal 261: 155–162. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Goldberg, Rachel M. 2009. “How our Worldviews Shape our Practice.” Conflict Resolution Quarterly 261: 405–431. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Greatbatch, David, and Robert Dingwall. 1991. “Argumentative Talk in Divorce Mediation Sessions.” American Sociological Review 621: 151–170. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Heisterkamp, Brian L. 2006. “Taking the Footing of a Neutral Mediator.” Conflict Resolution Quarterly 231: 301–315. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hundsnurscher, Franz. 2001. “The Grammar of Bargaining.” In Negotiation and Power in Dialogic Interaction, ed. by Edda Weigand and Marcelo Dascal, 77–90. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hutchby, Ian. 2001. Conversation and Technology: From the Telephone to the Internet. Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jacobs, Scott. 1994. “Language and Interpersonal Communication.” In Handbook of Interpersonal Communication, ed. by Mark L. Knapp and Gerald R. Miller, 199–228. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2002. “Maintaining Neutrality in Dispute Mediation: Managing Disagreement while Managing not to Disagree.” Journal of Pragmatics 341: 1403–1426. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2005. “Finding Available Means to Put Things Right.” In Engaging Argument. Selected Papers from the 2005 National Communication Association/American Forensic Association Summer Conference on Argumentation , ed. by Patricia Riley, 416–425. Washington, DC: National Communication Association.
Jacobs, Scott, and Mark Aakhus. 2002. “What Mediators Do with Words: Implementing Three Models of Rational Discussion in Dispute Mediation.” Conflict Resolution Quarterly 201:177–204. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Keltner, John W.S. 1987. Mediation: Toward a Civilized System of Dispute Resolution. Urbana, IL: ERIC Clearinghouse on Reading and Communication Skills.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lerner, Gene H., and Celia Kitzinger. 2007. “Extraction and Aggregation in the Repair of Individual and Collective Self-Reference.” Discourse Studies 91: 526–557. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Levinson, Stephen C. 1992. “Activity Types and Language.” In Talk at Work, ed. by Paul Drew and John Heritage, 66–100. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Littlejohn, Stephen W., and Karen A. Foss. 2009. Encyclopedia of Communication Theory, Vol. 11. Thousand Oaks, Calif.: Sage. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Maier, Robert. 2001. “Negotiation and Identity.” In Negotiation and Power in Dialogic Interaction, ed. by Edda Weigand and Marcelo Dascal, 225–237. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Raiffa, Howard, John Richardson, and David Metcalfe. 2002. Negotiation Analysis: The Science and Art of Collaborative Decision Making. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sacks, Harvey. 1992. Lectures on Conversation, Vol. 11. Cambridge, MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sacks, Harvey, and Emanuel A. Schegloff. 1979. “Two Preferences in the Organization of Reference to Persons in Conversation and Their Interaction.” In Everyday Language: Studies in Ethnomethodology, ed. by George Psathas, 15–21. New York, NY: Irvington Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Schegloff, Emanuel A. 1992. “On Talk and its Institutional Occasions.” In Talk at Work, ed. by Paul Drew and John Heritage, 101–136. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1996. “Some Practices for Referring to Persons in Talk-in-Interaction: A Partial Sketch of a Systematics.” In Studies in Anaphora, ed. by Barbara A. Fox, 437–485. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2007. “Categories in Action: Person-Reference and Membership Categorization.” Discourse Studies 91: 433–461. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Shon, Donald A., and Martin Rein. 1994. Frame Reflection: Towards the Resolution of Intractable Policy Controversion. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tracy, Karen. 2011. “What’s in a Name? Stance Markers in Oral Argument about Marriage Laws.” Discourse and Communication 51: 1–23. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tracy, Karen, and Anna Spradlin. 1994. ““Talking like a Mediator”: Conversational Moves of Experienced Divorce Mediators.” In New Directions in Mediation: Communication Research and Perspectives, ed. by Joseph P. Folger and Tricia S. Jones, 110–132. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Van De Mieroop, Dorien. 2011. “Identity Negotiations in Narrative Accounts about Poverty.” Discourse and Society 221: 565–591. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Vasilyeva, Alena. 2012a. “Argumentation in the Context of Mediation Activity.” Journal of Argumentation in Context 11: 209–233. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2012b. “Topics as Indication of Being On-task/Off-task.” Empedocles: European Journal for the Philosophy of Communication 31: 61–82. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Walton, Douglas. 1998. The New Dialectic: Conversational Context of Argument. Toronto: University of Toronto Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Weigand, Edda. 2010. Dialogue: Mixed Game. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
White, Cindy H., and Robert R. Agne. 2009. “Communication Practices of Coaches during Mediator Training: Addressing Issues of Knowledge and Enactment.” Conflict Resolution Quarterly 271: 83–105. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Whitehead, Kevin, and Gene H. Lerner. 2009. “When are Persons “White”? On Some Practical Asymmetries of Racist Reference in Talk-in-Interaction.” Discourse and Society 201: 613–641. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (16)

Cited by 16 other publications

Innocenti, Beth
2022. Cultivating contexts for deliberative argumentation. Journal of Argumentation in Context 11:3 ► pp. 394 ff. DOI logo
McKeon, Kerry, Betty Merchant, Juan Niño, Christopher Flanagan-Gonzales & Saleha Sultan
2022. Not theirs, but ours: South Texas superintendents take a stance on immigrant students. Multicultural Education Review 14:2 ► pp. 120 ff. DOI logo
Greco, Sara & Chiara Jermini-Martinez Soria
2021. Mediators’ reframing as a constitutive element of a reconciliatory argumentative style. Journal of Argumentation in Context 10:1 ► pp. 73 ff. DOI logo
Jahiu, Edona
2021. Social power and epistemic authority in workplace: Professional assessments. SSRN Electronic Journal DOI logo
Bijnen, Emma van
2019. Dialogical power negotiations in conflict mediation. Language and Dialogue 9:1 ► pp. 84 ff. DOI logo
García-Gómez, Antonio
2018. Managing conflict on WhatsApp. Journal of Language Aggression and Conflict 6:2 ► pp. 320 ff. DOI logo
Vasilyeva, Alena L
2017. Practices of topic and dialogue activity management in dispute mediation. Discourse Studies 19:3 ► pp. 341 ff. DOI logo
Vasilyeva, Alena L.
2016. Interpersonal-Communication and Language-and-Social-Interaction Approaches to Studying Conflict. TIPA. Travaux interdisciplinaires sur la parole et le langage :32 DOI logo
Vasilyeva, Alena L.
2016. Confrontation and collaboration in the course of the election debate. Language and Dialogue 6:3 ► pp. 370 ff. DOI logo
Vasilyeva, Alena L.
2017. The Role of References in Custody Mediation. TIPA. Travaux interdisciplinaires sur la parole et le langage :33 DOI logo
Vasilyeva, Alena L.
2017. Strategic maneuvering in dispute mediation. Argumentation and Advocacy 53:3 ► pp. 234 ff. DOI logo
Vasilyeva, Alena L.
2018. The facilitator’s communicative actions to construct meetings in a semi-informal educational context. Language and Dialogue 8:3 ► pp. 414 ff. DOI logo
Vasilyeva, Alena L.
2019. Language ideology and identity construction in public educational meetings. Journal of International and Intercultural Communication 12:2 ► pp. 146 ff. DOI logo
Vasilyeva, Alena L.
2021. Constructing disagreement space. Language and Dialogue 11:3 ► pp. 379 ff. DOI logo
Vasilyeva, Alena L.
2023. Debaters’ actions to manage interaction in the context of the debate talk show. Language and Dialogue 13:2 ► pp. 229 ff. DOI logo
Vasilyeva, Alena L.
2024. Framing interactivity in complex communication of debate talk show. Language and Dialogue 14:3 ► pp. 473 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 25 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue